Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Disassembling the influences of perceived family relational conflict on business family offspring’s intrapreneurial intentions

  • Published:
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Entrepreneurial business family offspring are key figures in helping family businesses achieve transgenerational entrepreneurship. However, a global survey reveals that entrepreneurial offspring avoid the family business when conducting entrepreneurial activities. Our study makes the first effort to explore what reduces business family offspring’s intrapreneurial intentions in the family business context. Applying a mixed-method approach, we conduct 18 explorative interviews, a pretest of 124 Chinese business family offspring, and a formal survey of 131 Chinese business family offspring approaching their career decision point. We realize that growing up in family businesses often exposes offspring to two types of perceived family relational conflicts that their parents’ entrepreneurial endeavors incur, which we define as “big-family” and “parent-offspring” relational conflicts. Our empirical results suggest that the relationship between perceived family (i.e., parent-offspring and big-family) relational conflict and family business intrapreneurial intentions were serially mediated by family relational outcome expectation and family relational self-efficacy. Contributions to family business research and social cognitive career theory are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1. The published 2018 GUESSS report does not show the exact percentage of business family offspring’s entrepreneurial intentions and intrapreneurial intentions. The figures of 37.2% and 8.9% in the introduction were obtained through our calculations. We contacted the authors of the GUESSS report, and they agreed with these calculations.

    We calculated the figure of 37.2% in the following way: according to the 2018 GUESSS report (page 20), 23.7% of all respondents were of family business backgrounds. Specifically, 13.9% indicated that their father is an entrepreneur; and 3.7% indicated the same for their mother; 6.1% did so for both parents. According to Figure 20 on page 20, 35.4% of the students whose father is an entrepreneur are intentional founders, 38.4% of the students whose mother is an entrepreneur are intentional founders, 40.4% of the students whose parents are both entrepreneurs are intentional founders. Assuming the number of the whole sample is N, we made the following calculation to get the percentage of business family offspring’s entrepreneurial intentions: [35.4%*(13.9%*N) + 38.4%*(3.7%*N) + 40.4%*(6.1%*N)]/23.7%*N = 37.2%.

    We calculated the figure of 8.9% in the following way: according to the 2018 GUESSS report (page 20), 23.7% of all respondents were of family business backgrounds, and 2.1% of all respondents (page 4) intended to succeed the family business five years after completing the study. Assuming the number of the whole sample is N, we made the following calculation to get the percentage of business family offspring’s succession intentions: (2.1%*N)/(23.7%*N) = 8.9%. Since succeeding the family business includes remaining in the family business and doing something new in the family business (i.e., intrapreneurship), we estimated that business family offspring’s intrapreneurial intentions are no higher than 8.9%.

References

  • Antoncic, B., & Hisrich, R. D. (2001). Intrapreneurship: Construct refinement and cross-cultural validation. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 495–527.

  • Astrachan, J. H., & Jaskiewicz, P. (2008). Emotional returns and emotional costs in privately held family businesses: Advancing traditional business valuation. Family Business Review, 21(2), 139–149.

  • Au, K., & Kwan, H. K. (2009). Start-up capital and Chinese entrepreneurs: The role of family. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(4), 889–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.

  • Bandura, A. (1995). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Retrieved from https://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Bandura/BanduraGuide2006.pdf.

  • Baruah, B., & Ward, A. (2015). Metamorphosis of intrapreneurship as an effective organizational strategy. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11, 811–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bizri, R. (2016). Succession in the family business: Drivers and pathways. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 22(1), 133–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanka, C. (2018). An individual-level perspective on intrapreneurship: A review and ways forward. Review of Managerial Science, 13(5), 919–961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, J. H. (2012). R&D investments in family and founder firms: An agency perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(2), 248–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloemen-Bekx, M., Voordeckers, W., Remery, C., & Schippers, J. (2019). Following in parental footsteps? The influence of gender and learning experiences on entrepreneurial intentions. International Small Business Journal, 37(6), 642–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. R. (1993). A primer on Q methodology. Operant Subjectivity, 16(3/4), 91–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buunk, A. P., Peiró, J. M., & Griffioen, C. (2007). A positive role model may stimulate career-oriented, behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(7), 1489–1500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, S. P., Gallo, L. A., Lisman, S. A., & Weinstein, A. (2006). Willing or able? The meanings of self-efficacy. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25(2), 196–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camelo-Ordaz, C., Fernandez-Alles, M., Ruiz-Navarro, J., & Sousa-Ginel, E. (2012). The intrapreneur and innovation in creative firms. International Small Business Journal, 30(5), 513–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, J. C., & Hmieleski, K. M. (2015). Differences in the outcomes of work and family conflict between family and non-family businesses: An examination of business founders. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(6), 1413–1432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, J. C., & Sequeira, J. M. (2007). Prior family business exposure as intergenerational influence and entrepreneurial intent: A theory of planned behavior approach. Journal of Business Research, 60(10), 1090–1098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chlosta, S., Patzelt, H., Klein, S. B., & Dormann, C. (2012). Parental role models and the decision to become self-employed: The moderating effect of personality. Small Business Economics, 38(1), 121–138.

  • Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., & Sharma, P. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(4), 19–39.

  • Corcoran, K. J. (1991). Efficacy, “skills,” reinforcement, and choice behavior. American Psychologist, 46(2), 155–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publication, Inc..

  • Criaco, G., Sieger, P., Wennberg, K., Chirico, F., & Minola, T. (2017). Parents’ performance in entrepreneurship as a “double-edged sword” for the intergenerational transmission of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 49(4), 841–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz, C., & Nordqvist, M. (2012). Entrepreneurial orientation in family firms: A generational perspective. Small Business Economics, 38(1), 33–49.

  • Dawson, A., Sharma, P., Irving, P., Markus, J., & Chirico, F. (2015). Predictors of later-generation family members’ commitment to family enterprises. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(3), 545–556.

  • DeNoble, A., Ehrlich, S., & Singh, G. (2007). Toward the development of a family business self-efficacy scale: A resource-based perspective. Family Business Review, 20(2), 127–140.

  • DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications (Vol. 26). Sage Publications, Inc..

  • Dey, I. (2004). Grounded theory. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, G. Gubrum, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 80–93). Sage Publications, Inc..

  • Dou, J., Zhang, Z., & Su, E. (2014). Does family involvement make firms donate more? Empirical evidence from Chinese private firms. Family Business Review, 27(3), 259–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dou, J., Su, E., Li, S., & Holt, D. T. (2020). Transgenerational entrepreneurship in entrepreneurial families: What is explicitly learned, and what is successfully transferred? Entrepreneurship and Regional Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2020.1727090.

  • Douglas, E. J., & Fitzsimmons, J. R. (2013). Intrapreneurial intentions versus entrepreneurial intentions: Distinct constructs with different antecedents. Small Business Economics, 41(1), 115–132.

  • Eddleston, K. A., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2007). Destructive and productive family relationships: A stewardship theory perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 545–565.

  • Eddleston, K. A., & Kidwell, R. E. (2012). Parent-child relationships: Planting the seeds of deviant behavior in the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(2), 369–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, Y. (2000). Storytelling in organizations: Facts, fictions, and fantasies. Oxford University Press.

  • Garcia, P. R. J. M., Milkovits, M., & Bordia, P. (2014). The impact of work-family conflict on late-career workers’ intentions to continue paid employment: A social cognitive career theory approach. Journal of Career Assessment, 22(4), 682–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, P. R. J. M., Sharma, P., De Massis, A., Wright, M., & Scholes, L. (2019). Perceived parental behaviors and next-generation engagement in family firms: A social cognitive perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(2), 224–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gawke, J. C., Gorgievski, M. J., & Bakker, A. B. (2019). Measuring intrapreneurship at the individual level: Development and validation of the employee intrapreneurship scale (EIS). European Management Journal, 37(6), 806–817.

  • Gimenez-Jimenez, D., Edelman, L. F., Minola, T., Calabrò, A., & Cassia, L. (2020). An intergeneration solidarity perspective on succession intentions in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258720956384.

  • Gogol, K., Brunner, M., Goetz, T., Martin, R., Ugen, S., Keller, U., Fischbach, A., & Preckel, F. (2014). “My questionnaire is too long!” the assessments of motivational-affective constructs with three-item and single-item measures. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(3), 188–205.

  • Goode, W. (1982). The family. Prentice-Hall Press.

  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Babin, B. J., & Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (Vol. 7). Pearson.

  • Harvey, M., & Evans, R. E. (1994). Family business and multiple levels of conflict. Family Business Review, 7(4), 331–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.

  • Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1), 104–121.

  • Jaskiewicz, P., Combs, J. G., & Rau, S. B. (2015). Entrepreneurial legacy: Toward a theory of how some family firms nurture transgenerational entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(1), 29–49.

  • Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2), 256–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133.

  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan.

  • Kellermanns, F. W., & Eddleston, K. A. (2006). Corporate entrepreneurship in family firms: A family perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(6), 809–830.

  • Kidwell, R. E., Eddleston, K. A., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2018). Learning bad habits across generations: How negative imprints affect human resource management in the family firm. Human Resource Management Review, 28(1), 5–17.

  • Kirsch, I. (1995). Self-efficacy and outcome expectancy: A concluding commentary. In J. E. Maddux (Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application (pp. 341–345). Plenum.

  • Klein, H. K., & Myers, M. D. (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 67–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanero, A., Vázquez, J. L., & Aza, C. L. (2016). Social cognitive determinants of entrepreneurial career choice in university students. International Small Business Journal, 34(8), 1053–1075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, P. J., Dierckx De Casterlé, B., & Schotsmans, P. (2007). Multilingual translation issues in qualitative research: Reflections on a metaphorical process. Qualitative Health Research, 17(4), 468–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laspita, S., Breugst, N., Heblich, S., & Patzelt, H. (2012). Intergenerational transmission of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(4), 414–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. (2006). Impact of family relationships on attitudes of the second generation in the family business. Family Business Review, 19(3), 175–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., Zhao, G., & Lu, F. (2019). The effect of value congruence between founder and successor on successor’s willingness: The mediating role of the founder-successor relationship. Family Business Review, 32(3), 259–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2006). On conceptualizing and assessing social cognitive constructs in career research: A measurement guide. Journal of Career Assessment, 14(1), 12–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. B., & Piezunka, H. (2020). The uniplex third: Enabling single-domain role transitions in multiplex relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 65(2), 314–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liguori, E. W., Bendickson, J. S., & McDowell, W. C. (2018). Revisiting entrepreneurial intentions: A social cognitive career theory approach. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(1), 67–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddux, J. E., Norton, L. W., & Stoltenberg, C. D. (1986). Self-efficacy expectancy, outcome expectancy, and outcome value: Relative effects on behavioral intentions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(4), 783–789.

  • Marquis, C., & Tilcsik, A. (2013). Imprinting: Toward a multilevel theory. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 195–245.

  • Marzillier, J. S., & Eastman, C. (1984). Continuing problems with self-efficacy theory: A reply to Bandura. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 8, 257–262.

  • Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative interviewing: Asking, listening, and interpreting. In T. May (Ed.), Qualitative research in action (pp. 225–241). Sage Publications, Ltd..

  • McMullen, J. S., & Warnick, B. J. (2015). To nurture or groom? The parent-founder succession dilemma. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(6), 1379–1412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minola, T., Brumana, M., Campopiano, G., Garrett, R. P., & Cassia, L. (2016). Corporate venturing in family business: A developmental approach of the enterprising family. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 10(4), 395–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. L. (2007). Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 48–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morse, J. M. (1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research, 40(1), 120–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mungai, E., & Velamuri, S. R. (2011). Parental entrepreneurial role model influence on male offspring: Is it always positive and when does it occur? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(2), 337–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, L., & Lambrechts, F. (2015). Investigating the actual career decisions of the next generation: The impact of family business involvement. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 6(1), 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neblett, N. G., & Cortina, K. S. (2006). Adolescents’ thoughts about parents’ jobs and their importance for adolescents’ future orientation. Journal of Adolescence, 29(5), 795–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordqvist, M., Wennberg, K., & Bau’, M., & Hellerstedt, K. (2013). An entrepreneurial process perspective on succession in family firms. Small Business Economics, 40(4), 1087–1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özcan, B. (2011). Only the lonely? The influence of the spouse on the transition to self-employment. Small Business Economics, 37(4), 465–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S. C. (2011). Intrapreneurship or entrepreneurship? Journal of Business Venturing, 26(1), 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S. C. (2016). Family firms and the “willing successor” problem. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(6), 1241–1259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pittino, D., Visintin, F., & Lauto, G. (2018). Fly away from the nest? A configurational analysis of family embeddedness and individual attributes in the entrepreneurial entry decision by next-generation members. Family Business Review, 31(3), 271–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poon, W.-Y., Leung, K., & Lee, S.-Y. (2002). The comparison of single item constructs by relative mean and relative variance. Organizational Research Methods, 5(3), 275–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porfírioa, J. A., Felício, J. A., & Carrilho, T. (2020). Family business succession: Analysis of the drivers of success based on entrepreneurship theory. Journal of Business Research, 115, 250–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. E., & Blanchard, C. M. (2007). What do confidence items measure in the physical activity domain? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(4), 759–774.

  • Rousseau, M. B., Kellermanns, F., Zellweger, T., & Beck, T. E. (2018). Relationship conflict, family name congruence, and socioemotional wealth in family firms. Family Business Review, 31(4), 397–416.

  • Russon, J. (2003). Human experience: Philosophy, neurosis, and the elements of everyday life. State University of New York Press.

  • Salvato, C. (2004). Predictors of entrepreneurship in family firms. Journal of Private Equity, 7(3), 68–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sardeshmukh, S. R., & Corbett, A. C. (2011). The duality of internal and external development of successors: Opportunity recognition in family firms. Family Business Review, 24(2), 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schriesheim, C. A., Powers, K. J., Scandura, T. A., Gardiner, C. C., & Lankau, M. J. (1993). Improving construct measurement in management research: Comments and a quantitative approach for assessing the theoretical content adequacy of paper and pencil survey-type instruments. Journal of Management, 19(2), 385–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schröder, E., Schmitt-Rodermund, E., & Arnaud, N. (2011). Career choice intentions of adolescents with a family business background. Family Business Review, 24(4), 305–321.

  • Sharma, P., & Irving, P. G. (2005). Four bases of family business successor commitment: Antecedents and consequences. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(1), 13–33.

  • Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422–445.

  • Sieger, P., & Minola, T. (2017). The family’s financial support as a “poisoned gift”: A family embeddedness perspective on entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Small Business Management, 55(1), 179–204.

  • Sieger, P., Fueglistaller, U., Zellweger, T., & Braun, I. (2019). Global student entrepreneurship 2018, insights from 54 countries. KMU-HSG/IMU.

  • Sirmon, D. G., & Hitt, M. A. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4), 339–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soleimanof, S., Singh, K., & Holt, D. T. (2019). Micro-foundations of corporate entrepreneurship in family firms: An institution-based perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(2), 274–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stavrou, E. T. (1999). Succession in family businesses: Exploring the effects of demographic factors on offspring intentions to join and take over the business. Journal of Small Business Management, 37(3), 43–61.

  • Stavrou, E. T., & Swiercz, P. M. (1998). Securing the future of the family enterprise: A model of offspring intentions to join the business. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(2), 19–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. R. (2009). Individual entrepreneurial intent: Construct clarification and development of an internationally reliable metric. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 669–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tornikoski, E., & Maalaoui, A. (2019). Critical reflections– The theory of planned behavior: An interview with Icek Ajzen with implications for entrepreneurship research. International Small Business Journal, 37(5), 536–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, D. M., Busenitz, L. W., & Arthurs, J. D. (2010). To start or not to start: Outcome and ability expectations in the decision to start a new venture. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(2), 192–202.

  • Wang, D., Wang, L., & Chen, L. (2018). Unlocking the influence of family business exposure on entrepreneurial intentions. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(4), 951–974.

  • Williams, D. M. (2010). Outcome expectancy and self-efficacy: Theoretical implications of an unresolved contradiction. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(4), 417–425.

  • Yan, Y. X. (2017). Private life under socialism: Love, intimacy, and family change in a Chinese village, 1949–1999. Horizon Media, Co., Ltd..

  • Yin, R. K. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage Publications, Inc..

  • Zahra, S. A. (1991). Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneurship: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(4), 259–285.

  • Zellweger, T., Sieger, P., & Halter, F. (2011). Should I stay or should I go? Career choice intentions of students with family business background. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(5), 521–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zellweger, T., Sieger, P., & Englisch, P. (2012). Coming home or breaking free? Career choice intentions of the next generation in family businesses. Ernst & Young Global Limited.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, 310023, China

    Dan Wang

  2. School of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China

    Zhongyuan Zhang

Authors
  1. Dan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhongyuan Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhongyuan Zhang.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 6 Variable measurements and reliability tests
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, D., Zhang, Z. Disassembling the influences of perceived family relational conflict on business family offspring’s intrapreneurial intentions. Int Entrep Manag J 18, 153–189 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-021-00747-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-021-00747-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation