Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

LCA for open systems: a review of the influence of natural and anthropogenic factors on aquaculture systems

  • UNCERTAINTIES IN LCA
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Life cycle assessment (LCA) studies in the aquaculture sector have included marine fish, freshwater fish, and shellfish species within closed (CAS), semiclosed (SCAS), and open aquaculture systems (OAS). The absence of a physical boundary separating open aquaculture systems from natural ecosystems has caused complications in determining the actual environmental conditions of individual aquaculture systems and has resulted in questionable LCA impact analysis results. This paper reviews how natural and anthropogenic factors were managed in the previous LCA studies for aquaculture systems.

Methods

Ten recent peer-reviewed documents on the LCA study of various aquaculture systems have been selected for content analysis. The disparities between OAS, SCAS, and CAS were outlined. Natural and anthropogenic factors were then identified and analyzed to ascertain their impact on the LCA process.

Results and discussion

Natural factors such as seasonal variations, biological interactions, and flooding were indicated in the OAS, SCAS, and CAS. For anthropogenic factors, industrial energy inputs and human activities were stated in SCAS and OAS. None of the anthropogenic factors were considered in CAS as these systems are isolated distinctly from natural ecosystems. LCA studies of the OAS have a few approaches: the development of the virtual boundary, a longer period of data collection, harmonization with other environmental management tools, and the need to diversify the LCA study in various regions.

Conclusions

For SCAS and OAS, the interaction between the aquaculture system and flood hazards, temporal changes, dilution effects due to the seasonal variation, disease, and local anthropogenic activities can be studied further. An LCA study of OAS will be more reliable if natural and anthropogenic factors are seen as supportive variables in determining the life cycle impact analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agusa T, Kunito T, Yasunaga G, Iwata H, Subramanian A, Ismail A, Shinsuke Tanabe S (2005) Concentrations of trace elements in marine fish and its risk assessment in Malaysia. Mar Pollut Bull 51:896–911

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aubin J, Papatryphon E, Van der Werf HMG, Petit J, Morvan Y (2006) Characterization of the environmental impact of a turbot (Scophtlamusmaximus) re-circulating production system using LCA. Aquaculture 261(4):1259–1268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aubin J, Papatryphon E, Van der Werf HMG, Chatzifotis S (2009) Assessment of the environmental impact of carnivorous finfish production systems using LCA. J Clean Prod 17:354–361

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ayer NW, Tyedmers PH (2009) Assessing alternative aquaculture technologies-LCA of salmonid culture system in Canada. J Clean Prod 17(3):362–373

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ayer NW, Tyedmers PH, Pelletier NL, Sonesson U, Scholz A (2007) Co-product allocation in life cycle assessments of seafood production systems: review of problems and strategies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12(7):480–487

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baumann H, Tillman AM (2004) The hitch hiker’s guide to LCA: an orientation in LCA methodology and application. Studentlitteratur, Lund

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosma R, Anh P, Potting J (2011) LCA of intensive striped catfish farming in the Mekong Delta for screening hotspots as input to environmental policy and research agenda. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(9):903–915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buck BH, Krause G, Rosenthal H (2004) Extensive open ocean aquaculture development within wind farms in Germany: the prospect of offshore co-management and legal constraints. Ocean Coast Manag 47:95–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao L (2012) Farming shrimp for the future: a sustainability analysis of shrimp farming in China. University of Michigan, PhD dissertation

    Google Scholar 

  • Chua TE, Gorre IRL, Ross SA et al (2000) The malacca straits. Mar Pollut Bull 41(1–6):160–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole DW, Cole R et al (2009) Aquaculture: environmental, toxicological, and health issues. Int J Hyg Environ Health 212:369–377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Costello C, Drake J, Lodge D (2007) Evaluating an invasive species policy: ballast water exchange in the Great Lakes. Ecol Appl 17(3):655–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curran M, de Baan L, De Schryver AM, van Zelm R, Hellweg S, Koellner T, Sonnemann G, Huijbregts MAJ (2010) Toward meaningful end points of biodiversity in life cycle assessment. Environ Sci Technol 45(1):70–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • d’Orbcastel R, Blancheton JP, Aubin J (2009) Towards environmentally sustainable aquaculture: comparison between two trout farming systems using LCA. Aqua Eng 40:113–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport J, Wong TM (1986) Responses of the blood cockle Anadara granosa (L.) (Bivalvia: Arcidae) to salinity, hypoxia, and aerial exposure. Aquaculture 56:151–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumbauld BR, Ruesink JL, Rumrill SS (2009) The ecological role of bivalve shellfish aquaculture in the estuarine environment: a review with application to oyster and clam culture in West Coast (USA) estuaries. Aquaculture 290:196–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (1997) Rural Aquaculture: Overview and Framework for Country Reviews. Rome, Italy. http://www.fao.org/documents/en/detail/60682/ Accessed 21 May 2013

  • FAO (2010) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2006. Rome, Italy. http://www.fao.org Accessed 23 June 2014

  • FAO (2012) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2012. Rome., Italy. http://www.fao.org Accessed 27 June 2013

  • Finnveden G, Hauschild M et al (2009) Recent developments in LCA. J Environ Manag 91(1):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford JS, Pelletier N et al (2012) Proposed local ecological impact categories and indicators for LCA of aquaculture. J Ind Ecol 16:254–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrest BM, Keeley NB et al (2009) Bivalve aquaculture in estuaries: review and synthesis of oyster cultivation effects. Aquaculture 298:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guttormsdóttir AB (2009) Life cycle assessment on Icelandic cod product based on two different fishing methods life cycle assessment on Icelandic cod product based on two different fishing methods. University of Iceland, M.Sc dissertation

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrikkson P, Guinẻe J, Kleijn R (2011) Proposed LCA methodology revisions for aquaculture SEAT LCA studies. http://seatglobal.eu/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Report-on-LCA-methodology.pdf/. Accessed 4 June 2013

  • Henriksson PJG, Guinée J, Kleijn R, Snoo GR (2012) LCA of aquaculture systems-a review of methodologies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:304–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iribarren D (2010) Life cycle assessment of mussel and turbot aquaculture: application and insights. Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, PhD dissertation

    Google Scholar 

  • Iribarren D, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2011) LCA of mussel culture. In: Mussel: anatomy, habitat, and environmental impact. Nova Publishers, New York, pp 357–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Ismail A, Ismail A (2008) Ekologi Air Tawar. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, Kuala Lumpur, pp 245–246

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 14040 (1997) Environmental management-LCA – principles and framework 1997. International Organization of Standardization, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarernpornnipat A, Pedersen O et al (2003) Sustainable management of shellfish resources in Bandon Bay, Gulf of Thailand. J Coast Conserv 9(2):135–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jerbi MA, Aubin J et al (2012) LCA of two rearing techniques of sea bass (Dicentrarchuslabrax). Aqua Eng 46:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser MJ, Broad G, Hall SJ (2001) Disturbance of intertidal soft-sediment benthic communities by cockle hand raking. J Sea Res 45:119–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick B, Fleming LE et al (2004) Literature review of Florida red tide: implications or human health effects. Harmful Algae 3:99–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleijn R, Henriksson P (2010) Env LCA of SEA Aquaculture systems for tilapia, catfish, peneid shrimp and macrobrachium prawns. http://seatglobal.eu/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/LCA-goal-and-scope-setting.pdf Accessed 15 May 2014

  • Klinger DH, Turnipseed M et al (2013) Moving beyond the fished or farmed dichotomy. Mar Policy 38:369–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluts IN, Potting J, Bosma RH, Phong LT, Udo HMJ (2012) Environmental comparison of intensive and integrated agriculture-aquaculture systems for striped catfish production in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam, based on two existing case studies using LCA. Aquaculture 4:195–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little DC, Edwards P (2003) Integrated livestock-fish farming systems. FAO, Rome. http://www.fao.org/docrep/006/y5098e/y5098e00.htm Accessed 13 Mar 2013

  • Mohammad NA, Sharifah Mastura SA, Johari Mat A (2007) Land use evaluation for Kuala Selangor, Malaysia using remote sensing and GIS technologies. Geogr Malays J Soc Space 3(1):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Mungkung R, Gheewala S (2007) Use of life cycle assessment (LCA) to compare the environmental impacts of aquaculture and agri-food products. In: Bartley DM, Brugère C, Soto D, Gerber P, Harvey B (eds) Comparative assessment of the environmental costs of aquaculture and other food production sectors: methods fo rmeaningful comparisons. FAO/WFT Expert Workshop. 24–28 April 2006. Vancouver, Canada. FAO Fisheries Proceedings. No. 10. Rome, FAO. 2007. pp. 87–96 http://library.enaca.org/environment/comparativeassessment08. Accessed 15 Oct 2014

  • Mungkung R, Udo de Haes HA, Clift R (2006) Potentials and limitations of life cycle assessment in setting ecolabelling criteria: a case study on Thai shrimp aquaculture product. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(1):55–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naylor et al (2000) Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies. Nature 405:1017–1024

