Skip to main content
Log in

The effectiveness of entrepreneurial firm’s knowledge acquisition from a business incubator

  • Published:
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This cross-cultural research project, involving the United States and Finland, explored how the entrepreneurial firm’s acquisition of business processes’ knowledge from interaction with incubator management positively impacts on new product development, increased technical competence, enhanced reputation and lower costs of sales to customers. In a sample of 52 firms, the study’s methodology depended on single response, self-reported data. The findings suggest that the sole knowledge benefits gained by the firm, from the incubator relationship, is a perception of enhanced reputation. Also, incubator managers should focus more on assisting new technology based firms with growing the venture in the marketplace.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldrich, H. (2000). Organizations evolving. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Martinez, M. A. (2001). Many are called, but few are chosen: An evolutionary perspective for the study of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4), 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, D. N., & McCluskey, R. (1990). Structure, policy, services, and performance in the business incubator industry. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 15(2), 61–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. (2002). Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995). Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 20, 343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1997). The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 339–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman, J. J., & Leslie, J. (1989). Strategic, administrative, and operating problems: The impact of outsiders on small firm performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 13(3), 37–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaskill, L. R., VanAuken, H. E., & Manning, R. A. (1993). A factor analytic study of the perceived causes of small business failure. Journal of Small Business Management, 31(4), 18–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M., Chesbrough, H. W., Nohria, N., & Sull, D. N. (2000). Networked incubators hothouses of the new economy. Harvard Business Review, 78(5), 74–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., Camp, M., & Sexton, D. L. (2001). Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue strategic entrepreneurship: entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 479–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innopoli Annual Report (2001). 01/31/2003, http://www.innopoli.fi

  • Kazanjian, R. K. (1988). Relation of dominant problems to stages of growth in technology-based new ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 257–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, D. J., & Rice, M. P. (2001). Technology-based strategic actions in new firms: The influence of founding technology resources. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(1), 55–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, E. H., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (1996). Innovation speed: A conceptual model of context, antecedents, and outcomes. Academy of Management Review, 21, 1143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchhoff, B. A. (1994). Entrepreneurship and dynamic capitalism: The economics of business firm formation and growth. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C., Miller, W. F., Hancock, M. G., & Rowen, H. S. (2000). The silicon valley edge a habitat for innovation and entrepreneurship. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, N. (2001). Social capital a theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, G. B., Trailer, J. W., & Hill, R. C. (1996). Measuring performance in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Research, 36, 15–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Business Incubator Association Retrieved February 19, 2003, from http://www.nbia.org

  • Otaniemi Science Park: Innolinko. http://www.otech.fi/eng/innolinko.htm, 02/04/2003.

  • Otaniemi Science Park: InnoTULI. http://www.otech.fi/eng/innotuli.htm, 02/04/2003.

  • Parikh, M. (2001). Knowledge management framework for high-tech research and development. Engineering Management Journal, 13(3), 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, M. P. (1992). Intervention mechanisms used to influence the critical success factors of new ventures: An exploratory study. Troy, NY: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, M. P. (2002). Co-production of business assistance in business incubators and exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 163–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, M., & Matthews, J. B. (1995). Growing new ventures, creating new jobs: Principles & practices of successful business incubation. Westport: Quorum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Science Park & Innovation Center Retrieved February 19, 2003 http://spica-directory.net

  • Shane, S., & Stuart, T. (2002). Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Science, 48, 154–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, H. D. (1999). Assessing the intervention effectiveness of business incubation programs on new business start-ups. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 4(2), 117–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinno Business Development Centre. http://www.spinno_company.htm, 02/04/2003.

  • Tekes, National Technology Agency Tekes Annual Review 2001.

  • Yli-Renko, H. (1999). Dependence, social capital, and learning in key customer relationships effects on the performance of technology-based new firms. Helsinki, Finland: Helsinki University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E., & Sapienza, H. J. (2001). Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 587–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M. A., & Zeitz, G. J. (2002). Beyond survival: achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27, 414–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., & Armstrong, J. S. (2002). Commercializing knowledge: University science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology. Management Science, 48, 138–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nareatha L. Studdard.

Additional information

Funding for this project was provided by The National Science Foundation, and The National Technology Agency of Finland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Studdard, N.L. The effectiveness of entrepreneurial firm’s knowledge acquisition from a business incubator. Int Entrep Manag J 2, 211–225 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-006-8685-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-006-8685-z

Keywords

Navigation