Abstract
We discuss the eight papers in this issue of Cultural Studies of Science Education focusing on the debate over conceptual change in science education and explore the issues that have emerged for us as we consider how conceptual change research relates to our practice as science educators. In presenting our interpretations of this research, we consider the role of participants in the research process and contextual factors in conducting research on science conceptions, and draw implications for the teaching of science.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
To avoid cumbersome constructions, female pronouns are being used to represent both male and female teachers and researchers in this section.
References
Belmont Report. (1979). Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Washington, DC: The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Retrieved January 3, 2008, from http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/belmont.html.
DiSessa, A. A., & Sherin, B. L. (1998). What changes in conceptual change? International Journal of Science Education, 20, 1155–1191.
Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Harding, S. (1998). Is science multicultural? Postcolonialisms, feminisms, and epistemologies. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous people. London: Zed Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Siry, C., Horowitz, G., Otulaja, F.S. et al. Conceptual change research and science education practice: a response from educators. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 3, 451–470 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-008-9094-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-008-9094-0