Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Normalization and weighting: the open challenge in LCA

  • Conference Report
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 19 January 2021

This article has been updated

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Change history

  • 19 January 2021

    The online version of the original article can be found at <ExternalRef><RefSource>https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01790-0</RefSource><RefTarget Address="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01790-0" TargetType="URL"/></ExternalRef>

Notes

  1. https://www.ecosurvey.it/en/2018/06/made-green-in-italy/

References

  • Ahlroth S (2014) The use of valuation and weighting sets in environmental impact assessment. Resour Conserv Recycl 85:34–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benini L, Sala S (2016) Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of normalization factors to methodological assumptions. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21(2):224–236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boulay A-M, Benini L, Sala S (2019) Marginal and non-marginal approaches in characterization: how context and scale affect the selection of an adequate characterization model. The AWARE model example. Int J Life Cycle Assess. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01680-0

  • Castellani V, Benini L, Sala S, Pant R (2016) A distance-to-target weighting method for Europe 2020. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21(8):1159–1169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crenna E, Secchi M, Benini L, Sala S (2019) Global environmental impacts: data sources and methodological choices for calculating normalization factors for LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 24(10):1851–1877

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EC-JRC (2011) International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook—recommendations for life cycle impact assessment in the European context—based on existing environmental impact assessment models and factors. EUR 24571 EN, Luxemburg. Available at http://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/ILCD-Recommendation-of-methods-for-LCIA-def.pdf (Accessed May 2020)

  • EC-JRC (2019) Normalisation and weighting factors of the environmental footprint. Available at https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/LCDN/developerEF.xhtml (Accessed May 2020)

  • FAO (2014) Sustainability Assessment of Food and Agriculture Systems (SAFA) Guidelines, Ver. 3. Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO), Rome

  • Faragò M, Benini L, Sala S, Secchi M, Laurent A (2019) National inventories of land occupation and transformation flows in the world for land use impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 24(8):1333–1347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hélias A, Esnouf A, Finkbeiner M (2020) Consistent normalization approach for life cycle assessment based on inventory databases. Sci Total Environ 703:134583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itsubo N, Murakami K, Kuriyama K, Yoshida K, Tokimatsu K, Inaba A (2018) Development of weighting factors for G20 countries—explore the difference in environmental awareness between developed and emerging countries. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23(12):2311–2326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jungbluth N, Keller R, Doublet G, König A, Eggenberger S (2016) Report on life cycle assessment, economic assessment, potential employment effects and exergy-based analysis: part I – LCA. Deliverable 7.3. SUSMILK: Re-design of the dairy industry for sustainable milk processing. Project funded by the European Commission within the 7th Framework Programme. Project number (613589). Available at: http://esu-services.ch/projects/lcafood/susmilk/ (Accessed May 2020)

  • Leclerc A, Sala S, Secchi M, Laurent A (2019) Building national emission inventories of toxic pollutants in Europe. Environ Int 130:104785

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee N, Hugé J, Sutherland WJ, McNeill J, Van Opstal M, Dahdouh-Guebas F, Koedam N (2015) The Delphi technique in ecology and biological conservation: applications and guidelines. Methods Ecol Evol 6:1097–1109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murakami K, Itsubo N, Kuriyama K, Yoshida K, Tokimatsu K (2018) Development of weighting factors for G20 countries. Part 2: estimation of willingness to pay and annual global damage cost. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23(12):2349–2364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pizzol M, Laurent A, Sala S, Weidema B, Verones F, Koffler C (2017) Normalisation and weighting in life cycle assessment: quo vadis? Int J Life Cycle Assess 22(6):853–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sala S, Benini L, Mancini L, Pant R (2015) Integrated assessment of environmental impact of Europe in 2010: data sources and extrapolation strategies for calculating normalization factors. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20(11):1568–1585

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sala S, Cerutti AK, Pant R (2018) Development of a weighting approach for the environmental footprint. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Sala C, Crenna E, Secchi M, Mengual Sanye E (2020) Environmental sustainability of European production and consumption assessed against planetary boundaries. J Environ Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110686

  • Schader C, Baumgart L, Landert J, Muller A, Ssebunya B, Blockeel J, Weisshaidinger R, Petrasek R, Mészáros D, Padel S (2016) Using the sustainability monitoring and assessment routine (smart) for the systematic analysis of trade-offs and synergies between sustainability dimensions and themes at farm level. Sustain 8(3):274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schader C, Curran M, Heidenreich A, Landert J, Blockeel J, Baumgart L, Ssebunya B, Moakes S, Marton S, Lazzarini G, Niggli U, Stolze M (2019) Accounting for uncertainty in multi-criteria sustainability assessments at the farm level: improving the robustness of the SMART-farm tool. Ecol Indic 106:105503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland WJ (2006) Predicting the ecological consequences of environmental change: a review of the methods. J Appl Ecol 43(4):599–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waggoner J, Carline JD, Durning SJ (2016) Is there a consensus on consensus methodology? Descriptions and recommendations for future consensus research. Acad Med 91:663–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the speakers for their interesting contributions to this Discussion Forum.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046, Zurich, Switzerland

    Andreas Roesch

  2. European Commission—Joint Research Centre, Via Enrico Fermi 2749, 21027, Ispra, VA, Italy

    Serenella Sala

  3. ESU-services Ltd., Vorstadt 14, 8200, Schaffhausen, Switzerland

    Niels Jungbluth

Authors
  1. Andreas Roesch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Serenella Sala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Niels Jungbluth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Roesch.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Matthias Finkbeiner

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: The names of the first two authors were mixed up.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roesch, A., Sala, S. & Jungbluth, N. Normalization and weighting: the open challenge in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 25, 1859–1865 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01790-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01790-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation