Abstract
Background, Aim, and Scope
The identification and assessment of environmental tradeoffs is a strongpoint of life cycle assessment (LCA). A tradeoff made in many product systems is the exchange of potential for occupational accidents with the additional use of energy and materials. Net benefits of safety measures with respect to human health are best illustrated if the consequences avoided and health impacts induced by additional emissions are assessed using commensurable metrics. Our aim is to develop a human health impact indicator for offshore crane lifts. Crane lifts are a major cause of accidents on offshore oil and gas (O & G) rigs, and health impacts from crane lift accidents should be included in comparative LCA of O & G technologies if the alternatives differ in the use of crane lifts.
Materials and methods
Accident records for mobile offshore petroleum installations were used to develop an empirical occupational health indicator for crane lifts in LCA. Probabilistic parameters were introduced in the procedure, and results were calculated by Monte Carlo simulation. The disability adjusted life years (DALY) framework was used to classify health outcome. The characterization factor for offshore crane lifts was applied in three comparisons to evaluate the significance of crane lifts to human health impacts from drilling technology.
Results
The mean occupational health impact per crane lift was 4.5∙10−6 DALY, with cumulative percentiles {P 2.5, P 50, P 97.5} = {6.0∙10−7, 3.1∙10−6, 1.7∙10−5}. Analogously, the fatal accident frequency was described by {P 2.5, P 50, P 97.5} = {7.6∙10−9, 3.9∙10−8, 2.0∙10−7}, with mean 5.6∙10−8 lives lost per crane lift.
Discussion
The uncertainty in the results is caused mainly by the random nature of accidents, i.e., variability in accident frequency. Applications of the characterization factor indicate that although crane lifts may not be significant to the overall health impact of the life cycle of drilling fluids, they are important to the occupational safety of employees on offshore drilling rigs and contribute significantly to the life cycle health impact of loading technologies used to transport drilling waste to shore. A comparative LCA of technologies for loading and off-loading drilling wastes shows that a recently developed hydraulic system performs better than the traditional crane lift alternative in terms of human health impacts.
Conclusions
With the availability of statistics to assess the risk of single mechanical operations, safety aspects may well be included in LCA. For the case of offshore crane lifts, the uncertainty in the characterization factor compares favorably to what is indicated for other human health impact chains. In further work of quantifying occupational health impacts in DALY using accident statistics, it is advised to see if records of non-recoverable injuries (fatalities and amputation cases) can be used to simplify the damage assessment procedure as recoverable injuries were insignificant to the total burden from crane accidents.
Recommendations and perspectives
The characterization factor for crane lifts identifies contributions to life cycle health impact from loading technologies that otherwise would have been overlooked in LCA. While many contest the inclusion of occupational accidents in LCA, our results show that such impacts can be included and that their consideration adds valuable insights.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Antonsson A-B, Carlsson H (1995) The basis for a method to integrate work environment in life cycle assessments. J Clean Prod 3(4):215–220
Barnthouse L, Fava J, Humphreys K, Hunt R, Laibson L, Noesen S, Norris G, Owens J, Todd J, Vigon B, Weitz K, Young J (eds) (1997) Life-cycle impact assessment: the state-of-the-art, 2nd edn. SETAC, Pensacola
Ciroth A, Fleischer G, Jörg S (2004) Uncertainty calculation in life cycle assessments: a combined model of simulation and approximation. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9(4):216–226
Crettaz P, Pennington D, Rhomberg L, Brand K, Jolliet O (2002) Assessing human health response in life cycle assessment using ED10s and DALYs, part 1—cancer effects. Risk Anal 22(5):931–946
DNV (2005a) Accident statistics for floating offshore units on the UK continental shelf 1980–2003. Prepared by Det Norske Veritas for the Health and Safety Executive. Research report RR353. Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, Norwich, http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrhtm/rr353.htm
DNV(2005b) Accident statistics for fixed offshore units on the UK continental shelf 1980–2003. Prepared by Det Norske Veritas for the Health and Safety Executive. Research report RR349. Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, Norwich, http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrhtm/rr349.htm
EC (1996) Council Directive 96/61/EC of 24 September 1996 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control. Official J Legis 257:26–40, Official publications of the European Communities
Forbes M (1997) A study of accident patterns in offshore drillers in the North Sea. Dissertation prepared for the diploma of membership of the Faculty of Occupational Medicine. Royal College of Physicians, London
Frischknecht R, Braunschweig A, Hofstetter P, Suter P (2000) Human health damages due to ionising radiation in life cycle impact assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev 20:159–189
GAD (2006) Interim life tables. Published online by The United Kingdom Government Actuary’s Department: http://www.gad.gov.uk/Life_Tables/Interim_life_tables.htm. Accessed 12 September 2006
Geisler G, Hellweg S, Hungerbühler K (2005) Uncertainty analysis in life cycle assessment (LCA): Case study on plant protection products and implications for decision making. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10(3):191–193
Goedkoop M, Spriensma R (2002) The Eco-indicator 99: a damage oriented method for life cycle impact assessment. Methodology report, 3rd edn. Prè Consultants, Amersfoort
Goedkoop M, Hofstetter P, Müller-Wenk R, Spriensma R (1998) The Eco-Indicator 98 explained. Int J Life Cycle Assess 3(6):352–360
Hauschild M, Wenzel H (1998) Environmental assessment of products. Scientific background, vol 2. Chapman and Hall, London
Heijungs R, Suh S (2002) Computational structure of life cycle assessment. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht
Hertwich EG, Hammitt JK (2001) A decision-analytic framework or impact assessment. Part 1: LCA and decision analysis. Int J Life Cycle Assess 6(1):5–12
Hertwich EG, McKone TE, Pease WS (2000) A systematic uncertainty analysis of an evaluative fate and exposure model. Risk Anal 20(4):437–452
Hofstetter P (1998) Perspectives in life cycle impact assessment: A structured approach to combine models of the technosphere, ecosphere and valuesphere. Kluwers Academic, Dordrecht
Hofstetter P, Norris GA (2003) Why and how should we assess occupational health impacts in integrated product policy. Environ Sci Technol 37(10):2025–2035
Huijbregts M (2002) Uncertainty and variability in environmental life-cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 7(3):173
Huijbregts MAJ, Rombouts LJA, Ragas AMJ, van de Meent D (2005) Human-toxicological effect and damage factors of carconigenic and noncarcinogenic chemicals for life cycle impact assessment. Integr Environ Assess Manage 1(3):181–244
ISO (2006) 14040:2006. Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. ISO, Geneva
Meijer A, Huijbregts MAJ, Reijnders L (2005) Human health damages due to indoor sources of organic compounds and radioactivity in life cycle impact assessment of dwellings. Part 1: characterisation factors. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10(5):309–316
Mazzola A (2000) A probabilistic methodology for the assessment of safety from dropped loads in offshore engineering. Risk Anal 20:327–337
Morgan MG, Henrion M (1990) Uncertainty. A guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Mueller BA, Morh DL, Rice JC, Clemmer DI (1987) Factors affecting individual injury experience among petroleum workers. J Occup Med 29(2):126–131
Müller-Wenk R (2004) A method to include in LCA road traffic noise and its health effects. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9(2):76–85
Murray CJ, Lopez AD (eds) (1996) The global burden of disease. WHO, World Bank, and Harvard School of Public Health, Boston
ODS-Petrodata (2005) RigPoint database: http://www.ods-petrodata.com
Pennington D, Crettaz P, Tauxe A, Rhomberg L, Brand K, Jolliet O (2002) Assessing human health response in life cycle assessment using ED10s and DALYs, part 2—noncancer effects. Risk Analysis 22(5):947–963
Pettersen J (2007) Overall evaluation of offshore drilling fluid technology—development and application of life-cycle inventory and impact assessment methods. PhD Thesis 2007:251. Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Department of Energy and Process Engineering
Poulsen PB, Jensen AA (eds) (2004) Working environment in life-cycle assessment. SETAC, Pensacola
Safetec (2005) Risk analysis of decommissioning activities. Main report. ST-20447-RA-1-Rev 03. Safetec Nordic AB, Trondheim
Schmidt A, Jensen AA, Clausen AU, Kamstrup O, Postlethwaite D (2004a) A comparative life cycle assessment of building insulation products made of stone wool, paper wool and flax. Part 2: Comparative assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9(2):122–129
Schmidt A, Poulsen PB, Andreasen J, Fløe T, Poulsen KE (2004b) The working environment in LCA. A new approach. Guidelines from the Danish Environmental Protection Agency No. 72. Danish Environmental Protection Agency, Copenhagen
Udo de Haes HA, Lindeijer E (2002) The conceptual structure of life-cycle impact assessment. In: Udo de Haes HA, Finnveden G, Goedkoop M, Hauschild M, Hertwich E, Hofstetter P, Klöppfer W, Krewitt W, Lindeijer E, Mueller-Wenk R, Olsen I, Pennington D, Potting J, Steen B (eds) Life-cycle impact assessment: striving towards best practice. SETAC, Pensacola
Wrisberg N, Udo de Haes HA, Triebswetter U, Eder P, Clift R (eds) (2002) Analytical tools for environmental design and management in a systems perspective—the combined use of analytical tools. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht
Acknowledgement
This work was funded by a PhD grant from StatoilHydro ASA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Andreas Ciroth
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pettersen, J., Hertwich, E.G. Occupational health impacts: offshore crane lifts in life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13, 440–449 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-008-0003-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-008-0003-2