Abstract
Purpose
In situ contaminated sediment remediation through the addition of activated carbon has been proven to be an effective remediation technique. An amendment delivery system was developed to accurately place and inject a powdered activated carbon slurry. The system was set up to deliver a series of discrete injections over a rectangular grid with the objective to deliver 3% carbon (C) by dry weight to an inundated saturated sediment at a maximum sediment depth of 30 cm.
Materials and methods
In situ conditions have been researched and small bench-scale models have been developed to provide valuable data for future field-scale models. Experiments were performed using kaolinite as a surrogate sediment because the color contrast between the clay and the C permitted the delivered C concentration to be quantified using a spectroradiometer. The experiments showed that a set of operational parameters for the injection system could be identified that provided relatively complete mixing of the C and clay at the desired depths. The experiments were repeated using soil samples contaminated with polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and polydimethylsiloxane coated solid-phase microextraction fiber analyses to quantify pore water concentrations.
Results and discussion
Several different combinations of pressure, injection duration, and nozzle diameter were evaluated during the initial phase of the characterization of powdered activated C penetration in the surrogate sediment. Iterative approach tactics were conducted that concluded specifically placed, short-duration injections were necessary to deliver meaningful amounts of C in the test sediment. Analysis of these injections found that an average amended C concentration of 14% was achieved up to 26.7 cm deep in the surrogate sediment by a 9.5-s injection, whereas a 7.5-s injection at the same depth yielded an average concentration of 9.3%. The reduction in pore water PAHs concentrations through C injection was achieved in excess of 90% at all sampled locations within the injected perimeter.
Conclusions
Reduction in contaminant pore water concentrations within the soil/sediment appeared to be less dependent on the duration of the individual waterjet injections, and the effective depth of penetration appeared to be greater than that observed during the surrogate sediment experiments. The empirical nature of the waterjet work and the expected heterogeneity of contaminated soils/sediments suggest that it is appropriate to conduct site-specific bench-scale treatability testing prior to full-scale remediation using waterjet-delivered activated C.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ASTM Standard D2216-10 (2010) Standard test methods for laboratory determination of water (moisture) content of soil and rock by mass. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2010. doi:10.1520/D2216-10, http://www.astm.org
Cable JW, Duchene ML, Elmore AC, Hill D, Summers DA, Dilly R (2005) Initial investigation on the use of waterjets to place amendments in the subsurface. Remediation J 16:43–54
Cho YM, Smithenry DW, Ghosh U, Kennedy AJ, Millward RN, Bridges TS, Luthy RG (2007) Field methods for amending marine sediment with activated carbon and assessing treatment effectiveness. Marine Environ Res 64:541–555
Cho YM, Ghosh U, Kennedy AJ, Grossman A, Ray G, Tomaszewski JE, Smithenry DW, Bridges TS, Luthy RG (2009) Field application of activated carbon amendment for in situ stabilization of polychlorinated biphenyls in marine sediment. Environ Sci Technol 43:3815–3823
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1986) Method 8310 polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons. EPA 8310, Washington, DC
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1993) Selecting remediation techniques for contaminated soil. EPA 823/B93-C81: Washington, DC
Jonker MTO, Van Der Heijden SA, Kreitinger JP, Hawthorne SB (2007) Predicting PAH bioaccumulation and toxicity in earthworms exposed to manufactured gas plant soils with solid-phase microextraction. Environ Sci Technol 41:7472–7478
Millward RN, Bridges TS, Ghosh U, Zimmerman JR, Luthy RG (2005) Addition of activated carbon to sediments to reduce PCB bioaccumulation by a polychaete (Neanthes arenaceodentata) and an amphipod (Leptocheirus plumulosus). Environ Sci Technol 39:2880–2887
Murphy P, Marquette A, Reible D, Lowry GV (2006) Predicting the performance of activated carbon-, coke-, and soil-amended thin layer sediment caps. J Environ Eng 132:787–794
Olsta J (2010) In situ capping of contaminated sediments with organophilic clay. Proceedings of Twelfth Triannual International Conference. ASCE, Jacksonville
Summers DA (1995) Waterjetting technology. Alden press, Oxford, UK
Sun X, Ghosh U (2007) PCB bioavailibility control in lumbriculus variegatus through different modes of activated carbon additions to sediments. Environ Sci Technol 41:4774–4780
Wang XQ, Thibodeaux LJ, Valsaraj KT, Reible DD (1991) Efficiency of capping contaminated bed sediments in situ. 1. Laboratory-scale experiments on diffusion-adsorption in the capping layer. Environ Sci Technol 25:1578–1584
Zimmerman JR, Ghosh U, Millward RN, Bridges TS, Luthy RG (2004) Addition of carbon sorbents to reduce PCB and PAH bioavailability in marine sediments: physicohemical tests. Eviron Sci Technol 38:5458–5464
Zimmerman JR, Werner D, Ghosh U, Millward RN, Bridges TS, Luthy RG (2005) Effects of dose and particle size on activated carbon treatment to sequester polychlorinated biphenyls and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in marine sediments. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:1594–1601
Acknowledgments
This project was funded by the US National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) through the Superfund Research Program SRP (Projects 5R01ES016158 and 3R01ES016158).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Gijs D. Breedveld
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Redell, C.J., Elmore, A.C., Burken, J.G. et al. Waterjet injection of powdered activated carbon for sediment remediation. J Soils Sediments 11, 1115–1124 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-011-0392-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-011-0392-x