Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Preparing Instructional Designers for Different Career Environments: A Case Study

  • Development Article
  • Development Article
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The competency requirements, content, culture, and value systems of business and industry career environments can differ significantly from that of the higher education context where instructional design and technology (IDT) students receive their formal training. Therefore, faculty should consider how they might provide flexibility in their programs to allow IDT students to experience the contexts in which they choose to work following graduation. The article reports on the results of a case study of an exemplary IDT program identified through a national survey. The emphases and preparation practices of faculty in the case study program were noted to provide an example of how one program successfully prepares its graduates for a variety of career environments, and specifically for a business and industry environment. By studying the successes and challenges of specific programs, new or existing programs may gain ideas for building or re-working existing programs to better meet the needs of students desiring contextualized preparation for different career environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alluisi, E. A. (1991). The development of technology for collective training: SIMNET a case history. Human Factors, 33, 343–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D. H., Moses, F. L., & Duke, D. S. (2002). Current trends in military instructional design, technology. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (pp. 211–224). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT) (2000). NCATE program standards for initial & advanced educational communications & technology programs. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atchison, B. J. (1996). Roles and competencies of instructional design as identified by expert instructional designers. (Doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University, 1996). Dissertation Abstracts International, 57, 1576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannan-Ritland, B. (2001). Teaching instructional design: An action learning approach. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 14(2), 37–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartell, S. M. (2001). Training’s new role in learning organizations. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 38(4), 354–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassi, L. J., Benson, G., & Cheney, S. (1996). The top ten trends. Training & Development, 50(11), 28–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D. K., Mead, M. (1987). The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11(3), 369–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berge, Z., de Verneil, M., Berge, N., Davis, L., & Smith, D. (2002). The increasing scope of training and development competency. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 9(1), 43–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bludnicki, M. (2001). A study of instructional technology graduate programs at selected educational institutions in the United States. Syracuse, NY, Unpublished manuscript, Syracuse University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branch, R. C., Moore, D. M., & Sherman, T. M. (1988). Evaluating potential instructional technology and design professionals for academic and business settings: Criteria for decision-making. Educational Technology, 28(10), 34–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byun, H. (2000). Identifying job types and competencies for instructional technologists: A five-year analysis. (Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, 2000). Dissertation Abstracts International, 61, 4346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabral-Cardoso, C. J. (2001). Too academic to get a proper job? The difficult transition of PhDs to the “real world” of industry. Career Development International, 6(4), 212–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cartlidge, S., Gerity, B., & Eastmond, N. (1999). Utah State University, Department of Instructional Technology: Needs Assessment. (Needs assessment conducted by class of course 7010: Institutional Technology, Pro-Seminar). Logan, Utah: Utah State University, Department of Instructional Technology. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED434649).

  • Cennamo, K. S., & Holmes, G. (2001). Developing awareness of client relations through immersion in practice. Educational Technology, 41(6), 44–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawe, S. (2003). Determinants of successful training practice in large Australian firms. National Center for Vocational Education Research: Kensington Park, South Australia. Retrieved on March 30, 2006 from http://www.ncver.edu.au/publications/930.html.

  • Ertmer, P. A., & Cennamo, K. S. (1995). Teaching instructional design: An apprenticeship model. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 8(4), 43–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A., & Quinn, J. (2003). The ID casebook: Case studies in instructional design. (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A., & Stepich, D. A. (2003). Building community as a critical element of online course design. Educational Technology, 43(5), 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, E. J., & Klein, J. D. (2003). What should instructional designers and technologists know about human performance technology? Performance Improvement Quarterly, 16(3), 87–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furst-Bowe, J. A. (Ed.) (1996). Competencies needed to design and deliver training using instructional technology. In proceedings of selected research and development presentations at the 1996 national convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Indianapolis, IN. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED397795).

  • Gardner, P. D. (2000). Are college students prepared to work?: They may not be as ready as we think! Collegiate Employment Research Institute. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED446517).

  • Greer, M. (1992). ID project management: Tools and techniques for instructional designers and developers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

  • Grimwald, A. (2001). Industry vs. Academia: Survey results, March 2001. The Scientist, 15(8), 28. Retrieved April 4, 2001 from: http://www.the-scientist.com/yr2001/apr/survey_010416.html

  • Julian, M. F., Kinzie, M. B., & Larsen, V. A. (2000). Compelling case experiences: Performance, practice, and application for emerging instructional designers. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 13(3), 164–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Julian, M. F. (2001). Learning in action: The professional preparation of instructional designers. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia, 2001). Dissertation Abstracts International, 62, 136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapp, K. M., & Phillips, T. L. (2003). Teaching the business of instructional technology: A collaborative corporate/academic partnership. TechTrends, 47(1), 46–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, J. V. (1998). Practitioner perceptions of critical data for analysis of three types of training. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Northern Colorado, 1998). Dissertation Abstracts International, 59, 2459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. D., & Fox, E. J. (2004). Performance improvement competencies for instructional technologists. TechTrends, 48(2), 22–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, M. B. (2005). Instructional design career environments: Survey of the alignment of preparation and practice. TechTrends 49(6), 22–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, C. C. (1999). Benchmarking competent instructional media designers in the corporate world. Educational Media International, 36(4), 317–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLoughlin, C. (1999). Culturally responsive technology use: developing an on-line community of learners. British Journal of Educational Technology, 30(3), 231–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B. (2001). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moallem, M. (1995). Analysis of job announcements and the required competencies for instructional technology professionals. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED405355).

  • Morlan, J. E., & Lu, M. (1993). A survey of media and instructional technology competencies needed by business, industry, health professions, agencies, military trainers, and independent contractors in Northern California, USA. In proceedings of selected research and development presentations at the convention of the Association of Educational Communications and Technology, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED362188).

  • Paetsch, J. R. (1991). Applying for a state training grant. Training & Development, 45(4), 61–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piskurich, G. M., & Sanders, E. S. (1998). ASTD models for learning technologies: Roles, competencies, and outputs. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. (1997). Understanding the language of diversity. Educational Technology, 37(2), 15–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. (1994). Connecting education and practice in an instructional design graduate program. Educational Technology Research & Development, 42(3), 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. (1995). The education of instructional designers: Reflections on the Tripp paper. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 8(3), 11–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiser, R. A. (2002). What field did you say you were in? Defining and naming our field. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiser R. A. & Dempsey J. V. (Eds.) (2002). Trends and issues in instructional design and technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richey R. C., (Ed.), Fields, D.C. & Foxon, M. (2001). (With R. C. Roberts, T. Spannaus, & J. M. Spector). Instructional design competencies: The standards (3rd Ed.). Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information & Technology. International Board of Standards for Training and Performance Improvement (ibstpi).

  • Rossett, A. (1981). Instructional technology as link between university and community. NSPI Journal, 20(1), 26–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossett, A. (1990). Performance technology and academic programs in instructional design and technology: Must we change? Educational Technology, 30(8), 48–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossett, A. (2000). What’s academia got to do with it? An informal tour of what managers are seeking from entry-level instructional technologists. TechTrends, 44(5), 32–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossett, A. (2002). From training to training and performance. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.). Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (pp. 123–132). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, G., Parra, M. L., & Basnet, K. (1994). Educating instructional designers: Different methods for different outcomes. Educational Technology, 34(6), 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruckdeschel, C., Yarter, M., Riveccio, M. A., Cortes, I., & Cookson, M. S. (1998). Beyond instructional systems: A performance technology degree. Performance Improvement, 37(3), 22–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salopek, J. J. (1998). Train your brain. Training & Development, 52(10), 26–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, M. J., & de la Teja, I. (2001). Competencies for online teaching. ERIC Digest. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED456841).

  • Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, L., Lohr, L., & O’Neil, C. (2002). Building instructional design credibility through communication competency. TechTrends, 46(1), 26–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Surrey, D. W., & Robinson, M. A. (2001). A taxonomy of instructional technology service positions in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 38(3), 231–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tasker, M., & Packham, D. (1993). Industry and higher education: A question of values. Studies in Higher Education, 18(2), 127–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tessmer, M., & Richey, R. C. (1997). The role of context in learning and instructional design. Educational Technology Research & Development, 45(2), 85–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M., Mitchell, M., & Joseph, R. (2002). The third dimension of ADDIE: A cultural embrace. TechTrends, 46(2), 40–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trimby, M. J. (1982). Entry level competencies for team members and supervisors/managers on instructional development teams in business and industry. (Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, 1982). Dissertation Abstracts International, 43, 0346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripp, S. D. (1994). How should instructional designers be educated?. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 7(3), 116–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valkeavaara, T. (1998). Exploring the nature of human resource developers’ expertise. European journal of work and organizational psychology, 7(4), 533–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Tiem, D. (2004). Six Sigma and HPT: Mutual benefits. Performance Xpress, February 2004. Retrieved January 7, 2005 from: http://www.performancexpress.org/0402.

  • Winn, W. (1997). Advantages of a theory-based curriculum in instructional technology. Educational Technology, 37(1), 34–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 220 War Memorial Hall, Blacksburg, VA, 24061-0313, USA

    Miriam B. Larson & Barbara B. Lockee

Authors
  1. Miriam B. Larson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Barbara B. Lockee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miriam B. Larson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Larson, M.B., Lockee, B.B. Preparing Instructional Designers for Different Career Environments: A Case Study. Education Tech Research Dev 57, 1–24 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9031-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9031-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation