Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A curvilinear relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: The moderating role of employees’ psychological safety

  • Published:
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While many studies on the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation (EO) and firm performance suggested a considerable variation in size and direction of the relationship, our study tested a model that considered the drawbacks of a high EO. We identified that EO has a curvilinear relationship with firm performance and analyzed how the psychological safety of employees can mitigate the negative effects of high EO on firm performance. We tested our model on 157 enterprises comprising 1633 employees and 157 managers. After taking a longitudinal approach with objective financial outcome data, our results showed that EO has an inverted U-shaped effect in predicting firm performance and that employees’ psychological safety moderates the relationship between EO and firm performance, mitigating the negative effects. This study has theoretical implications related to the potential negative impact of excessive EO and practical implications for companies in mitigating this drawback by increasing employees’ psychological safety.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albort-Morant, G., & Rey-Martí, A. (2015). The development of ICTs and the introduction of entrepreneurial capital. In Annual conference of the global innovation and knowledge academy (pp. 84–92). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B. S., & Eshima, Y. (2013). The influence of firm age and intangible resources on the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm growth among Japanese SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(3), 413–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (1962). Interpersonal competence and organizational effectiveness. Homewood: Dorsey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhuian, S. N., Menguc, B., & Bell, S. J. (2005). Just entrepreneurial enough: The moderating effect of entrepreneurship on the relationship between market orientation and performance. Journal of Business Research, 58, 9–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 349–381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boso, N., Story, V. M., & Cadogan, J. W. (2013). Entrepreneurial orientation, market orientation, network ties, and performance: Study of entrepreneurial firms in a developing economy. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(6), 708–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budner, S. (1962). Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable. Journal of Personality, 30(1), 29–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment (Vol. 17). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, K., Dwyer, S., & Barnett, T. (1999). An empirical investigation among entrepreneurial orientation, organizational culture, and firm performance. Presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Combs, J. G., Crook, T. R., & Shook, C. L. (2005). The dimensionality of organizational performance and its implications for strategic management research. In D. J. Ketchen & D. D. Bergh (Eds.), Research methodology in strategic management (pp. 259–286). San Diego: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J. G., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2011). Entrepreneurial orientation theory and research: Reflections on a needed construct. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(5), 855–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J. G., & Miller, D. (2014). International entrepreneurial orientation: Conceptual considerations, research themes, measurement issues, and future research directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(1), 11–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1986). The development and testing of an organizational-level entrepreneurship scale. In R. Ronstadt, J. A. Hornaday, R. Peterson, & K. H. Vesper (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research—1986 (pp. 628–639). Wellesley: Babson College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J. G., & Wales, W. J. (2012). The measurement of entrepreneurial orientation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(4), 677–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J. G., Slevin, D. P., & Schultz, R. L. (1994). Implementing strategic missions: Effective strategic, structural, and tactical choices. Journal of Management Studies, 31(4), 481–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J. G., Green, K. M., & Slevin, D. P. (2006). Strategic process effects on the entrepreneurial orientation—Sales growth rate relationships. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 57–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Clercq, D., Dimov, D., & Thongpapanl, N. T. (2010). The moderating impact of internal social exchange processes on the entrepreneurial orientation–performance relationship. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 87–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler, F. E., Chemers, M. M., & Mahar, L. (1976). Improving leadership effectiveness: The leader match concept. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 382–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, B. A., & Marino, L. (2011). The epistemology of entrepreneurial orientation: Conceptual formation, modeling, and operationalization. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(5), 989–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, G., Wood, D. R., & Khan, R. (2001). Networking strategy of boards: Implications for small and medium-sized enterprises. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 13(3), 269–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, K. M., Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (2008). Exploring the relationship between strategic reactiveness and entrepreneurial orientation: The role of structure–style fit. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(3), 356–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gürol, Y., & Atsan, N. (2006). Entrepreneurial characteristics amongst university students: Some insights for entrepreneurship education and training in Turkey. Education & Training, 48(1), 25–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, J. (1988). The Abilene paradox and other meditations on management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henseler, J., & Fassott, G. (2010). Testing moderating effects in PLS path models: An illustration of available procedures. In V. Esposito Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods, and applications (pp. 713–735). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R. C., & Levenhagen, M. (1995). Metaphors and mental models: Sense-making and sense-giving in innovative and entrepreneurial activities. Journal of Management, 21(6), 1057–1074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1993). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(1), 132–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., & Sirmon, D. G. (2003). A model of strategic entrepreneurship: The construct and its dimensions. Journal of Management, 29, 963–989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1993). rwg: An assessment of within group inter-rater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 306–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jelinek, M., & Litterer, J. A. (1995). Toward entrepreneurial organizations: Meeting ambiguity with engagement. Entrepreneurial Theory and Practice, 19, 137–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A., & LaVoie, L. (1985). Separating individual and group effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 339–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, G. A. (1997). Cross-cultural reliability and validity of a scale to measure firm entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 213–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, S., Rigtering, J. C., Hughes, M., & Hosman, V. (2012). Entrepreneurial orientation and the business performance of SMEs: A quantitative study from the Netherlands. Review of Managerial Science, 6(2), 161–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, S. I., Frese, M., Friedrich, C., & Unger, J. M. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation: A psychological model of success among southern African small business owners. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 14, 315–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreiser, P. M., Marino, L. D., Dickson, P., & Weaver, K. M. (2010). Cultural influences on entrepreneurial orientation: The impact of national culture on risk taking and proactiveness in SMEs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(5), 959–983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kropp, F., Lindsay, N. J., & Shoham, A. (2006). Entrepreneurial, market, and learning orientations and international entrepreneurial business venture performance in South African firms. International Marketing Review, 23, 504–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leal-Rodríguez, A. L., Eldridge, S., Roldán, J. L., Leal-Millán, A. G., & Ortega-Gutiérrez, J. (2015). Organizational unlearning, innovation outcomes, and performance: The moderating effect of firm size. Journal of Business Research, 68(4), 803–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leal-Rodríguez, A. L., Albort-Morant, G., & Martelo-Landroguez, S. (in press). Links between entrepreneurial culture, innovation, and performance: The moderating role of family firms. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1–17.

  • Lechner, C., & Gudmundsson, S. V. (2014). Entrepreneurial orientation, firm strategy and small firm performance. International Small Business Journal, 32(1), 36–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C., Lee, K., & Pennings, J. M. (2001). Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: A study of technology based ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 615–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. M., Lim, S. B., & Pathak, R. D. (2011). Culture and entrepreneurial orientation: A multi-country study. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H. Y., & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2001). Product innovation strategy and the performance of new technology ventures in China. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1123–1134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, G. S., Skov, R. B., & Abel, K. D. (1999). Practices that support team learning and their impact on speed of market and new product success. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 16(5), 439–454. doi:10.1016/S0737-6782(98)00071-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald Jr., A. P. (1970). Revised scale for ambiguity tolerance: Reliability and validity. Psychological Reports, 26(3), 791–798. doi:10.2466/pr0.1970.26.3.791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madhoushi, M., Sadati, A., Delavari, H., Mehdivand, M., & Mihandost, R. (2011). Entrepreneurial orientation and innovation performance: The mediating role of knowledge management. Asian Journal of Business Management, 3(4), 310–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marino, L., Strandholm, K., Steensma, H. K., & Weaver, K. M. (2002). The moderating effect of national culture on the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and strategic alliance portfolio extensiveness. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(4), 145–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(7), 770–791. doi:10.1287/mnsc.29.7.770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1982). Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum. Strategic Management Journal, 3(1), 1–25. doi:10.1002/smj.4250030102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naman, J. L., & Slevin, D. P. (1993). Entrepreneurship and the concept of fit: A model and empirical tests. Strategic Management Journal, 14(2), 137–153. doi:10.1002/smj.4250140205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). The assessment of reliability. Psychometric Theory, 3(1), 248–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peris-Ortiz, M. (2009). An analytical model for human resource management as an enabler of organizational renewal: A framework for corporate entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 5(4), 461–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G. T., & Frese, M. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: An assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 761–787. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00308.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richard, O. C., Barnett, T., Dwyer, S., & Chadwick, K. (2004). Cultural diversity in management, firm performance, and the moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation dimensions. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 255–266. doi:10.2307/20159576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Will, A. (2005). SmartPLS, 2.0 www.smartpls.de.

  • Roldán, J. L., & Sánchez-Franco, M. J. (2012). Variance-based structural equation modeling: Guidelines for using partial least squares. In M. Mora, O. Gelman, A. L. Steenkamp, & M. Raisinghani (Eds.), Research methodologies, innovations and philosophies in software systems engineering and information systems (pp. 193–221). Hershey: IGI Global.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. (1968). The logic of survey analysis. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbusch, N., Rauch, A., & Bausch, A. (2013). The mediating role of entrepreneurial orientation in the task environment–performance relationship: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 39(3), 633–659. doi:10.1177/0149206311425612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H., & Warren, B. (1965). Personal and organizational change via group methods. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheré, J. L. (1982). Tolerance of ambiguity as a discriminating variable between entrepreneurs and managers. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings,42(1), 404–408. doi: 10.5465/AMBPP.1982.4976860

  • Sexton, D. L., & Bowman, N. (1985). The entrepreneur: A capable executive and more. Journal of Business Venturing, 1(1), 129–140. doi:10.1016/0883-9026(85)90012-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stetz, P. E., Howell, R., Stewart, A., Blair, J. D., & Fottler, M. D. (2000). Multidimensionality of entrepreneurial firm-level processes: Do the dimensions covary? In R. D. Reynolds, E. Autio, C. G. Brush, W. D. Bygrave, S. Manigart, H. J. Sapienza, & D. L. Sexton (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research (pp. 459–469). Wellesley: Babson College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sung, Y. S., & Choi, J. N. (2012). Effects of team knowledge management on the creativity and financial performance of organizational teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 118(1), 4–13. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.01.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, J., & Tan, D. (2005). Environment-strategy co-evolution and co-alignment: A staged model of Chinese SOEs under transition. Strategic Management Journal,26(2), 141–157. doi:10.1002/smj.437

  • Tang, J., Tang, Z., Marino, L. D., Zhang, Y., & Li, Q. (2008). Exploring an inverted U-shape relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and performance in Chinese ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(1), 219–239. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00223.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, A. S., & Mueller, S. L. (2000). A case for comparative entrepreneurship: Assessing the relevance of culture. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(2), 287–301. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wales, W. J., Gupta, V. K., & Mousa, F. T. (2013). Empirical research on entrepreneurial orientation: An assessment and suggestions for future research. International Small Business Journal, 31(4), 357–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, A., Auer, M., & Ritter, T. (2006). The impact of network capabilities and entrepreneurial orientation on university spin-off performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(4), 541–567. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.02.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. L. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation, learning orientation, and firm performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(4), 635–657. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00246.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, Y. S., O'Neill, H., Lee, R. P., & Zhou, N. (2013). The impact of innovative culture on individual employees: The moderating role of market information sharing. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(5), 1027–1041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund, J. (1999). The sustainability of the entrepreneurial orientation–performance relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24(1), 37–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: A configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1), 71–91. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.01.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winslow, E. K., & Solomon, G. T. (1993). Entrepreneurs: Architects of innovation, paradigm pioneers and change. Journal of Creative Behavior, 27(2), 75–88. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1993.tb01391.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yarbrough, L., Morgan, N. A., & Vorhies, D. W. (2011). The impact of product market strategy-organizational culture fit on business performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(4), 555-–573.

  • Yoon, J., & Kayes, C. D. (2016). Employees’ self-efficacy and perception of individual learning in teams: The cross-level moderating role of team-learning behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37, 1044–1060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y., Li, Y., Lee, S. H., & Chen, L. B. (2011). Entrepreneurial orientation, organizational learning, and performance: Evidence from China. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(2), 293–317. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00359.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the editor and anonymous reviewers for their help in developing this manuscript. This manuscript was supported by a Korea University Grant (K1614951).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Korea University, Graduate School of Management of Technology, 145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, South Korea

    Jeewhan Yoon

  2. Department of Management, George Washington University, 2201 G Street NW, Washington, DC, 20052, USA

    George T Solomon

Authors
  1. Jeewhan Yoon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. George T Solomon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeewhan Yoon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yoon, J., Solomon, G.T. A curvilinear relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: The moderating role of employees’ psychological safety. Int Entrep Manag J 13, 1139–1156 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-017-0448-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-017-0448-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation