Abstract
This article explores how the doing of social class and gender can intersect with the learning of science, through case studies of two male, working-class university students’ constitutions of identities as physics students. In doing so, I challenge the taken-for-granted notion that male physics students have an unproblematic relation to their chosen discipline, and nuance the picture of how working-class students relate to higher education by the explicit focus on one disciplinary culture. Working from the perspective of situated learning theory, the interviews with the two male students were analysed for how they negotiated the practice of the physics student laboratory and their own classed and gendered participation in this practice. By drawing on the heterogeneity of the practice of physics the two students were able to use the practical and technological aspects of physics as a gateway into the discipline. However, this is not to say that their participation in physics was completely frictionless. The students were both engaged in a continuous negotiation of how skills they had learned to value in the background may or may not be compatible with the ones they perceived to be valued in the university physicist community.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Archer, L. (2003). Social class and higher education. In L. Archer, M. Hutchings, & A. Ross (Eds.), Higher education and social class: Issues of exclusion and inclusion (pp. 5–20). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Archer, L., & Hutchings, M. (2000). Bettering yourself? Discourses of risk, cost and benefit in young working class non-participants’ constructions of HE. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21, 555–574.
Barton, A. C. (2001). Science education in urban settings: Seeking new ways of praxis through critical ethnography. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 899–917.
Brickhouse, N. W., Lowery, P., & Schultz, K. (2000). What kind of girl does science? The construction of school science identities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 441–458.
Broady, D., & Börjesson, M. (2008). En social karta över gymnasieskolan. In U. P. Lundgren (Ed.), Individ—samhälle—lärande. Åtta exempel på utbildningsvetenskaplig forskning: Vetenskapsrådets rapportserie 2008:2.
Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 1187–1218.
Connell, R. W. (2005). Masculinities. Berkley: University of California Press.
Danielsson, A. T. (2009). Doing physics—doing gender. An exploration of physics students’ identity constitution in the context of laboratory work. Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 83.
Danielsson, A. T. (2010). Gender in physics education research: A review and a look forward. In M. Blomqvist & E. Lindsmyr (Eds.), Never mind the gap! Gendering science in transgressive encounters. Uppsala: Centre for Gender Research.
Davies, B., & Gannon, S. (2005). Feminism/Poststructuralism. In B. Somekh & C. Lewin (Eds.), Research methods in the social sciences: A guide for students and researchers. London: SAGE.
Du, X.-Y. (2006). Gendered practices of constructing an engineering identity in a problem-based learning environment. European Journal of Engineering Education, 31, 35–42.
Faulkner, W. (2007). Nuts and bolts and people: Gender-troubled engineering identities. Social Studies of Science, 37, 331–356.
Fox Keller, E. (1992). Secrets of life. Secrets of death. London: Routledge.
Gee, J. P. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis. Theory and method (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism. Milton Keynes: Open University press.
Hasse, C. (2002). Gender diversity in play with physics: The problem of premises for participation in activities. Mind, culture, and activity, 9, 250–269.
Hildebrand, G. M. (2001). Con/Testing learning models. Paper presented at the National Association of Research in Science Teaching (NARST).
Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2003). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88, 28–54.
Hughes, G. (2001). Exploring the availability of student scientist identities within curriculum discourse: An anti-essentialist approach to gender-inclusive science. Gender and Education, 13, 275–290.
Johnstone, J., & Dunne, M. (1996). Revealing assumptions: Problematising research on gender and mathematics and science education. In L. H. Parker, L. J. Rennie, & B. J. Fraser (Eds.), Gender, science and mathematics. Shortening the shadow. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Jorgensen, J. (2002). Engineering selves. Negotiating gender and identity in technical work. Management Communications Quarterly, 15, 350–380.
Kvande, E. (1999). In the belly of the beast. Constructing femininities in engineering organizations. The European Journal of Women’s Studies, 6, 305–328.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McDermott, L. C., & Redish, E. F. (1999). Resource letter: PER-1: Physics education research. American Journal of Physics, 67, 755–767.
Mellström, U. (1995). Engineering lives: Technology, time and space in a male-centred world. Linköping: Linköping Studies in Art and Science.
Mellström, U. (1999). Män och deras maskiner. Nora: Bokförlaget Nya Doxa.
Morrison, A. (2010). I want an education: Two case studies of working-class ambition and ambivalence in further and higher education. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 15, 67–80.
Norman, O., Ault, J., Charles, R., Bentz, B., & Meskimen, L. (2001). The black-white “achievement gap” as a perennial challenge of urban science education: A sociocultural and historical overview with implications for research and practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 1101–1114.
Nyström, E. (2007). Talking and taking positions. An encounter between action research and the gendered and racialised discourses of school science. Umeå: Umeå University.
Reay, D. (2001). Finding or losing yourself? Working-class relationships to education. Journal of Education Policy, 16, 333–346.
Reay, D. (2006). The zombie stalking English schools: Social class and educational inequality. British Journal of Educational Studies, 54, 288–307.
Reay, D., Crozier, G., & Clayton, J. (2009). ‘Fitting in’ or ‘standing out’: Working-class students in UK higher education. British Educational Research Journal, 32, 1–19.
Robertson, L. A. (2006). Why are there so few female physicists? The Physics Teacher, 44, 177–180.
Robinson, J. G., & Mcllwee, J. S. (1991). Men, women, and the culture of engineering. The Sociological Quarterly, 32, 403–421.
Roth, W. M. (Ed.). (2010). Re/structuring science education: Reuniting sociological and psychological perspectives. New York: Springer.
Séré, M.-G. (2002). Towards renewed research questions from the outcomes of the European project. Labwork in Science Education, 86, 624–644.
Stonyer, H. (2002). Making engineering students—making women: The discursive context of engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 18, 392–399.
Thomas, K. (1990). Gender and subject in higher education. Buckingham: Open University press.
Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes. The world of high energy physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Van De Werfhorst, H. G., Sullivan, A., & Cheung, S. Y. (2003). Social class, ability and choice of subject in secondary and tertiary education in Britain. British Educational Research Journal, 29, 41–62.
Wajcman, J. (1991). Feminism confronts technology. Great Britain: Polity Press.
Weaver-Hightower, M. (2003). The ‘boy turn’ in research and gender and education. Review of Educational Research, 73, 471–498.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wieman, C. E. (2002). Autobiography. In T. Frängsmyr (Ed.), The Nobel Prizes 2001. Stockholm: The Nobel Foundation. Retrieved 21 Jun 2012 from: http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/2001/wieman.html.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Lead Editors: K. Scantlebury and A. Hussenius
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Danielsson, A.T. In the physics class: university physics students’ enactment of class and gender in the context of laboratory work. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 9, 477–494 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9421-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9421-3