Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A relational, indirect, meso-level approach to CSCL design in the next decade

  • Published:
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reviews some foundational issues that we believe will affect the progress of CSCL over the next ten years. In particular, we examine the terms technology, affordance, and infrastructure and we propose a relational approach to their use in CSCL. Following a consideration of networks, space, and trust as conditions of productive learning, we propose an indirect approach to design in CSCL. The work supporting this theoretical paper is based on the outcomes of two European research networks: E-QUEL, a network investigating e-quality in e-learning; and Kaleidoscope, a European Union Framework 6 Network of Excellence. In arguing for a relational understanding of affordance, infrastructure, and technology we also argue for a focus on what we describe as meso-level activity. Overall this paper does not aim to be comprehensive or summative in its review of the state of the art in CSCL, but rather to provide a view of the issues currently facing CSCL from a European perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bernsteiner, A., & Lehner‐Wieternik, A. (2004). eLearning in Austrian teacher colleges. In L. Dirckinck‐Holmfeld, B. Lindström, B. M. Svendsen, & M. Ponti (Eds.), Conditions for productive learning in networked learning environments. Aalborg, Aalborg University/Kaleidoscope. Retrieved 6th November, 2005 from: http://www.ell.aau.dk/index.php?id=60.

  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12(2), 198–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1996, 2000). The rise of the network society (2nd Ed.) Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

  • Castells, M. (2001). The internet galaxy: Reflections on the internet, business, and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and a future discipline. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collis, B., & Moonen, J. (2001). Flexible learning in a digital world: Experiences and expectations. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook, C. (2002). The campus experience of networked learning. In C. Steeples & C. Jones (Eds.), Networked learning: perspectives and issues. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirckinck‐Holmfeld, L. (2002). Designing virtual learning environments based on problem oriented project pedagogy. In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld & B. Fibiger (Eds.), Learning in virtual environments. Frederiksberg C: Samfundslitteratur Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L., & Fibiger, B. (Eds). (2002). Learning in virtual environments. Frederiksberg C: Samfundslitteratur Press.

  • Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L., Lindström, B., Sørensen, B. M., & Ponti, M. (2005). Conditions for productive learning in networked learning environments. Aalborg: Aalborg University/Kaleidoscope. Retrieved 6th November, 2005 from: http://www.ell.aau.dk/index.php?id=60.

  • Dirckinck‐Holmfeld, L., Sorensen, E. K., Ryberg, T., & Buus, L. (2004). A theoretical framework for designing online master communities of practice. In S. Banks, P. Goodyear, V. Hodgson, C. Jones, V. Lally, D. McConnell, & C. Steeples (Eds.), Networked learning 2004. Proceedings of the Networked Learning Conference. Lancaster: Lancaster University. Retrieved 6th November, 2005 from: http://www.shef.ac.uk/nlc2004/Proceedings/Contents.htm.

  • Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: Free Press, Macmillan Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding–an activity theoretical approach to developmental research. Retrieved 6th November 2005 from: http://communication.ucsd.edu/MCA/Paper/Engestrom/expanding/toc.htm.

  • Engeström, Y. (1999). Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 377–404). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Towards an activity theory reconceptualisation. Journal of Education and Work, 14, 133–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fjuk, A. & Berge, O. (2004). Learning the process of programming through ICT-mediated apprenticeship–an activity theoretical approach. In L. Dirckinck–Holmfeld, B. Lindström, B. M. Svendsen, & M. Ponti (Eds.), Conditions for productive learning in networked learning environments. Aalborg: Aalborg University/Kaleidoscope. Retrieved 6th November, 2005 from: http://www.ell.aau.dk/index.php?id=60.

  • Fjuk, A., & Dirckinck‐Holmfeld, L. (1997). Articulation of actions in distributed collaborative learning. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 9(2), 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaver, W. W. (1996). Situating action 11: Affordances for interaction: the social is material for design. Ecological Psychology, 8(2), 111–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting and knowing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structure. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, P., Jones, C., Asensio, M., Hodgson, V., & Steeples, C. (2001). Effective networked learning in higher education: notes and guidelines. Lancaster: CSALT, Lancaster University. Retrieved 6th November, 2005 from: http://csalt.lancs.ac.uk/jisc/.

  • Guribye, F. (2005). Infrastructures for learning: Ethnographic inquiries into the social and technical conditions of education and training. Unpublished Doctoral thesis; Norway: University of Bergen.

