Skip to main content
Log in

Does the setting of local government economic growth targets promote or hinder urban carbon emission performance? Evidence from China

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Growth target management drives China’s economic expansion, leading to potential carbon emission externalities. This study examines the impact of economic growth target setting on carbon emission performance in 257 Chinese localities from 2004 to 2020. Using cluster standard error regression, 2SLS instrumental variable regression, and the spatial Durbin model, the results show that moderate growth targets improve urban carbon emission performance. Conversely, aggressive targets do not enhance regional carbon emission performance. Moderate growth targets foster innovation in green technology, while aggressive ones encourage investment in fixed assets and new city growth, impeding performance. Cities in the eastern and western regions, with larger populations and less reliance on natural resources, benefit more from effective economic development targets. The establishment of local targets negatively affects neighboring regions’ carbon emissions performance, particularly at a spatial scale of 100 to 200 km. This paper contributes to understanding the environmental consequences of growth target setting and offers insights for balancing economic growth with carbon emission governance in emerging market countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data and materials are available from the authors upon request.

Notes

  1. In column 6 of Table 8, the direct effect of aggressive economic growth targets (Aggressive-Target-gdp) is 0.024, and the indirect effect through fixed-asset investment (Fix-asset) is calculated as − 0.02352 (0.547 * − 0.043). Therefore, the overall effect of aggressive economic growth targets on carbon emission performance is determined to be 0.0005. This finding closely aligns with the estimated results from the conditional analysis presented in Table 7.

References

Download references

Funding

This research was funded by the National Social Science Foundation of China (23BJY085).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Mo Chen: Data collection, conceptualization, methodology, writing original draft and editing. Jijian Zhang: validation, writing review, funding acquisition. Zhe Xu: data curation, writing review and editing. Xuhua Hu: writing review and editing. Dianxi Hu: writing review and editing. Guang Yang: writing review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jijian Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Arshian Sharif

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, M., Zhang, J., Xu, Z. et al. Does the setting of local government economic growth targets promote or hinder urban carbon emission performance? Evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 117404–117434 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-30307-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-30307-z

Keywords

Navigation