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Norhana W, Ainy N (2011) Establishment of a shellfish model farm: a case study in Sg. Jarum. Food Res Int 18:79–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Notarnicola B, Hayashi K, Curran MA, Huisingh D (2012) Progress in working towards a more sustainable agri-food industry. J Clean Prod 28:1–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Onn CC, Yusoff S (2010) The formulation of life cycle impact assessment framework for Malaysia using Eco-indicator. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:985–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson CO (2000) Algae toxic algae and algal toxins. In: Encyclopedia of aquaculture. Wiley, New York, pp 17–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Payraudeau S, Hayo MG, Der Werf V (2005) Environmental impact assessment for a farming region: a review of methods. Agric Ecosyst Environ 107:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier N, Tyedmers P (2008) Life cycle considerations for improving sustainability assessments in seafood campaigns. Environ Manag 42:918–931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier N, Tyedmers P et al (2007) Impact categories for life cycle assessment research of seafood production systems: review and prospectus. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12(6):414–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phong LT, de Boer IJM, Udo HMJ (2011) LCA of food production in integrated agriculture–aquaculture systems of the Mekong Delta. Livest Sci 139:80–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potting J, Hauschild MZ (2006) Spatial differentiation in life cycle impact assessment a decade of method development to increase the environmental realism of LCIA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(1):11–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Potting J, Schöpp W et al (1998) Site-dependent life cycle impact assessment of acidification. J Ind Ecol 2(2):63–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • PRé (2014) SimaPro 8 Database Manual: Methods Library. http://www.pre-sustainability.com/simapro-database-and-methods-library. Accessed 5 Dec 2014

  • Rees G, Bartram J, Kay D (2010) Expert consensus. In: Safe management of shellfish and harvest water. IWA Publishing, London, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuel-Fitwi B, Nagela F, Meyer S, Schroeder JP, Schulz C (2013a) Comparative LCA (LCA) of raising rainbow trout (Oncorhynchusmykiss) in different production systems. Aqua Eng 54:85–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuel-Fitwi B, Schroeder J, Schulz C (2013b) System delimitation in LCA (LCA) of aquaculture: striving for valid and comprehensive environmental assessment using rainbow trout farming as a case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:577–589

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Santo Domingo JW, Edge TA (2010) Identification of primary sources of faecal pollution. In: Safe management of shellfish and harvest water. IWA Publishing, London, pp 51–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Schau EM (2012) Environmental life cycle assessment of fish food products with emphasis on the fish catch process. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, PhD dissertation

    Google Scholar 

  • Schau EM, Fet AM (2008) LCA studies of food products as background for environmental product declarations. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(3):255–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt JH (2008) System delimitation in agricultural consequential LCA. Int J LCA 13(4):350–364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seikei T (2000) Flounder culture, Japan. In: Encyclopedia of aquaculture. Wiley, New York, pp 382–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamsuddin L (1992) Akuakultur Pinggir Laut. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, Kuala Lumpur, pp 10–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Spångberg J, Jönsson H, Tidåker P (2013) Bringing nutrients from sea to land-mussels as fertiliser from a life cycle perspective. J Clean Prod 51:234–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stickney RR (2000) Pesticides. In: Encyclopedia of aquaculture. Wiley, New York, pp 645–646

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrane M (2006) LCA of Danish fish products: New methods and insights. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(1):66–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tillman A-M, Akvell T, Bauman H, Rydberg T (1994) Choice of system boundaries in LCA. J Clean Prod 2(1):21–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu NPC, Ha NN, Agusa T, Ikemoto T, Tuyen BC, Tanabe S, Takeuchi I (2011) Trace elements in Anadara spp. (Mollusca: Bivalva) collected along the coast of Vietnam, with emphasis on regional differences and human health risk assessment. Fish Sci 77(6):1033–1043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Udo de Haes HA et al (1999) Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 4(2):6–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez-Rowe I, Hospido A, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2012) Best practices in life cycle assessment implementation in fisheries. Improving and broadening environmental assessment for seafood production systems. Trends Food Sci Technol 28:116–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vörösmarty CJ, McIntyre et al (2010) Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467:555–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilfart A, Prudhomme J, Blancheton JP, Aubin J (2013) LCA and emergy accounting of aquaculture systems: towards ecological intensification. J Environ Manag 121:96–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler F, Nilsson P, Mattsson B, Wahher Y (2003) Life cycle assessment of frozen Cod fillets including fishery-specific environmental impacts. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8(1):39–47

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Environment and Development, National University of Malaysia, 43600, Bangi, Malaysia

    Siti Dina Razman Pahri & Ahmad Fariz Mohamed

  2. School of Environmental and Natural Resource Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, National University of Malaysia, 43600, Bangi, Malaysia

    Abdullah Samat

Authors
  1. Siti Dina Razman Pahri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ahmad Fariz Mohamed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Abdullah Samat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siti Dina Razman Pahri.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Ian Vázquez-Rowe

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pahri, S.D.R., Mohamed, A.F. & Samat, A. LCA for open systems: a review of the influence of natural and anthropogenic factors on aquaculture systems. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20, 1324–1337 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0929-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0929-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation