Abstract
In her article, Karin Due presents us with a contradiction in physics: the construction of physics as a symbolically masculine discipline alongside a simultaneous discourse of the “gender-neutrality” of the discipline. Due’s article makes an important contribution to the study of the gendering of physics practices, particularly in group dynamics, and how this serves to simultaneously reinforce the two competing discourses of physics as a masculine discipline, and the discourse of physics as a gender neutral discipline. Due also suggests that an implication of this contradiction is a limited number of available positions for girls in physics compared to those available to boys. I wish to take up this observation and discuss how available positions for boys and girls in physics are related quite closely to two other concepts discussed in Due’s article: competence and recognition.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 1187–1218.
Conefrey, T. (1997). Gender, culture and authority in a university life sciences laboratory. Discourse Society, 8, 313–340.
Danielsson, A. T. (2009). Doing physics—doing gender: An exploration of physics students’ identity constitution in the context of laboratory work (Doctoral dissertation, Uppsala University). Retrieved from http://uu.divaportal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:207676.
Due, K (2012). Who is the competent physics student? A study of students’ positions, social interaction and the process of learning in small-group discussions. Cultural Studies in Science Education.
Faulkner, W. (2009). Doing gender in engineering workplace cultures. II. Gender in/authenticity and the in/visibility paradox. Engineering Studies, 1, 169–189.
Gee, J. P. (2000). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99–125.
Gee, J. P. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Gonsalves, A. (2010). Discourses and gender in doctoral physics: A hard look inside a hard science. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Quebec, Canada: McGill University.
Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism (1st ed.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Harding, S. (1998). Is science multicultural? Postcolonialism, feminisms, and epistemologies. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Keller, E. F. (1985). Reflections on gender and science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Keller, E. F. (1992). How gender matters, or, why it’s so hard for us to count past two? In G. Kirkup & L. S. Keller (Eds.), Inventing women: Science, technology and gender (pp. 42–56). Cambridge, UK: Open University Press.
Salzinger, L. (2004). Revealing the unmarked: Finding masculinity in a global factory. Ethnography, 5, 5–27.
Schiebinger, L. (1999). Has feminism changed science?. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Thomas, K. (1990). Gender and subject in higher education. London, England: Open University Press.
Tonso, K. (2006). Student engineers and engineer identity: Campus engineer identities as figured world. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1, 273–307.
Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Walkerdine, V. (1988). The mastery of reason: Cognitive development and the production of rationality. London, England: Routledge.
Walkerdine, V. (1989). Counting girls out. London, England: Virago.
Whitten, B. (1996). What physics is fundamental physics? Feminist implications of physicists’ debate over the superconducting supercollider. NWSA Journal, 8, 1–16. Retrieved from: http://www.cehd.umn.edu/Feminist-Formations/.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Lead Editors: K. Scantlebury and A. Hussénius
This paper responds to central issues raised in Karin Due's manuscript entitled: Who is the competent physics student? A study of students’ positions and social interaction in small-group discussions.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gonsalves, A. Persistent discourses in physics education: gender neutrality and the gendering of competence. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 9, 461–467 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9423-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9423-1