Skip to main content
Log in

A feedback learning and mental models perspective on strategic decision making

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to be a contribution to a theoretical model that explains the effectiveness of the learning and decision-making processes by means of a feedback and mental models perspective. With appropriate mental models, managers should be able to improve their capacity to deal with dynamically complex contexts, in order to achieve long-term success. We present a set of hypotheses about the influence of feedback information and systems thinking facilitation on mental models and management performance. We explore, under controlled conditions, the role of mental models in terms of structure and behaviour. A test based on a simulation experiment with a system dynamics model was performed. Three out of the four hypotheses were confirmed. Causal diagramming positively influences mental model structure similarity, mental model structure similarity positively influences mental model behaviour similarity, and mental model behaviour similarity positively influences the quality of the decision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Argyris, C. (1976). Increasing leadership effectiveness. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P., & Scholes, J. (1990). Soft systems methodology in action. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, T., Koller, T., & Murrin, J. (2000). Valuation–measuring and management the value of companies. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craik, K. (1943). The nature of explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F., & Yi, M. (2004). Improving computer skill training: Behavior modeling, symbolic mental rehearsal, and the role of knowledge structures. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 509–523. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C., & Ackermann, F. (1998). Strategy making: The journey of strategic management. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J. (1961). Industrial dynamics. Waltham, MA: Pegasus Communications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gary, M., & Wood, R. (2007). Testing the effects of a system dynamics decision aid on mental model accuracy and performance on dynamic decision making tasks. In Proceedings of the 25th international conference of the system dynamics society, Boston, USA.

  • Gentner, D., & Stevens, A. (Eds.). (1983). Mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howie, E., Sy, S., Ford, L., & Vicente, K. (2000). Human-computer interface design can reduce misperceptions of feedback. System Dynamics Review, 16, 151–171. doi:10.1002/1099-1727(200023)16:3<151::AID-SDR191>3.0.CO;2-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huff, A., & Jenkins, M. (Eds.). (2002). Mapping strategic knowledge. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, in-ference and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (2001). The Strategy-focused organization: How balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, J., Goodwin, G., Heffner, T., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 273–283. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, J., Goodwin, G., Heffner, T., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. (2005). Scaling the quality of teammates’ mental models: Equifinality and normative comparisons. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 37–56. doi:10.1002/job.296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morecroft, J., Sanchez, R., & Heene, A. (Eds.). (2002). Systems perspectives on resources, capabilities, and management process. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narciss, S. (2008). Feedback strategies for interactive learning tasks. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merril, J. van Merrienboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 125–143). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paich, M., & Sterman, J. (1993). Boom, bust, and failures to learn in experimental markets. Management Science, 39, 1439–1458. doi:10.1287/mnsc.39.12.1439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pidd, M. (Ed.). (2004). Systems modelling–theory and practice. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, G., Andersen, D., Maxwell, T., & Stewart, T. (1994). Foundations of mental model research. Stirling, Scotland: International System Dynamics Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie-Dunham, J. (2002). Balanced scorecards, mental models, and organizational performance: A simulation experiment. University of Texas at Austin, USA: Doctoral Dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, A., & Cooke, N. (1995). Measuring mental models: Choosing the right tools for the job. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 6, 243–255. doi:10.1002/hrdq.3920060303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schvaneveldt, R. (1990). Pathfinder associative networks: Studies in knowledge organization. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta, K., & Abdel-Hamid, T. (1993). Alternative conceptions of feedback in dynamic decision environments: An experimental investigation. Management Science, 39, 411–428. doi:10.1287/mnsc.39.4.411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterman, J. (1989). Modeling managerial behavior: Misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Management Science, 35, 321–339. doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.3.321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterman, J. (2000). Business dynamics: System thinking and modeling for a complex world. New York: Irwin McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stout, R., Salas, E., & Kraiger, K. (1996). The role of trainee knowledge structures in aviation team environments. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 7, 235–350. doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap0703_4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyman, B., & Randel, J. (1998). The relation of knowledge organization to performance of a complex cognitive task. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 12, 251–264. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199806)12:3<251::AID-ACP510>3.0.CO;2-F.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the CELDA 2008 meeting in Freiburg, Germany and published in the CELDA 2008 Proceedings: Capelo, C., & Dias, J. (2008). Exploring the role of mental models in strategic decision making. In Kinshuk, D. G. Sampson, J. M. Spector, P. Isaías, & D. Ifenthaler (Eds.), Proceedings of the IADIS international conference on cognition and exploratory learning in the digital age (pp 10–17). IADIS: Freiburg, Germany. We want to thank the editor for excellent guidance and reviewers for valuable feedback.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos Capelo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Capelo, C., Dias, J.F. A feedback learning and mental models perspective on strategic decision making. Education Tech Research Dev 57, 629–644 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9123-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9123-z

Keywords

Navigation