Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-residue analysis of PAH, PCB, and OCP optimized for organic matter of forest soil

  • SOILS, SEC 2 • GLOBAL CHANGE, ENVIRON RISK ASSESS, SUSTAINABLE LAND USE • RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Analyzing organic pollutants in forest soil is challenging because they are strongly physical and chemical bound to soil organic matter (SOM). Within the framework of a forest soil inventory, an analytical protocol for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB), and organochlorine pesticides (OCP) should be established and validated using one and the same extraction and cleanup procedure. The protocol should be applicable for reliable analysis of a high number of samples in a short timeframe.

Materials and methods

Two different soil samples representative for the humic layer from a typical mixed and coniferous forest soil had been used for the analysis. Three solvents of different polarity, namely cyclohexane (CH), ethylacetate (EA)/CH (1/1, v/v), and acetone (AC)/CH (2/1, v/v), and the six standard extraction techniques (pressurized liquid extraction (PLE), soxhlet extraction, fluidized bed extraction, sonication, shaking, and one-step extraction recommended for analyzing agricultural soil in Germany (VDLUFA 2008)) were compared concerning their extraction efficiency. For additional matrix separation, two different cleanup procedures (gel permeation chromatography (GPC) and solid-phase extraction (SPE) with different sorbents) were tested. Quantification was carried out using gas chromatography combined with mass spectrometry (GC–MS) and two different injection systems (split/splitless injection and programmable temperature vaporizer (PTV) injection). Labeled internal standards, added prior to extraction, were used for method evaluation.

Results and discussion

For the simultaneous extraction of PAH, PCB, and OCP from organic forest soil PLE with acetone/cyclohexane (2/1, v/v) provided the highest extraction efficiency. A two-step cleanup procedure consisting of GPC followed by SPE with silica gel was entirely sufficient for the separation of humic substances without discrimination of analytes. Recovery rates for the different extraction and cleanup steps ranged between 89% and 106%. For quantification, a GC–MS method was developed using two different injection systems and two capillary columns of different selectivity.

Conclusions

By comparing six standard extraction techniques for PAH, PCB, and OCP from forest soil, we obtained the highest extraction efficiency when using PLE with AC/CH (2/1). For sample injection, we achieved best results using an optimized PTV injection system as it highly reduced the breakdown of thermolabile pesticides. Using this combination of technical equipment, it is possible to determine a concentration of the analytes in the trace level range of 1–2 μg kg−1 in humic soil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrie LA, Gregor D, Hargrave B, Lake R, Muir D, Shearer R, Tracey B, Bidleman T (1992) Arctic contaminants: sources, occurrence and pathways. Sci Total Environ 122:1–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bidleman TF, Walla MD, Roura R, Carr E, Schmidt S (1993) Organochlorine pesticides in the atmosphere of the southern ocean and Antarctica. Mar Pollut Bull 26:258–262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DIN (2008) DIN 32645: chemical analysis—decision limit, detection limit and determination limit under repeatability conditions—terms, methods, evaluation. DIN, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Doll TE, Frimmel FH (1999) Interaction between natural organic matter (NOM) and polycyclic aromatic compounds (PAC) – comparison of fluorescence quenching and solid phase micro extraction (SPME). Fresenius J Anal Chem 364:313–319

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foreman WT, Gates PM (1997) Matrix-enhanced degradation of p, p’-DDT during gas chromatographic analysis: A consideration. Environ Sci Technol 31:905–910

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gfrerer M, Fernandes C, Lankmayr E (2004) Optimization of fluid-bed-extraction for determination of organochlorine pesticides in sediment. Chromatographia 60:681–686

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haworth RD (1971) The chemical nature of humic acids. Soil Sci 111:71–79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ISO (1995) ISO 10694: soil quality—determination of organic and total carbon after dry combustion (elementary analysis). ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2000) ISO 13877: soil quality—determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH)—method using high-performance chromatography. ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2002) ISO 10382: soil quality—determination of organochlorine pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls—gaschromatographic method with electron capture detection. ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2005) ISO 10390: soil quality—determination of pH value. ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2006) ISO 18287: soil quality—determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH)—gas chromatographic method with mass spectrometric detection (GC–MS). ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwata H, Tanabe S, Sakal N, Tatsukawa R (1993) Distribution of persistent organochlorines in the oceanic air and surface seawater and the role of ocean on their global transport and fate. Environ Sci Technol 27:1080–1098

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kickuth R (1972) Huminstoffe—ihre Chemie und Ökochemie. Chemie für Labor und Betrieb 23(11):481–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinloch D, Kuhnlein H, Muir DC (1992) Inuit foods and diet: a preliminary assessment of benefits and risks. Sci Total Environ 122:247–278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mulvad G, Pederson HS, Hansen JC, Dewailly E, Jul E, Pedersen MB, Bjerregaard P, Malcom GT, Deguchi Y, Middaugh JP (1996) Exposure of Greenlandic Inuit to organochlorines and heavy metals through the marine food-chain: an international study. Sci Total Environ 186:137–139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richter BE, Jones BA, Ezzell JL, Porter NL (1996) Accelerated solvent extraction: a technique for sample preparation. Anal Chem 68:1033–1039

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts TR (1984) IUPAC reports on pesticides (17) Non-extractable pesticide residues in soils and plants. Pure Appl Chem 56(7):945–956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulten HR (1995) The three-dimensional structure of humic substances and soil organic matter studied by computional analytical chemistry. Fresenius J Anal Chem 351:62–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson FJ (1976) Organic matter reactions involving pesticides. Soil Sci 29:180–207

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tanabe S, Tatsukawa R, Kawano M, Hidaka H (1982) Global distribution and atmospheric transport of chlorinated hydrocarbons: HCH (BHC) isomers and DDT compounds in the western pacific, eastern indian and antarctic oceans. J Oceanog Soc Jpn 38:137–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • UN-ECE (1998) Aarhus Protocol to the Convention on Long-range Air Pollution on Persistent Organic Pollutants, United Nations Economic and Social Council, Economic Commission for Europe (EB.AIR/1998/2). http://www.unece.org/env/lrtap/pops_h1.htm

  • UNEP (2004) Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants. United Nations Environmental Programme. http://chm.pops.int/convention

  • USEPA (1982) Priority list of the US Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov

  • USEPA (1995a) Methods for the determination of organic compounds in drinking water. US Government Printing Office: Washington DC, EPA -600/R-95/131, method rev. 3.1. pp 508.1–508.32

  • USEPA (1995b) Methods for the determination of organic compounds in drinking water. US Government Printing Office: Washington DC, EPA -600/R-95/131, method rev. 2.0. pp 525.1–525.58

  • VDLUFA (2008) Handbuch der landwirtschaftlichen Versuchs- und Untersuchungsmethodik. Bd. VII, 3 rd edn. VDLUFA Verlag

  • Wise SA, Schantz MM, Benner BA, Hays MJ, Schiller SB (1995) Certification of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in a marine sediment standard reference material. Anal Chem 67:1171–1178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ziechmann W (1972) Über die Elektronen-Donator- und Acceptor-Eigenschaften von Huminstoffen. Geoderma 8:111–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ziechmann W (1996) Huminstoffe und ihre Wirkungen. Spektrum Akademischer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the Federal Environment Agency (UBA) of Germany for financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petra Lehnik-Habrink.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Hailong Wang

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lehnik-Habrink, P., Hein, S., Win, T. et al. Multi-residue analysis of PAH, PCB, and OCP optimized for organic matter of forest soil. J Soils Sediments 10, 1487–1498 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-010-0241-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-010-0241-3

Keywords

Navigation