Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Integrating regionalized Brazilian land use change datasets into the ecoinvent database: new data, premises and uncertainties have large effects in the results

  • LCA FOR AGRICULTURE.
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Land use change (LUC) is a critical process in the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of agricultural products and Brazil is a major exporter of these. This work had the objective of integrating refined and regionalized datasets of LUC in Brazil into the ecoinvent database, to better represent its dynamics and heterogeneity. We present the adaptations needs for having it suitable for crops, pasture and forestry in state-level and impacts of modelling assumptions and uncertainties.

Methods

Adaptation and integration were based in ecoinvent version 3 guidelines and the database requirements to LUC modelling. BRLUC, a method for Brazilian LUC accounting, was the main data source. The workflow for the integration process consisted in identifying necessary adaptations in both sources to allow a better representation of Brazilian LUC. Four new reference products and 27 geographies were added in the database.

Results and discussion

A total of 566 new datasets were integrated into ecoinvent version 3.6, allowing the incorporation of LUC in Brazilian products in state, regional and national level. GHG emissions reduced, being 42.2% and 99.9% lower to soybean and sugarcane than in ecoinvent v3.5. Four improvements were the main causes: (i) state-level LUC modelling with national official data; (ii) regionalizing carbon stocks; (iii) including pasture and forestry land use categories; (iv) and considering sugarcane as a perennial crop. The way to calculate national-level results based on subnational data was an important source of difference in emissions too. Uncertainties specifically associated with land use substitution patterns were not incorporated, and they can potentially have impacts as large as the uncertainties of all the remaining processes combined.

Conclusions

Results showed that small changes in data sources and premises have large impacts on emissions associated with LUC in agricultural products. It also showed the large impacts of uncertainties of LUC patterns. Improving current models in better representing regional LUC patterns, regional carbon stocks and uncertainty accounting could reduce these impacts. Nonetheless, efforts in reducing the complexity of LUC accounting methods could enhance transparency and effectiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adami M, Rudorff BFT, Freitas RM, Aguiar DA, Sugawara LM, Mello MP (2012) Remote sensing time series to evaluate direct land use change of recent expanded sugarcane crop in Brazil. Sustainability 4(4):574–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrosatélite (2018) Análise geoespacial da dinâmica da soja no bioma Cerrado: 2014 a 2017. Technical report. Agrosatélite Geotecnologia Aplicada, Florianópolis

  • Ali AAM, Negm AM, Bady MF, Ibrahim MGE (2014) Moving towards an Egyptian national life cycle inventory database. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:1551–1558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0760-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blonk Consultants (2016) Direct land use change assessment tool, Version 2016.1. http://www.blonkconsultants.nl/?lang=en . Accessed 16 June 2016

  • BRAZIL (2016) Third National Communication of Brazil to the United Nations framework convention on climate change – volume III. Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation, Brasília

  • BSI (2011) PAS 2050:2011 - specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services British Standards Institution (BSI), London

  • BSI (2012) PAS 2050-1:2012 - assessment of life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from horticultural products British Standards Institute (BSI), London

  • Castanheira EG, Freire F (2013) Greenhouse gas assessment of soybean production: implications of land use change and different cultivation systems. J Clean Prod 54:49–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Donke ACG, Novaes RML, Pazianotto RAA, Ruiz EM, Reinhard J, Folegatti-Matsuura MIS (2018) Integrating land use change estimates at state level in the ecoinvent database structure v3.3. In: Congresso Brasileiro Sobre Gestão do Ciclo de Vida, 6, Brasília. Anais do VI Congresso… Ibict, Brasília, pp 199-205. ISBN 978-85-7013-146-1. Available in ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/189832/1/2018AA23.pdf

  • EMBRAPA (2019) BRLUC - method for estimating land use change and CO2 emissions associated to agriculture in Brazil. www.cnpma.embrapa.br/forms/BRLUC.php. Accessed April 2019

  • FAO (2010) Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010. Main Report. FAO, Rome. http://www.fao.org/docrep/013/i1757e/i1757e.pdf. Accessed 20 October 2017

  • Folegatti-Matsuura MIS, Picoli JF (2018) Agriculture, forestry and animal husbandry - Brazil. In: Agriculture, forestry and animal husbandry Ecoinvent Association, Zürich, Switzerland

  • Gibbs HK, Rausch L, Munger J, Schelly I, Morton DC, Noojipady P, Soares-Filho B, Barreto P, Micol L, Walker NF (2015) Brazil’s soy moratorium. Science 347(6220):377–378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2006) 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, prepared by the national greenhouse gas inventories programme. Eggleston HS, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T and Tanabe K (eds). IGES, Japan

  • IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014 synthesis report summary for policymakers. Available in https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/syr/AR5_SYR_FINAL_SPM.pdf

  • Jungbluth N, Chudacoff M, Dauriat A, Dinkel F, Doka G, Faist Emmenegger M et al (2007) Life cycle inventories of bioenergy. Final report ecoinvent data v2.0 no. 17. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dübendorf, CH

  • Lesage P, Samson R (2016) The Quebec life cycle inventory database project: using the ecoinvent database to generate, review, integrate, and host regional LCI data. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:1282–1289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0593-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mello FF, Cerri CE, Davies CA, Holbrook NM, Paustian K, Maia SMF et al (2014) Payback time for soil carbon and sugar-cane ethanol. Nat Clim Chang 4:605–609

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moreira M, Gurgel AC, Seabra JEA (2014) Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of sugar cane renewable jet fuel. Environ Sci Technol 48:14756–14763

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Ruiz E, Lévová T, Reinhard J, Valsasina L, Bourgault G, Wernet G (2016) Documentation of changes implemented in ecoinvent database v3.3. Ecoinvent, Zürich, Switzerland

  • Moreno-Ruiz E., Valsasina L., Brunner, F., Symeonidis A., FitzGerald D., Treyer, K., Bourgault G., Wernet G., (2018) Documentation of changes implemented in ecoinvent database v3.5. Ecoinvent, Zürich, Switzerland

  • Moreno-Ruiz E et al (2019) “Documentation of changes implemented in ecoinvent database v3.6.” Ecoinvent, Zürich, Switzerland Publication in process

  • Nemecek T, Schnetzer J, Reinhard J (2014) Updated and harmonized greenhouse gas emissions for crop inventories. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:1361–1378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0712-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nemecek T, Bengoa X, Lansche J, Mouron P, Riedener E, Rossi V, Humbert S (2015) Methodological guidelines for the life cycle inventory of agricultural products. Version 3.0, July 2015. World food LCA database (WFLDB) Quantis and Agroscope, Lausanne And Zurich, Switzerland

  • Novaes RML, Pazianotto RA, Brandao M, Alves BJR, May A, Folegatti-Matsuura MIS (2017) Estimating 20-year land use change and derived CO2 emissions associated with crops, pasture and forestry in Brazil and each of its 27 states. Glob Chang Biol 23:3716–3728. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PRé Consultants bv (2017) SimaPro 8.4.0. www.simapro.com. Accessed October 2018

  • R CORE TEAM (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

  • Reinhard, J., Moreno-Ruiz, E., Gmünder, S. (2017) Consideration of land use change in ecoinvent version 3.3: method, implementation and illustration, ecoinvent association, Switzerland

  • Reinhard J, Wernet G, Zah R, Heijungs R, Hilty LM (2019) Contribution-based prioritization of LCI database improvements: the most important unit processes in ecoinvent. Int J Life Cycle Assess:1–15

  • Rodriguez C, Ciroth A, Srocka M (2014) The importance of regionalized LCIA in agricultural LCA – new software implementation and case study. In: International Conference LCA of Food San Francisco, USA, 9, 8–10 October 2014

  • Rosa M, Knudsen MT, Hermansen JE (2016) A comparison of land use change models: challenges and future developments. J Clean Prod 113:183–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruviaro CF, Gianezini M, Brandao FS, Winck CA, Dewes H (2012) Life cycle assessment in Brazilian agriculture facing worldwide trends. J Clean Prod 28:9–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Middelaar CE, Cederberg C, Vellinga TV, van der Werf HM, De Boer IJ (2013) Exploring variability in methods and data sensitivity in carbon footprints of feed ingredients. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(4):768–782

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weidema BP, Bauer C, Hischier R, Mutel C, Nemecek T, Reinhard J, Vadenbo CO, Wernet G (2013) Overview and methodology. Data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3. Ecoinvent Report 1(v3) The ecoinvent Centre, St Gallen

  • Wernet G, Bauer C, Steubing B, Reinhard J, Moreno-Ruiz E, Weidema B (2016) The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:1218–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dias LCP, Pimenta FM, Santos AB, Costa MH, Ladle RJ (2016) Patterns of land use, extensification, and intensification of Brazilian agriculture. Glob Chang Biol 22(8):2887–2903

Download references

Acknowledgments

We greatly acknowledge Guillaume Bourgault and Avraam Symeonidis from ecoinvent for their work in adjusting and integrating the data into the database structure. We are also thankful for Simon Gmünder and Amir Safaei for suggestions and arrangements on the early steps of the work. Finally, we thank Fernando Dias and Maria Clea Figueiredo for providing information regarding beef and mango production systems, and Anna Letícia Pighinelli for helping running data and two anonymous reviewers for providing suggestions that improved the manuscript.

Funding information

The research was funded by SECO (SRI programm) and EMBRAPA (project number 33.17.00.060.00.00).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Renan Milagres Lage Novaes.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Miguel Brandão

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(XLSX 273 kb)

ESM 2

(XLSX 69 kb)

ESM 3

(XLSX 1.41 mb)

ESM 4

(XLSX 1.41 mb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Donke, A.C.G., Novaes, R.M.L., Pazianotto, R.A.A. et al. Integrating regionalized Brazilian land use change datasets into the ecoinvent database: new data, premises and uncertainties have large effects in the results. Int J Life Cycle Assess 25, 1027–1042 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01763-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01763-3

Keywords

Navigation