Abstract
Purpose
At the parameter level, data inaccuracy, data gaps, and the use of unrepresentative data have been recognized as sources of uncertainty in life cycle assessment (LCA). In many LCA uncertainty studies, parameter distributions were created based on the measured variability or on “rules of thumb,” but the possible existence of correlation was not explored. The correlation between parameters may alter the sampling space and, thus, yield unrepresentative results. The objective of this article is to describe the effect of correlation between input parameters (and the final product) on the outcome of an uncertainty analysis, carried out for an LCA of an agricultural product.
Methods
After a theoretical discussion about the statistical concepts on the creation of multivariate random distributions for a Monte Carlo simulation, a LCA case study for potatoes was performed. LCA followed the International Standards Organization guidelines, and the CML baseline characterization method was applied. The functional unit was 1 t of potatoes, while the inputs were restricted to inorganic fertilizers and pesticides. Differences among the two ways to assess uncertainty (with or without correlation) were analyzed through Monte Carlo methodologies, based on the respective estimated probability density functions. In order to demonstrate the effect of correlation on the final outcome, only global warming potential, acidification, and eutrophication impact categories are presented.
Results and discussion
The LCA outcome evidenced the highest environmental impact for N-based fertilizers. Environmental impact of the pesticides to the categories considered was minimum, while its contribution in the characterization phase was lower than 10%. Different degrees of correlation were found between the input factors analyzed and also in relation with yield. Uncertainty analysis results indicated a lower uncertainty level for abiotic depletion and global warming when correlation was taken into account, and the Monte Carlo simulations were based on a multivariate sampling space. The results presented allowed the inclusion of the existence of such correlation within the sampling space for a Monte Carlo simulation. Multivariate sampling spaces can be included in LCA uncertainty analysis but only if sensitivity analysis are done previously in order to identify the input factors with the highest contribution to the output uncertainty.
Conclusions
The results of an LCA uncertainty analysis at the parameter level may lead to the wrong conclusions when the input parameters are correlated. Under a Monte Carlo procedure, the sampling space derived from univariate or multivariate normal distributions exert a varying degree of error propagation leading to different responses in the uncertainty analysis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baruah DC, Dutta PK (2007) An investigation into the energy use in relation to yield of rice (Oryza sativa) in Assam, India. Agric Ecosyst Environ 120:185–191
Björklund AE (2002) Survey of approaches to improve reliability in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 7(2):64–72
Ciroth A, Fleischer G, Steinbach J (2005) Uncertainty calculation in life cycle assessments a combined model of simulation and approximation. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9(4):216–226
R Development Core Team (2008) R—a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. Available from http://www.r-project.org
Ecoinvent centre (2007) Ecoinvent data v2.0. Swiss centre for life cycle inventories. Available from: http://www.ecoinvent.org
Everitt BS, Dunn G (1991) Applied multivariate data analysis. Edward Arnold, Bristol
Ferret R, Mendoza G, Castilla M (2004) The influence of agricultural data uncertainty in the life cycle assessment of biodegradable hydraulic lubricants. In: Pahl-Wostl C, Schmidt S, Rizzoli A, Jakeman A (eds) Complexity and integrated resources management—transactions of the 2nd biennial meeting of the international environmental modelling and software society, vol 1. International Environmental Modelling and Software Society, Manno, Switzerland, pp 301–307
Guinée J, Gorrée M, Heijungs R, Huppes G, Kleijn R, de Koning A, van Oers L, Wegener Sleeswijk A, Suh S, Udo de Haes H.A, de Bruijn H, van Duin R, Huijbregts MAJ, Lindeijer E, Roorda AAH, van der Ven BL, Weidema BP (eds) (2002) Life cycle assessment. An operational guide to the ISO standards. VROM & CML, Leiden University, The Netherlands
Heijungs R, Huijbregts MAJ (2004) A review of approaches to treat uncertainty in LCA. In: Pahl-Wostl C, Schmidt S, Rizzoli A, Jakeman A (eds) Complexity and integrated resources management—transactions of the 2nd biennial meeting of the international environmental modelling and software society, vol 1. International Environmental Modelling and Software Society, Manno, Switzerland, pp 332–340
Heijungs R, Suh S, Kleijn R (2004) Numerical approaches to life cycle interpretation: the case of the ecoinvent '96 database. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10(2):103–112
Huijbregts MAJ (1998) Application of uncertainty and variability in LCA. Part I: general framework for the analysis of uncertainty and variability in life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 3(5):273–280
Huijbregts MAJ, Norris G, Bretz R, Ciroth A, Maurice B, von Bahr B, Weidema B, de Beaufort ASH (2001) Framework for modelling data uncertainty in life cycle inventories. Int J Life Cycle Assess 6(3):127–132
Huijbregts MAJ, Gilijamse W, Ragas MJ, Reijnders L (2003) Evaluating uncertainty in environmental life-cycle assessment. A case study comparing two insulation options for a Dutch one-family dwelling. Environ Sci Technol 37(11):2600–2608
ISO (2006a) ISO 14040: Environmental management—life cycle assessment-principles and framework. ISO 14040:2006(E). International Standards Organization
ISO (2006b) ISO 14044: Environmental management—life cycle assessment-requirements and guidelines. ISO 14044:2006(E). International Standards Organization
Johnson RA, Wichern DW (1998) Applied multivariate statistical analysis, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey
Karkacier O, Gokalp Goktolga Z, Cicek A (2006) A regression analysis of the effect of energy use in agriculture. Energy Policy 34:3796–3800
Lloyd SM, Ries R (2007) Characterizing, propagating, and analyzing uncertainty in life-cycle assessment. A survey of quantitative approaches. J Ind Ecol 11(1):161–179
May JR, Brennan DJ (2003) Application of data quality assessment methods to an LCA of electricity generation. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8(4):215–225
Reap J, Roman F, Duncan S, Bras B (2008) A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment. Part 2: impact assessment and interpretation. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(5):374–388
Sonnemann GW, Schuhmacher M, Castells F (2003) Uncertainty assessment by a Monte Carlo simulation in a life cycle inventory of electricity produced by a waste incinerator. J Cleaner Prod 11:279–292
Acknowledgements
The present study was realized thanks to funds from the Flemish Interuniversity Council (VLIR) through the own initiative project ZEIN2004PR295 entitled “Optimization and implementation of green waste compost applications in sustainable agriculture in the high tropics.”
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Andreas Ciroth
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bojacá, C.R., Schrevens, E. Parameter uncertainty in LCA: stochastic sampling under correlation. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15, 238–246 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-010-0150-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-010-0150-0