Abstract
It is now possible to create flexible learning environments without time and distance barriers on the internet. However, research has shown that learners typically experience isolation and alienation in online learning environments. These negative experiences can be reduced by enhancing social presence. In order to better facilitate the perceived social presence in online classrooms, this study presents a framework developed from the social cognitive theory for investigating social presence and its relationships with relevant factors. An instrument with sufficient reliability and validity was developed to measure these factors. A formal questionnaire-based survey was carried out among learners with previous learning experiences in online learning environments. A total of 522 valid samples were collected from three schools and analyzed using structural equation modeling to examine the proposed framework and hypotheses. The results show that user interface and social cues have significant effects on social presence. User interface also has significant effects on social cues. Moreover, this study evidenced that social presence has significant effects on learning interaction which in turn has significant effects on learning performance. Finally, implications of the findings were discussed for further research directions and practical applications.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allmendinger, K. (2010). Social presence in synchronous virtual learning situations: the role of nonverbal signals displayed by avatars. Educational Psychology Review, 22(1), 41–56.
Arbaugh, J. B., & Benbunan-Fich, R. (2007). The importance of participant interaction in online environments. Decision Support Systems, 43(3), 853–865.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Beaudoin, M. F. (2002). Learning or lurking? Tracking the “invisible” online student. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(2), 147–155.
Bente, G., Ruggenberg, S., Kramer, N. C., & Eschenburg, F. (2008). Avatar-mediated networking: increasing social presence and interpersonal trust in net-based collaborations. Human Communication Research, 34(2), 287–318.
Biocca, F., Harms, C., Burgoon, J. K. (2003). Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: review and suggested criteria. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12(5), 456–480.
Bolliger, D. U. (2004). Key factors for determining student satisfaction in online courses. International Journal on E-Learning, 3(1), 61–67.
Chang, H. H., & Wang, I. C. (2008). An investigation of user communication behavior in computer mediated environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 2336–2356.
Chen, G., & Chiu, M. M. (2008). Online discussion processes: effects of earlier messages’ evaluations, knowledge content, social cues and personal information on later messages. Computers and Education, 50(3), 678–692.
Chen, N. S., Kinshuk, Wei, C. W., & Liu, C. C. (2011). Effects of matching teaching strategy to thinking style on learner’s quality of reflection in an online learning environment. Computers and Education, 56(1), 53–64.
Chen, N. S., Kinshuk, Wei, C. W., & Yang, S. J. H. (2008). Designing a self-contained group area network for ubiquitous learning. Educational Technology and Society, 11(2), 16–26.
Chen, N. S., Wei, C. W., Wu, K. T., & Uden, L. (2009). Effects of high level prompts and peer assessment on online learners’ reflection levels. Computers and Education, 52(2), 283–291.
Cho, Y. S., & Proctor, R. W. (2001). Effect of an initiating action on the up-right/down-left advantage for vertically arrayed stimuli and horizontally arrayed responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(2), 472–484.
Chou, C. E., Peng, H. Y., & Chang, C. Y. (2010). The technical framework of interactive functions for course-management systems: students’ perceptions, uses, and evaluations. Computers and Education, 55(3), 1004–1017.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571.
Entwistle, N., & Waterston, S. (1988). Approaches to studying and levels of processing in university students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58(3), 258–265.
Ferguson, R. (2010). Peer interaction: the experience of distance students at university level. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(6), 574–584.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010a). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: a retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 5–9.
Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T. S. (2010b). Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 31–36.
Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. The American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8–26.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Jin, S. A. A. (2010). Parasocial interaction with an avatar in second life: a typology of the self and an empirical test of the mediating role of social presence. Presence-Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 19(4), 331–340.
Jung, I., Choi, S., Lim, C., & Leem, J. (2002). Effects of different types of interaction on learning achievement, satisfaction and participation in web-based instruction. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(2), 153–162.
Ke, F. F. (2010). Examining online teaching, cognitive, and social presence for adult students. Computers and Education, 55(2), 808–820.
Kerlinger, F. N., Lee, H. B. (2000). Foundations of behavioral research (4th Edn.). Thomson Learning, Belmont.
Kirschner, P., Strijbos, J., Kreijns, K., & Beers, P. J. (2004). Designing electronic collaborative learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 47–66.
Offir, B., & Lev, J. (2000). Constructing an aid for evaluating teacher-learner interaction in distance learning. Educational Media International, 37(2), 91–97.
Offir, B., Lev, Y., & Bezalel, R. (2008). Surface and deep learning processes in distance education: synchronous versus asynchronous systems. Computers and Education, 51(3), 1172–1183.
Raykov, T. (1997). Estimation of composite reliability for congeneric measures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21(2), 173–184.
Rovai, A. P. (2007). Facilitating online discussions effectively. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(1), 77–88.
Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: John Wiley and Sons.
Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Construct validation of a triangular love scale. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27(3), 313–335.
Thurlow, C., Lengel, L. B., & Tomic, A. (2004). Computer mediated communication: Social interaction and the Internet. London: Sage.
Traphagan, T., Kucsera, J. V., & Kishi, K. (2010). Impact of class lecture webcasting on attendance and learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(1), 19–37.
Tu, C. H. (2000). On-line learning migration: from social learning theory to social presence theory in a CMC environment. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 23(1), 27–37.
Tu, C. H., & McIsaac, M. S. (2002). The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 131–150.
Tutty, J. I., & Klein, J. D. (2008). Computer-mediated instruction: a comparison of online and face-to-face collaboration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(2), 101–124.
Wang, Y. S. (2003). Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems. Information and Management, 41(1), 75–86.
Wei, C. W., Hung, I. C., Lee, L., & Chen, N. S. (2011). A joyful classroom learning system with robot learning companion for children to learn mathematics multiplication. The Turkish Online Journal of Education Technology, 10(2), 11–23.
Weinel, M., Bannert, M., Zumbach, J., Hoppe, H. U., & Malzahn, N. (2011). A closer look on social presence as a causing factor in computer-mediated collaboration. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 513–521.
Whipp, J. L., & Lorentz, R. A. (2009). Cognitive and social help giving in online teaching: an exploratory study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(2), 169–192.
Yoon, S. W., & Johnson, S. D. (2008). Phases and patterns of group development in virtual learning teams. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(5/6), 595–618.
Zhang, Q., & Oetzel, J. G. (2006). Constructing and validating a teacher immediacy scale: a Chinese perspective. Communication Education, 55(2), 218–241.
Zhao, S. Y. (2003). Toward a taxonomy of copresence. Presence-Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12(5), 445–455.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the National Science Council, Taiwan under the contract numbers: NSC101-2917-I-110-001, NSC100-2511-S-110-001-MY3, NSC100-2631-S-011-003, and NSC100-2511-S-269-001. The authors also acknowledge the support of NSERC, iCORE, Xerox, and the research-related gift funding by Mr. A. Markin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix I: Questionnaire
Appendix I: Questionnaire
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wei, CW., Chen, NS. & Kinshuk A model for social presence in online classrooms. Education Tech Research Dev 60, 529–545 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9234-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9234-9