Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Technology enhanced feedback tools as a knowledge management mechanism for supporting professional growth and school reform

  • Development Article
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Attempts at school reform and improvement have experienced difficulty creating and implementing feedback systems that energize and sustain change efforts. If the call for reform at all levels of education is to be met, attention must be given to establishing effective feedback mechanisms in educational institutions as they embark on improvement efforts. The purpose of this article is to describe application of an educational design metaphor to create a Knowledge Management System that provides teachers with timely and constructive feedback about their professional practice. This system includes the way in which a corpus of professional knowledge about differentiated content and instruction, classroom grouping, evidence-based practice and classroom management can be embedded in a set of tools that provides multiple stakeholders (teachers, students, administrators) the opportunity to generate feedback about instructional practice. Use of the approach is discussed within the broader context of Knowledge Management as a vehicle to extend the role of feedback in school reform and improvement within a long term pilot application in one school.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.

  • Bain, A. (2007). The self-organizing school. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain, A., & Parkes, R. J. (2006a). Can schools realize the learning potential of knowledge management? Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 32(2). Retrieved from http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/49/46.

  • Bain, A., & Parkes, R. J. (2006b). Curriculum authoring tools and inclusive classroom teaching practice: A longitudinal study. The British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(2), 177–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berends, M., Nataraj Kirby, S. N., Naftel, S., & McKelvey, C. (2001). Implementation and performance in New American Schools: Three years into scale-up. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berends, M., Bodilly, S. J., & Nataraj Kirby, S. (2002). Facing the challenge of whole school reform, New American Schools after a decade. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinko, K. T. (1993). The practice of giving feedback to improve teaching. What is effective? Journal of Higher Education, 64(5), 574–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celio, M., & Harvey, J. (2005). Buried Treasure: Developing a management guide from mountains of school data. The Center for Reinventing Public Education. Retrieved May 5, 2006 from http://www.crpe.org/pubs/pdf/BuriedTreasure_celio.pdf.

  • Datnow, A. (2000). Power and politics in the adoption of school reform models. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(4), 357–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desimone, L. (2002). How can comprehensive school reform models be successfully implemented? Review of Educational Research, 72, 433–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, F. M., & Reigeluth, C. M. (2008). The school system transformation (SST) protocol. Educational Technology, 48(4), 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friend, M., & Cook, L. (2003). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodlad, J. I. (1984). A place called school: Prospects for the future. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. (2008). TPCK in in-service education. In M. J. Koehler & P. Mishra (Eds.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 251–271). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, E. (1999). Cooperative learning in context: An educational innovation in everyday classrooms. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T. & Stanne, M. B. (2000). Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis. Retrieved January 15, 2007 from http://www.co-operation.org/pages/cl-methods.html.

  • Klingner, D., & Sabet, M. G. (2005). Knowledge management, organizational learning, innovation diffusion and adoption, and technology transfer: What they mean and why they matter. Comparative Technology Transfer and Society, 3(3), 199–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, J., & Rossett, A. (2000). In J. M. Spector & T. M. Anderson (Eds.), Knowledge management for school-based educators. Integrated and holistic perspectives on learning, instruction and technology: Understanding complexity. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Mason, S. A. (2003). Learning from data: The role of professional learning communities. Chicago, IL: Wisconsin Center for Educational Research. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED476852).

  • Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (2004). The inclusive classroom. Strategies for effective instruction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, Merrill, Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2001). Professional communities and the work of high school teaching. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmann, F. M., King, M. B., & Youngs, P. (2000). Professional development that addresses school capacity: Lessons from urban elementary schools. American Journal of Education, 108(4), 259–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newmann, F. M., Smith, B., Allenswoth, A., & Bryk, A. S. (2001). Instructional program coherence: What it is and why it should guide school improvement policy. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(4), 297–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrides, L. A., & Nodine, T. R. (2003). Knowledge management in education: Defining the landscape. The Institute for the Study of Knowledge Management. Retrieved March 27, 2005 from www.iskme.org/kmeducation.pdf.

  • Petrides, L. A., Guiney, S., & Zahra, S. (2002). Knowledge management for school leaders: An ecological framework for thinking schools. Teachers College Record, 104(8), 1702–1717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reigeluth, C. M., & Garfinkle, R. J. (1994). Systemic change in education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sallis, E., & Jones, G. (2002). Knowledge management in education: Enhancing learning and education. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santo, S. A. (2005). Knowledge management: An imperative for schools of education. TechTrends, 49(6), 42–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheeler, M. C., Ruhl, K. L., & McAfee, J. F. (2004). Providing performance feedback to teachers: A review. Teacher Education and Special Education, 27(4), 396–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serban, A. M., & Luan, J. (2002). Overview of knowledge management. New Directions for Institutional Research, 113, 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shneiderman, B. (1998). Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human–computer interaction (3rd ed.). Menlo Park, CA: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sizer, T. (1984). Horace’s compromise: The dilemma of the American High School. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (1990). Cooperative learning: Theory research and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, J. M. (2002). Knowledge management tools for instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(4), 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, J. M., & Davidsen, P. I. (2006). How can organizational learning be modeled and measured. Evaluation and Program Planning, 29(1), 63–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, J. M., & Edmonds, G. S. (2002, September). Knowledge management in instructional design. ERIC Digest EDO-IR-2002-02. Syracuse, NY: ERIC Information Technology Clearinghouse. Available at http://www.ericit.org/digests/EDO-IR-2002-02.shtml.

  • Telem, M. (2001). Computerization of school administration: Impact on the principal’s role—a case study. Computers and Education, 37, 345–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorn, C.A. (2001). Knowledge management for educational information systems: What is the state of the field? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 9(47). Retrieved March 25, 2010 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v9n47/.

  • Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed ability classrooms (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, S., & Arguilles, M. E. (2000). Adaptations in general education classrooms. In R. A. Villa & J. S. Thousand (Eds.), Restructuring for caring and effective education: Piecing the puzzle together (2nd ed., pp. 166–185). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visscher, A., Wild, P., Smith, D., & Newton, L. (2003). Evaluation of the implementation, use and effects of a computerised management information system in English secondary schools. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(3), 357–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, S. L. (2006). The learner centered paradigm of education. Educational Technology Magazine: The Magazine for Managers of Change in Education, 50(2), 24–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, S. L., & Reigeluth, C. M. (2008). The learner centered paradigm of education. Educational Technology Magazine: The Magazine for Managers of Change in Education, 48(5), 42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, J. F., Idol, L., & Cannon, G. (1989). Collaboration in the schools. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Charles Sturt University, Panorama Ave, Bathurst, NSW, 2795, Australia

    Alan Bain

  2. University of Kentucky, 335 Dickey Hall, Lexington, KY, 40506-0017, USA

    Gerry Swan

Authors
  1. Alan Bain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gerry Swan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerry Swan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bain, A., Swan, G. Technology enhanced feedback tools as a knowledge management mechanism for supporting professional growth and school reform. Education Tech Research Dev 59, 673–685 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-011-9201-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-011-9201-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation