Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

In the physics class: university physics students’ enactment of class and gender in the context of laboratory work

  • Forum
  • Published:
Cultural Studies of Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article explores how the doing of social class and gender can intersect with the learning of science, through case studies of two male, working-class university students’ constitutions of identities as physics students. In doing so, I challenge the taken-for-granted notion that male physics students have an unproblematic relation to their chosen discipline, and nuance the picture of how working-class students relate to higher education by the explicit focus on one disciplinary culture. Working from the perspective of situated learning theory, the interviews with the two male students were analysed for how they negotiated the practice of the physics student laboratory and their own classed and gendered participation in this practice. By drawing on the heterogeneity of the practice of physics the two students were able to use the practical and technological aspects of physics as a gateway into the discipline. However, this is not to say that their participation in physics was completely frictionless. The students were both engaged in a continuous negotiation of how skills they had learned to value in the background may or may not be compatible with the ones they perceived to be valued in the university physicist community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Archer, L. (2003). Social class and higher education. In L. Archer, M. Hutchings, & A. Ross (Eds.), Higher education and social class: Issues of exclusion and inclusion (pp. 5–20). London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, L., & Hutchings, M. (2000). Bettering yourself? Discourses of risk, cost and benefit in young working class non-participants’ constructions of HE. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21, 555–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, A. C. (2001). Science education in urban settings: Seeking new ways of praxis through critical ethnography. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 899–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickhouse, N. W., Lowery, P., & Schultz, K. (2000). What kind of girl does science? The construction of school science identities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 441–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broady, D., & Börjesson, M. (2008). En social karta över gymnasieskolan. In U. P. Lundgren (Ed.), Individsamhällelärande. Åtta exempel på utbildningsvetenskaplig forskning: Vetenskapsrådets rapportserie 2008:2.

  • Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 1187–1218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (2005). Masculinities. Berkley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielsson, A. T. (2009). Doing physicsdoing gender. An exploration of physics students’ identity constitution in the context of laboratory work. Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 83.

  • Danielsson, A. T. (2010). Gender in physics education research: A review and a look forward. In M. Blomqvist & E. Lindsmyr (Eds.), Never mind the gap! Gendering science in transgressive encounters. Uppsala: Centre for Gender Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B., & Gannon, S. (2005). Feminism/Poststructuralism. In B. Somekh & C. Lewin (Eds.), Research methods in the social sciences: A guide for students and researchers. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du, X.-Y. (2006). Gendered practices of constructing an engineering identity in a problem-based learning environment. European Journal of Engineering Education, 31, 35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faulkner, W. (2007). Nuts and bolts and people: Gender-troubled engineering identities. Social Studies of Science, 37, 331–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox Keller, E. (1992). Secrets of life. Secrets of death. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis. Theory and method (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism. Milton Keynes: Open University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasse, C. (2002). Gender diversity in play with physics: The problem of premises for participation in activities. Mind, culture, and activity, 9, 250–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrand, G. M. (2001). Con/Testing learning models. Paper presented at the National Association of Research in Science Teaching (NARST).

  • Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2003). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88, 28–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, G. (2001). Exploring the availability of student scientist identities within curriculum discourse: An anti-essentialist approach to gender-inclusive science. Gender and Education, 13, 275–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, J., & Dunne, M. (1996). Revealing assumptions: Problematising research on gender and mathematics and science education. In L. H. Parker, L. J. Rennie, & B. J. Fraser (Eds.), Gender, science and mathematics. Shortening the shadow. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, J. (2002). Engineering selves. Negotiating gender and identity in technical work. Management Communications Quarterly, 15, 350–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvande, E. (1999). In the belly of the beast. Constructing femininities in engineering organizations. The European Journal of Women’s Studies, 6, 305–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, L. C., & Redish, E. F. (1999). Resource letter: PER-1: Physics education research. American Journal of Physics, 67, 755–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellström, U. (1995). Engineering lives: Technology, time and space in a male-centred world. Linköping: Linköping Studies in Art and Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellström, U. (1999). Män och deras maskiner. Nora: Bokförlaget Nya Doxa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, A. (2010). I want an education: Two case studies of working-class ambition and ambivalence in further and higher education. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 15, 67–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, O., Ault, J., Charles, R., Bentz, B., & Meskimen, L. (2001). The black-white “achievement gap” as a perennial challenge of urban science education: A sociocultural and historical overview with implications for research and practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 1101–1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyström, E. (2007). Talking and taking positions. An encounter between action research and the gendered and racialised discourses of school science. Umeå: Umeå University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reay, D. (2001). Finding or losing yourself? Working-class relationships to education. Journal of Education Policy, 16, 333–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reay, D. (2006). The zombie stalking English schools: Social class and educational inequality. British Journal of Educational Studies, 54, 288–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reay, D., Crozier, G., & Clayton, J. (2009). ‘Fitting in’ or ‘standing out’: Working-class students in UK higher education. British Educational Research Journal, 32, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, L. A. (2006). Why are there so few female physicists? The Physics Teacher, 44, 177–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. G., & Mcllwee, J. S. (1991). Men, women, and the culture of engineering. The Sociological Quarterly, 32, 403–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W. M. (Ed.). (2010). Re/structuring science education: Reuniting sociological and psychological perspectives. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Séré, M.-G. (2002). Towards renewed research questions from the outcomes of the European project. Labwork in Science Education, 86, 624–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stonyer, H. (2002). Making engineering students—making women: The discursive context of engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 18, 392–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, K. (1990). Gender and subject in higher education. Buckingham: Open University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes. The world of high energy physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van De Werfhorst, H. G., Sullivan, A., & Cheung, S. Y. (2003). Social class, ability and choice of subject in secondary and tertiary education in Britain. British Educational Research Journal, 29, 41–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wajcman, J. (1991). Feminism confronts technology. Great Britain: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver-Hightower, M. (2003). The ‘boy turn’ in research and gender and education. Review of Educational Research, 73, 471–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wieman, C. E. (2002). Autobiography. In T. Frängsmyr (Ed.), The Nobel Prizes 2001. Stockholm: The Nobel Foundation. Retrieved 21 Jun 2012 from: http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/2001/wieman.html.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna T. Danielsson.

Additional information

Lead Editors: K. Scantlebury and A. Hussenius

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Danielsson, A.T. In the physics class: university physics students’ enactment of class and gender in the context of laboratory work. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 9, 477–494 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9421-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9421-3

Keywords

Navigation