Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The design of motivational agents and avatars

  • Development Article
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While the addition of an anthropomorphic interface agent to a learning system generally has little direct impact on learning, it potentially has a huge impact on learner motivation. As such agents become increasingly ubiquitous on the Internet, in virtual worlds, and as interfaces for learning and gaming systems, it is important to design them to optimally impact motivation. The focus of this paper is on the design of agents and avatars (one’s self-representation as a visual agent) for enhancing motivational and affective outcomes, such as improving self-efficacy, engagement and satisfaction, moderating frustration, and/or improving stereotypes. Together with motivational messages and dialogue (which are not discussed here), the agent’s appearance is the most important design feature as it dictates the learner’s perception of the agent as a virtual social model, in the Bandurian sense. The message delivery, through a human-like voice with appropriate and relevant emotional expressions, is also a key motivational design feature. More research is needed to determine the specifics with respect to the ideal agent voice and the role of other nonverbal communication (e.g., deictic gestures) that may contribute to the agent’s role as an embodied motivator, particularly in the long-term.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arroyo, I., Cooper, D. G., Burleson, W., Woolf, B. P., Muldner, K., & Christopherson, R. (2009). Emotion sensors go to school. In V. Dimitrova, R. Mizoguchi, B. DuBoulay & A. Graesser (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education—Building learning systems that care: From knowledge representation to affective modelling (Vol. 200, pp. 17–24). Amsterdam: IOS Press.

  • Atkinson, R. K. (2002). Optimizing learning from examples using animated pedagogical agents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 416–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, R. K., Mayer, R. E., & Merrill, M. M. (2005). Fostering social agency in multimedia learning: Examining the impact of an animated agent’s voice. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 117–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailenson, J. N., Blascovich, J., & Guadagno, R. E. (2008). Self-representations in immersive virtual environments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(11), 2673–2690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baylor, A. L. (2007). Pedagogical agents as a social interface. Educational Technology, 47(1), 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baylor, A. L. (2009). Promoting motivation with virtual agents and avatars: Role of visual presence and appearance. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B—Biological Sciences, 364(1535), 3559–3565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baylor, A. L., & Ebbers, S. J. (2003). Evidence that multiple agents facilitate greater learning. In U. Hoppe, M. F. Verdejo, & J. Kay (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education: Shaping the future of learning through intelligent technologies (pp. 377–379). Amsterdam: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baylor, A. L., & Kim, Y. (2003). The role of gender and ethnicity in pedagogical agent perception. In G. Richards (Ed.), Proceedings of world conference on E-learning in corporate, government, healthcare, & higher education 2003 (pp. 1503–1506). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baylor, A. L., & Kim, Y. (2004). Pedagogical agent design: The impact of agent realism, gender, ethnicity, and instructional role. In J. Lester et al. (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science: Intelligent tutoring systems (Vol. 3220, pp. 592–603). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

  • Baylor, A. L., & Kim, Y. (2005). Simulating instructional roles through pedagogical agents. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 15(1), 95–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baylor, A. L., & Kim, S. (2009). Designing nonverbal communication for pedagogical agents: When less is more. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 450–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baylor, A. L., & Plant, E. A. (2005). Pedagogical agents as social models for engineering: The influence of appearance on female choice. In C.-K. Looi, G. McCalla, B. Bredeweg, & J. Breuker (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education: Supporting learning through intelligent and socially informed technology (Vol. 125, pp. 65–72). Bristol: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baylor, A. L., Ryu, J., & Shen, E. (2003). The effects of pedagogical agent voice and animation on learning, motivation and perceived persona. Proceedings of world conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications, Honolulu, Hawaii (pp. 452–458). Norfolk, VA: AACE.

  • Bem, D. J. (1967). Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 74, 183–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickmore, T., Schulman, D., & Yin, L. X. (2009). Engagement vs. deceit: Virtual humans with human autobiographies. In Z. Ruttkay, M. Kipp, A. Nijholt & H. H. Vilhjalmsson (Eds.), Proceedings of intelligent virtual agents (Vol. 5773, pp. 6–19). Amsterdam: Springer.

  • Ebbers, S. J. (2007). The impact of social model agent type (coping, mastery) and social interaction type (vicarious, direct) on learner motivation, attitudes, social comparisons, affect and learning performance (Vol. Ph.D). Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ersner-Hershfield, H., Bailenson, J., & Carstensen, L. L. (2008). A vivid future self: Immersive virtual reality enhances retirement saving. Paper presented at the Association for Psychological Science. Annual Convention. Chicago, IL.

  • Fox, J., & Bailenson, J. N. (2009). Virtual self-modeling: The effects of vicarious reinforcement and identification on exercise behaviors. Media Psychology, 12(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gratch, J., Wang, N., Gerten, J., Fast, E., & Duffy, R. (2007). Creating rapport with virtual agents. In Lecture notes in artificial intelligence: Proceedings of international conference on intelligent virtual agents. Paris: Springer.

  • Guadagno, R. E., Blascovich, J., Bailenson, J. N., & McCall, C. (2007). Virtual humans and persuasion: The effects of agency and behavioral realism. Media Psychology, 10(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W. L., Rickel, J. W., & Lester, J. C. (2000). Animated pedagogical agents: Face-to-face interaction in interactive learning environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11, 47–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y., & Baylor, A. L. (2006). Pedagogical agents as learning companions: The role of agent competency and type of interaction. ETR&D—Educational Technology Research and Development, 54(3), 223–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y., & Baylor, A. L. (2007). Pedagogical agents as social models to influence learner attitudes. Educational Technology, 47(1), 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y., Baylor, A. L., & Shen, E. (2007). Pedagogical agents as learning companions: The impact of agent emotion and gender. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(3), 220–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J.-E. R., Nass, C., Brave, S., Morishima, Y., Nakajima, H., & Yamada, R. (2007). The case for caring co-learners: The effects of a computer-mediated co-learner agent on trust and learning. Journal of Communication, 57(2), 183–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lester, J. C., Towns, S. G., Callaway, C. B., Voerman, J. L., & FitzGerald, P. J. (2000). Deictic and emotive communication in animated pedagogical agents. In J. Sullivant (Ed.), Embodied conversational agents. Boston, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 312–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, R., & Flowerday, T. (2006). Students’ choice of animated pedagogical agents in science learning: A test of the similarity-attraction hypothesis on gender and ethnicity. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31(2), 186–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity effects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 358–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nass, C., & Brave, S. (2005). Wired for speech: How voice activates and advances the human–computer relationship. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nass, C., & Steuer, J. (1993). Anthropomorphism, agency, and thopoeia: Computers as social actors. Human Communication Research, 19(4), 504–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niedenthal, P. M. (2007). Embodying emotion. Science, 316(5827), 1002–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plant, E. A., Baylor, A. L., Doerr, C. E., & Rosenberg-Kima, R. B. (2009). Changing middle-school students’ attitudes and performance regarding engineering with computer-based social models. Computers and Education, 53(2), 209–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg-Kima, R. B., Baylor, A. L., Plant, E. A., & Doerr, C. E. (2007). The importance of interface agent visual presence: Voice alone is less effective in impacting young women’s attitudes toward engineering. Paper presented at the Persuasive 2007, Stanford, CA.

  • Rosenberg-Kima, R. B., Baylor, A. L., Plant, E. A., & Doerr, C. E. (2008). Interface agents as social models for female students: The effects of agent visual presence and appearance on female students’ attitudes and beliefs. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(6), 2741–2756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg-Kima, R. B., Plant, E. A., Doerr, C. E., & Baylor, A. L. (2010). The influence of computer-based model’s race and gender on female students’ attitudes and beliefs towards engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(1), 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryu, J., & Baylor, A. L. (2005). The psychometric structure of pedagogical agent persona. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning (TICL), 2(4), 291–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H. (1981). Modeling and attributional effects on children’s achievement: A self-efficacy analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H., Hanson, A. R., & Cox, P. D. (1987). Peer model attributes and children’s achievement behaviors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 54–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yee, N., & Bailenson, J. N. (2007). The Proteus effect: The effect of transformed self-representation on behavior. Human Communication Research, 33(3), 271–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yee, N., Bailenson, J. N., & Ducheneaut, N. (2009). The Proteus effect implications of transformed digital self-representation on online and offline behavior. Communication Research, 36(2), 285–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Amy Baylor Consulting, LLC, Reston, VA, 20195, USA

    Amy L. Baylor

Authors
  1. Amy L. Baylor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy L. Baylor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baylor, A.L. The design of motivational agents and avatars. Education Tech Research Dev 59, 291–300 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-011-9196-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-011-9196-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation