Skip to main content
Log in

Implementation of the Belt and Road Initiative in Africa: A Firm-Level Study of Sub-Saharan African SMEs

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Chinese Political Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the past few years, the implementation of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has seen a marked increase among state-owned enterprises and large organizations. However, SMEs especially, those in Africa are yet to exploit the full potential opportunities embedded in the BRI. This study takes the initiative to systematically identify and rank the set of factors that enable the implementation of the BRI among Sub-Saharan African (SSA) SMEs using survey data from 178 stakeholders. In total, we identified twenty-two factors and categorized them into five broad headings. These are governmental, technical and innovation, firm-specific, network and cooperation, and BRI policy factors. Subsequently, the picture fuzzy projection-based TOPSIS technique was applied to rank the factors and sub-factors. The utmost ranked factor in the five categories was the governmental factors, while transparency in BRI policy, subsidy for SMEs, flexible trade agreements and clarity in the BRI policy framework emerged as the top four factors respectively within the 22 sub-factors. The study demonstrates that the BRI is embodied with its unique features, hence, the factors explored in this study could provide policymakers and SMEs in Africa and beyond with more useful information to understanding the nature of BRI projects objectively and comprehensively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Li, Jiatao, Bin Liu, and Gongming Qian. 2019. The belt and road initiative, cultural friction and ethnicity: Their effects on the export performance of SMEs in China. Journal of World Business 54 (4): 350–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sayeed Rafif, AL and Yang Jianhua, Y. 2017. Chinese technological innovation in the context of the one belt one road initiative, in 12th European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship ECIE, Paris, France, 22–30.

  3. Yu, Shu, Xingwang Qian, and Taoxiong Liu. 2019. Belt and road initiative and Chinese firms’ outward foreign direct investment. Emerging Markets Review 41: 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson, Christopher K 2018. President Xi Jinping’s “belt and road” initiative: a practical assessment of the Chinese communist party’s roadmap for china’s global resurgence. Available at https://csisprod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fspublic/publication/160328_Johnson_PresidentXiJinping_Web.pdf (accessed January 30, 2020).

  5. Matura, Tamas. 2018. The belt and road initiative depicted in Hungary and Slovakia. Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies 7 (2): 174–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China. 2017. BRI to create more opportunities for developing countries: Chinese diplomat. Available at http://www.Xinhuanet.Com/English/2019-05/08/C_138041216.Htm (Accessed 20 December 2019).

  7. The African Review. 2018. East African Economies to Enjoy Sustained Economic Growth. Available at http://www.africanreview.com/finance/economy/east-african-economies-to-enjoy-sustained-economic-growth (accessed January 23, 2020).

  8. Orestes, Georgiou Daniel and Mick, Ryan. 2018. The Belt and Road Initiatives: Opportunities and Challenges for EU SMEs. Available at https://www.eusmecentre.org.cn/guideline/belt-and-road-initiatives-opportunities-and-challenges-eu-smes (accessed May 23, 2020).

  9. Khin, Aye Aye, Fong Yi Chiun, and Lim Chee Seong. 2019. Identifying the factors of the successful implementation of belt and road initiative on small–medium Enterprises in Malaysia. China Report 55 (4): 345–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang, Yanying, Thomas B. Fischer, and He Xu. 2017. The stakeholder analysis for SEA of Chinese foreign direct investment: The case of “one belt, one road” initiative in Pakistan. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 35 (2): 158–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Asante, Dennis, Evans Opoku-Mensah, and Peter Adjei Darko. 2019. Application of two-staged MCDM techniques in evaluating the performance of electronic payment systems in Ghana. International Journal of Data Mining & Knowledge Management Process 9 (3): 01–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Agrawal, Saurabh, Singh, Rajesh K. and Murtaza, Qasim. 2016. Prioritizing critical success factors for reverse logistics implementation using fuzzy-TOPSIS methodology. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, (12), 15–27.

  13. Acar, Canan, Ahmet Beskese, and Gül Tekin Temur. 2018. Sustainability analysis of different hydrogen production options using hesitant fuzzy AHP. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 43 (39): 18059–18076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hafner, Marco and Knack, Anna. 2020. China Belt and Road Initiative: Measuring the impact of improving transport connectivity on international trade. Available at https://www.rand.org/randeurope/research/projects/china-belt-and-road-initiative.html (Accessed May 20, 2020).

  15. Jones, Lee. 2020. Does China’s belt and road initiative challenge the liberal, rules-based order?’. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 13 (1): 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-019-00252-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Green BRI Center. 2020. Countries of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Available at https://green-bri.org/countries-of-the-belt-and-road-initiative-bri/ (accessed April 3, 2020).

  17. Bala Ramasamy, Matthew Yeung, Chorthip Utoktham and Yann Duval. 2017. Trade and trade facilitation along the Belt and Road Initiative corridors. ARTNeT Working Paper Series, No. 172, November 2017, Bangkok, ESCAP.

  18. EU SME Centre. 2017. A French SME’s travels on the belt & road. Available at https://www.eusmecentre.org.cn/success-story/french-sme-travels-belt-road (accessed April 3, 2020.

  19. Jayaram, Kartik, Kassiri, Omid and Sun, Yuan Irene. 2017. The closest look yet at Chinese economic engagement in Africa. Available at https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/middle-east-and-africa/the-closest-look-yet-at-chinese-economic-engagement-in-africa# (accessed April 20, 2020).

  20. Githaiga, Nancy Muthoni, Burimaso, Alfred, Bing, Wang and Ahmed, Salum Mohammed. 2019. The belt and road initiative: Opportunities and risks for Africa’s connectivity. China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies, 5(1), 117–141.

  21. Cheng, Leonard K. 2016. Three questions on China’s belt and road initiative. China Economic Review 40: 309–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lo, C. 2015. China’s silk road strategy. The International Economy, 54–71. Available from: http://www.international-economy.com/TIE_F15_Lo.pdf (Accessed 26 November 2020).

  23. Huang, Yiping. 2016. Understanding China’s Belt & Road Initiative: Motivation, framework and assessment. China Economic Review 40: 314–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gan, Junxian, and Yan Mao. 2016. China’s new silk road: Where does it lead? Asian Perspective 1 (10): 105–130.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hussain, Ejaz. 2019. CPEC: Governance and security challenges—Implications for the belt and road initiative. Chinese Political Science Review 4 (1): 135–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shah, Abdur Rehman. 2021. Revisiting China threat: The US’ securitization of the belt and road initiative. Chinese Political Science Review: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-021-00179-0.

  27. Herrero, Alicia Garcia, and Jianwei Xu. 2017. China’s belt and road initiative: Can Europe expect trade gains?’. China & World Economy 25 (6): 84–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Casarini, Nicola. 2016. When all roads lead to Beijing. Assessing China’s new silk road and its implications for Europe’. International Spectator 51 (4): 95–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pradhan, Ramakrushna, and Siba Sankar Mohanty. 2021. Chinese grand strategies in Central Asia: The role of Shanghai cooperation organization and belt and road initiative. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 14 (2): 197–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-021-00318-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Du, Mengshuang. 2021. Cross-border M&A performance of Chinese enterprises in the context of the belt and road initiative. Chinese Political Science Review 6 (2): 228–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-020-00173-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. In Chan, Seng, and Weiqing Song. 2020. Telling the China story well: A discursive approach to the analysis of Chinese foreign policy in the “belt and road” initiative. Chinese Political Science Review 5 (3): 417–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-020-00146-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Yilmaz, Serafettin, and Bo Li. 2020. The BRI-led globalization and its implications for east Asian regionalization. Chinese Political Science Review 5 (3): 395–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-020-00145-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang, Mei Ling, Qian Qiu, and Chang Hwan Choi. 2019. How will the belt and road initiative advance China’s exports?’. Asia Pacific Business Review 25 (1): 81–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Chen, Shih Chih, Jianing Hou, and De Xiao. 2018. One belt, one road initiative to stimulate trade in China: A counter-factual analysis. Sustainability 10 (9): 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kamel, Maha S. 2018. China’s belt and road initiative: Implications for the Middle East. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 31 (1): 76–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gyamerah, Samuel, He, Zheng, Ampaw, Enock Mintah, Asante, Dennis and Asare-Kyire, Lydia 2021. The Belt and Road Initiative and East African small and medium-sized enterprises: benefits, drivers and particular sectors. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 1–20.

  37. Görg, Holger and Mao, Haiou. 2020. Does the belt and road initiative stimulate Chinese exports? The role of state-owned enterprises. KCG Working Papers, 1–24.

