Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Coupled effects of biochar use and farming practice on physical properties of a salt-affected soil with wheat–maize rotation

  • Biochar and Agricultural Sustainability (SI APBC 2018)
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Being carbon-rich and porous, biochar has the potential to improve soil physical properties, so does conventional farming practice. Here, a field trial was conducted to investigate the combined effects of biochar use and farming practice on the physical properties of a salt-affected compact soil for wheat–maize rotation in the Yellow River Delta region.

Materials and methods

Salix fragilis L. was used as feedstock to produce biochar in the field via aerobic carbonization at an average temperature of 502 °C, terminated by a water mist spray, for use as a soil amendment at 0, 1, 2, and 4 g kg−1 doses (CK, T1, T2, and T3, respectively). Farming practices included rotary tillage/straw returning for wheat sowing, spring irrigation, no-tillage seeding of maize, and autumn irrigation. Both cutting ring and composite samples of the soil were collected at four stages of wheat–maize rotation (22, 238, 321, and 382 d after the benchmark date of land preparation for wheat sowing) for the determination of soil properties by established methods.

Results and discussion

Rotary tillage/straw returning reduced soil bulk density (BD) from 1.48 to 1.27 g cm−3 (CK) and 1.14 g cm−3 (T3) and increased saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) from 0.05 × 10−5 to 0.75 × 10−5 cm s−1 (CK) and 1.25 × 10−5 cm s−1 (T3). This tillage effect on BD and Ks gradually disappeared due to the disturbance from the subsequent farming practice. Biochar use lessened the disturbance. At maize harvest, BD was 1.47 (CK) vs. 1.34 g cm−3 (T3), and Ks was 0.06 × 10−5 (CK) vs. 0.28 × 10−5 cm s−1(T3); in comparison with CK, T3 increased Na+ leaching by 65%, Cl− leaching by 98%, organic carbon content by 40.3%, and water-stable aggregates (0.25–2 mm) by 38%, indicating an improvement in soil properties.

Conclusions

Biochar use and rotary tillage improved soil physical properties (BD, Ks) and favored soil aeration, water filtration, and salt leaching, which further helped the accumulation of soil organic carbon, the formation of water-stable aggregates, and the amelioration of salt-affected compact soil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajayi AE, Holthusen D, Horn R (2016) Changes in microstructural behavior and hydraulic functions of biochar amended soils. Soil Tillage Res 155:166-175

    Google Scholar 

  • Alghamdi AG (2018) Biochar as a potential soil additive for improving soil physical properties—a review. Arab J Geosci 11(24):755-776

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Wabel M, Hussain Q, Usman ARA, Ahmad M, Abduljabbar A, Sallam AS, Ok YS (2018) Impact of biochar properties on soil conditions and agricultural sustainability: a review. Land Degrad Dev 29(7):2124-2161

    Google Scholar 

  • Asai H, Samson BK, Stephan HM, Songyikhangsuthor K, Homma K, Kiyono Y, Horie T (2009) Biochar amendment techniques for upland rice production in Northern Laos 1. Soil physical properties, leaf SPAD and grain yield. Field Crop Res 111(1):81-84

    Google Scholar 

  • Baiamonte G, Crescimanno G, Parrino F, Pasquale CD (2019) Effect of biochar on the physical and structural properties of a desert sandy soil. Catena 175:294-303

    Google Scholar 

  • Bao SD (2000) Soil agrochemical analysis, 3rd edn. China Agriculture Press, Beijing, pp 187-188 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell P, Reithmuller G, Collins M (2009) Biochar application to soil. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Earthscan, London, pp 207-226

    Google Scholar 

  • Blancocanqui H (2017) Biochar and soil physical properties. Soil Sci Soc Am J 81(4):687-711

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burrell LD, Zehetner F, Rampazzo N, Wimmer B, Soja G (2016) Long-term effects of biochar on soil physical properties. Geoderma 282:96-102

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chaganti VN, Crohn DM, Šimůnek J (2015) Leaching and reclamation of a biochar and compost amended saline-sodic soil with moderate SAR reclaimed water. Agric Water Manag 158:255-265

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong XL, Guan TY, Li GT, Li QM, Zhao XR (2016) Long-term effects of biochar amount on the content and composition of organic matter in soil aggregates under field conditions. J Soils Sediments 16(5):1481-1497

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Downie A, Crosky A, Munroe P (2009) Physical properties of biochar. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Earthscan, London, pp 13-29

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott ET (1986) Aggregate structure and carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in native and cultivated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50(3):627-633

    Google Scholar 

  • Githinji L (2014) Effect of biochar application rate on soil physical and hydraulic properties of a sandy loam. Arch Agron Soil Sci 60(4):457-470

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herath HMSK, Camps-Arbestain M, Hedley M (2013) Effect of biochar on soil physical properties in two contrasting soils: an Alfisol and an Andisol. Geoderma 209-210:188-197

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim A, Usman ARA, Al-Wabel MI, Nadeem M, Ok YS, Al-Omran A (2016) Effects of conocarpus biochar on hydraulic properties of calcareous sandy soil: influence of particle size and application depth. Arch Agron Soil Sci 63(2):185-197

    Google Scholar 

  • International Humic Substances Society. Acidic functional groups of IHSS samples. http://humic-substances.org/acidic-functional-groups-of-ihss-samples/. Accessed on 20 Jun 2019

  • Khademalrasoul A, Naveed M, Heckrath G, Kumari KGID, Jonge LWD, Elsgaard L, Voge HJ, Iversen BV (2014) Biochar effects on soil aggregate properties under no-till maize. Soil Sci 179(6):273-283

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J, Joseph S (2009) Biochar for environmental management: an introduction. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Earthscan, London, pp 1-12

    Google Scholar 

  • Li R, Jiang CS, Hao QJ (2015) Impact of land utilization pattern on distributing characters of labile organic carbon in soil aggregates on Jinyun Mountain. Environ Sci 36(9):3429-3437 (in Chinese, with English abstract)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Dugan B, Masiello CA, Barnes RT, Gallagher ME, Gonnermann HM (2016) Impacts of biochar concentration and particle size on hydraulic conductivity and DOC leaching of biochar-sand mixtures. J Hydrol 533:461-472

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu ZL, Dugan B, Masiello CA, Gonnermann HM (2017) Biochar particle size, shape, and porosity act together to influence soil water properties. PLoS One 12(6):e0179079

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu RK (1999) Analytical methods for soil and agricultural chemistry, vol 107-108. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, p 269 (in Chinese)

  • Luo XX, Liu GC, Xia Y, Chen L, Jiang ZX, Zheng H, Wang ZY (2017) Use of biochar-compost to improve properties and productivity of the degraded coastal soil in the Yellow River Delta, China. J Soils Sediments 17(3):780-789

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Major J, Lehmann J, Rondon M, Goodale C (2010) Fate of soil-applied black carbon: downward migration, leaching and soil respiration. Glob Chang Biol 16:1366-1379

    Google Scholar 

  • McBeath AV, Smernik RJ, Krull ES, Lehmann J (2014) The influence of feedstock and production temperature on biochar carbon chemistry: a solid-state 13-C NMR study. Biomass Bioenergy 60:121-129

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee A, Lal R (2013) Biochar impacts on soil physical properties and greenhouse gas emissions. Agronomy 3(2):313-339

    Google Scholar 

  • Obia A, Mulder J, Martinsen V, Maizeelissen G, Borresen T (2016) In situ effects of biochar on aggregation, water retention and porosity in light-textured tropical soils. Soil Tillage Res 155:35-44

    Google Scholar 

  • Omondi MO, Xia X, Nahayo A, Liu XY, Korai PK, Pan GX (2016) Quantification of biochar effects on soil hydrological properties using meta-analysis of literature data. Geoderma 274:28-34

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang L, Wang F, Tang J, Zhang R (2013) Effects of biochar amendment on soil aggregates and hydraulic properties. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 13(4):991-1002

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietikäinen J, Kiikkilä O, Fritze H (2000) Charcoal as a habitat for microbes and its effect on the microbial community of the underlying humus. Oikos 89:231-242

    Google Scholar 

  • Saifullah DS, Naeem A, Rengel Z, Naidu R (2018) Biochar application for the remediation of salt-affected soils: challenges and opportunities. Sci Total Environ 625:320-335

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shabangu S, Woolf D, Fisher EM, Angenent LT, Lehmann J (2014) Techno-economic assessment of biomass slow pyrolysis into different biochar and methanol concepts. Fuel 117:742-748

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shackley S, Hammond J, Gaunt J, Ibarrola R (2011) The feasibility and costs of biochar deployment in the UK. Carbon Manag 2(3):335-356

    Google Scholar 

  • Shao MA, Wang QJ, Huang MB (2006) Soil physics. Beijing: Higher Education Press, pp 37-38, 84, 142 (in Chinese)

  • Simon S, Jim H, John J, Rodrigo I (2011) The feasibility and costs of biochar deployment in the UK. Carbon Manag 2(3):335-356

    Google Scholar 

  • Six J, Bossuyt H, Degryze S, Denef K (2004) A history of research on the link between (micro) aggregates, soil biota, and soil organic carbon dynamics. Soil Tillage Res 79:7-31

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun JN, Yang RY, Li WX, Pan YH, Zheng MZ, Zhang ZH (2018) Effect of biochar amendment on water infiltration in a coastal saline soil. J Soils Sediments 18:3271-3279

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wei J, Tu C, Yuan GD, Wang HL, Zhang LJ, Theng BKG (2019a) Pyrolysis temperature-dependent changes in the characteristics of biochar-borne dissolved organic matter and its copper binding properties. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 103:169-174

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wei J, Tu C, Yuan GD, Liu Y, Bi DX, Xiao L, Lu J, Theng BKG, Wang HL, Zhang LJ, Zhang XZ (2019b) Assessing the effect of pyrolysis temperature on the molecular properties and copper sorption capacity of a halophyte biochar. Environ Pollut 251:56-65

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wei J, Tu C, Yuan GD, Zhou YQ, Wang HL, Lu J (2019c) Limited Cu (II) binding to biochar DOM: evidence from C K-edge NEXAFS and EEM-PARAFAC combined with two-dimensional correlation analysis. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134919

  • Xiao L, Yuan GD, Bi DX, Wei J, Shen GH (2019a) Equipment and technology of field preparation of biochars from agricultural and forest residues under aerobic conditions with water-fire coupled method. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng 35(11):239-244 (in Chinese, with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao L, Feng LR, Yuan GD, Wei J (2019b) Low-cost field production of biochars and their properties. Environ Geochem Health:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-019-00458-5

  • Xie WJ, Wu LF, Zhang YP, Wu T, Li XP, Ouyang Z (2017) Effects of straw application on coastal saline topsoil salinity and wheat yield trend. Soil Tillage Res 169:1-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu GX, Wang ZF, Gao M, Tian D, Huang R, Liu J, Li JC (2018) Effects of straw and biochar return in soil on soil aggregate and carbon sequestration. Environ Sci 39(1):355-362 (in Chinese, with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan GD, Theng BKG (2012) Clay-organic interactions in soil environments. In: Huang PM, Sumner M, Li YC (eds) Handbook of soil science: resource management and environmental impacts, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, pp 2-1-2-20

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang TT, Zeng SL, Gao Y, Ouyang ZT, Li B, Fang CM, Zhao B (2011) Assessing impact of land uses on land salinization in the Yellow River Delta, China using an integrated and spatial statistical model. Land Use Policy 28(4):857-866

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang T, Wang T, Liu KS, Wang LX, Zhou Y (2015) Effects of different amendments for the reclamation of coastal saline soil on soil nutrient dynamics and electrical conductivity responses. Agric Water Manag 159:115-122

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Wang JW, Wang SQ, Xing GX (2014) Successive straw biochar application as a strategy to sequester carbon and improve fertility: a pot experiment with two rice/wheat rotations in paddy soil. Plant Soil 378(1-2):279-294

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng H, Wang X, Chen L, Wang Z, Xia Y, Zhang Y, Wang H, Luo X, Xing B (2017) Enhanced growth of halophyte plants in biochar-amended coastal soil: roles of nutrient availability and rhizosphere microbial modulation. Plant Cell Environ 41(3):517-553

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by grants from the Chinese National Key Research and Development Program (2016YFD0200303), and Key Research and Development Program of Shandong Province (2016CYJS05A01).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yantai, 264003, Shandong, China

    Liang Xiao, Lirong Feng, Dongxue Bi & Jing Wei

  2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China

    Liang Xiao, Lirong Feng & Dongxue Bi

  3. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Health and Land Resource, Zhaoqing University, Zhaoqing, 526061, Guangdong, China

    Guodong Yuan & Guanhua Shen

  4. Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, 250000, Shandong, China

    Zhaohui Liu

Authors
  1. Liang Xiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guodong Yuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lirong Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dongxue Bi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jing Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Guanhua Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Zhaohui Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guodong Yuan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Not applicable. This article does not involve any individuals.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Yong Sik Ok

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiao, L., Yuan, G., Feng, L. et al. Coupled effects of biochar use and farming practice on physical properties of a salt-affected soil with wheat–maize rotation. J Soils Sediments 20, 3053–3061 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-020-02616-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-020-02616-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation