Skip to main content
Log in

Does ivermectin attract earthworms?

  • SOILS, SEC 4 • ECOTOXICOLOGY • RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Changes in the behavior of earthworms (for example avoidance of a particular substrate) can influence the soil ecosystem. Our aim was to determine whether the earthworms Eisenia fetida and Lumbricus terrestris are able to avoid ivermectin (a veterinary endectocide belonging to the avermectins). A standard avoidance test with earthworms was conducted using standardized Lufa 2.3 soil (Speyer, Germany) and sandy soil provided by Cinkarna Celje (Slovenia).

Materials and methods

A two-chamber system of avoidance test as described in ISO guideline 17512-1 (ISO 2008) was applied. We investigated the substrate preference of E. fetida and L. terrestris after 48 h at ivermectin concentrations of 8, 32, 64, and 256 mg kg−1 dry soil.

Results and discussion

No deterrent effects were observed for either species and either soil types. E. fetida in Lufa 2.3 soil was clearly attracted to ivermectin. More than 70% of the earthworms preferred soil with ivermectin concentrations of 8, 64, and 256 mg kg−1. No observed effect concentration and lowest observed effect concentration, 2-day exposure, for effects on the avoidance of both species are >256 mg kg−1 dry soil in two different soils.

Conclusions

High percentage of earthworms in the test soil was observed in the experiment with E. fetida in Lufa 2.3 soil treated with 8, 64, and 256 mg ivermectin kg−1. We can conclude that earthworms, as it was observed in E. fetida in Lufa 2.3 soil treated with ivermectin, may be attracted by some chemicals. The percentage of L. terrestris in soil from Cinkarna Celje treated with ivermectin ranged from 39% to 52% and of E. fetida from 33% to 55%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Campbell WC, Fisher MH, Stapley EO, Albers-Schonberg G, Jacob TA (1983) Ivermectin: a potent new antiparasitic agent. Science 221:823–828

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Floate KD (2007) Endectocide residues affect insect attraction to dung from treated cattle: implications for toxicity tests. Med Vet Entomol 21:312–322

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia M, Römbke J, De Brito MT, Scheffczyk A (2008) Effects of three pesticides on the avoidance behaviour of earthworms in laboratory test performed under temperate and tropical conditions. Environ Pollut 153:450–456

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gunn A, Sadd JW (1994) The effect of ivermectin on the survival, behaviour and cocoon production of the earthworm Eisenia fetida. Pedobiologia 38:327–333

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Halley BA, Jacob TA, Lu AYH (1989) The environmental impact of the use of ivermectin: environmental effects and fate. Chemosphere 18:1543–1563

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hund-Rinke K, Lindemann M, Simon M (2005) Experiences with novel approaches in earthworm testing alternatives. J Soils Sediments 5:233–239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ISO (1993) ISO guideline 11268-1. Soil quality—effects of pollutants on earthworms (Eisenia fetida)—Part 2: Determination of acute toxicity using artificial soil substrate. International Organization for Standardisation, Geneva

  • ISO (2008) ISO guideline 17512-1. Soil quality—Avoidance test for determining the quality of soils and effects of chemicals on behavior—Part 1: Tests with earthworms (Eisenia fetida and Eisenia Andrei). International Organization for Standardisation, Geneva

  • ISO11268-2 (1998) ISO guideline 11268-2. Soil quality—effects of pollutants on earthworms (Eisenia fetida)—Part 2: Determination of effects on reproduction. International Organization for Standardisation, Geneva

  • Kaneda S, Yamashita N, Uchida T, Shimano S, Miyoshi N, Sasaki M, Enami Y (2005) Effects of ivermectin in dung pats on earthworm (Megascolecidae) populations and pat degradation in Japanese grassland. Appl Soil Ecol 31:280–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolar L, Kožuh Eržen N, Hogerwerf L, Van Gestel CAM (2008) Toxicity of abamectin and doramectin to soil invertebrates. Environ Pollut 151:182–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McKellar Q, Benchaoui HA (1996) Avermectins and milbemycins. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 19:331–351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer M (2003) Behavioural endpoints in earthworm ecotoxicology—evaluation of different test systems in soil toxicity assessement. J Soils Sediments 3:79–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sousa A, Pereira R, Antunes SC, Cachada A, Pereira E, Duarte AC, Gonçalves F (2008) Validation of assays for the screening assessment of soils under different anthropogenic disturbances. Ecotox Environ Safe 71:661–670

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Diao X, Zhang Q, Shen J (2005) Bioaccumulation and elimination of avermectin B1a in the earthworms (Eisenia fetida). Chemosphere 60:699–704

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Slovenian Research Agency, Grant J4-9277. Our thanks go to Erik Zidar and Katarina Babnik for technical support. Special thanks to Dr. Jörg Römbke who provided numerous scientific advices during our work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Domen Leštan.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Kerstin Hund-Rinke

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Torkhani, A.L., Eržen, N.K., Kolar, L. et al. Does ivermectin attract earthworms?. J Soils Sediments 11, 124–128 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-010-0284-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-010-0284-5

Keywords

Navigation