Abstract
In this paper, we analyze the distributional properties of the balance sheets of Icelandic firms by performing an empirical analysis of total assets, profit rates and growth rates using a data set of 2,818 Icelandic firms during the period 2000–2009. We find that the firms size measure, i.e. total assets, have the same heavy tail characteristics as various studies have shown, e.g. for US and Italian firms. The heavy tail nature of the total assets distribution seems to be robust w.r.t. a boom-bust cycle of the economy as well as special characteristics of Icelandic firms, e.g. their relatively small size and private ownership. Another important finding is that the profit rates, or return on assets, of Icelandic firms follow a Laplace like distribution similar to US firms. Additionally, we identified deviations from the distributional regularities, namely the power law behavior of firms’ size and Laplacian distributions of growth and profit rates, during the booming period of the economy 2005–2007.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alfarano S, Milakovic M (2008) Does classical competition explain the statistical features of firm growth. Econ Lett 101(3): 272–274
Alfarano S, Milakovic M, Irle A, Kauschke J (2012) A statistical equilibrium model of competitive firms. J Econ Dyn Control 36(1):136–149. doi:10.1016/j.jedc.2011.07.002; http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165188911001424
Atalay E, Hortasu A, Roberts J, Syverson C (2011) Network structure of production. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(13): 5199
Axtell R (2001) Zipf distribution of us firm sizes. Science 293(5536): 1818
Baek S, Bernhardsson S, Minnhagen P (2011) Zipf’s law unzipped. New J Phys 13: 043004
Bottazzi G, Secchi A (2006) Explaining the distribution of firm growth rates. RAND J Econ 37(2): 235–256
Champernowne D (1953) A model of income distribution. Econ J 83: 318–351
Cincotti S, Raberto M, Teglio A (2010) Credit money and macroeconomic instability in the agent-based model and simulator eurace. The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal 4(2010-26)
Cirillo P (2010) An analysis of the size distribution of Italian firms by age. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 389(3): 459–466
Cirillo P, Hüsler J (2009) On the upper tail of italian firms’ size distribution. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 388(8): 1546–1554
Clauset A, Shalizi C, Newman M (2009) Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Rev 51(4): 661–703
De Wit G (2005) Firm size distributions: an overview of steady-state distributions resulting from firm dynamics models. Int J Ind Org 23(5–6): 423–450
Delli Gatti D, Guilmi C, Gaffeo E, Giulioni G, Gallegati M, Palestrini A (2005) A new approach to business fluctuations: heterogeneous interacting agents, scaling laws and financial fragility. J Econ Behav Org 56(4): 489–512
Farmer J, Foley D (2009) The economy needs agent-based modelling. Nature 460(7256): 685–686
Gabaix X (2009) Power laws in economics and finance. Annu Rev Econ 1(1): 255–294
Gibrat R (1931) Les In覡lits Economique. Sirely, Paris
Goldstein M, Morris S, Yen G (2004) Problems with fitting to the power-law distribution. Eur Phys J B Condens Matter Complex Syst 41(2): 255–258
Ijiri Y, Simon HA (1974) Interpretations of departures from the pareto curve firm-size distributions. J Polit Econ 82(2): 315–331
Myers S (1984) The capital structure puzzle. J Financ 39(3): 575–592
Podobnik B, Horvatic D, Petersen A, Uroevi B, Stanley H (2010) Bankruptcy risk model and empirical tests. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(43): 18325
Puig P, Stephens M (2000) Tests of fit for the Laplace distribution, with applications. Technometrics 42(4): 417–424
Raberto M, Teglio A, Cincotti S (2012) Debt deleveraging and business cycles. An agent-based perspective. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal 6(2012-27), doi:10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2012-27
Scalas E, Gallegati M, Guerci E, Mas D, Tedeschi A (2006) Growth and allocation of resources in economics: the agent-based approach. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 370(1): 86–90
Simon H, Bonini C (1958) The size distribution of business firms. Am Econ Rev 48(4): 607–617
Smets F, Wouters R, Europeo BC (2002) An estimated stochastic dynamic general equilibrium model of the Euro area. European Central Bank, Frankfurt
Stanley M, Amaral LAN, Buldyrev SV, Leschhorn H, Maass P, Salinger M, Stanley HE (1996) Scaling behavior in the growth of companies. Nature 379: 804–806
Wagner F, Milaković M, Alfarano S (2010) Firm profitability and the network of organizational capabilities. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 389(21): 4769–4775
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Erlingsson, E.J., Alfarano, S., Raberto, M. et al. On the distributional properties of size, profit and growth of Icelandic firms. J Econ Interact Coord 8, 57–74 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-012-0103-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-012-0103-8