Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Effects of Organizational Culture on Mental Health Service Engagement of Transition Age Youth

  • Published:
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nationwide, there is a growing concern in understanding mental health service engagement among transition age youth. The ecological perspective suggests that there are multiple barriers to service engagement which exist on varying levels of the ecosystem. Based on the socio-technical theory and organizational culture theory, this study examined the impact of organization-level characteristics on perceived service engagement and the moderating role of organizational culture on practitioner-level characteristics affecting youth service engagement. A cross-sectional survey research design was used to address the research questions. The data were collected from 279 practitioners from 27 mental health service organizations representing three major metropolitan areas in Ohio. Hierarchical linear modeling was used to address a nested structure. Findings revealed that location of organization, service setting, and organizational culture had significant effects on the continuation of services. In addition, the relationship between service coordination and resource knowledge and service engagement was moderated by organizational culture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kessler RC, Birnbaum H, Bromet E, et al. Age differences in major depression: results from the national comorbidity survey replication (NCS-R). Psychological Medicine 2009; 40: 225–237.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kessler RC, McGonagle KA, Zhao S, et al. Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey. Archives of General Psychiatry 1994; 51(1): 8–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Newman DL, Moffitt TE, Caspi A, et al. Psychiatric disorder in a birth cohort young adults: Prevalence, comorbidity, clinical significance, and new case incidence from ages 11–21. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1996; 64: 552–562.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Arnett JJ. Emerging adulthood: A theory of adulthood from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist 2000; 55(5): 469–480.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim-Cohen J, Caspi A, Moffitt TE, et al. Prior juvenile diagnoses in adults with mental disorder: Developmental follow-back of a prospective-longitudinal cohort. Archives of General Psychiatry 2003; 60: 709–717.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gralinski-Baker JH, Hauser ST, Billings RL, Allen JP. Risks along the road to adulthood: Challenges faced by youth with serious mental disorders. In: DW Osgood, EM Foster, C Flanagan, GR Ruth (Eds). On your own without a net: The transition to adulthood for vulnerable populations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baydar MN, Reid J, Webster-Stratto C. The role of mental health factors and program engagement in the effectiveness of a preventive parenting program for head start mothers. Child Development 2003; 74(5): 1433–1453.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Meyers RJ, Miller WR, Smith JE, et al. A randomized trial of two methods for engaging treatment-refusing drug users through concerned significant others. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2002; 70: 1182–1185.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Barrett MS, Chua W, Crits-Christoph P, et al. Early withdrawal from mental health treatment: Implications for psychotherapy practice. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training 2009; 46(2): 247–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Munson MR, Jaccard J, Smalling S, et al. Static, dynamic, integrated, and contextualized: A framework for understanding mental health service utilization among young adults. Social Science & Medicine 2012; 75(8): 1441–1449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McMillen JC, Ramesh R. Pediatric to adult mental health service use of young people leaving the foster care system. Journal of Adolescent Health 2009; 44(1): 7–13.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Munson MR, Scott LD Jr, Kim H. Making the transition from care with care. Encyclopedia of Adolescence 2011.

  13. Kazdin AE, Holland L, Crowley M, et al. Barriers to treatment participation scale: Evaluation and validation in the context of child outpatient treatment. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines 1997; 38(8): 1051–1062.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Mental health: A report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD: Public Health Service, Office of the Surgeon General, 1999.

  15. Olfson M, Mojtabai R, Sampson NA, et al. Dropout from outpatient mental health care in the United States. Psychiatric Services 2009; 60(7): 898–907.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Harrison ME, McKay MM, Bannon Jr WM. Inner-city child mental health service use: The real question is why youth and families do not use services. Community Mental Health Journal 2004; 40(2): 119–131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Thompson S, Bender K, Lantry J, et al. Treatment engagement: Building therapeutic alliance in home-based treatment with adolescents and their families. Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal 2007; 29(1/2): 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. McKay MM, McCadam K, Gonzales J. Addressing the barriers to mental health services for inner city children and their caretakers. Community Mental Health Journal 1996; 32: 353–361.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Porras JI, Robertson PJ. Organizational development: Theory, practice, and research. In: MD Dunnette, LM Hough (Eds). Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1992, pp. 719–822.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Glisson C, Landsverk J, Schoenwald S, et al. Assessing the Organizational Social Context (OSC) of mental health services: Implications for research and practice. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 2008; 35(1–2): 98–113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Burns T, Stalker GM. The management of innovation. London: Tavistock Publications, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Aarons GA, Sawitzky AC. Organizational culture and climate and mental health provider attitudes toward evidence-based practice. Psychological Services 2006; 3(1): 61–72.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rousseau DM. Assessing organizational culture: The case for multiple methods. In: B Schneider (Ed). Organizational climate and culture. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1990, pp. 153–192.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Glisson C, James LR. The cross-level effects of culture and climate in human service teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior 2002; 23(6): 767–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pfeffer J. Power in Organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pfeffer J. Developing resource dependence theory: how theory is affected by its environment. In: KG Smith, MA Hitt (Eds). Great Minds in Management: The Process of Theory Development, Oxford University Press, New York, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tait L, Birchwood M, Trower P. A new scale (SES) to measure engagement with community mental health services. Journal of Mental Health 2002; 11(2): 191–198.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tait L, Birchwood M, Trower P. Adapting to the challenge of psychosis: personal resilience and the use of sealing-over (avoidant) coping strategies. The British Journal of Psychiatry 2004; 185(5): 410–415.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mulder CL, Koopmans G, Hengeveld M. Lack of motivation for treatment in emergency psychiatry patients. Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology 2005; 40(6): 484–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Davidson G, Campbell J. An examination of the use of coercion by assertive outreach and community mental health teams in Northern Ireland. British Journal of Social Work 2007; 37(3): 537–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lecomte T, Spidel A, Leclerc C, et al. Predictors and profiles of treatment non-adherence and engagement in services problems in early psychosis. Schizophrenia Research 2008; 102(1–3): 295–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Fisher H, Theodore K, Power P, et al. Routine evaluation in first episode psychosis services: feasibility and results from the MiData project. Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology 2008; 43(12): 960–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ruchlewska A, Mulder CL, Smulders R, et al. The effects of crisis plans for patients with psychotic and bipolar disorders: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry 2009; 9: 41–48.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Staring ABP, Mulder CL, Duivenvoorden HJ, et al. Fewer symptoms vs. more side-effects in schizophrenia? Opposing pathways between antipsychotic medication compliance and quality of life. Schizophrenia Research 2009; 113(1): 27–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bunger AC, Stiffman AR, Foster KA, et al. Child welfare workers’ connectivity to resources and youth’s receipt of services. Advances in Social Work 2009; 10(1): 19–38.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Stiffman AR, Hadley-Ives E, Dore P, et al. Youth’s access to mental health services: The role of providers’ training, resource connectivity, and assessment of need. Mental Health Services Research 2000; 2(3): 141–154.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Stiffman AR, Striley C, Horvath VE, et al. Organizational context and provider perception as determinants of mental health service use. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 2001; 28(2): 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Schiff JW. A measure of organizational culture in mental health clinics. Best Practice in Mental Health: An International Journal 2009; 5(2): 89–111.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kerber J. Staff evaluations and perceptions of organizational culture: Implications for performance improvement and mental healthcare service evaluation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Goldstein H. Multilevel Statistical Models. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hofmann DA, Griffin M, Gavin M. The application of hierarchical linear modeling to organizational research. In: KJ Klein, SWJ Kozlowski (Eds). Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2000, pp. 467–511.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Klein KJ, Kozlowski SWJ. From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organizational Research Methods 2000; 3(3): 211–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. James LR, Demaree RG, Wolf G. rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology 1993; 78(2): 306–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and data analysis methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Cunningham PB, Henggeler SW. Engaging multiproblem families in treatment: Lessons learned throughout the development of multisystemic therapy. Family Process 1999; 38(3): 265.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Staudt M. Treatment engagement with caregivers of at-risk children: Gaps in research and conceptualization. Journal of Child & Family Studies 2007; 16(2): 183–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Mitchell AJ, Selmes T. Why don’t patients attend their appointments? Maintaining engagement with psychiatric services. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment 2007; 12: 423–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Henggeler SW, Rowland MD, Randall J, et al. Home-based multisystemic therapy as an alternative to the hospitalization of youths in psychiatric crisis: Clinical outcomes. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 1999; 38(11): 1331–1339.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. O’Mahen HA, Flynn HA. Preferences and perceived barriers to treatment for depression during the perinatal period. Journal of Women’s Health 2008; 17(8): 1301–1309.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Reamer FG. Social Work Values and Ethics, 3rd ed., New York: Columbia University Press, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Lindell MK, Whitney DJ. Accounting for common method variance in cross sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology 2001; 86: 114–121.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Podsakoff P, MacKenzie S, Lee J, et al. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 2003; 88: 879–903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Glisson C, Green P. The effects of organizational culture and climate on the access to mental health care in child welfare and juvenile justice systems. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 2006; 33(4): 433–448.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Hemmelgarn AL, Glisson C, Dukes D. Emergency room culture and the emotional support component of family-centered care. Children's Health Care 2001; 30(2): 93–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Schein HE. Defining Organizational Culture. In: JM Shafritz, JS Ott (Eds). Classics of Organization Theory. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1992, pp. 490-502.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Glisson C. Structure and technology in human service organizations. In: Y Hasenfeld (Ed). Human services as complex organizations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was funded by the Ohio Department of Mental Health, under grant number ODMH 10.1260.

Conflict of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest declared.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to HyunSoo Kim PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, H., Tracy, E.M., Biegel, D.E. et al. The Effects of Organizational Culture on Mental Health Service Engagement of Transition Age Youth. J Behav Health Serv Res 42, 466–485 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-014-9406-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-014-9406-y

Keywords

Navigation