Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Life history of a topic in an online discussion: a complex systems theory perspective on how one message attracts class members to create meaning collaboratively

  • Published:
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Complex adaptive systems theory served as a framework for this qualitative study exploring the process of how meaning emerges from the collective interactions of individuals in a synchronous online discussion through their shared words about a topic. In an effort to bridge levels of analysis from the individual to the small group to the community, we analyzed how a group of students introduced, sustained, and eventually let go of one topic while participating in a classroom discussion that took place in a CSCL environment. Our purpose was to examine a single posted message’s influence not only through the responses it garnered, but also by how individuals reacted to it intellectually. Participants were eight students and their teacher in a graduate-level seminar. Data sources included the online discussion’s final transcript, screen-captured recordings of each participant’s computer screen, video recordings of participants’ actions, and observation notes. Our analyses revealed three key understandings: (a) the interdependencies of process and content are manifestations of the complex development of co-created understandings in computer-supported discussions, (b) private individual processes and particular meanings co-mingle in a social space to create publicly shared experiences, and (c) the importance of attending to the content was shown in the details of a topic’s incipience, its developing “mid-life,” and how factors conspired to its end. These findings help illustrate how co-created meaning-making experiences emerge in a system through interactions among individual agents, suggesting ways instructors may work to foster student learning in CSCL contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, R. C., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., McNurlen, B., Archodidou, A., Kim, S., Reznitskaya, A., Tillmans, M., & Gilbert, L. (2001). The snowball phenomenon: Spread of ways of talking and ways of thinking across groups of children. Cognition & Instruction, 19, 1–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64(6), 359–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, M. P., & Markarian, W. (2015). Dialogic teaching and dialogic stance: Moving beyond interactional form. Research in the Teaching of English, 49(3), 272–296.

  • Byrne, D., & Callaghan, G. (2014). Complexity theory and the social sciences. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. (2002). Control processes and self-organization as complementary principles underlying behavior. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 6, 304–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, B. Y. (2013). Adolescents' constructively responsive reading strategy use in a critical internet reading task. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(4), 329–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., Ell, F., Ludlow, L., Grudnoff, L., & Aitken, G. (2014). The challenge and promise of complexity theory for teacher education research. Teachers College Record, 116, 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coiro, J., & Dobler, E. (2007). Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the internet. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(2), 214–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cress, U., & Kimmerle, J. (2008). A systemic and cognitive view on collaborative knowledge building with wikis. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3, 105–122. doi:10.1007/s11412-007-9035-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cress, U., Stahl, G., Ludvigsen, S., & Law, N. (2015). The core features of CSCL: Social situation, collaborative knowledge processes and their design. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(2), 109–116. doi:10.1007/s11412-015-9214-2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, F. (1999). Going for the zone: The social and cognitive ecology of teacher-student interaction in classroom conversations. In D. Hicks (Ed.), Discourse, learning, and schooling (pp. 29–62). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, S. K., Pearce, K. E., Vitak, J., & Treem, J. W. (2016). Explicating affordance: A conceptual framework for understanding affordance in communication research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. Doi:10.111/jcc4.12180.

  • Fleckenstein, K. S., Spinuzzi, C., Rickly, R. J., & Papper, C. (2008). The importance of harmony: An ecological metaphor for writing research. College Composition and Communication, 60(2), 388–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galatzer-Levy, R. M. (2009). Finding your way through chaos, fractals, and other exotic mathematical objects: A guide for the perplexed. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 57(5), 1227–1249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halatchliyski, I., & Cress, U. (2014). How structure shapes dynamics: Knowledge development in Wikipedia – A network multilevel modeling approach. PloS One, 9(11), e111958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halatchliyski, I., Moskaliuk, J., Kimmerle, J., & Cress, U. (2014). Explaining authors’ contribution to pivotal artifacts during mass collaboration in the Wikipedia’s knowledge base. International Journal of Computer—Supported Collaborative Learning, 9, 97–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, J. T., Curry, L. E., Goorha, S., & Woodworth, M. (2008). On lying and being lied to: A linguistic analysis of deception in computer-mediated communication. Discourse Processes, 45(1), 1–23. doi:10.1080/01638530701739181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harney, O. M., Hogan, M. J., Broome, B., Hall, T., & Ryan, C. (2015). Investigating the effects of prompts on argumentation style, consensus and perceived efficacy in collaborative learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(4), 367–394. doi:10.1007/s11412-015-9223-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, G. A., & Katz, M. L. (2006). Crafting an agentive self: Case studies of digital storytelling. Research in the Teaching of English, 41(1), 43–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, M., Kapur, M., & Reimann, P. (2016). Conceptualizing debates in learning and educational research: Toward a complex systems conceptual framework of learning. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 210–218. doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1166963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, M., & Wilensky, U. (2006). Complex systems in education: Scientific and educational importance and implications for the learning sciences. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 11–34. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1501_4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, M., Schallert, D. L., Cheng, A., Park, Y., Lee, H., Chen, Y., et al. (2007). Seeking self-organization in classroom computer-mediated discussion through a complex adaptive systems lens. National Reading Conference Yearbook, 56, 304–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapur, M. (2011). Temporality matters: Advancing a method for analyzing problem-solving processes in a computer-supported collaborative environment. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6, 39–56. doi:10.1007/s11412-011-9109-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapur, M., Voiklis, J., & Kinzer, C. (2008). Sensitivities to early exchange in synchronous computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) groups. Computers & Education, 51, 54–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmerle, J., Moskaliuk, J., Oeberst, A., & Cress, U. (2015). Learning and collective knowledge construction with social media: A process-oriented perspective. Educational Psychologist, 50(2), 120–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kincanon, E., & Powel, W. (1995). Chaotic analysis in psychology and psychoanalysis. The Journal of Psychology, 129(5), 495–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, M., & Stamovlasis, D. (2016). Complex dynamical systems in education. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-27577-2.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kramsch, C. (Ed.). (2002). Language acquisition and language socialization: Ecological perspectives. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18, 141–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., Schallert, D. L., Song, K., Park, Y., Chiang, Y. V., Vogler, J. S., et al. (2011). Resistance phenomena in collaborative online discussions. Literacy Research Association Yearbook, 60, 370–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, M. C., & Michaels, S. (1997). Shifting participant frameworks: Orchestrating thinking practices in group discussion. In D. Hicks (Ed.), Discourse, learning, and schooling (pp. 63–103). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, M. C., & Michaels, S. (2007). When is dialogue ‘dialogic’? Human Development, 50(5), 275–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Op’t Eynde, P., & Turner, J. E. (2006). Focusing on the complexity of emotion-motivation issues in academic learning: A dynamical component systems approach. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 361–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulson, E. J. (2005). Viewing eye movements during reading through the lens of chaos theory: How reading is like the weather. Reading Research Quarterly, 40(3), 338–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennings, J. J. M., van Tartwijk, J., Wubbels, T., Claessens, L. C. A., van der Want, A. C., & Brekelmans, M. (2014). Real-time teacher-student interactions: A dynamic systems approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 37, 183–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranker, J. (2007). Designing meaning with multiple media sources: A case study of an eight-year-old student’s writing processes. Research in the Teaching of English, 41(4), 43–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimann, P. (2009). Time is precious: Variable- and event-centred approaches to process analysis in CSCL research. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(3), 239–257. doi:10.1007/s11412-009-9070-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinking, D. (1997). Me and my hypertext:) A multiple digression analysis of technology and literacy (sic). The Reading Teacher, 50(8), 626–643.

  • Remer, R. (2005). An introduction to chaos theory for psychodramatists. Journal of Group Psychotherapy, Psychodrama & Sociometry, 58(3), 130–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera, E. T., Wilbur, M. F.-S., Roberts-Wilbur, J. P., & Garrett, M. T. (2005). Group chaos theory: A metaphor and model for group work. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 30(2), 111–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W., & Duit, R. (2003). Emergence, flexibility, and stabilization of language in a physics classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(9), 869–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schallert, D. L., Chiang, Y. V., Park, Y., Jordan, M. E., Lee, H., Cheng, A. J., et al. (2009). Being polite while fulfilling different discourse functions in online classroom discussions. Computers & Education, 53(3), 713–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schallert, D. L., Lissi, M. R., Reed, J. H., Dodson, M. M., Benton, R. E., & Hopkins, L. F. (1996). How coherence is socially constructed in oral and written classroom discussions of reading assignments. In D. J. Leu, C. K. Kinzer, & K. Hinchman (Eds.), Forty-fifth Yearbook of the National Reading Conference. Chicago, IL: The National Reading Conference, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B., & Pea, R. (2014). Toward collaboration sensing. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 9(4), 371–395. doi:10.1007/s11412-014-9202-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 3–36). NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2000). A model of collaborative knowledge building. In B. Fishman & S. O’Connor-Divelbiss (Eds.), Fourth international conference of the learning sciences (pp. 70–77). Mahwah, NJ: Earlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2013). Learning across levels. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8(1), 1–12. doi:10.1007/s11412-013-9169-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamovlosis, D. (2016). Nonlinear dynamical interaction patterns in collaborative groups: Discourse analysis with orbital decomposition. In M. Koopmans & D. Stamovlasis (Eds.), Complex dynamical systems in education. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-27577-2_13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suthers, D. D. (2006). Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(3), 315–337. doi:10.1007/s11412-006-9660-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suthers, D. D., Dwyer, N., Medina, R., & Vatrapu, R. (2010). A framework for conceptualizing, representing, and analyzing distributed interaction. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(1), 5–42. doi:10.1007/s11412-009-9081-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tudini, V. (2015). Extending prior posts in dyadic online text chat. Discourse Processes, 52(8), 642–669. doi:10.1080/0163853Z.2014.969138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C., & Fulmer, S. M. (2013). Observing interpersonal regulation of engagement during instruction in middle school classrooms. In S. Volet & M. Vauras (Eds.), Interpersonal regulation of learning and motivation: Methodological advances (pp. 147–169). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vauras, M., Kinnunen, R., Kajamies, A., & Lehtinen, E. (2013). Interpersonal regulation in instructional interaction: A dynamic systems analysis of scaffolding. In S. Volet & M. Vauras (Eds.), Interpersonal regulation of learning and motivation: Methodological advances (pp. 125–146). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogler, J. S., Schallert, D. L., Park, Y., Song, K., Chiang, Y. V., Jordan, M. E., et al. (2013). How reading, thinking, and writing intermingle when a classroom discussion takes place online. Journal of Literacy Research, 45(3), 211–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., Cambria, J., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Motivation in education, The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 463–478). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wise, A. F., Hausknecht, S. N., & Zhao, Y. (2014). Attending to others’ posts in asynchronous discussions: Learners’ online “listening” and its relationship to speaking. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 9(2), 185–209. doi:10.1007/s11412-014-9192-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuiker, S., Anderson, K., Jordan, M. E., & Stewart, O. (2016). Complementary lenses: Using theories of situativity and complexity to understand collaborative learning as systems-level social activity. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 9, 80–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank YangJoo Park and Yi-Jeng Chen for their help on this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Educational Foundations, Leadership, and Aviation, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA

    Jane S. Vogler

  2. Department of Educational Psychology, University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA

    Diane L. Schallert

  3. Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA

    Michelle E. Jordan

  4. Department of Curriculum and Teaching, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA

    Kwangok Song

  5. SandEd - Educational Services and Material, Houston, TX, USA

    Anke J. Z. Sanders

  6. Dharma Drum Mountain Buddhist Foundation, Taiwan, Republic of China

    Yueh-hui Yan Te Chiang

  7. Middle School attached to College of Education, Dongguk University, Seoul, South Korea

    Ji-Eun Lee

  8. Department of Literature, Writing, and Rhetoric, St. Edward’s University, Austin, TX, USA

    Jeongbin Hannah Park

  9. Department of English Language and Literature, Fu Jen Catholic University, Taiwan, Republic of China

    Li-Tang Yu

Authors
  1. Jane S. Vogler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Diane L. Schallert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michelle E. Jordan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kwangok Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Anke J. Z. Sanders
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yueh-hui Yan Te Chiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ji-Eun Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jeongbin Hannah Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Li-Tang Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jane S. Vogler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vogler, J.S., Schallert, D.L., Jordan, M.E. et al. Life history of a topic in an online discussion: a complex systems theory perspective on how one message attracts class members to create meaning collaboratively. Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn 12, 173–194 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-017-9255-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-017-9255-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation