Abstract
The growing importance of medical imaging in everyday diagnostic practices poses challenges for medical education. While the emergence of novel imaging technologies offers new opportunities, many pedagogical questions remain. In the present study, we explore the use of a new tool, a virtual microscope, for the instruction and the collaborative learning of pathology. Fifteen pairs of medical students were asked to solve diagnostic tasks in a virtual microscopy learning environment. The students’ collaborative efforts were analysed on the basis of approximately 20 hours of video recordings. Our analyses show how students use the technology as a mediating tool to organize, manipulate and construct a shared visual field, and later, shared understanding of the problem and solutions. Organization of the visual field is done through multimodal referential practices: gestures, three dimensional manipulation of the image and paced inspection of the specimen. Furthermore, we analyse and describe how the aforementioned practices coincide with students’ medical reasoning in this particular learning context. The analysis of medical students’ diagnostic work illustrates the collaborative potential of the virtual microscopy environment and how such interactive tools render the traditional distinction between collaborating around or through computers irrelevant, as even face to face collaboration becomes enacted through technology. Finally, we argue that as technologies develop, understanding the technical side of image production, or any representation, becomes an integral part of the interpretative process. How this knowledge is communicated to the students may play a substantive role in how students learn to interpret medical images.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alač, M. (2008). Working with brain scans: Digital images and gestural interaction in fMRI laboratory. Social Studies of Science, 38, 483–508.
Arnseth, H. C., & Ludvigsen, S. (2006). Approaching institutional contexts: Systemic versus dialogic research in CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(2), 167–185.
Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of Research in Education, 24, 61–100.
Cook, D. (2009). The failure of e-learning research to inform educational practice, and what we can do about it. Medical Teacher, 31(2), 158–162.
Crook, C., & Light, P. (2002). Virtual society and the cultural practice of study. In S. Woolgar (Ed.), Virtual xociety? Technology, cyberbole, reality (pp. 153–175). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dillenbourg, P., Järvelä S., & Fischer F. (2009). The evolution of research on computer-supported collaborative learning: From design to orchestration. Technology-Enhanced Learning, Part I, 3–19.
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
Eva, K. W. (2009). Diagnostic error in medical education: Where wrongs can make rights. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 14, 71–81.
Helin, H., Lundin, M., Lundin, J., Martikainen, P., Tammela, T., van der Kwast, T., & Isola, J. (2005). Web-based virtual microscopy in teaching and standardizing Gleason grading. Human Pathology, 36, 281–286.
Hindmarsh, J., & Heath, C. (2000). Embodied reference: A study of deixis in workplace interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1855–1878.
Koschmann, T., & Zemel, A. (2009). Optical pulsars and black arrows: Discoveries as occasioned productions. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(2), 200–246. doi:10.1080/10508400902797966.
Krupinski, E. (2010). Current perspectives in medical imaging. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(5), 1205–1217.
Kushniruk, A. W., Kaufman, R. D., Patel, V. L., Lévesque, Y., & Lottin, P. (1996). Assessment of a computerized patient record system: A cognitive approach to evaluation of an emerging medical technology. M.D. Computing, Computers in Medical Practice, 13, 406–415.
Kuutti, K., & Kaptelinin, V. (1997). Rethinking cognitive tools: From augmentation to mediation, ct, pp. 31, 2nd International Conference on Cognitive Technology (CT ‘97), 1997.
Lehtinen, E. (2003). Computer supported collaborative learning: An approach to powerful learning environments. In E. De Corte, L. Verschaffel, N. Entwistle, & J. Van Merriëboer (Eds.), Unraveling basic components and dimensions of powerful learning environments (pp. 35–53). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Lehtinen, E. (2012). Learning of complex competences: On the need to coordinate multiple theoretical perspectives. In A. Koskensalo, J. Smeds, A. Huguet, & R. de Cillia (Eds.), Language: Competencies—contact—change. Berlin: LIT Verlag.
Lesgold, A., Rubinson, H., Feltovich, P., Glaser, R., Klopfer, D., & Wang, Y. (1988). Expertise in a complex skill: Diagnosing x-ray pictures. The nature of expertise. In M. Chi, R. Glaser, & M. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lynch, M. (1985). Art and artifact in laboratory science: A study of shop work and shop talk in research laboratory. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Myles-Worsley, M., Johnston, W. A., & Simons, M. A. (1988). The influence of expertise on X-ray image processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 553–557.
Nivala, M., Säljö, R., Rystedt, H., Kronqvist, P., & Lehtinen, E. (2012). Using virtual microscopy to scaffold learning of pathology: A naturalistic experiment on the role of visual and conceptual cues. Instructional Science. doi:10.1007/s11251-012-9215-8.
Norman, G., Coblentz, C., Brooks, L., & Babcook, C. (1992). Expertise in visual diagnosis: a review of the literature. Academic Medicine 67(10), 78–83.
Overdijk, M., van Diggelen, W., Kirschner, P. A., & Baker, M. (2012). Connecting agents and artifacts in CSCL: Towards a rationale of mutual shaping. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7, 193–210.
Patel, V. L., Arocha, J. F., & Zhang, J. (2005). Thinking and reasoning in medicine. In K. Holyoak (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pathak, S. A., Kim, B., Jacobson, M. J., & Zhang, B. H. (2011). Learning the physics of electricity: A qualitative analysis of collaborative processes involved in productive failure. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(1), 57–73.
Ritella, G., & Hakkarainen, K. (2012). Instrumental genesis in technology-mediated learning: From double stimulation to expansive knowledge practices. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(2), 239–258.
Robbins, S. (2010). Robbins and Cotran pathologic basis of disease (8th ed.). Philadelphia: Saunders/Elsevier. ISBN 9781416031215.
Roschelle, J. (1992). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(3), 235–276.
Roth, W. (2000). From gesture to scientific language. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1683–1714.
Rystedt, H., Ivarsson, J., Asplund, S., Johnsson, A. A., & Båth, M. (2011). Rediscovering radiology: New technologies and remedial action at the worksite. Social Studies of Science, 41(6), 101–125. doi:10.1177/0306312711423433.
Stahl, G., & Hesse, F. (2009) Paradigms of shared knowledge. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(4), 365–369.
Säljö, R. (2009). Learning, learning theories and units of analysis in research. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 202–208.
Säljö, R. (2010). Digital tools and challenges to institutional traditions of learning: Technologies, social memory and the performative nature of learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 53–64.
Schoultz, J., Säljö, R., & Wyndham, J. (2001). Heavenly talk: Discourse, artifacts and children’s understanding of elementary astronomy. Human Development, 44, 103–118.
Wertsch, J. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the developers and administrators of WebMicroscope, Dr. Johan Lundin and Dr. Mikael Lundin, for the technical support during our research. We also thank Dr. Raymond Bertram for his extensive comments on draft version of this paper. Finally, we are grateful to nurse Hannele Nysten whose practical assistance in organising the data collections has been invaluable to us.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nivala, M., Rystedt, H., Säljö, R. et al. Interactive visual tools as triggers of collaborative reasoning in entry-level pathology. Computer Supported Learning 7, 499–518 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-012-9153-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-012-9153-0