  38. Yu, Shu, Xingwang Qian, and Taoxiong Liu. 2019. Belt and road initiative and Chinese firms’ outward foreign direct investment’. Emerging Markets Review 41: 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Chen, Yahui, Changsheng Xu, and Ming Yi. 2019. Does the belt and road initiative reduce the R&D investment of OFDI enterprises? Evidence from China’s A-share listed companies. Sustainability 11 (5): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Nilashi, Mehrbakhsh, Sarminah Samad, Azizah Abdul Manaf, Hossein Ahmadi, Tarik A. Rashid, Asmaa Munshi, Wafa Almukadi, Othman Ibrahim, and Omed Hassan Ahmed. 2019. Factors influencing medical tourism adoption in Malaysia: A DEMATEL-fuzzy TOPSIS approach. Computers and Industrial Engineering 137: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Gupta, Himanshu, and Mukesh Kumar Barua. 2018. A framework to overcome barriers to green innovation in SMEs using BWM and fuzzy TOPSIS. Science of the Total Environment 633: 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Subramaniya, K.P., C. Ajay Guru Dev, and V.S. Senthilkumar. 2017. Critical success factors: A TOPSIS approach to increase agility level in a textile industry. Materials Today: Proceedings 4 (2): 1510–1517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.01.173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sadeghi, Arash, Adel Azar, and Ramin Sepehri Rad. 2012. Developing a fuzzy group AHP model for prioritizing the factors affecting the success of high-tech SME’s in Iran: A case study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 62: 957–961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hwang, Ching-Lai, and Kwangsun Yoon. 1981. Multiple attribute decision making. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  45. Seiti, Hamidreza, and Ashkan Hafezalkotob. 2019. Developing the R-TOPSIS methodology for risk-based preventive maintenance planning: A case study in rolling mill company. Computers and Industrial Engineering 128: 622–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Singh, Lovejit, Sarbjeet Singh, and Naveen Aggarwal. 2019. Improved TOPSIS method for peak frame selection in audio-video human emotion recognition. Multimedia Tools and Applications 78 (5): 6277–6308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Tang, Huimin, Yong Shi, and Peiwu Dong. 2019. Public blockchain evaluation using entropy and TOPSIS. Expert Systems with Applications 117: 204–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Cuong, Bùi Công. 2014. Picture fuzzy sets. Journal of Computer Science and Cybernetics 30 (4): 409–420.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wang, Le, Hong Yu Zhang, Jian Qiang Wang, and Lin Li. 2018. Picture fuzzy normalized projection-based VIKOR method for the risk evaluation of construction project. Applied Soft Computing Journal 64: 216–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.12.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Ganie, Abdul Haseeb, Surender Singh, and Pradeep Kumar Bhatia. 2020. Some new correlation coefficients of picture fuzzy sets with applications. Neural Computing and Applications 32 (16): 12609–12625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-04715-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Khan, Saifullah, Saleem Abdullah, and Shahzaib Ashraf. 2019. Picture fuzzy aggregation information based on Einstein operations and their application in decision making. Mathematical Sciences 13 (3): 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40096-019-0291-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Wei, Guiwu. 2017. Picture 2-tuple linguistic Bonferroni mean operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems 19 (4): 997–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Wei, Guiwu, Fuad E. Alsaadi, Tasawar Hayat, and Ahmed Alsaedi. 2018. Projection models for multiple attribute decision-making with picture fuzzy information. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics 9 (4): 713–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Saleh, Ali Salman, Nguyen, Anh Thi Lan, Vinen, Denis and Safari, Arsalan. 2017. A new theoretical framework to assess multinational corporations’ motivation for Foreign Direct Investment: A case study on Vietnamese service industries. Research in International Business and Finance, 630–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.007

  55. Lei, Han Sheng, and Yung Shuan Chen. 2011. The right tree for the right bird: Location choice decision of Taiwanese firms’ FDI in China and Vietnam. International Business Review 20 (3): 338–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Robson, Paul J.A., and Mark Freel. 2008. Small firm exporters in a developing economy context: Evidence from Ghana. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 20 (5): 431–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Tang, Ryan W., and Peter J. Buckley. 2020. Host country risk and foreign ownership strategy: Meta-analysis and theory on the moderating role of home country institutions. International Business Review 29 (4): 101666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Masood, Ehsan. 2019. How China is redrawing the map of world science. Available at https://www.nature.com/immersive/d41586-019-01124-7/index.html (accessed April 10, 2020).

  59. United Nations Economic and Social Commission. 2017. A study of ICT connectivity for the belt and road initiative (BRI): Enhancing the collaboration in China-Central Asia corridor. Working Paper by the Information and Communications Technology and Disaster Risk Reduction Division.

  60. Kurnia, Sherah, Jyoti Choudrie, Rahim Md Mahbubur, and Basil Alzougool. 2015. E-commerce technology adoption: A Malaysian grocery SME retail sector study. Journal of Business Research 68 (9): 1906–1918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Hin, Ho Chee. 2020. Partnerships key as Singapore firms embark on Belt and Road. Available at https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/partnerships-key-as-spore-firms-embark-on-belt-and-road (accessed April 2, 2020).

  62. Cankar, Stanka Setnikar, Janko Seljak, and Veronika Petkovšek. 2014. Factors that influence cross-border cooperation between businesses in the Alps–Adriatic region. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja 27 (1): 304–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2014.952091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Gentile-Lüdecke, Simona, Tilo Halaszovich, and Sarianna Lundan. 2017. What role does CEO vision play in the internationalization process of firms? Evidence from the banking sector in Africa. Thunderbird International Business Review 23 (2): 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Lan, Le Thi, and Nguyen Duc Viet. 2018. Factors affects investment decisions of enterprises into Vietnam’s economic zones. Journal of Global Economics 6 (1): 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Lv, Ping, Guo, Chenxi and Chen, Xuchang. 2018. How the Belt and Road Initiative Affects China’s Outward FDI: Comparing Chinese Independent Firms and Business Group Affiliates’, in China’s Belt and Road Initiative, Springer International Publishing, 243–263.

  66. Andrić, Jelena M., Jiayuan Wang, and Ruoyu Zhong. 2019. Identifying the critical risks in railway projects based on fuzzy and sensitivity analysis: A case study of belt and road projects. Sustainability (Switzerland) 11 (5): 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Standard Chartered. 2019. Belt and Road in Africa: East Africa’s early advantage: What does the future hold for one of the first B&R frontiers in Africa? Available at https://www.sc.com/en/feature/br-in-africa-east-africas-early-advantage/ (accessed, April 19, 2020).

  68. Devonshire-Ellis. 2019. Belt and Road Initiative and implications for us & global trade on rethinking the dollar. Available at https://www.silkroadbriefing.com/news/2019/11/01/chris-devonshire-ellis-discusses-belt-road-initiative-implications-us-global-trade-rethinking-dollar/ (accessed March 20, 2020).

  69. Luo, Yadong, Qiuzhi Xue, and Binjie Han. 2010. How emerging market governments promote outward FDI: Experience from China. Journal of World Business 45 (1): 68–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Kapri, Kul. 2019. Impact of political instability on firm-level export decisions. International Review of Economics and Finance 59: 98–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Witte, Caroline T., Martijn J. Burger, and Enrico Pennings. 2020. When political instability devaluates home-host ties. Journal of World Business 55 (4): 101077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Piperopoulos, Panagiotis, Jie Wu, and Chengqi Wang. 2018. Outward FDI, location choices and innovation performance of emerging market enterprises. Research Policy 47 (1): 232–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Omokaro-Romanus, Constance, John R. Anchor, and Palitha Konara. 2019. The internationalization of Nigerian firms: Motivations and location patterns. Thunderbird International Business Review 61 (1): 75–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Castanho, Rui, Luis Loures, José Fernández, and Luis Pozo. 2018. Identifying critical factors for success in cross border cooperation (CBC) development projects. Habitat International 72: 92–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Xinhua. 2019. Interview: BRI may help SMEs tackle global trade challenges: ITC head. Available at http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2019-04/20/c_137992645.htm (assessed May 15 2020).

  76. Yu, Jie. 2018. The belt and road initiative: Domestic interests, bureaucratic politics and the EU-China relations. Asia Europe Journal 16 (3): 223–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Kher, Priyanka and Tran, Trang. 2019. Investment protection along the Belt & Road , Washington, DC, World Bank. Available from: https://www.economist.com/the-economist-explains/2017/05/14/what-is-chinas-belt-and- (Accessed 24 December 2020).

  78. Ragozzino, Roberto. 2009. The effects of geographic distance on the foreign acquisition activity of U.S. firms. Management International Review 49 (4): 509–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Cheng, Leonard K., and Yum K. Kwan. 2000. What are the determinants of the location of foreign direct investment? The Chinese experience. Journal of International Economics 51 (2): 379–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Fosu, Augustin Kwasi. 2003. Political instability and export performance in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Development Studies 39 (4): 68–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Bagheri, Mahshid, Siwan Mitchelmorea, Vassiliki Bamiatzib, and Konstantinos Nikolopoulosa. 2019. Internationalization orientation in SMEs: The mediating role of technological innovation. Journal of International Management 25: 121–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Senik, Zizah C., R.M. Isa, Brenda Scott-Ladd, and A. Entrekin. 2010. Influential factors for sme internationalization: Evidence from Malaysia. International Journal of Economics and Management 4 (2): 285–304.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Drabek, Zdenek, and Warren Payne. 2002. The impact of transparency on foreign direct investment. Journal of Economic Integration 4 (17): 777–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Crabtree, James. 2019. China needs to make BRI more transparent and predictable. Available at https://www.ft.com/content/3c5d6d14-66ac-11e9-b809-6f0d2f5705f6 (accessed January 20, 2020).

Download references

Funding

This was financially supported by the Science and Technology Planning Fund of Sichuan Province, China (No. 2020JDR0117).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel Gyamerah.

Ethics declarations

Conflicting Interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gyamerah, S., He, Z., Gyamerah, E.ED. et al. Implementation of the Belt and Road Initiative in Africa: A Firm-Level Study of Sub-Saharan African SMEs. J OF CHIN POLIT SCI 27, 719–745 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-021-09749-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-021-09749-0

Keywords

Navigation