Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Identifying complex cultural interactions in the instructional design process: a case study of a cross-border, cross-sector training for innovation program

  • International Review
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to identify complex cultural dynamics in the instructional design process of a cross-sector, cross-border training environment by applying Young’s (2009) Culture-Based Model (CBM) as a theoretical framework and taxonomy for description of the instructional design process under the conditions of one case. This research uses the qualitative approach of case study and applies a cultural design framework to examine cultural interactions with the process of instructional design in a NASA/university consortium program to train employees of an education software company headquartered in India. The findings indicate that at least twenty-three distinguishable elements of culture interact with every component of the design process in the: 1) goals and funding decisions of the client; 2) goals and design decisions of the design team; 3) perceptions of the training program of all stakeholders; and 4) the observable outcomes of the training program. By empirically illuminating the pervasive presence of cultural interactions across the instructional design process, this study advocates for culture to be recognized as a construct of importance in our field and demonstrates the powerful capabilities of using a comprehensive descriptive model as a lens for exploring cultural dynamics in the instructional design process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aydin, C. H., & McIsaac, M. S. (2004). The impact of instructional technology in Turkey. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(1), 105–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barta, J., Jetté, C., & Wiseman, D. (2003). Dancing numbers: Cultural, cognitive, and technical instructional perspectives on the development of Native American mathematical and scientific pedagogy. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(2), 88–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, J. P. H., Tinney, M. V., & Chia, B. H. (2004). Intercultural internet-based learning: Know your audience and what it values. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(2), 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birdi, K. S., Patterson, M. G., & Wood, S. J. (2007). Learning to perform? A comparison of learning practices and organizational performance in profit-and non-profit-making sectors in the UK. International Journal of Training and Development, 11(4), 265–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Sage Publications, Incorporated.

  • Chitiyo, R., & Harmon, S. W. (2009). An analysis of the integration of instructional technology in pre-service teacher education in Zimbabwe. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57, 807–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson-Shivers, G. V., & Rasmussen, K. L. (2007). Competencies for instructional design and technology professionals. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (2nd ed., pp. 271–286). New Jersey: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debry, D. P. (2002). Analysis of emerging practices in globalizing instructional materials. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(4), 73–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eastmond, J. N., Martiz, G., Gutierrez, R., & Shanley, K. (2010). Conducting a cultural audit: A case study in service learning for the Dominican Republic. TechTrends, 54(2), 16–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmundson, A. L. (2007). Globalized e-learning cultural challenges. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunawardena, C. N., Jayatilleke, G., & Lekamge, G. D. (1996). Learning style of the open university students of Sri Lanka. Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(1), 115–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunawardena, C. N., & LaPointe, D. (2008). Social and cultural diversity in distance education. In T. Evans, M. Haughey, & D. Murphy (Eds.), International handbook of distance education (pp. 51–70). Bingley, UK: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, L. (1996). Instructional design of interactive multimedia: A cultural critique. Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(4), 85–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1984). National cultures and corporate cultures. In L. A. Samovar & R. E. Porter (Eds.), Communication between cultures. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keppel, M. (2001). Optimizing instructional designer: Subject-matter-expert communication in the design and development of multimedia projects. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 12(2), 209–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber, A. L., & Kluckhohn, C. (1952). Culture: A critical review of concepts and definitions. Harvard University Peabody Museum of American Archeology and Ethnology Papers 47.

  • Ku, H. Y., & Lohr, L. L. (2003). A case study of Chinese students’ attitudes toward their first online learning experience. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(3), 95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, C. P. (2007). Effective integration of ICT in Singapore schools: Pedagogical and policy implications. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55, 83–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchessou, F. (1999). From instructional technology (IT) to open and distance learning: A brief overview of educational technology in Western Europe. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(1), 113–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, D. M. (2007). The proper study of instructional design. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, B., & Sahay, S. (2001). Some political and cultural issues in the globalization of software development: Case experience from Britain and India. Information and Organization, 11, 25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, B., & Sahay, S. (2004). Embedded knowledge and offshore software development. Information and Organization, 14, 329–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oosterhof, A., Conrad, R., & Ely, D. P. (2008). Assessing learners online. New Jersey: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulus, T. M., Bichelmeyer, B., Malopinsky, M. P., & Rastogi, P. (2005). Power distance and group dynamics of an international project team: A case. Teaching in Higher Education, 10(1), 43–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, R. A. (2008). Challenges and questions concerning “Culturally-Sensitive Design”. TechTrends, 52(6), 19–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. (1997). On being a culturally sensitive instructional designer and educator. Educational Technology, 37(2), 6–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richey, R. C. (2005). Validating instructional design and development models. In J. M. Spector & D. A. Wiley (Eds.), Innovations in instructional technology: Essays in honor of M. David Merrill (pp. 171–185). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richey, R. C., Morrison, G. R. & Foxon, M. (2007). Instructional design in business and industry. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (2nd ed., pp. 174–184). New Jersey: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richey, R. C. (2009). Foreword. In P. A. Young (Ed.), Instructional design frameworks and intercultural models (pp. ix–xi). Hershey, PA: IGI Global/Information Science Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, P. C., Graham, C. R., & Mayes, C. T. (2007). Cultural competence and instructional design: Exploration research into the delivery of online instruction cross-culturally. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(2), 197–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subramony, D. P. (2004). Instructional technologists’ inattention to issues of cultural diversity among learners. Educational Technology, 44(4), 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tessmer, M., & Richey, R. C. (1997). The role of context in learning and instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(2), 85–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M., Mitchell, M., & Joseph, R. (2002). The third dimension of ADDIE: A cultural embrace. TechTrends, 46(2), 40–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visser, J. (2007). Learning in a global society. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Heijden, B. I. (2006). Age differences in career activities among higher-level employees in The Netherlands: A comparison between profit sector and non-profit sector staff. International Journal of Training and Development, 10(2), 98–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. M., & Reeves, T. C. (2007). The meaning of culture in online education: Implications for teaching, learning, and design. In A. Edmundson (Ed.), Globalized e-learning cultural challenges (pp. 2–17). Hershey, PA: Information Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., Yang, B., & McLean, G. N. (2007). Influence of demographic factors and ownership type upon organizational learning culture in Chinese enterprises. International Journal of Training and Development, 11(3), 154–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, P. A. (2009). Instructional design frameworks and intercultural models. Hershey, PA: IGI Global/Information Science Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Advanced Studies, University of Phoenix Online, 4887 Greenway Road, Norcross, GA, 30071, USA

    L. Roxanne Russell

  2. Middle-Secondary Education and Instructional Technology Department, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 3978, Atlanta, GA, 30302-3978, USA

    Wanjira L. Kinuthia & Reeny Madathany

  3. Department of Instructional Technology, Kennesaw State University, 1000 Chastain Rd. MD 0127, Kennesaw, GA, 30144, USA

    Anissa Lokey-Vega

  4. Enrollment Services, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 4017, Atlanta, GA, 30302-4017, USA

    Winnie Tsang-Kosma

Authors
  1. L. Roxanne Russell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wanjira L. Kinuthia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anissa Lokey-Vega
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Winnie Tsang-Kosma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Reeny Madathany
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Roxanne Russell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Russell, L.R., Kinuthia, W.L., Lokey-Vega, A. et al. Identifying complex cultural interactions in the instructional design process: a case study of a cross-border, cross-sector training for innovation program. Education Tech Research Dev 61, 707–732 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9291-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9291-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation