Abstract
Purpose
The application of soil conditioner has become one of the most important strategies to reduce nitrogen (N) losses from agricultural fields. However, it is still unclear about the effect of conditioners on soil profile N accumulation and crop N utilization under different irrigation levels.
Materials and methods
In this study, the effects of combination of N fertilizer (255 kg/ha) and different doses of soil conditioner (mixture of anionic polyacrylamide, polyvinyl alcohol, and manganese sulfate) (0 (N), 0.008 (P1N), 0.016 (P2N), and 0.024 (P3N) g/kg) on soil - oat crop N transport and oat crop N utilization were explored under different irrigation levels (conventional irrigation volume (4.1 × 106 L/ha), W100; 80% of the conventional irrigation volume (3.28 × 106 L/ha), W80).
Results and discussion
The combination of conditioner and N fertilizer increased soil capillary moisture capacity (CWC), field capacity (FC), total porosity (TP), and capillary porosity (CP) in the 0–40 cm (W80) and 20–60 cm (W100) soil layers, and reduced non-capillary porosity (N-CP) of the 0–40 cm soil layer (W100). Besides, it also positively affected the total N storage (STN) and nitrate N storage (SNN) in the 0–80 cm soil layer, especially under the W100 condition (the STN and SNN in the combination treatments of conditioner and N fertilizer (P1N, P2N, and P3N) increased by 5.5%–9.2% and 14.6%–16.3%, respectively compared with those in the single N treatment). Correlation analysis of N fractions and soil physical properties showed that STN was significantly positively correlated with CP; SNN was significantly negatively correlated with CP under the W80 condition, but there was no significant correlation between them under the W100 condition. Finally, the combination of different doses of conditioner and N fertilizer increased grain N accumulation and oat yield, especially under the W80 condition.
Conclusions
The addition of conditioner had a higher N loss risk under the W100 condition than under the W80 condition, although it was beneficial to reducing N loss (31.8%–32.2%) and increasing inorganic N accumulation (14.5%–16.0%) during the reproductive period. We suggest that the combination of 12 kg/ha conditioner, 255 kg/ha N, and 80% of the conventional irrigation volume could be widely used to increase oat crop yield and reduce production cost and environmental pollution risk in the study area.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data during the study are available from the first author / corresponding author (Xiaoming Tian, txm7458103@163.com) by request.
References
Agegnehu G, Nelson PN, Bird MI et al (2016) Crop yield, plant nutrient uptake and soil physicochemical properties under organic soil amendments and nitrogen fertilization on Nitisols. Soil till Res 160:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.02003
Ao C, Yang PL, Zeng WZ et al (2019) Impact of raindrop diameter and polyacrylamide application on runoff, soil and nitrogen loss via raindrop splashing. Geoderma 353:372–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.07026
Bao SD (2008) Soil and Agricultural Chemistry Analysis. China Agriculture Press, Beijing
Cai DQ, Wu ZY, Jiang J et al (2014) Controlling nitrogen migration through micro-nano networks. Sci Rep-uk 4:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep03665
Chen J, Xiao W, Zheng C et al (2020) Nitrogen addition has contrasting effects on particulate and mineral-associated soil organic carbon in a subtropical forest. Soil Biol Biochem 142:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107708
Chen Y, Liu X, Hou Y et al (2019) Particulate organic carbon is more vulnerable to nitrogen addition than mineral-associated organic carbon in soil of an alpine meadow. Plant Soil 458(1/2):93–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.12101
Elliott GD, Cathryn AO, Margaret MR et al (2018) Influence of co-application of nitrogen with phosphorus, potassium and sulphur on the apparent efficiency of nitrogen fertilizer use, grain yield and protein content of wheat: review. Field Crop Res 149(2):56–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2018.07010
El-naggar A, Lee SS, Awady M et al (2018) Influence of soil properties and feed stocks on biochar potential for carbon mineralization and improvement of infertile soils. Geoderma 332:100–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.06017
Fan Z, Tian XF, Zhai S et al (2022a) Co-application of controlled-release urea and a superabsorbent polymer to improve nitrogen and water use in maize. Arch Agron Soil Sci 68(7):914–928. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2020.1862803
Fan Z, Zhao Y, Chen H et al (2022b) Effects of Irrigation and Polymer-Coated Urea on Water-Nitrogen Productivity and Yield of Winter Wheat. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 22:4717–4726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-022-00954-1
Geng M, Liu WX, Li SS et al (2019) Determining the optimal N input to improve grain yield and quality in winter wheat with reduced apparent N loss in the North China Plain. Front plant sci 10:181. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00181
Hansen V, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Petersen CT et al (2016) Effects of gasification biochar on plant-available water capacity and plant growth in two contrasting soil types. Soil till Res 161:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.03002
Heitkötter J, Niebuhr J, Heinze S et al (2017) Patterns of nitrogen and citric acid induced changes in C-turnover and enzyme activities are different in topsoil and subsoils of a sandy Cambisol. Geoderma 292:111–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.01017
Islam MR, Xue X, Mao S et al (2011a) Effects of water-saving superabsorbent polymer on antioxidant enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation in oat (Avena sativa L.) under drought stress. J Sci Food Agr 91(4):680–686. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.4234
Islam MR, Xue X, Li S et al (2011b) Effectiveness of Water-Saving Superabsorbent Polymer in Soil Water Conservation for Oat Based on Ecophysiological Parameter. Commun Soil Sci Plan 42(19):2322–2333. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2011.605490
Ju XT, Xing GX, Chen XP et al (2009) Reducing environmental risk by improving N management in intensive Chinese agricultural systems. P Natl Acad Sci USA 106(9):3041–3046. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0902655106
Kang J, Mclaughlin RA, Amoozegar A et al (2015) Transport of dissolved polyacrylamide through a clay loam soil. Geoderma 243:108–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.12022
Krauth DM, Bouldin JL, Green VS et al (2008) Evaluation of a polyacrylamide soil additive to reduce agricultural-associated contamination. B Environ Contam Tox 81(2):116–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-008-9448-z
Kumar A, Saha A (2011) Effect of polyacrylamide and gypsum on surface runoff, sediment yield and nutrient losses from steep slopes. Agr Water Manage 98:999–1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2011.01007
Li SX, Wang ZH, Hu TT et al (2009) Nitrogen in dryland soils of China and its management. Adv Agron 101:123–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)00803-1
Li Y, Liu H, Huang G (2016) The effect of nitrogen rates on yields and nitrogen use efficiencies during four years of wheat-maize rotation cropping seasons. Agron J 108(5):2076–2088. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2015.0610
Liu K, Du J, Zhong Y et al (2021) The response of potato tuber yield, nitrogen uptake, soil nitrate nitrogen to different nitrogen rates in red soil. Sci Rep-uk 11:22506. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02086-5
Liu T, Yang JH, Wang HY et al (2022a) Effects of molecular weight of polyaspartic acid on nitrogen use efficiency and crop yield. J Sci Food Agr 102:7343–7352. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.12101
Liu TT, Han FL, Xing ZB et al (2022b) Effects of different factors on fly ash-based functional soil and its oat grass cultivation. Front Plant Sci 13:1048101. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1048101
Matthews AM, Armstrong AC, Leeds-Harrison PB et al (2000) Development and testing of a model for predicting tillage effects on nitrate leaching from cracked clay soils. Soil till Res 53:245–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(99)00109-9
Mon J, Bronson KF, Hunsaker DJ et al (2016) Interactive effects of nitrogen fertilization and irrigation on grain yield, canopy temperature, and nitrogen use efficiency in overhead sprinkler-irrigated durum wheat. Field Crop Res 191:54–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.02011
Mueller ND, Gerber J, S., Johnstion, M., et al (2012) Closing yield gaps through nutrient and water management. Nature 490(7419):254–325. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11420
Nelson KA, Paniagua SM, Motavalli PP (2009) Effect of Polymer Coated Urea, Irrigation, and Drainage on Nitrogen Utilization and Yield of Corn in a Claypan Soil. Agron J. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2008.0201
Pamela C, Louise N, Joseph WK et al (2014) Agricultural uses of plant bio stimulants. Plant Soil 383:3–41.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2131-8
Patil MD, Das BS, Bhadoria PBS (2011) A simple bund plugging technique for improving water productivity in wetland rice. Soil till Res 112(1):66–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2010.11010
Saha A, Rattan B, Sreedeep S et al (2020a) Effect of Water absorbing polymer amendment on Water retention properties of cohesionless soil. Advances in Computer Methods and Geomechanics. Springer, Singapore, pp. 185–195
Saha A, Sekharan S, Manna U (2020b) Superabsorbent hydrogel (SAH) as a soil amendment for drought management: A review. Soil Till Res 204:104736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2020.104736
Sekharan S, Gadi VK, Bordoloi S et al (2019) Sustainable geotechnics: a bio-geotechnical perspective. Frontiers in Geotechnical Engineering. Springer, Singapore, pp. 313–331
Sepaskhah AR, Shahabizad V (2010) Effects of water quality and PAM application rate on the control of soil erosion, water infiltration and runoff for different soil textures measured in a rainfall simulator. Biosyst Eng 106:513–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2010.05019
Sojka RE, Bjorneberg DL, Entry JA et al (2007) Polyacrylamide in agriculture and environmental land management. Adv Agron 92:75–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(04)92002-0
Soupir ML, Mostaghimi S, Masters A et al (2004) Effectiveness of polyacrylamide (PAM) in improving runoff water quality from construction sites. Am Water Resour Assoc 40(1):53–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2004.tb01009.x
Tarkalson DD, Payero JO, Ensley SM et al (2006) Nitrate accumulation and movement under deficit irrigation in soil receiving cattle manure and commercial fertilizer. Agr Water Manage 85(1/2):201–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2006.04005
Tian L, Liu JH, Zhang S et al (2022) Effects of strip cropping with reducing row spacing and super absorbent polymer on yield and water productivity of oat (Avena sativa L.) under drip irrigation in Inner Mongolia, China. Sci Rep 12:11441. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15418-w
Vicensi M, Lopes C, Koszalka V et al (2020) Soil Fertility, Root and Aboveground Growth of Black Oat Under Gypsum and Urea Rates in No Till. J Soil Sci Plant Nut 3(20):1271–1286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-020-00211-3
Wang L, Liu S, Ma G et al (2022) Soil organic carbon and nitrogen storage under a wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)-maize (Zea mays L.) cropping system in northern China was modified by nitrogen application rates. PeerJ 10:e13568. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13568
Wang SQ, Wei SC, Liang HY et al (2019) Nitrogen stock and leaching rates in a thick vadose zone below areas of long-term nitrogen fertilizer application in the North China Plain: A future groundwater quality threat. J Hydrol 576:28–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.06012
Wang Z, Zong H, Zheng H et al (2015a) Reduced nitrification and abundance of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in acidic soil amended with biochar. Chemosphere 138:576–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.06084
Wang ZH, Miao YF, Li SX (2015b) Effect of ammonium and nitrate nitrogen fertilizers on wheat yield in relation to accumulated nitrate at different depths of soil in drylands of China. Field Crop Res 183:211–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.07019
Weihermüller L, Siemens J, Deurer M et al (2017) In Situ Soil Water Extraction: A Review. J Environ Qual 36(6):1735–1748. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2007.0218
Wu Y, Li F, Zheng HC et al (2019) Effects of three types of soil amendments on yield and soil nitrogen balance of maize–wheat rotation system in the Hetao Irrigation Area, China. J Arid Land 904–915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-019-0005-x
Xu ZZ, Yu ZW, Wang D et al (2005) Nitrogen accumulation and translocation for winter wheat under different irrigation regimes. J Agron Crop Sci 191:439–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2005.00178.x
Zeineldin FI, Al-Molhim Y (2021) Polymer and deficit irrigation influence on water use efficiency and yield of muskmelon under surface and subsurface drip irrigation. Soil Water Res 16(3):191–203. https://doi.org/10.17221/94/2020-SWR
Zheng H, Wang Z, Deng X et al (2013) Impacts of adding biochar on nitrogen retention and bioavailability in agricultural soil. Geoderma 206(9):32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.04.018
Funding
Thanks for the financial supports from the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei (D2020405002), the S&T Program of Hebei (21326405D), and the Hebei North University Project (JYT2021003).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Responsible editor: Zhaoliang Song
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Tian, X., Suo, W., Wang, J. et al. Effects of soil conditioner on soil-crop nitrogen transport and crop nitrogen utilization under different irrigation levels in China. J Soils Sediments 23, 3806–3819 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-023-03592-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-023-03592-x