  • Guribye, F., Andreassen, E. F., & Wasson, B. (2003). The organisation of interaction in distributed collaborative learning. In B. Wasson, S. Ludvigsen, & U. Hoppe (Eds.), Designing for change in networked learning environments. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning 2003 (pp. 385–394). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, R. Randall, D., & Rouncefield, M. (2000). Organizational change and retail finance: an ethnographic approach. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison & Dourish (1996). Re-place-ing space: The roles of space and place in collaborative systems. Proceedings of CSCW 96 (pp. 67–76). New York, NY: ACM.

  • Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35(2), 451–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, P., Taylor, P. G., Fisher, K., Trevitt, A. C. F., & Gilding, T. (2000). Place and space in the design of new learning environments. Higher Education Research & Development, 19(2), 221–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsson, L. E., Vigmo, S., Peterson, L., & Bergviken‐Rensfeldt, A. (2004). Sharing thoughts in computer mediated communication. In. L. Dirckinck‐Holmfeld, B. Lindström, B. M. Svendsen, & M. Ponti (Eds.), Conditions for productive learning in networked learning environments Aalborg, Aalborg University/Kaleidoscope. Retrieved 6th November, 2005 from: http://www.ell.aau.dk/index.php?id=60.

  • Jones, C. (2004a). Networks and learning: Communities, practices and the metaphor of networks. ALT–J, The Association for Learning Technology Journal, 12(1), 82–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. (2004b). Network theory and description—The Lancaster ALT masters programme. In L. Dirckinck–Holmfeld, B. Lindström, B. M. Svendsen, & M. Ponti (Eds.), Conditions for productive learning in networked learning environments. Aalborg: Aalborg University/Kaleidoscope. Retrieved 6th November 2005 from: http://www.ell.aau.dk/index.php?id=60.

  • Jones, C. (2004c). The conditions of learning in networks. In L. Dirckinck–Holmfeld, B. Lindström, B. M. Svendsen and M. Ponti (Eds.), Conditions for productive learning in networked learning environments. Aalborg: Aalborg University/Kaleidoscope. Retrieved 6th November 2005 from: http://www.ell.aau.dk/index.php?id=60.

  • Jones, C., & Esnault, L. (2004). The metaphor of networks in learning: communities, collaboration and practice. In S. Banks, P. Goodyear, V. Hodgson, C. Jones, V. Lally, D. McConnell, & C. Steeples (Eds.), Networked learning 2004. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Networked Learning 2004. Lancaster: Lancaster University and University of Sheffield pp 317–323. Retrieved 6th November, 2005 from: http://www.shef.ac.uk/nlc2004/Proceedings/Contents.htm.

  • Kaptelinin, V., & Hedestig. U. (2004). Facilitator's invisible expertise and supra-situational activities in a telelearning environment. In L. Dirckinck‐Holmfeld, B. Lindström, B. M. Svendsen, & M. Ponti (Eds.), Conditions for productive learning in networked learning environments. Aalborg: Aalborg University/Kaleidoscope. Retrieved 6th November 2005 from: http://www.ell.aau.dk/index.php?id=60.

  • Kaptelinin, V., Danielsson, K. & Hedestig. U. (2004). Towards learning-centered participatory design-main issues and challenges. In L. Dirckinck‐Holmfeld, B. Lindström, B. M. Svendsen, & M. Ponti (Eds.), Conditions for productive learning in networked learning environments. Aalborg: Aalborg University/Kaleidoscope. Retrieved 6th November 2005 from: http://www. ell.aau.dk/index.php?id=60.

  • Kirschner, P. A., Strijbos, J., & Martens, R. L. (2004). CSCL in higher education. In J.‐A., Strijbos, P. A. Kirschner, & R. L. Martens (Eds.), What we know about CSCL: And implementing it in higher education. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koschmann, T. (Ed.). (1996). CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Koschmann, T. (2001). Revisiting the paradigms of instructional technology. In G. Kennedy, M. Keppell, C. McNaught, & T. Petrovic (Eds.), Meeting at the crossroads. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 15–22). Melbourne: Biomedical Multimedia Unit, The University of Melbourne. Retrieved 6th November, 2005 from: http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/melbourne01/pdf/papers/koschmannt.pdf.

  • Kreijens, K., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004). Designing sociable CSCL environments. In J.‐A., Strijbos, P. A. Kirschner, & R. L. Martens (Eds.), What we know about CSCL: and implementing it in higher education. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, R., & Bayne, S. (2005). Screen or monitor? Surveillance and disciplinary power on online learning environments. In R. Land & S. Bayne (Eds.), Education in cyberspace (pp. 165–178). London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lash, S. (2001). Technological forms of life. Theory, Culture & Society, 18(1), 105–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning-legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontjew, A. N. (1977). Problemer i det psykiskes udvikling. København: Rhodos.

  • Lipponen, L. & Lallimo, J. (2004). From collaborative technology to collaborative use of technology: designing learning oriented infrastructures. Educational Media International, 41(2), 111–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Løgstrup, K. E. (1997). The ethical demand. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dam Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, B., & O'Day, V. (1999). Information ecologies: using technology with heart. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negt, O. (1975). Sociologisk fantasi og eksemplarisk indlæring. Roskilde: Roskilde University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A. (1990). The design of everyday things. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A. (1999). Affordance, convention and design. Interactions, 6(3), 38–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyvang, T. & Bygholm. (2004). Human centered informatics-the emergence of an educational infrastructure. In L. Dirckinck–Holmfeld, B. Lindström, B. M. Svendsen, & M. Ponti (Eds.), Conditions for productive learning in networked learning environments. Aalborg: Aalborg University/Kaleidoscope. Retrieved 6th November 2005 from: http://www.ell.aau.dk/index.php?id=60.

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organizations Science, 11(4), 404–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilkington, R. & Guldberg, K. (2004). Towards a networked community of learners and carers: The webautism project. In L. Dirckinck‐Holmfeld, B. Lindström, B. M. Svendsen, & M. Ponti (Eds.), Conditions for productive learning in networked learning environments. Aalborg: Aalborg University/Kaleidoscope. Retrieved 6th November 2005 from: http://www.ell.aau.dk/index.php?id=60.

  • Rasmussen, A. (2004). Computer‐mediated collaborative processes from an ethical perspective. In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, B. Lindström, B. M. Svendsen, & M. Ponti (Eds.). Conditions for productive learning in networked learning environments. Aalborg: Aalborg University/ Kaleidoscope. Retrieved 6th November 2005 from: http://www.ell.aau.dk/index.php?id=60.

  • Ryberg, T., & Ponti, M. (2004). Constructing place: The relationship between place-making and sociability in networked environments-a condition for productive learning environments. In L. Dirckinck‐Holmfeld, B. Lindström, B. M. Svendsen, & M. Ponti (Eds.). Conditions forproductive learning in networked learning environments. Aalborg: Aalborg University/Kaleidoscope. Retrieved 6th November 2005 from: http://www.ell.aau.dk/index.php?id=60.

  • Salmon G. (2000). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Säljö, R. (1999). Learning as the use of tools: a sociocultural perspective on the human technology link. In K. Littleton & P. Light (Eds.), Learning with computers: Analysing productive intervention. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. R. (1996). Social practices: A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. R., Cetina, K., & von Savigny, E. (Eds). (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge.

  • Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L., & Ruhleder, K. (1994). Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Complex problems in design and access for large-scale collaborative systems. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. New York: ACM.

  • Star, S. L., & Ruhleder. K. (1996). Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 111–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strijbos, J.‐A., Kirschner, P. A., and Martens, R. L. (Eds.). (2004). What we know about CSCL: And implementing it in higher education. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Svendsen, B. M., Ryberg, T., Nyvang, T., Semey, I., Buus, L & Dirckinck‐Holmfeld, L. (2004). Institutional and pedagogical criteria for productive open source learning environments. In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, B. Lindström, B. M. Svendsen & M. Ponti (Eds.), Conditions forproductive learning in networked learning environments. Aalborg: Aalborg University/Kaleidoscope. Retrieved 6th November 2005 from: http://www.ell.aau.dk/index.php?id=60.

  • Tolsby, H., Nyvang, T., & Dirckinck‐Holmfeld, L. (2002). A survey of technologies-supporting virtual project based learning. In S. Banks, P. Goodyear, V. Hodgson & D. McConnell (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Networked Learning. Retrieved 6th November 2005 from: http://www.shef.ac.uk/nlc2002/proceedings/papers/40.htm.

  • Urry, J. (2000). Sociology beyond societies: mobilities for the twenty-first century. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978) Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, B., Quan‐Haase, A., Boase, J., Chen, W., Hampton, K., Isla de Diaz, I., et al. (2003). The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked Individualism. JCMC, 8(3). Retrieved 7th November, 2005 from: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/issues.html.

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice-learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CSALT Department of Educational Research, Lancaster University, LA1 4YD, United Kingdom

    Chris Jones

  2. Aalborg University, Denmark

    Lone Dirckinck‐Holmfeld

  3. Gothenberg University, Sweden

    Berner Lindström

Authors
  1. Chris Jones
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lone Dirckinck‐Holmfeld
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Berner Lindström
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris Jones.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, C., Dirckinck‐Holmfeld, L. & Lindström, B. A relational, indirect, meso-level approach to CSCL design in the next decade. Computer Supported Learning 1, 35–56 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-006-6841-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-006-6841-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation