Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Network legitimacy diffusion: a model for corporate entrepreneurship

  • Published:
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

International corporate entrepreneurship increasingly requires broader internal and external networks and legitimacy seeking in areas where the corporation and the entrepreneur are not well known. In this article, the important factors that influence the degree of legitimacy granted to corporate entrepreneurs are proposed and discussed. Specifically, we identify three primary levels of legitimacy: pragmatic legitimacy, normative legitimacy, and structural legitimacy. A model is proposed that suggests that organizations move through these levels of legitimacy resulting in differing brokering behaviors for network building. In addition, we integrate this effort into a global perspective by focusing on corporate entrepreneurs who seek to engage in international efforts. Implications for future research are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahuja, G., & Katila, R. (2001). Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 197–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. (2007). Discovery and creation: alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 19, 645–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B. (1995). Innovation and industry evolution. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battilana, J., & Casciaro, T. (2012). Change agents, networks, and institutions: a contingency theory of organizational change. Academy of Management Journal, 55(2), 381–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J. A. C., & Oliver, C. (1991). Institutional linkages and organizational mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 187–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergh, P., Thorgren, S., & Wincent, J. (2011). Entrepreneurs learning together: the importance of building trust for learning and exploiting business opportunities. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7, 17–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. (1995). Conformity explains social behavior. In L. Barteck & K. Mullin (Eds.), Enduring issues in sociology (pp. 127–131). San Diego: Greenhaven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R. A., & Sayles, L. R. (1986). Inside corporate innovation. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkhardt, M. E. (1994). Social interaction effects following a technological change: a longitudinal investigation. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 869–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1987). Social contagion and innovation, cohesion versus structural equivalence. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 1287–1335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (2005). Brokerage & closure. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S., Katz, E., & Menzel, H. (1966). Medical innovation: a diffusion study. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen, J. A., & Clarke, J. S. (2010). Imagining and rationalizing opportunities: inductive reasoning and the creation and justification of new ventures. Academy of Management Review, 35(4), 539–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J. G., & Kuratko, D. F. (2012). The concept of corporate entrepreneurship. In V. K. Narayanan & G. C. O’Connor (Eds.), Wiley encyclopedia of technology and innovation management. West Sussex: Wiley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J. G., & Miles, M. P. (1999). Corporate entrepreneurship and the pursuit of competitive advantage. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 23(3), 47–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J. G., Slevin, D. P., & Heeley, M. B. (2000). Pioneers and followers: competitive tactics, environment and firm growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(2), 175–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M., & Prince, M. (2005). Dynamics of trust between clients and their advertising agencies: advances in performance theory. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 11, 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, D. L. (1994). Raising radicals. Organization Science, 5(2), 148–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delmar, F., & Shane, S. (2004). Legitimating first: organizing activities and the survival of new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 385–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dess, G. G., Lumpkin, G. T., & McGee, J. E. (1999). Linking corporate entrepreneurship to strategy, structure, and process: suggested research directions. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 23(3), 85–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J. (1992). Nadel’s paradox revisited: relational and cultural aspects of organizational structure. In N. Nohria & R. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: structure, form, and action (pp. 118–142). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enkel, E., & Goel, S. (2012). Smoothing the corporate venturing path: rules still count. Journal of Business Strategy, 33(3), 30–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filatotchev, I., Liu, X., Buck, T., & Wright, M. (2009). The export orientation and export performance of high-technology SMEs in emerging markets: the effects of knowledge transfer by returnee entrepreneurs. Journal of International Business Studies, 40, 1005–1021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galaskiewicz, J. (1991). Making corporate actors accountable: institution-building in Minneapolis-St. Paul. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 293–310). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galaskiewicz, J., & Burt, R. S. (1991). Interorganization contagion in corporate philanthropy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 88–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galaskiewicz, J., & Wasserman, S. (1989). Mimetic processes within an interorganizational field: an empirical test. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 454–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godoe, H. (2012). Innovation theory, aesthetics, and science of the artificial after Herbert Simon. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3(4), 372–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, E. B., Yli-Renko, H., & Janakiraman, R. (2012). Resource search, interpersonal similarity, and network tie valuation in nascent entrepreneurs’ emerging networks. Journal of Management, 38(6), 1760–1787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G. (2000). Leading the revolution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49, 149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haunschild, P. R., & Miner, A. S. (1997). Modes of interorganizational imitation: the effects of outcome salience and uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 472–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayton, J. C., George, G., & Zahra, S. A. (2002). National culture and entrepreneurship: a review of behavioral research. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 26(4), 33–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s Consequences: international differences in work related values. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornsby, J. S., Kuratko, D. F., Shepherd, D. A., & Bott, J. P. (2009). Managers’corporate entrepreneurial actions: examining perception and position. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(3), 236–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, J. M., & Higgins, C. A. (1990). The champions of technological innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 317–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y. (2009). Strategic renewal within an information technology firm. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 15(5), 436–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra, H. (1993). Network centrality, power, and innovation involvement – determinants of technical and administrative roles. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 471–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., & Sirmon, D. G. (2003a). A model of strategic entrepreneurship: the construct and its dimensions. Journal of Management, 29(6), 963–989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, R. D., Kuratko, D. F., & Covin, J. G. (2003b). Antecedents, elements, and consequences of corporate entrepreneurship strategy. Best paper proceedings: Academy of Management, Annual Meeting, Seattle Washington.

  • Ireland, R. D., Kuratko, D. F., & Morris, M. (2006). A health audit for corporate entrepreneurship: Innovation at all levels (Part 1). Journal of Business Strategy, 27(2), 10–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, R. D., Covin, J. G., & Kuratko, D. F. (2009). Conceptualizing corporate entrepreneurship strategy. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 33(1), 19–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C., Dowd, T. J., & Ridgeway, C. L. (2006). Legitimacy as a social process. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 53–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, S. C., Morris, S. S., & Snell, S. A. (2007). Extending the human architecture: relational archetypes and value creation. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 236–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R., & Richardson, L. (1991). Engines of progress: designing and running entrepreneurial vehicles in established companies – the Enter-Prize Program at Ohio Bell, 1985–1990. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(3), 209–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R., North, J., Bernstain, A. P., & Williamson, A. (1990). Engines of progress: designing and running entrepreneurial vehicles in established companies. Journal of Business Venturing, 5(6), 415–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. M. (1979). Perception, opportunity, and profit. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B., & Singh, H. (1988). The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies (Eall), 411–432.

  • Kuratko, D. F., Hornsby, J. S., & Goldsby, M. G. (2004). Sustaining corporate entrepreneurship: a proposed model of perceived implementation/outcome comparisons at the organizational and individual levels. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 5(2), 77–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuratko, D. F., Goldsby, M. G., & Hornsby, J. S. (2012). Innovation acceleration: transforming organizational thinking. Upper Saddle River: Pearson/Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lounsbury, M., & Glynn, M. (2001). Cultural entrepreneurship: stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 454–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyles, M. A., & Salk, J. E. (1996). Knowledge acquisition from foreign parents in international joint ventures: an empirical examination in the Hungarian context. Journal of International Business Studies, 27(5), 877–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maidique, M. A. (1980). Entrepreneurs, champions, and technological innovation. Sloan Management Review, 21(2), 59–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makino, S., & Neupert, K. E. (2000). National culture, transaction costs, and the choice between joint venture and wholly owned subsidiary. Journal of International Business Studies, 31, 705–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, M. H., & Zimmerer, T. W. (2003). A longitudinal study of the impact of intrapreneurial programs in Fortune 500 firms. Journal of Management Research, 3(1), 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, R. G., Bloodgood, J. M., & Payan, J. M. (2008). Supply chain contagion. Journal of Marketing, 72(2), 63–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, G., & McKinney, M. (1989). Forget the corporate umbrella – entrepreneurs shine in the rain. Sloan Management Review, 30(4), 77–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milanov, H., & Fernhaber, S. A. (2009). The impact of early imprinting on the evolution of new venture networks. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(1), 46–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. H., Kuratko, D. F., & Covin, J. G. (2011). Corporate entrepreneurship & innovation. Boston: Cengage/South-Western/Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phan, P. H., Wright, M., Ucbasaran, D., & Tan, W. L. (2009). Corporate entrepreneurship: current research and future directions. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(3), 197–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, R. D. (1999). Developing a process model of intrapreneurial systems: a cognitive mapping approach. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23, 65–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebora, T. C., Theerapatvong, T., & Lee, S. M. (2010). Corporate entrepreneurship in the face of changing competition. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 23(4), 453–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (1992). Why do some societies invent more than others. Journal of Business Venturing, 7, 29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (1994a). The effect of national culture on the choice between licensing and direct foreign investment. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 627–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (1994b). Cultural values and the championing process. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 18, 25–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (1995). Uncertainty avoidance and the preference for innovation championing roles. Journal of International Business Studies (First Quarter), Al-61.

  • Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (1996). Renegade and rational championing strategies. Organization Studies, 17(5), 715–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, P., & Chrisman, J. J. (1999). Toward a reconciliation of the definitional issues in the field of corporate entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 23(3), 11–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, D. A., & Zacharakis, A. (2003). A new venture’s cognitive legitimacy: an assessment by customers. Journal of Small Business Management, 41(2), 148–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrader, R., & Simon, M. (1997). Corporate versus independent new ventures: resource, strategy, and performance differences. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(1), 47–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souitaris, V., Zerbinati, S., & Liu, G. (2012). Which iron cage? Endo- and Exoisomorphism in corporate venture capital programs. Academy of Management Journal, 55(2), 477–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steensma, H. K., Marino, L., & Weaver, K. M. (2000). Attitudes toward cooperative strategies: a cross- cultural analysis of entrepreneurs. Journal of International Business Studies, 31, 591–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strang, D., & Meyer, J. W. (1994). Institutional conditions for diffusion. In W. R. Scott & J. W. Meyer (Eds.), Institutional environments and organizations (pp. 100–112). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, M. (1995). Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorgren, S., Wincent, J., & Örtqvist, D. (2010). Unleashing synergies in strategic networks of SMEs: the influence of partner fit on corporate entrepreneurship. International Small Business Journal, 30(5), 453–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, S., & Amit, R. (2000). A dynamic perspective of internal fit in corporate venturing. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 25–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bulte, C., & Lilien, G. L. (2001). Medical innovation revisited: social contagion versus marketing effort. The American Journal of Sociology, 106(5), 1409–1436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, F., & Barkema, H. (2001). Learning through acquisitions. Academy of Management Journal, 44(3), 457–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, I. O., & Cable, D. M. (2003). Organizational hiring patterns, interfirm network ties, and interorganizational imitation. Academy of Management Journal, 46(3), 349–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., & Hayton, J. C. (2008). The effect of international venturing on firm performance: the moderating influence of absorptive capacity. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(2), 195–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., Kuratko, D. F., & Jennings, D. F. (1999). Entrepreneurship and the acquisition of dynamic organizational capabilities. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 23(3), 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M. A., & Zeitz, G. J. (2002). Beyond survival: achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414–431.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Regnier Institute for Entrepreneurship and Innovation, Henry W. Bloch School of Management, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA

    Jeffrey S. Hornsby

  2. College of Business Administration, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA

    James M. Bloodgood

  3. Warwick Business School, The University of Warwick, Coventry, UK

    James Hayton

  4. The Kelley School of Business, Indiana University - Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, USA

    Donald F. Kuratko

Authors
  1. Jeffrey S. Hornsby
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James M. Bloodgood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. James Hayton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Donald F. Kuratko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey S. Hornsby.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hornsby, J.S., Bloodgood, J.M., Hayton, J. et al. Network legitimacy diffusion: a model for corporate entrepreneurship. Int Entrep Manag J 9, 307–322 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-013-0256-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-013-0256-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation