Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Flipped classroom as an alternative future class model?: implications of South Korea’s social experiment

  • Cultural and Regional Perspectives
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study explores the implications of the flipped classroom experiment in South Korea as a counter-proposal for the school innovation project based on the Korean educational context. Using Dongpyung middle school in South Korea for this case study, this paper focuses on how and why the flipped classroom impacts Korea’s education culture. The results of the experiment provide significant insights, such as promoting more active classroom learning and the improvement of student academic achievement. In particular, the narratives of the students and teachers in the flipped classroom experiment show the following positive impacts on learning and teaching: (1) Transformation into a more equal and democratic classroom, (2) restoration of enjoyment in learning and teaching, (3) improvement of self-confidence, and (4) inspiration for the learning and teaching community. Based on these results, this paper discusses possible implications of the flipped classroom as an alternative future class model in Korean society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. “School or classroom collapse” in Korea refers to the mood in schools, in which teachers and students are no longer successfully fulfilling their longstanding respective roles as responsible educators and dutiful learners (Lim 2011).

  2. http://www.kbs.co.kr/1tv/sisa/panorama/vod/view/index,1,list1,12.html.

  3. It should be noted that the interview conducted after finishing the experiment was preferentially conducted with those who showed a very sharp shift in test scores. This choice was based on the supposition that they would have specific empirical narratives concerning the meaning and effectiveness of the flipped classroom.

  4. Following the Korean social experiment in 2014, a nationwide teacher community was created in Korea named “Teachers seeking future classrooms”. https://www.futureclassnet.org.

  5. Korea is ranked among the top 1–8 countries in math, reading and science in the OECD countries and among the top 4–14 countries globally. However, Korean students showed very low levels of satisfaction with their school life (OECD 2016).

References

  • Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: reach every student in every class every day. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagat, K. K., Chang, C. N., & Chang, C. Y. (2016). The impact of the flipped classroom on mathematics concept learning in high school. Educational Technology and Society, 19(3), 134–142. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286047548_The_Impact_of_the_Flipped_Classroom_on_Mathematics_Concept_Learning_in_High_school. Accessed 02 Apr 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao, C. Y., Chen, Y. T., & Chuang, K. Y. (2015). Exploring students’ learning attitude and achievement in flipped learning supported computer aided design curriculum: a study in high school engineering education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 23(4), 514–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H. L., & Summers, K. L. (2015). Developing, using, and interacting in the flipped learning movement: gaps among subject areas. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 41–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Wang, Y., & Chen, N. S. (2014). Is FLIP enough? Or should we use the FLIPPED model instead? Computers and Education, 79, 16–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, D. L., Pickerell, J. E., & Reidy, C. A. (2014). Student learning outcomes associated with video vs paper cases in a public health dentistry course. Journal of Dental Education, 78(1), 2430. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24385521. Accessed 12 Apr 2017.

  • Choe, E., & Seong, M. H. (2016). A case study of the flipped classroom in a Korean university general English course. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 20(2), 71–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho-Han, H. J. (1997). The young who reject school, society which reject the young. Seoul: Alternative Culture Press. (In Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C., Johnson, C. W., & Horn, M. B. (2008). Disrupting class: how disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, B. H., Kim, C. H., Lee, S. K., & Lee, M. K. (2008). Why educational reform has not Succeed?. Seoul: Changbi. (In Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, Y. S., & Lee, M. K. (2008). A study on the types and characteristics of latent school dropout. Journal of Korean Education, 35(1), 79–102. (In Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, R. S., Dean, D. L., & Ball, N. (2013). Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(4), 563–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estes, M. D., Ingram, R., & Liu, J. C. (2014). A review of flipped classroom research, practice, and technologies. International HETL Review 4(7). https://www.hetl.org/feature-articles/a-review-of-flipped-classroom-research-practice-and-technologies. Accessed 09 Apr 2017.

  • Halili, S. H., & Zainuddin, Z. (2015). Flipping the classroom: what we know and what we don’t. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 3(1), 28–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heo, H. J., & Chun, B. A. (2016). A Study on the Effects of mobile-based LMS on flipped learning: focused on the affective pathway in pre-service teacher education. International Journal of Software Engineering and its Applications, 10(12), 473–484. http://www.sersc.org/journals/IJSEIA/vol10_no12_2016/39.pdf. Accessed 4 Sept 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, D., Lee, M., & Teng, Y. (2016). Exploring the relationship between school-level teacher qualifications and teachers’ perceptions of school-based professional learning community practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 54, 32–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y. N., & Hong, Z. R. (2016). The effects of a flipped English classroom intervention on students’ information and communication technology and English reading comprehension. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(2), 175–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, E., & Werner, A. (2016). A review of the literature on flipping the STEM classroom: preliminary findings. In S. Barker, S. Dawson, A. Pardo, & C. Colvin (Eds.), Show Me The Learning. Proceedings ASCILITE 2016 Adelaide (pp. 267–274).

  • Kaufmann, J. C. (1996). L’entretien compréhensif. Paris: Nathan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keddie, N. (1971). Classroom knowledge. In M. Young (Ed.), Knowledge and control (pp. 133–160). London: Collier Macmillan LTd.

  • Kim, M. S. (2003). Teaching and learning in Korean classrooms: the crisis and the new approach. Asia Pacific Education Review, 4(2), 140–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. W. (2004). Education reform policies and classroom teaching in South Korea. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 14(2), 125–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M. K., & Shin, C. W. (2016). The effects of flipped classroom on middle school learners English academic achievement and affective domains. Journal of Secondary education, 64(2), 289–314. (In Korean).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: a gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakmal, A., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research and Development, 34(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. M. (2010). Views on education and achievement: Finland’s story of success and South Korea’s story of decline. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 7(2), 379–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. K. (2014a). Case study on effects and signification of flipped classroom. Journal of Korean Education, 41(1), 87–116. (In Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. K. (2014b). Signification of flipped classroom by sociology of classroom: focusing on the experience of teachers. Korean Journal of Sociology of Education, 24(2), 181–207. (In Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. K. (2016). In defiance of school education: retrospective narratives of the new generation of dropout youth in Korea. Korea Journal, 56(3), 33–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. M., & Park, H. K. (2016). Analysis of flipped learning in K-12 education. Journal of Digital Convergence, 14(8), 19–36. (In Korea).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, J. H. (2011). South Korea’s ‘school collapse’ debates: experiments in South Korean education. In N. Abelmann, J.-A. Choi, & S. J. Park (Eds.), No alternatives? (pp. 45–73). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2017). A critical review of flipped classroom challenges in K-12 education: possible solutions and recommendations for future research. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morin, E. (1992). La méthode 3. la connaissance de la connaissance. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, E. (2000). Les sept savoirs nécessaires à l’education du futur. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mucchielli, A. (1991). Les méthodes qualitatives. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD(2005). The definition and selection of key competencies: executive summary. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/35070367.pdf.Accessed. Accessed 12 Sept 2015.

  • OECD. (2009). Highlights from education at a glance. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 results in focus: what 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 results in focus: what 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh, O. W. (2009). Using imagination to trace causes of the failure of educational policies in Korea. The Journal of Educational Research, 47(4), 98–117. (In Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ormrod, J. E. (2006). Educational psychology: developing learners (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paille, P., & Mucchielli, A. (2003). L’analyse qualitative en sciences humaines et sociales. Paris: Armand Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pang, N.-S. K., & Wang, T. (2016). Professional learning communities: research and practices across six educational systems in the Asia-pacific region. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 36(2), 193–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partnership for 21st century skills (2015). P21 Framework definitions. http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/docs/P21_Framework_Definitions_New_Logo_2015.pdf. Accessed 17 Oct 2015.

  • Ripley, A. (2013). The smartest kids in the world and how they got that way. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, K., & Aronica, L. (2015). Creative schools: the grassroots revolution that’s transforming education paperback. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, G. (2016). Teachers motivation to teach and students motivation to learn: a self-determination theory analysis, worldwide education initiative: creativity, character education, and curriculum integration. Paper presented at the 2016 70th anniversary of teachers college, Kyungpook national university secondary education Institute international conference, Daegu, Korea.

  • Salina, L., Ruffinengo, C., & Garrino, L. (2012). Effectiveness of an educational video as an instrument to refresh and reinforce the learning of a nursing technique: a randomized controlled trial [Abstract]. Perspectives on Medical Education, 1 (2), 67–75. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs40037-012-0013-4. Accessed 04 Sept 2017.

  • Schultz, D., Duffield, S., Rasmussen, S. C., & Wageman, J. (2014). Effects of the flipped classroom model on student performance for advanced placement high school chemistry students. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(9), 1334–1339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, Y. J., & Ha, J. H. (2016). Analysis of science teachers’ perception of flipped learning. Journal of Teaching, 20(2), 152–167. (In Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, Y. J., Ha, J. H., & Lee, S. H. (2016). An analysis of the perceptions and difficulties experienced by science teachers in flipped learning. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 36(1), 159–166. (In Korean).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sohng, H. S., & Seo, S. Y. (2016). Effects of project-based flipped classroom on the affective attitude and metacognitive learning strategies of pre-service teachers of English. English Language and Literature, 22(2), 167–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strayer, J. F. (2007). The effects of the classroom flip on the learning environment: a comparison of learning activity in a traditional classroom and a flip classroom that used an intelligent tutoring system. USA: The Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 171–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suh, M. (2016). The effect and awareness of the flipped classroom approach through mixed methods. Journal of Educational Technology, 32(3), 535–570. (In Korean).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sung, Y. K., & Lee, H. B. (2014). Sleeping students in class: a grounded theory study on the phenomenon of students disengagement. Korean Journal of Sociology of Education, 24(1), 147–171. (In Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Touraine, A. (1995). Critique de la modernité. Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Um, K. H. (2013). Teachers also fear the school. Seoul: Gyoyukgongdongchebeot. (In Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing and Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, T. (2014). The global achievement gap: why even our best schools don’t teach the new survival skills our children need- and what we can do about it. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, C. (2005). Classroom as learning community. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min-Kyung Lee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

This study is based on the Korea Broadcast System (KBS) Program “Educational revolution in the Twenty-first century: searching for the future classroom”. This study was funded by a faculty research grant from Daegu University (Grant Number 20160018).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, MK. Flipped classroom as an alternative future class model?: implications of South Korea’s social experiment. Education Tech Research Dev 66, 837–857 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9587-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9587-9

Keywords

Navigation