Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Life cycle inventory for electricity generation in China

  • LCA Case Studies
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background, Goal and Scope

The objective of this study was to produce detailed a life cycle inventory (LCI) for the provision of 1 kWh of electricity to consumers in China in 2002 in order to identify areas of improvement in the industry. The system boundaries were processes in power stations, and the construction and operation of infrastructure were not included. The scope of this study was the consumption of fossil fuels and the emissions of air pollutants, water pollutants and solid wastes, which are listed as follows: (1) consumption of fossil fuels, including general fuels, such as raw coal, crude oil and natural gas, and the uranium used for nuclear power; (2) emissions of air pollutants from thermal power, hydropower and nuclear power plants; (3) emissions of water pollutants, including general water waste from fuel electric plants and radioactive waste fluid from nuclear power plants; (4) emissions of solid wastes, including fly ash and slag from thermal power plants and radioactive solid wastes from nuclear power plants.

Methods

Data were collected regarding the amount of fuel, properties of fuel and the technical parameters of the power plants. The emissions of CO2, SO2, NOx, CH4, CO, non-methane volatile organic compound (NMVOC), dust and heavy metals (As, Cd, Cr, Hg, Ni, Pb, V, Zn) from thermal power plants as well as fuel production and distribution were estimated. The emissions of CO2 and CH4 from hydropower plants and radioactive emissions from nuclear power plants were also investigated. Finally, the life cycle inventory for China’s electricity industry was calculated and analyzed.

Results

Related to 1 kWh of usable electricity in China in 2002, the consumption of coal, oil, gas and enriched uranium were 4.57E-01, 8.88E-03, 7.95E-03 and 9.03E-08 kg; the emissions of CO2, SO2, NOx, CO, CH4, NMVOC, dust, As, Cd, Cr, Hg, Ni, Pb, V, and Zn were 8.77E-01, 8.04E-03, 5.23E-03, 1.25E-03, 2.65E-03, 3.95E-04, 1.63E-02, 1.62E-06, 1.03E-08, 1.37E-07, 7.11E-08, 2.03E-07, 1.42E-06, 2.33E-06, and 1.94E-06 kg; the emissions of waste water, COD, coal fly ash, and slag were 1.31, 6.02E-05, 8.34E-02, and 1.87E-02 kg; and the emissions of inactive gas, halogen and gasoloid, tritium, non-tritium, and radioactive solid waste were 3.74E+01 Bq, 1.61E-01 Bq, 4.22E+01 Bq, 4.06E-02 Bq, and 2.68E-10 m3 respectively.

Conclusions

The comparison result between the LCI data of China’s electricity industry and that of Japan showed that most emission intensities of China’s electricity industry were higher than that of Japan except for NMVOC. Compared with emission intensities of the electricity industry in Japan, the emission intensities of CO2 and Ni in China were about double; the emission intensities of NOx, Cd, CO, Cr, Hg and SO2 in China were more than 10 times that of Japan; and the emission intensities of CH4, V, Pb, Zn, As and dust were more than 20 times. The reasons for such disparities were also analyzed.

Recommendations and Perspectives

To get better LCI for the electricity industry in China, it is important to estimate the life cycle emissions during fuel production and transportation for China. Another future improvement could be the development of LCIs for construction and operation of infrastructure such as factory buildings and dams. It would also be important to add the information about land use for hydropower.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rafaschieri A, Rapaccini M, Manfrida G (1999): Life Cycle Assessment of electricity production from polar energy crops compared with conventional fossil fuels. Energy Convers Manage 40, 1477–1493

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dubreuil A (2001): Inventory for Energy Production in Canada. Int J LCA 6, 281–284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Coltro L, García EEC, Queiroz GC (2003). Life cycle inventory for electric energy system in Brazil. Int J LCA 8, 290–296

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lee KM, Lee SY, Hur T (2004): Life cycle inventory analysis for electricity in Korea. Energy 29, 87–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Curran MA, Mann M, Norris G (2005): The international workshop on electricity data for life cycle inventories. J Clean Prod 13, 853–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Babbitt CW, Lindner AS (2005): A life cycle inventory of coal used for electricity production in Florida. J Clean Prod 13, 903–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhao S, Shi X, Bao Y, Mo X, Wei Z, Fang D, Ma Y, Li H, Zhou D, Liu X, Xue X, Pan Z, Li X (2000): Case Study on Comparative Assessment of Nuclear and Coal-Fueled Electricity Generation Options and Strategy. China nuclear science and technology report, CNIC-01433/CINIE-0010. Atomic Energy Press, China

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pan Z, Ma Z, Li X, Wu T, Xiu B (2001): Comparative study of impacts of coal chain and nuclear power chain in china on health, environment and climate. Radiation Protection 21(3) 129–145 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tian H, Hao J, Lu Y (2001): Nitrogen oxides emissions arising from commercial energy consumption in China. Chinese Journal of Environmental Science 22(6) 24–28 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yang J, Liu B (2002): Life cycle inventory of steel products in China. Chinese Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae 22(4) 519–522 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zou Z, Ma X (2003): Life Cycle Assessment on Wind-power Generation. Electric Power 36(9) 83–87 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zou Z, Ma X, Zhao Z, Li H, Chen Y (2004): Life cycle assessment on hydropower project. Water Power 30(4) 53–55 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jiang J, Ma X (2004): Comparison on Different Power Source Effect on Environment Based on LCA. Power System Engineering 20(3) 26–28 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhu X, Duan L, Tang G, Hao J, Dong G (2004): Estimation of atmospheric emissions of base cations in China. Journal of Tsinghua University (Sci & Tech) 44(9) 1176–1179 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Electricity Yearbook of China (2003): China Electric Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

  16. Department of Industry and Transport Statistics, National Bureau of Statistics of China (2004): China Energy Statistical Yearbook 2000–2002. China Statistics Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wu Z, Chen W (2000): The diversified clean energy resources strategies with coal as the backbone. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  18. IPCC (1999): Revised IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Bracknell, UK

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wang Q (2001): Coal industry in China (I): evolvement and development. China Coal 27(1) 6–12 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang Z (2002): Integrated countermeasures and suggestions to SO2 emission control of thermal power plants in China. Electricity — CSEE 13(1) 23–26

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wang W, Wang W, Zhang W, Hong S (1996): Geographical distribution of SO2 and NOx emission intensities and trends in China. China Environmental Science 16(3) 161–167 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  22. State Planning Commission of China, Chinese Academy of Science, Tsinghua University (1993): The environment problems in exploitating energy resources of China. China Building Materials Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lu M, Zhu D, Zhang K (2000): The environment-priority structure and policy for energy resources. In: Li Zhidong, et al. (eds), Proceedings of Energy and Environment Research in China. Chinese Environmental Science Press, Beijing, China: 51–75 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wu Z, Ying H (2001): Translation rate of sulfur dioxide from fuel coal for fine coal boilers in power plants. Chongqing Environmental Science 23(1) 35–36 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sun Q, Lu Y, Fu L, Tian H, Hao J (2004): Adjustment on NOx emission factors and calculation of NOx emissions in China in the year 2000. Techniques and Equipment for Environmental Pollution Control 5(2) 90–94 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Klimont Z, Streets DG, Gupta S, Janusz C, Fu L, Yoichi I (2002): Anthropogenic emissions of non-methane volatile organic compounds in China. Atmos Environ 36, 1309–1322

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang Z, Zhu F, Liu S (2002): Environmental impact of sulphur dioxide from thermal power plants andits control strategy. China Environmental Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Li G, Li J (2000): Power construction and environmental protection. Tianjin University Press, Tianjin (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wang Z (1999): Status Quo and Prospect of Environment Protection of China’s Electric Power. China Electric Power 32(10) 46–51 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Matsuno Y, Betz M (2002): Development of Life Cycle Inventories for Electricity Grid Mixes in Japan. Int J LCA 5, 295–305

    Google Scholar 

  31. Chen P (2001): The Properties, Classification and Utilization of Coals in China. Chemical Industry Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Magaw RI, McMillen SJ, Gala WR, Trefry JH, Trocine RP (2000): Risk evaluation of metals in crude oils. In: Proceeding of 6th International Petroleum Environmental Conference. SCG, Inc., Houston, pp 460–473

    Google Scholar 

  33. Liang L, Horvat M, Danilchik P (1996): A novel analytical method for determination of picogram levels of total mercury in gasoline and other petroleum based products. Sci Total Environ 187(1) 57–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang Q, Shen W, Ma Z (2000): Estimation of mercury emission from coal combustion in China. Environ Sci Technol 34, 2711–2713

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Luo K, Zhang X, Chen C, Lu Y (2004): Estimate of arsenic emission amount from the coal power stations in China. Chinese Science Bulletin 49(19) 2014–2019 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Xu L, Cheng J, Zeng H (2004): Experimental investigation of the release characteristics of trace elements As, Cd and Cr during the combustion of coal 19(5) 478–482 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Han J, Xu M, Cheng J, Qiao Y, Zeng H (2002): Study of trece element emission factor in coal-fired boilers. Journal of Engineering Thermaophysics 23(6) 770–772 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Xu M, Zheng C, Feng R, Qiao Y, Yan R (2001): Overview of trace elements research in coal combustion process [J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2001, 21(10) 33–38 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. World Health Organization (1988): Environmental health criteria 81: Vanadium [M]. WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  40. China Environmental Yearbook (2003). China Environmental Yearbook Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

  41. Ma Z (2002): The comparison of Greenhouse gas emission factors for energy systems in China. PhD thesis. China Institute for Radiation Protection (in Chinese)

  42. Sun M (2002): Minimization of radioactive wastes from NPP in some countries. Radiation Protection 22(1) 57–60 (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zuroen Nie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Di, X., Nie, Z., Yuan, B. et al. Life cycle inventory for electricity generation in China. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12, 217–224 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2007.05.331

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2007.05.331

Keywords

Navigation