Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Forms and buffering potential of aluminum in tropical and subtropical acid soils cultivated with Pinus taeda L

  • Soils, Sec 3 • Remediation and Management of Contaminated or Degraded Lands • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Several interactions between Al and the solid phase of soil influence Al buffering in soil solution. This work evaluated soils cultivated with Pinus taeda L. to determine Al forms in organic and mineral horizons using various extraction methods and to relate acidity with clay mineralogy.

Materials and methods

Organic and mineral horizons of 10 soil profiles (up to 2.1 m deep) in southern Brazil were sampled. Organic horizons were separated into fresh, aged, and fermented/humified litter. The following Al extraction methods were utilized: 0.5 mol L−1 pH 2.8 CuCl2–Al complexed in organic matter; 1.0 mol L−1 KCl–exchangeable Al; water–Al soluble in soil solution; HF concentrated + HNO3 concentrated + H2O2 30% (v/v)–total Al. Six sequential extractions were carried out to isolate different forms of amorphous minerals that can buffer Al on soil solution: 0.05 and 0.1 mol L−1 sodium pyrophosphate; 0.1 and 0.2 mol L−1 ammonium oxalate; 0.25 and 0.5 mol L−1 NaOH. Samples of clay were also analyzed by XRD.

Results and discussion

There was a clear effect of litter age on increasing total Al concentration. In the aged litter and fermented and/or humified litter, levels of total Al were 1.4 to 3.8 and 1.5 to 7.8 times greater than in fresh litter, respectively. The CuCl2 method had higher Al extraction capacity than the KCl method for litter. The lowest Al–pyrophosphate values were observed in the Oxisol, which also had a predominance of gibbsite and the lowest levels of Al–KCl and Al–CuCl2. There was an inverse relationship between degree of soil weathering and soluble and exchangeable Al in soils. Available Al increased with higher Si proportion in minerals of the clay fraction (2:1 > 1:1 > 0:1).

Conclusions

The worst scenario was soils with the combination of high soluble and exchangeable Al levels and high concentrations of amorphous forms of Al minerals. The best predictors of Al accumulation in the youngest litter horizon were extractions of amorphous minerals with pyrophosphate and NaOH. These extractors are normally used to predict the level of Al buffering in soils. Organic matter had less influence on Al dynamics in soils.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bloom PR, McBride MB, Weaver RM (1979) Aluminum organic matter in acid soils: salt–extractable aluminum. Soil Sci Soc Am J 43:813–815

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brunner I, Sperisen C (2013) Aluminum exclusion and aluminum tolerance in woody plants. Front Plant Sci 4:172–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren RA (1994) Quantification of allophane and imogolite. In: Amonette JE, Zelazny LW (eds) Quantitative methods in soil mineralogy. Soil Science Society of America, Madson, pp 430–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Eimil-Fraga C, Álvarez-Rodríguez E, Rodríguez-Soalleiro R, Fernández-Sanjurjo MJ (2015) Influence of parent material on the aluminium fractions in acidic soils under Pinus pinaster in Galicia (NW Spain). Geoderma 255:50–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Embrapa – Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (1997) Handbook of analysis of soil methods, 2nd edn. Embrapa/CNPS, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

    Google Scholar 

  • Foy CD, Fleming AL (1978) The physiology of plant tolerance to excess available aluminum and manganese in acid soils. In: Jung GA (ed) Crop tolerance to suboptimal land conditions, ASA spec Publ 32. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, pp 301–328. https://doi.org/10.2134/asaspecpub32.c14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • García-Rodeja E, Nóvoa JC, Pontevedra X, Martínez-Cortizas A, Buurman P (2004) Aluminium fractionation of European volcanic soils by selective dissolution techniques. Catena 56:155–183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gee GW, Bauder JW (1986) Particle–size analysis. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis part 1: physical and mineralogical methods. ASA, Madison, pp 383–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Goya J, Pérez C, Fernández R (2008) Concentración foliar de nutrientes en plantaciones de diferentes edades de Pinus taeda L. en el norte de Misiones, Argentina. XIII Jornadas Técnicas Forestales y Ambientales, UNAM–INTA. Eldorado, Misiones, Argentina. ISSN,16685385

  • Hargrove WL, Thomas GW (1984) Extraction of aluminum from aluminum–organic matter in relation to titratable acidity. Soil Sci Soc Am J 48:1458–1460

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson ML, Lim CH, Zelazny LW (1986) Oxides, hydroxides, and aluminosilicates. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis part 1: physical and mineralogical methods. ASA, Madison, pp 101–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonczak J (2012) Effect of pine admixture in a beech stand on the intensity of dissolved organic carbon, iron and aluminium leaching from organic and humic horizons of dystric Arenosols. For Res Pap 73:143–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Juo ASR, Kamprath EJ (1979) Copper chloride as an extractant for estimating the potentially reactive aluminum pool in acid soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 43:35–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkland DL, Hajek BF (1972) Formula derivation of Al–interlayered vermiculite in selected soil clays. Soil Sci 114:317–322

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay WL (1979) Chemical equilibria in soils. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins AP, Reissmann CB (2007) Plant material and laboratory routines in chemical-analytical procedures. Sci Agrár 8:56–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehra OP, Jackson ML (1960) Iron oxide removal from soils and clays by a ditionite–citrate system buffered with sodium bicarbonate. Clay Miner 7:317–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melo VF, Schaefer CE, Novais RF, Singh B, Fontes MPF (2002) Potassium and magnesium in clay minerals of some Brazilian soils as indicated by a sequential extraction procedure. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 33:2203–2225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mendonça T, Melo VF, Alleoni LR, Schaefer CE, Michel RF (2013) Lead adsorption in the clay fraction of two soil profiles from Fildes peninsula, King George Island. Antarct Sci 25:389–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mládková L, Boruvka L, Drábek O (2004) Distribution of aluminium among its mobilizable forms in soils of the Jizera mountains region. Plant Soil Environ 50:346–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poggere GC, Melo VF, Francelino MR, Schaefer CE, Simas FN (2016) Characterization of products of the early stages of pedogenesis in ornithogenic soil from maritime Antarctica. Eur J Soil Sci 67:70–78

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poggere GC, Melo VF, Curi N, Schaefer CE, Francelino MR (2017) Adsorption and desorption of lead by low–crystallinity colloids of Antarctic soils. Appl Clay Sci 146:371–379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poppe LJ, Paskevich VF, Hathaway JC, Blackwood DS (2004) A laboratory manual for X–ray powder diffraction. US Geological Survey Open–File Report. US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey, Woods Hole

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabel DO, Motta ACV, Barbosa JZ, Melo VF, Prior ST (2018) Depth distribution of exchangeable aluminum in acid soils: a study from subtropical Brazil. Acta Sci Agron 40:39320. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v40i1.39320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos MR, Melo VF, Uhlmann A, Dedecek RA, Curcio GR (2015) Clay mineralogy and genesis of fragipan in soils from Southeast Brazil. Catena 135:22–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwertmann U (1973) Use of oxalate for Fe extraction from soils. Can J Soil Sci 53:244–246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silva S (2012) Aluminium toxicity targets in plants. J Bot 2012:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/219462

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tarì G, Bobos I, Gomes CSF, Ferreira JMF (1999) Modification of surface charge properties during kaolinite to halloysite–7Å transformation. J Colloid Interface Sci 210:360–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tejnecký V, Drábek O, Borůvka L, Nikodem A, Kopáč J, Vokurková P, Šebek O (2010) Seasonal variation of water extractable aluminium forms in acidified forest organic soils under different vegetation cover. Biogeochemistry 101:151–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • USEPA – United States Environmental Protection Agency(1997) Method 3052 – Microwave assisted acid digestion of siliceous and organically based matrices. http://www.epa.gov/solidwaste/hazard/testmethods/sw846/pdfs/3052.pdf

  • Vance GF, Stevensen FJ, Sikora FJ (1996) Environmental chemistry of aluminum–organic complexes. In: Sposito G (ed) The environmental chemistry of aluminum. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 169–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker WJ, Cronan CS, Bloom PR (1990) Aluminum solubility in organic soil horizons from northern and southern forested watersheds. Soil Sci Soc Am J 54:369–374

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zołotajkin M, Ciba J, Kluczka J, Skwira M, Smoliński A (2011) Exchangeable and bioavailable aluminium in the mountain forest soil of Barania Góra range (Silesian Beskids, Poland). Water Air Soil Pollut 216:571–580

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Rondônia Federal Institute, Avenida 7 de Setembro, 2090, Porto Velho, Rondônia, 76804-124, Brazil

    Antonio Neri Azevedo Rodrigues

  2. Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Engineering of Federal, University of Paraná State, Rua dos Funcionários, 1540, Cabral, Curitiba, Paraná, 80.035-050, Brazil

    Antonio Carlos Vargas Motta, Vander Freitas Melo & Gabriel Democh Goularte

  3. National Soil Dynamics Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service, 411 South Donahue Drive, Auburn, Alabama, 36832, USA

    Stephen A. Prior

Authors
  1. Antonio Neri Azevedo Rodrigues
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Antonio Carlos Vargas Motta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vander Freitas Melo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gabriel Democh Goularte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Stephen A. Prior
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vander Freitas Melo.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Yanzheng Gao

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rodrigues, A.N.A., Motta, A.C.V., Melo, V.F. et al. Forms and buffering potential of aluminum in tropical and subtropical acid soils cultivated with Pinus taeda L. J Soils Sediments 19, 1355–1366 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-018-2144-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-018-2144-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation