Skip to main content
Log in

Waterjet injection of powdered activated carbon for sediment remediation

  • SEDIMENTS, SEC 5 • SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT • RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In situ contaminated sediment remediation through the addition of activated carbon has been proven to be an effective remediation technique. An amendment delivery system was developed to accurately place and inject a powdered activated carbon slurry. The system was set up to deliver a series of discrete injections over a rectangular grid with the objective to deliver 3% carbon (C) by dry weight to an inundated saturated sediment at a maximum sediment depth of 30 cm.

Materials and methods

In situ conditions have been researched and small bench-scale models have been developed to provide valuable data for future field-scale models. Experiments were performed using kaolinite as a surrogate sediment because the color contrast between the clay and the C permitted the delivered C concentration to be quantified using a spectroradiometer. The experiments showed that a set of operational parameters for the injection system could be identified that provided relatively complete mixing of the C and clay at the desired depths. The experiments were repeated using soil samples contaminated with polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and polydimethylsiloxane coated solid-phase microextraction fiber analyses to quantify pore water concentrations.

Results and discussion

Several different combinations of pressure, injection duration, and nozzle diameter were evaluated during the initial phase of the characterization of powdered activated C penetration in the surrogate sediment. Iterative approach tactics were conducted that concluded specifically placed, short-duration injections were necessary to deliver meaningful amounts of C in the test sediment. Analysis of these injections found that an average amended C concentration of 14% was achieved up to 26.7 cm deep in the surrogate sediment by a 9.5-s injection, whereas a 7.5-s injection at the same depth yielded an average concentration of 9.3%. The reduction in pore water PAHs concentrations through C injection was achieved in excess of 90% at all sampled locations within the injected perimeter.

Conclusions

Reduction in contaminant pore water concentrations within the soil/sediment appeared to be less dependent on the duration of the individual waterjet injections, and the effective depth of penetration appeared to be greater than that observed during the surrogate sediment experiments. The empirical nature of the waterjet work and the expected heterogeneity of contaminated soils/sediments suggest that it is appropriate to conduct site-specific bench-scale treatability testing prior to full-scale remediation using waterjet-delivered activated C.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ASTM Standard D2216-10 (2010) Standard test methods for laboratory determination of water (moisture) content of soil and rock by mass. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2010. doi:10.1520/D2216-10, http://www.astm.org

  • Cable JW, Duchene ML, Elmore AC, Hill D, Summers DA, Dilly R (2005) Initial investigation on the use of waterjets to place amendments in the subsurface. Remediation J 16:43–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho YM, Smithenry DW, Ghosh U, Kennedy AJ, Millward RN, Bridges TS, Luthy RG (2007) Field methods for amending marine sediment with activated carbon and assessing treatment effectiveness. Marine Environ Res 64:541–555

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cho YM, Ghosh U, Kennedy AJ, Grossman A, Ray G, Tomaszewski JE, Smithenry DW, Bridges TS, Luthy RG (2009) Field application of activated carbon amendment for in situ stabilization of polychlorinated biphenyls in marine sediment. Environ Sci Technol 43:3815–3823

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1986) Method 8310 polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons. EPA 8310, Washington, DC

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1993) Selecting remediation techniques for contaminated soil. EPA 823/B93-C81: Washington, DC

  • Jonker MTO, Van Der Heijden SA, Kreitinger JP, Hawthorne SB (2007) Predicting PAH bioaccumulation and toxicity in earthworms exposed to manufactured gas plant soils with solid-phase microextraction. Environ Sci Technol 41:7472–7478

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Millward RN, Bridges TS, Ghosh U, Zimmerman JR, Luthy RG (2005) Addition of activated carbon to sediments to reduce PCB bioaccumulation by a polychaete (Neanthes arenaceodentata) and an amphipod (Leptocheirus plumulosus). Environ Sci Technol 39:2880–2887

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy P, Marquette A, Reible D, Lowry GV (2006) Predicting the performance of activated carbon-, coke-, and soil-amended thin layer sediment caps. J Environ Eng 132:787–794

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olsta J (2010) In situ capping of contaminated sediments with organophilic clay. Proceedings of Twelfth Triannual International Conference. ASCE, Jacksonville

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers DA (1995) Waterjetting technology. Alden press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun X, Ghosh U (2007) PCB bioavailibility control in lumbriculus variegatus through different modes of activated carbon additions to sediments. Environ Sci Technol 41:4774–4780

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang XQ, Thibodeaux LJ, Valsaraj KT, Reible DD (1991) Efficiency of capping contaminated bed sediments in situ. 1. Laboratory-scale experiments on diffusion-adsorption in the capping layer. Environ Sci Technol 25:1578–1584

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman JR, Ghosh U, Millward RN, Bridges TS, Luthy RG (2004) Addition of carbon sorbents to reduce PCB and PAH bioavailability in marine sediments: physicohemical tests. Eviron Sci Technol 38:5458–5464

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman JR, Werner D, Ghosh U, Millward RN, Bridges TS, Luthy RG (2005) Effects of dose and particle size on activated carbon treatment to sequester polychlorinated biphenyls and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in marine sediments. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:1594–1601

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was funded by the US National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) through the Superfund Research Program SRP (Projects 5R01ES016158 and 3R01ES016158).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris J. Redell.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Gijs D. Breedveld

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Redell, C.J., Elmore, A.C., Burken, J.G. et al. Waterjet injection of powdered activated carbon for sediment remediation. J Soils Sediments 11, 1115–1124 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-011-0392-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-011-0392-x

Keywords

Navigation