Skip to main content
Log in

The role of gravel channel beds on the particle size and organic matter selectivity of transported fine-grained sediment: implications for sediment fingerprinting and biogeochemical flux research

  • Advances in Sediment Fingerprinting
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The preferential erosion, delivery, and transport of sediment within a drainage basin can result in downstream changes in both particle size and organic matter content. The physical and biological properties of transported and deposited sediment are important considerations in many sediment management and investigative tools, including sediment fingerprinting, and aid in the interpretation of sediment-associated nutrient and contaminant data.

Materials and methods

A recirculating flume (2 × 2 × 40 m) was used to assess the changes in particle size, organic matter content, and geochemical composition of fine-grained sediment (<125 μm) over a 31-h period (representing a travel distance of ∼24 km) under three contrasting channel bed conditions. The three channel gravel bed conditions investigated were 0-, 5-, and 40-cm gravel bed depths. Suspended sediment samples were collected throughout the duration of the experiment and gravel-stored sediment were collected along the length of the flume at the end of the experiment. Both suspended and gravel-stored sediment were analyzed for particle size and organic matter content. In addition, suspended sediment samples were analyzed for a broad suite of geochemical elements.

Results and discussion

The channel bed characteristics had a significant effect on both the particle size and organic matter selectivity of the transported suspended sediment. Furthermore, it was shown that a smooth planar channel bed as compared to a planar gravel bed (i.e., 0- vs. 5-cm gravel treatments) introduced small-scale roughness which resulted in the preferential deposition of larger particles into the channel bed. Increasing the gravel bed from 5 to 40 cm increased the amount of intra-gravel flow and reduced the potential for resuspension resulting in a further reduction in the particle size as well as resulting in a significant increase in the organic matter content of the suspended sediment. The relation between geochemical concentrations and particle size of the suspended sediment, in terms of linearity, magnitude, and direction, were not consistent between the different elements investigated.

Conclusions

This research helps to understand the processes that control the particle size and organic matter selectivity of fluvial transported sediment. This information is an important part of many sediment management tools, including sediment fingerprinting, as it provides context when selecting sampling sites and interpreting the data they provide. The inconsistent relation between particle size and the concentration of different geochemical elements highlights the uncertainty associated with commonly used particle size correction factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albers SJ, Petticrew EL (2012) Ecosystem response to a salmon disturbance regime: implications for downstream nutrient fluxes in aquatic systems. Limnol Oceanogr 57:113–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angers DA, Bullock MS, Mehuys GR (2007) Aggregate stability to water. In: Carter MR, Gregorich EG (eds) Methods of soil analysis, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 811–819

  • Arcement GJ, Schneider VR (1989) Guide for selecting manning’s roughness coefficients for natural channels and flood plains. Report 2339. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Reston

    Google Scholar 

  • Bainbridge ZT, Lewis SE, Smithers SG, Kuhnert PM, Henderson BL, Brodie JE (2014) Fine-suspended sediment and water budgets for a large, seasonally dry tropical catchment: Burdekin River catchment, Queensland, Australia. Water Resour Res 50:9067–9087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady NC, Weil RR (2001) The nature and properties of soils, 13th edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole JJ, Prairie YT, Caraco NF, McDowell WH, Tranvik LH, Striegle RG, Duarte CM, Kortelainen P, Downing JA, Middleburg JJ, Melack J (2007) Plumbing the global carbon cycle: integrating inland waters into the terrestrial carbon budget. Ecosystems 10:172–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins AL, Walling DE, Leeks GJL (1997) Source type ascription for fluvial suspended sediment based on a quantitative composite fingerprinting technique. Catena 29:1–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davis CM, Fox JF (2009) Sediment fingerprinting: review of the method and future improvements for allocating nonpoint source pollution. Environ Eng 135:490–504

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Di Stefano C, Ferro V (2002) Soil and water: linking clay enrichment and sediment delivery processes. Biosyst Eng 81:465–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Droppo IG (2001) Rethinking what constitutes suspended sediment. Hydrol Process 15:1551–1564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Droppo IG, Leppard GG, Flannigan DT, Liss SN (1997) The freshwater floc: a functional relationship of water and organic and inorganic floc constituents affecting suspended sediment properties. Water Air Soil Pollut 99:43–53

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duiker SW, Rhoton FE, Torrent J, Smeck NE, Lal R (2003) Iron (hydr)oxide crystallinity effects on soil aggregation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 67:606–611

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fryirs K (2013) (Dis)Connectivity in catchment sediment cascades: a fresh look at the sediment delivery problem. Earth Surf Process Landforms 38:30–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garzon-Garcia A, Olley JM, Bunn SE (2015) Controls on carbon and nitrogen export in an eroding catchment of south-eastern Queensland, Australia. Hydrol Process 29:739–751

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson S, Heath R, Abraham D, Schoellhamer D (2011) Visualization and analysis of temporal trends of sand infiltration into a gravel bed. Water Resour Res 47, W12601

    Google Scholar 

  • Grams PE, Wilcock PR (2014) Transport of fine sediment over a coarse, immobile riverbed. J Geophys Res:Earth 119:188–211

  • Hamm NT, Dade WB, Renshaw CE (2011) Fine particle deposition to porous beds. Water Resour Res 47, W11508

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjulström F (1935) Studies of the morphological activity of rivers as illustrated by the River Fyris. Bull Geol Instit Uppsala 25:221–527

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz AJ (1991) A primer on sediment-trace element chemistry, 2nd edn. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr JG, Burford MA, Olley JM, Bunn SE, Udy J (2011) Examining the link between terrestrial and aquatic phosphorus speciation in a subtropical catchment: the role of selective erosion and transport of fine sediments during storm events. Water Res 45:3331–3340

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkgöz MS (1989) Turbulent velocity profiles for smooth and rough open channel flow. J Hydraul Eng 115:1543–1561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koiter AJ, Owens PN, Petticrew EL, Lobb DA (2013a) The behavioural characteristics of sediment properties and their implications for sediment fingerprinting as an approach for identifying sediment sources in river basins. Earth-Sci Rev 125:24–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koiter AJ, Lobb DA, Owens PN, Petticrew EL, Li S, Tiessen KHD (2013b) Investigating the role of connectivity and scale in assessing the sources of sediment in an agricultural watershed in the Canadian prairies using sediment source fingerprinting. J Soils Sediments 13:1676–1691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroetsch D, Cang C (2007) Particle size distribution. In: Carter MR, Gregorich EG (eds) Soil sampling and methods of analysis, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 713–727

    Google Scholar 

  • Laceby JP, McMahon J, Evrard O, Olley J (2015) A comparison of geological and statistical approaches to element selection for sediment fingerprinting. J Soils Sediments. doi:10.1007/s11368-015-1111-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskaoui K, Zhou JL (2010) Colloids as a sink for certain pharmaceuticals in the aquatic environment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 17:898–907

  • Naden PS (2010) The fine-sediment cascade. In: Burt TP, Allison RJ (eds) Sediment cascades: an integrated approach. Wiley, Chichester, pp 271–305

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ockenden MC, Deasy C, Quinton JN, Surridge B, Stoate C (2014) Keeping agricultural soil out of rivers: evidence of sediment and nutrient accumulation within field wetlands in the UK. J Environ Manage 135:54–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver DM, Clegg CD, Heathwaite AL, Haygarth PM (2007) Preferential attachment of Escherichia coli to different particle size fractions of an agricultural grassland soil. Water Air Soil Pollut 185:369–375

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Packman AI, Salehin M (2003) Relative roles of stream flow and sedimentary conditions in controlling hyporheic exchange. Hydrobiologia 494:291–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petticrew EL, Krein A, Walling DE (2007) Evaluating fine sediment mobilization and storage in a gravel-bed river using controlled reservoir releases. Hydrol Process 21:198–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulley S, Foster I, Antunes P (2015) The application of sediment fingerprinting to floodplain and lake sediment cores: assumptions and uncertainties evaluated through case studies in the Nene Basin, UK. J Soils Sediments. doi:10.1007/s11368-015-1136-0

    Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2015) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org

  • Rehg KJ, Packman AI, Ren JH (2005) Effects of suspended sediment characteristics and bed sediment transport on streambed clogging. Hydrol Process 19:413–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rex JF, Petticrew EL (2008) Delivery of marine-derived nutrients to streambeds by Pacific salmon. Nat Geosci 1:840–843

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rex JF, Petticrew EL (2010) Salmon-derived nitrogen delivery and storage within a gravel bed: sediment and water interactions. Ecol Eng 36:1167–1173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoton FE, Emmerich WE, Goodrich DC, Miller SN, McChesney DS (2006) Soil geomorphological characteristics of a semiarid watershed. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:1532

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • RStudio (2015) RStudio: integrated development environment for R. http://www.rstudio.org/

  • Russell MA, Walling DE, Hodgkinson RA (2001) Suspended sediment sources in two small lowland agricultural catchments in the UK. J Hydrol 252:1–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sherriff SC, Franks SW, Rowan JS, Fenton O, Ó’hUallacháin D (2015) Uncertainty-based assessment of tracer selection, tracer non-conservativeness and multiple solutions in sediment fingerprinting using synthetic and field data. J Soils Sediments. doi:10.1007/s11368-015-1123-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields A (1936) Anwendung der Aehnlichkeitsmechanik und der urbulenzforschung auf die eschiebebewegung. Mitteilung der preussischen Versuchsanstalt fur Wass erbau und Schiffba, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Slager A (2014) Hyporheic exchange inside a flat gravel bed, flume experiments and modelling. M.Sc. thesis, Utrecht University. Netherlands

  • Slattery MC, Burt TP (1997) Particle size characteristics of suspended sediment in hillslope runoff and stream flow. Earth Surf Process Landforms 22:705–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith HG, Blake WH (2014) Sediment fingerprinting in agricultural catchments: a critical re-examination of source discrimination and data corrections. Geomorphology 204:177–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone PM, Walling DE (1997) Particle size selectivity considerations in suspended sediment budget investigations. Water Air Soil Pollut 99:63–70

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tranvik LJ, Downing JA, Cotner JB, Loiselle SA, Striegl RG, Ballatore TJ, Dillon P, Finlay K, Fortino K, Knoll LB (2009) Lakes and reservoirs as regulators of carbon cycling and climate. Limnol Oceanogr 54:2298–2314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walling DE (1983) The sediment delivery problem. J Hydrol 65:209–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walling DE (2005) Tracing suspended sediment sources in catchments and river systems. Sci Total Environ 344:159–184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walling DE, Webb BW, Woodward JC (1992) Some sampling considerations in the design of effective strategies for monitoring sediment-associated transport. In: Bogen J, Walling DE, Day TJ (eds) Erosion and sediment transport monitoring programmes in river basins. IAHS Publ. no. 210. IAHS Press, Wallingford, pp 279–288

  • Wickham H (2009) ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson SN, Olley JM, Furuichi T, Burton J, Kinsey-Henderson AE (2015) Sediment source tracing with stratified sampling and weightings based on spatial gradients in soil erosion. J Soils Sediments. doi:10.1007/s11368-015-1134-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Withers P, Jarvie H (2008) Delivery and cycling of phosphorus in rivers: a review. Sci of Total Environ 400:379–395

  • Wooster JK, Dusterhoff SR, Cui Y, Sklar LS, Dietrich WE, Malko M (2008) Sediment supply and relative size distribution effects on fine sediment infiltration into immobile gravels. Water Resour Res 44, W03424

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu H, Lu J, Liu X (2008) Non-uniform sediment incipient velocity. Int J Sediment Res 23:69–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Young R, Huryn A (1997) Longitudinal patterns of organic matter transport and turnover along a New Zealand grassland river. Freshwater Biol 38:93–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng Y, Luo X, Zhang W, Wu B, Han F, Lin Z, Wang X (2012) Enrichment behavior and transport mechanism of soil-bound PAHs during rainfall-runoff events. Environ Pollut 171:85–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zingg T (1935) Beitrag zur schotteranalyse. Schweizerische mineralogische und petrologische mitteilungen 15:39–140

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The first author is supported by the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada through the Alexander Graham Bell Canada Graduate Scholarship Program. This work is funded by a NSERC Strategic Grant—Development of environmental fingerprinting techniques for sources of sediment and associated phosphorus within agricultural watersheds of Canada—to DAL, PNO, and ELP. The authors would also like to acknowledge the Quesnel River Research Centre (QRRC) and the Landscape Ecology Research Group staff and students for the use of the facilities and equipment as well as technical support. This paper comprises part of the QRRC Publication Series.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander J. Koiter.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Hugh Smith

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koiter, A.J., Owens, P.N., Petticrew, E.L. et al. The role of gravel channel beds on the particle size and organic matter selectivity of transported fine-grained sediment: implications for sediment fingerprinting and biogeochemical flux research. J Soils Sediments 15, 2174–2188 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-015-1203-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-015-1203-6

Keywords

Navigation