Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Consumption-as-usual instead of ceteris paribus assumption for demand

Integration of potential rebound effects into LCA

  • UNCERTAINTIES IN LCA
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background, aims, and scope

Life cycle assessment (LCA) according to ISO 14040 standard (ISO-LCA) is applied to assess the environmental impact per functional unit of new or modified products. However, new or modified products can also induce demand changes—so-called rebound effects. If overall environmental impact is of interest, there is a need to assess the potential magnitude of such rebound effects and to allow recommendations on how to mitigate these effects. To do so, this study proposes to complement the constant demand assumption (implicitly assumed by the ISO-LCA), commonly known as the ceteris paribus assumption, with a consumption-as-usual assumption allowing a systematic stepwise inclusion of rebound effects.

Materials and methods

We base our results on a formal description of household consumption. To indicate the relevance of the proposed integration of rebound effects, different comparative LCAs are reviewed and the concept is applied to mobility as illustrative examples.

Results

Based on a description of household demand and consumption feedback loops, we propose the consumption-as-usual concept, which in contrast to the constant demand assumption assumes that (1) the use of household resources for consumption does not change and (2) preferences remain the same. Household resources for example are purchasing power (we assume that households do not work less), time, and living space. We outline how this concept allows integrating potential rebound effects into ISO-LCA by considering three different cases of reallocating freed household resources. To illustrate the use of the consumption-as-usual concept, we draw implications for different comparative LCAs from the literature and illustrate cases with income and time rebound for different personal travel modes.

Discussion

The consumption-as-usual concept is applicable to a broad range of product modifications and allows an important complementation of the LCA regarding rebound effects. For products with various changes in the need for household resources, the assessment becomes however a challenging task. The limits of the consumption-as-usual concept are mainly given by its two underlying assumptions. Therefore, new or modified products with the potential to change consumer preferences or even the amount of household resources used for consumption go beyond this concept.

Conclusions

The integration of rebound effects is feasible for many comparative LCAs. It helps in increasing the reliability of the assessment of overall environmental impact reduction through new or modified products. In addition, a basis is provided with which to mitigate rebound effects and give appropriate recommendations to product users.

Recommendations and perspectives

Potential rebound effects should be included in LCA in order to guide consumers and policy towards sustainable consumption. We recommend the consumption-as-usual concept for this purpose. To predict rebound effects under consumption as usual instead of outlining potential amplitudes, further research on household preferences is needed and an optimisation model should be applied for household consumption. However, even if data are available for such a prediction, the assessment of potential rebound effects is still recommended in order to recognise dangers and opportunities in consumption changes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The term ‘product’ as used in this article includes all economic output purchased by households (i.e. also services).

  2. The LCA resulted in primary energy use for 1 Gbit of 800 MJ-eq. (GSM) and 640 MJ-eq. (UMTS). The data rate (speed) of UMTS is indicated as three times that of GSM. The resulting rebound is: \( {\hbox{RE}} = 8 = 1 - \left( {3\cdot 640 - 800} \right)/\left( {640 - 800} \right) \).

References

  • Banks J, Blundell R, Lewbel A (1997) Quadratic engel curves and consumer demand. Rev Econ Stat 79(4):527–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker GS (1976) The economic approach to human behavior. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannlund R, Ghalwash T, Nordstrom J (2007) Increased energy efficiency and the rebound effect: effects on consumption and emissions. Energ Econ 29(1):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookes L (2000) Energy efficiency fallacies revisited. Energ Policy 28(6–7):355–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordella M, Tugnoli A, Spadoni G, Santarelli F, Zangrando T (2008) LCA of an Italian lager beer. Int J Life Cycle Ass 13(2):133–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Haan P, Mueller MG, Peters A (2006) Does the hybrid toyota prius lead to rebound effects? Analysis of size and number of cars previously owned by Swiss Prius buyers. Ecol Econ 58(3):592–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Haan P, Peters A, Scholz RW (2007) Reducing energy consumption in road transport through hybrid vehicles: investigation of rebound effects, and possible effects of tax rebates. J Clean Prod 15(11–12):1076–1084. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.05.025

    Google Scholar 

  • Duan H, Eugster M, Hischier R, Streicher-Porte M, Li J (2009) Life cycle assessment study of a chinese desktop personal computer. Sci Total Environ 407(5):1755–1764

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Faist Emmenegger M, Frischknecht R, Stutz M, Guggisberg M, Witschi R, Otto T (2006) Life cycle assessment of the mobile communication system UMTS: towards eco-efficient systems (12 pp). Int J Life Cycle Ass 11(4):265–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FOPH (2005) 5. Schweizerischer Ernährungsbericht (5th Swiss food report). Federal Office for Public Health (FOPH), Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • Girod B, de Haan P (2008) Mental rebound. Rebound research report nr. 3. ETH Zurich, Institute for Environmental Decisions (IED). www.uns.ethz.ch/res/irl/emdm/publications/berichte. Zurich

  • Girod B, de Haan P (2009) GHG reduction potential of changes in consumption patterns and higher quality levels: evidence from Swiss household consumption survey. Energ Policy 37(12):5650–5661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girod B, de Haan P (2010) More or better? A model for changes in household greenhouse gas emissions due to higher income. J Ind Ecol 14(1):31–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Girod B, Wiek A, Mieg H, Hulme M (2009) The evolution of the IPCC’s emissions scenarios. Environ Sci Policy 12(2):103–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heijungs R, Huppes G, Guinée J (2009) A scientific framework for LCA—deliverable (d15) of work package 2 (wp2) CALCAS project. Institute of Environmental Sciences, Leiden University (CML)

  • Hertwich EG (2005) Consumption and the rebound effect—an industrial ecology perspective. J Ind Ecol 9(1–2):85–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstetter P, Madjar M, Ozawa T (2006) Happiness and sustainable consumption—psychological and physical rebound effects at work in a tool for sustainable design. Int J Life Cycle Ass 11:105–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2006) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines 14040. International Standards Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalas M (2005) The everyday life context of increasing energy demands—time use survey data in a decomposition analysis. J Ind Ecol 9(1–2):129–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungbluth N, Tietje O, Scholz RW (2000) Food purchases: impacts from the consumers’ point of view investigated with a modular LCA. Int J Life Cycle Ass 5(3):134–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maeder P, Fliessbach A, Dubois D, Gunst L, Fried P, Niggli U (2002) Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming. Science 296(5573):1694–1697. doi:10.1126/science.1071148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz RW (2011) Environmental literacy in science and society: from knowledge to decision. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorrell S (2007) The rebound effect—an assessment of the evidence for economy-wide energy savings from improved energy efficiency. UKERC (UK Energy Research Centre), ISBN 1-903144-0-35

  • Spielmann M, Scholz RW (2005) Life cycle inventories of transport services. Int J Life Cycle Ass 10(1):85–94. doi:10.1065/lca.10.181.10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spielmann M, Scholz RW, Tietje O, de Haan P (2005) Scenario modelling in prospective LCA of transport systems—application of formative scenario analysis. Int J Life Cycle Ass 10(5):325–335. doi:10.1065/lca2004.10.188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spielmann M, de Haan P, Scholz RW (2008) Environmental rebound effects of high-speed transport technologies: a case study of climate change rebound effects of a future underground maglev train system. J Clean Prod 16(13):1388–1398. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock JH (1988) A reexamination of Friedman consumption puzzle. J Bus Econ Stat 6(4):401–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swiss Statistics (2005) Einkommens- und Verbrauchserhebung. Neuenburg

  • Swiss Statistics (2007) Mobilität in der Schweiz, Ergebnisse des Mikrozensus 2005 zum Verkehrsverhalten. Swiss Statistics, Neuenburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler RH (1999) Mental accounting matters. J Behav Decis Making 12(3):183–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiesen J, Christensen T, Kristensen T, Andersen R, Brunoe B, Gregersen T, Thrane M, Weidema B (2008) Rebound effects of price differences. Int J Life Cycle Ass 13(2):104–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first author is supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant 105212-112475). We also would like to thank Gjalt Huppes (CML, Institute for Environmental Sciences, Leiden University) and Christian Bauer (Technology Assessment Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI)) for their valuable comments on previous versions of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Environmental Decisions, Natural and Social Science Interface, ETH Zurich, Universitaetstraβe 22, CHN K73.2, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland

    Bastien Girod, Peter de Haan & Roland W. Scholz

Authors
  1. Bastien Girod
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter de Haan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Roland W. Scholz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bastien Girod.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Andreas Ciroth

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Girod, B., de Haan, P. & Scholz, R.W. Consumption-as-usual instead of ceteris paribus assumption for demand. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16, 3–11 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-010-0240-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-010-0240-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation