Abstract
Integrating signaling theory with insights derived from the attention based view, this study addresses the question of which types of upper echelons ties initial public offering (IPO) markets value more. Specifically, we argue that the signals conveyed by upper echelons ties with publicly traded firms are perceived by IPO equity markets as more valuable than upper echelons ties with privately held firms. Additionally, we contend that the signals sent by external directorates with publicly traded firms are perceived more favorably by IPO equity markets than managerial ties with publicly traded firms. The theory in this study is tested on a sample of 366 firms than underwent their IPOs during 1997. The results of hypothesis tests provide partial support for our arguments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Because the range of this variable extended into negative numbers we took the natural logarithm of 1 plus the absolute value of the sample minimum ROA value added to firm ROA.
References
Baum, J. A. C., & Oliver, C. (1991). Institutional linkages and organizational mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 187–218.
Boeker, W. (1997). Executive migration and strategic change: the effect of top manager movement on product-market entry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2), 213–236.
Carter, R. B., & Manaster, S. (1990). Initial public offerings and underwriter reputation. Journal of Finance, 45(4), 1045–1067.
Carter, R. B., Dark, F. H., & Singh, A. K. (1998). Underwriter reputation, initial returns, and the long-run performance of IPO stocks. Journal of Finance, 53, 285–311.
Certo, S. T. (2003). Influencing initial public offering investors with prestige: signaling with board structures. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 432–446.
Certo, S. T., Covin, J. G., Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (2001a). Wealth and the effects of founder management among IPO-stage new ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 641–658.
Certo, S. T., Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (2001b). Signaling firm value through board structure: An investigation of initial public offerings. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, Winter: 33–50.
Chemmanur, T. J., & Paeglis, I. (2005). Managerial quality, certification, and initial public offerings. Journal of Financial Economics, 76, 331–368.
Cohen, B. D., & Dean, T. J. (2005). Information asymmetry and investor valuation of IPOs: top management team legitimacy as a capital market signal. Strategic Management Journal, 26(7), 683–690.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S., & Aiken, L. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Daily, C. M., Certo, S. T., Dalton, D. R., & Roengpitya, R. (2003). IPO underpricing: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, Spring: 271–295.
Daily, C. M., Certo, S. T., & Dalton, D. R. (2005). Investment bankers and IPO pricing: does prospectus information matter? Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1), 93–111.
Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Johnson, J. L., & Ellstrand, A. E. (1999). Number of directors and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 674–686.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1996). Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, 7(2), 136–150.
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2004). New lists: fundamentals and survival rates. Journal of Financial Economics, 73(2), 229–269.
Fischer, H. M., & Pollock, T. G. (2004). Effects of social capital and power on surviving transformational change: the case of initial public offerings. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 463–481.
Freeman, J., Carroll, T. N., & Hannan, M. (1983). The liability of newness. American Sociological Review, 48, 692–710.
Geletkanycz, M. A., & Hambrick, D. C. (1997). The external ties of top executives: implications for strategic choice and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4), 654–681.
Haunschild, P. R., & Beckman, C. M. (1998). When do interlocks matter?: alternate sources of information and interlock influence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4), 815–844.
Higgins, M. C., & Gulati, R. (2003). Getting off to a good start: the effects of upper echelon affiliations on underwriter prestige. Organization Science, 14(3), 244–263.
Higgins, M. C., & Gulati, R. (2006). Stacking the deck: the effects of top management backgrounds on investor decisions. Strategic Management Journal, 27(1), 1–25.
Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., & Vaidyanath, D. (2002). Alliance management as a source of competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 28(3), 413–446.
Jain, B. A., & Kini, O. (2000). Does the presence of venture capitalists improve the survival profile of IPO firms? Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 27, 1139–1176.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.
Kono, C., Palmer, D. A., Friedland, R., & Zafonte, M. (1998). Lost in space: the geography of corporate interlocking directorates. American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 863–911.
Kroll, M., Walters, B. A., & Le, S. A. (2007). The impact of board composition and top management team ownership structure on post-IPO performance in young entrepreneurial firms. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1198–1216.
Lester, R. H., Certo, S. T., Dalton, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Cannella, A. A. (2006). Initial public offering investor valuations: an examination of top management team prestige and environmental uncertainty. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(1), 1–26.
Miner, A. S., Amburgey, T. L., & Stearns, T. M. (1990). Interorganizational linkages and population dynamics: buffering and transformational shields. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 689–713.
Mizruchi, M. S. (1996). What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 271–298.
Ocasio, W. (1997). Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18(Summer Special Issue): 187–206.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
Ritter, J. R. (1991). The long-run performance of initial public offerings. Journal of Finance, 46(1), 3–27.
Ritter, J. R., & Welch, I. (2002). A review of IPO activity, pricing, and allocations. Journal of Finance, 57(4), 1795–1828.
Ross, S. A. (1977). The determinants of financial structure: the incentive signaling approach. Bell Journal of Economics, 8, 23–40.
Singh, J. V., House, R. J., & Tucker, D. J. (1986). Organizational change and organizational mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(4), 587–611.
Singh, K., & Mitchell, W. (2005). Growth dynamics: the bidirecitonal relationship between interfirm collaboration and business sales in entrant and incumbent alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 26(6), 497–521.
Spence, A. M. (1973). Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87, 355–379.
Spence, A. M. (1974). Market signaling: Informational transfer in hiring and related screening processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Stuart, T. E. (2000). Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: a study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 21(8), 791–811.
Stuart, T. E., Hoang, H., & Hybels, R. C. (1999). Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 315–349.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reutzel, C.R., Belsito, C.A. Examining the relative influence of upper echelons ties on IPO underpricing. Int Entrep Manag J 8, 1–14 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-010-0163-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-010-0163-y