Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

6-DOF extension of memory-based passivation approach for stable haptic interaction

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Intelligent Service Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper extends previously proposed memory-based passivity approach (MBPA) to 6 degrees-of-freedom (DOF) haptic interactions. By introducing 6-DOF virtual proxy and virtual object, connected with haptic interaction point (HIP), we can extend MBPA to 6-DOF, including torque vs. orientation passivity. To find a passive relationship between positions vs. force graph, instead of position itself, we use position error between the center of mass of the virtual proxy and virtual object. For the angle vs. torque graph, we use angular displacement between the unit vector of the virtual proxy and virtual object instead of angle itself. After the extension, position/angular resolution became a problem, since it depends on configuration of the haptic device. Position resolution should be fixed, and real-time monitoring of every single position change is strongly required in previous MBPA. However, those are difficult requirements when the approach is extended to multi-DOF, especially 6-DOF including orientation. This paper revises the data saving procedure and force bounding mechanism to allow variable position resolution. Position value instead of simple incremental integer is saved together with matched force data into memory space, which allows to interpolate corresponding force value at the releasing trajectory even though it is not in the saved data list. This generalized framework of 6-DOF haptic rendering is evaluated according to simulation results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Salisbury JK, Brock D, Massie T, Swarup N, Zilles C (1995) Haptic rendering: programming touch interaction with virtual objects. In: Proc. of ACM Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, pp 123–130

  2. Colgate JE, Schenkel GG (1994) Passivity of a class of sampled-data systems: application to haptic interfaces. In: Proc. of American Control Conference

  3. Colgate JE, Brown JM (1994) Factors affecting the z-width of a haptic display. In: Proceedings of IEEE Int. Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp 3205–3210

  4. Hannaford B, Ryu J-H (2002) Time domain passivity control of haptic interfaces. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 18(1):1–10

  5. Gosline AHC, Hayward V (2008) Eddy current brakes for haptic interfaces: design, identification, and control. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 13(6):669–677

  6. Srikanth MB, Vasudevan H, Muniyandi M (2008) DC motor damping: a strategy to increase passive stiffness of haptic device. In: Ferre M (ed) Haptics: Perception, Devices and Scenarios, EuroHaptics, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5024. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 53–62

  7. Do TH, Ryu JH (2011) Memory based passivation method for stable haptic interaction. In: IEEE World Haptics Conference, pp 409–414

  8. Ryu JH, Yoon M-Y (2013) Memory-based passivation approach for stable haptic interaction. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron, pp 1–12

  9. Colgate JE, Stanley MC, Brown JM (2005) Issues in the haptic display of tool use, in WHC’05. In: Proceedings of the First Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic interfaces for virtual environment and teleoperator systems), 21(5):952–964

  10. Ellis RE, Sarkar N, Jenkins MA (1996) Numerical methods for the haptic presentation of contact: theory, simulations, and experiments. Proc ASME Dyn Syst Control Div 58:413–420

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gillespie B, Cutkosky M (1996) Stable user-specific haptic rendering of the virtual wall. Proc ASME Conf 58:397–406

    Google Scholar 

  12. Basdogan C, Laycock SD, Day AM, Patoglu V, Gillespie RB (2007) 3-Dof haptic rendering. In: Lin MC, Otaduy M (eds). Haptic Rendering. A.K. Peters, USA, pp 311–333

  13. Paul RP, Zhang H (1986) Computationally efficient kinematics for manipulators with spherical wrists. Int J Robot Res 5(2):3244

    Google Scholar 

  14. Corke P, Armstrong-Helouvry B (1994) A search for consensus among model parameters reported for the PUMA 560 robot. In: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, (San Diego), pp 1608–1613

  15. Corke P, Armstrong-Helouvry B (1995) A meta-study of PUMA 560 dynamics: a critical appraisal of literature data. Robotica 13(3):253–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Willems JC (1972) Dissipative dynamical systems, part I: general theory. Arch Rat Mech Anal 45:321–351

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Yasrebi N, Constantinescu D (2013) Passive multirate wave communications for haptic interaction in slow virtual environments. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 18(1):328–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. van der Schaft AJ (2000) L2-gain and passivity techniques in nonlinear control. In: Communications and Control Engineering, 2nd edn. Springer, London

  19. Armstrong B, Khatib O, Burdick J (1986) The explicit dynamic model and inertial parameters of the Puma 560 arm. In: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation 1, pp 510–518

  20. Preusche C, Hirzinger G, Ryu JH, Hannaford B (2003) Time domain passivity control for 6 degrees of freedom haptic display. In: IEEE/RSJ International conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, vol 3. Las Vegas, pp 2944–2949

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was partially supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIP) (No. NRF-2013R1A2A1A03069658), and also this research was partially supported by the project “Development of core technologies for underwater construction robots including a light work class ROV,” funded by Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, South Korea.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Korea University of Technology and Education (KOREATECH), 1600, Chungjeol-ro, Byeongcheon-myeon, Dongnam-gu, Cheonan-si, Chungcheongnam-do, Republic of Korea

    Aghil Jafari & Jee-Hwan Ryu

Authors
  1. Aghil Jafari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jee-Hwan Ryu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jee-Hwan Ryu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jafari, A., Ryu, JH. 6-DOF extension of memory-based passivation approach for stable haptic interaction. Intel Serv Robotics 8, 23–34 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-014-0161-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-014-0161-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation