Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Prospective teachers’ insights towards scaffolding students’ writing processes through teacher–student role reversal in an online system

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Teachers are encouraged to plan their teaching based on students’ needs from the student-centered perspectives. Of the many teacher training programs, teacher–student role reversal is regarded as one of the most effective avenues to help teachers identify students’ learning difficulties and further provide adaptive instruction. However, as the role reversal process is difficult to document in the face-to-face environment due to its interactive and dynamic property, very few studies on teacher–student role reversal have been empirically conducted. Studies on this issue thus were mainly presented in the form of position papers or experience sharing entries. The purpose of this study was to explore prospective teachers’ (PT) role reversal experience within the computer-supported (CS) environment. In the CS environment, 14 PT were invited to play the role as student Writers, Editors, and Commentators. The results showed that the teacher–student role reversal activities provided the PTs with a first-hand experience to formulate and reformulate their professional knowledge through reflection. By reflecting on their role-reversal, the PTs could identify the difficulties that impeded students’ writing and generated the insights on how they could better scaffold their students’ writing, editing, and revising process. With the feature of the process data, the CS environment was found to effectively support teacher–student role reversal as the PTs employed the process data, such as action logs or written texts, to reflect on their role play process to probe into the students’ writing problems and develop insights into pedagogy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, N. A., Barksdale, M. A., & Hite, C. E. (2005). Prospective teachers’ observations of cooperating teachers and peers while participating in an early field experience. Teacher Education Quarterly, 32(4), 97–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, K. M., Curtis, A., & Nunan, D. (2001). Pursuing professional development: The self as source. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baylor, A. L. (2002). Expanding preservice teachers’ metacognitive awareness of instructional planning through pedagogical agents. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(2), 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, J. (2005). The importance of teachers writing on TESOL. TESL-EJ, 9(2), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield, E. C., Hacker, D. J., & Albertson, L. R. (1996). Environmental, cognitive, and metacognitive influences on text revision: Assessing the evidence. Educational Psychology Review, 8(3), 229–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, I., Land, S., & Turgeon, A. J. (2005). Scaffolding peer-questioning strategies to during online small group discussion. Instructional Science, 33, 483–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. (1992). The teacher’s role in learner strategy training: An innovation in teacher education. In J. Flowerdew, M. Brock, & S. Hsia (Eds.), Perspectives on second language teacher education (pp. 241–252). Hong Kong: City Polytechnic of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of a reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 597–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Wever, B., Van Keer, H., Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2010). Roles as a structuring tool in online discussion groups: The differential impact of different roles on social knowledge construction. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 516–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eken, D. K. (1999). Through the eyes of the learner: Learner observations of teaching and learning. ELT Journal, 53(4), 240–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, E. M. (2003). Bilingualism among teachers of English as a second language: A study of second language learning experience as a contributor to the professional knowledge and beliefs of teachers of ESL to adults. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Griffith University.

  • Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grainger, T. (2005). Teachers as writers: Learning together. English in Education, 39, 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. (1998). The language leaner as teacher: The use of interactive diaries in teacher training. ELT Jounral, 52(1), 29–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamaludin, A., Chee, Y. S., & Ho, C. M. L. (2009). Fostering argumentative knowledge construction through enactive role play in Second Life. Computers & Education, 53, 317–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Land, S. M. (2000). Cognitive requirements for learning with open-ended learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 61–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, X., Hmelo, C., Charles, Kinzer, C. K., & Secules, T. J. (1999). Designing technology to support reflection. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(3), 43–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, T.-C. (2005). Web-based cognitive apprenticeship model for improving pre-service teachers’ performances and attitudes towards instructional planning: Design and field experiment. Educational Technology & Society, 8(2), 136–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, T. (1987). An experiment in role reversal: Teacher as language learners. ELT Journal, 41(2), 89–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCombs, B. L. (2001). What do we know about leaner and learning? The learner-centered framework: Bringing the educational system into balance. Educational Horizons, 79(4), 182–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, J. (2002). The teacher as language learner: Worlds of difference? ELT Journal, 56(4), 404–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. N. (2010). Preservice teachers as writers. Literacy Research and Instruction, 49(4), 352–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palinscar, A., & Brown, A. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pata, K., Sarapuu, T., & Lehtinen, E. (2005). Tutor scaffolding styles of dilemma solving in network-based role-play. Learning and Instruction, 15, 571–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, M. C. (1995). The teacher change cycle. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 705–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ransdell, D. R. (1993). Creative writing is Greek to me: The continuing education of a language teacher. ELT Journal, 47(1), 40–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, J. S., & Wilson, D. E. (2000). Teacher narrative as critical inquiry: Rewriting the script. New York: Teachers College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge-building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1(1), 37–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97–118). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., & Steinbach, R. (1984). Teachability of reflective processes in written composition. Cognitive Science, 8(2), 173–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, D., & Hirsh, S. (2000). A national plan for improving professional development. Oxford, OH: National Staff Development Council. Retrieved May 1, 2009, from http://www.nsdc.org/news/authors/NSDCPlan.cfm.

  • Walters, A., Sunderland, J., Bray, T., & Allwright, J. (1990). Getting the best out of ‘the language-learning experience’. ELT Journal, 44(4), 305–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wishart, J. M., Oades, C. E., & Morris, M. (2007). Using online role play to teach internet safety awareness. Computers & Education, 48, 460–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, S. H. (2009). Using blogs to enhance critical reflection and community of practice. Educational Technology and Society, 12(2), 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y. F., Yeh, H. C., & Wong, W. K. (2008). Constructing mental representation of reference by feedback in a computer system. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1959–1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, H. C., & Yang, Y. F. (2010). Metacognitive process in online text construction. Educational Technology and Society, in press.

  • Yeh, H. C., Yang, Y. F., & Wong, W. K. (2010). Interaction chain patterns of online text construction with lexical cohesion. Educational Technology & Society, 13(1), 38–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, S. W. (2003). The effects of web page structure and metacognitive knowledge on EFL learners’ comprehension in hypermedia CALL. In Proceedings of the 2003 international conference on english teaching and learning in the Republic of China (pp. 613–624). Taipei: Crane.

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study was part of a larger study, supported by National Science Council in the Republic of China, Taiwan (NSC 96-2411-H-224-015). The research grant made the continuation of this study possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School of Applied Foreign Languages, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, 123, University Road Section 3, Douliu, Yunlin, Taiwan, ROC

    Hui-Chin Yeh & Yu-Fen Yang

Authors
  1. Hui-Chin Yeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yu-Fen Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hui-Chin Yeh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yeh, HC., Yang, YF. Prospective teachers’ insights towards scaffolding students’ writing processes through teacher–student role reversal in an online system. Education Tech Research Dev 59, 351–368 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9170-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9170-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation