Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Meditation for role of productive capacities and green investment on ecological footprint in BRI countries

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is a development strategy with a focus on enhancing connectivity, promoting economic growth, and improving people’s livelihoods. However, it has also raised concerns about its effect on the environment. This study explores the impact of productive capacities and green investment in mitigating the ecological footprint of BRI countries. The role of productive capacities on ecological footprint is very little discussed in earlier studies. This study investigates the effect of productive capacities index and green investment on ecological footprint for 42 BRI participating countries covering the time span of 2000-2018. Different methods are applied to tackle the problem of dependence of cross sections; then Lagrange multiplier bootstrap method is applied to find co-integration. The long run relationship is uncovered by “augmented mean group” (AMG) and “common correlated effects mean group” (CCEMG). The findings of the study show that both productive capacities and green investment have a significant negative impact on ecological footprint, depicting that promoting sustainable development and environmental protection is feasible through increasing productive capacities and investing in green technologies. The findings of this study have important implications for policymakers, who should focus on promoting sustainable environment by prioritizing productive capacities and green technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All data is freely available.

References

  • Abid M (2016) Impact of economic, financial, and institutional factors on CO2 emissions: evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa economies. Util Policy 41:85–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Adekoya O, Oliyide J, Noman A (2021) The volatility connectedness of the EU carbon market with commodity and financial markets in time-and frequency-domain: the role of the US economic policy uncertainty. Resour Pol 74:102252

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad T, Zhang D (2020) A critical review of comparative global historical energy consumption and future demand: the story told so far. Energy Rep 6:1973–1991

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad M, Jiang P, Majeed A, Raza M (2020) Does financial development and foreign direct investment improve environmental quality? Evidence from belt and road countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:23586–23601

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad U, Usman M, Hussain S, Jahanger A, Abrar M (2022) Determinants of renewable energy sources in Pakistan: an overview. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:29183–29201

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed Z, Asghar M, Malik M, Nawaz K (2020) Moving towards a sustainable environment: the dynamic linkage between natural resources, human capital, urbanization, economic growth, and ecological footprint in China. Resour Policy 67:101677

    Google Scholar 

  • Akadiri S, Saint Alkawfi M, Uğural S, Akadiri A (2019) Towards achieving environmental sustainability target in Italy. The role of energy, real income and globalization. Sci Total Environ 671:1293–1301

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alotaibi S, Quddus M, Morton C, Imprialou M (2021) Transport investment, railway accessibility and their dynamic impacts on regional economic growth. Research in Transportation Business & Management. 43:100702

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarado R, Ortiz C, Jimenez N, Ochoa-Jimenez D, Tillaguango B (2021) Ecological footprint, air quality and research and development: the role of agriculture and international trade. J Clean Prod 288:125589

    Google Scholar 

  • Anser MK, Apergis N, Syed QR et al (2021) Exploring a new perspective of sustainable development drive through environmental Phillips curve in the case of the BRICST countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:48112–48122

    Google Scholar 

  • Apergis N, Can M, Gozgor G, Lau C (2018) Effects of export concentration on CO 2 emissions in developed countries: an empirical analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(14):14106–14116

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baloch M, Zhang J, Iqbal K, Iqbal Z (2019) The effect of financial development on ecological footprint in BRI countries: evidence from panel data estimation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:6199–6208

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi B, Feng Q, Kao C (2012) A Lagrange multiplier test for cross-sectional dependence in a fixed effects panel. J Econ 170:164–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Bashir M, Sheng B, Doğan B, Sarwar S, Shahzad U (2020) Export product diversification and energy efficiency: empirical evidence from OECD countries. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 55:232–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya M, Awaworyi CS, Paramati SR (2017) The dynamic impact of renewable energy and institutions on economic output and CO2 emissions across regions. Renew Energy 111:157–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt N, Schreyer P, Zipperer V (2017) Productivity measurement with natural capital. Rev Income Wealth 63:S7–S21

    Google Scholar 

  • Breusch TS, Pagan AR (1980) The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Rev Econ Stud 47:239

    Google Scholar 

  • Caglar AE (2022) Can nuclear energy technology budgets pave the way for a transition toward low-carbon economy: insights from the United Kingdom. Sustain Dev 31(1):198–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Caglar AE, Mert M (2022) Carbon hysteresis hypothesis as a new approach to emission behavior: a case of top five emitters. Gondwana Res 109:171–182

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caglar AE, Ulug M (2022) The role of government spending on energy efficiency R&D budgets in the green transformation process: insight from the top-five countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:76472–76484

    Google Scholar 

  • Caglar AE, Guloglu B, Gedikli A (2022) Moving towards sustainable environmental development for BRICS: investigating the asymmetric effect of natural resources on CO2. Sustain Dev. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2318

  • Can M, Gozgor G (2017) The impact of economic complexity on carbon emissions: evidence from France. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(19):16364–16370

    Google Scholar 

  • Can M, Ahmad M, Khan Z (2021) The impact of export composition on environment and energy demand: evidence from newly industrialized countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:33599–33612

    Google Scholar 

  • Casson MC, Della GM, Kambhampati US (2010) Formal and informal institutions and development. World Dev 38(2):137–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Charfeddine L (2017) The impact of energy consumption and economic development on ecological footprint and CO2 emissions: evidence from a Markov switching equilibrium correction model. Energy Econ 65:355–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatti W (2021) Moving towards environmental sustainability: information and communication technology (ICT), freight transport, and CO2 emissions. Heliyon 7(10):e08190

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dagar V, Khan MK, Alvarado R, Usman M, Zakari A, Rehman A, Murshed M, Tillaguango B (2021) Variations in technical efficiency of farmers with distinct land size across agro-climatic zones: evidence from India. J Clean Prod 315:128109

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz T, Rosa EA (1994) Rethinking the environmental impacts of population, affluence and technology. Human Ecol Rev 1(2):277–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Doğan B, Saboori B, Can M (2019) Does economic complexity matter for environmental degradation? An empirical analysis for different stages of development. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(31):31900–31912

    Google Scholar 

  • Fafchamps M, Quisumbing AR (1999) Human capital, productivity, and labor allocation in rural Pakistan. J Hum Resour 34(2):369–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Frees EW (1995) Assessing cross-sectional correlation in panel data. J Econ 69:393–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman M (1937) The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance. J Am Stat Assoc 32:675–701

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurgul H, Lach Ł (2014) Globalization and economic growth: evidence from two decades of transition in CEE. Econ Model 36:99–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock C, Kingo L, Raynaud O (2011) The private sector, international development and NCDs. Glob Health 7:23

    Google Scholar 

  • Husnain MIU, Syed QR, Bashir A. 2022. et al. Do geopolitical risk and energy consumption contribute to environmental degradation? Evidence from E7 countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:41640–41652.

  • Jahanger A (2021) Impact of globalization on CO2 emissions based on EKC hypothesis in developing world: the moderating role of human capital. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:20731–20751

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamal M, Usman M, Jahanger A, Balsalobre-Lorente D (2021) Revisiting the role of fiscal policy, financial development, and foreign direct investment in reducing environmental pollution during globalization mode: evidence from linear and nonlinear panel data approaches. Energies 14:6968

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kang YQ, Zhao T, Yang YY (2016) Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions in China: a spatial panel data approach. Ecol Indic 63:231–239

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khan M (2020) CO2 emissions and sustainable economic development: new evidence on the role of human capital. Sustain Dev 28(5):1279–1288

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan A, Hussain J, Bano S, Yang C (2020a) The repercussions of foreign direct investment, renewable energy and health expenditure on environmental decay? An econometric analysis of B&RI countries. J Environ Plan Manag 63:1965–1986

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan Z, Hussain M, Shahbaz M, Yang S, Jiao Z (2020b) Natural resource abundance, technological innovation, and human capital nexus with financial development: a case study of China. Resour Policy 65:101585

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan I, Hou F, Le HP (2021a) The impact of natural resources, energy consumption, and population growth on environmental quality: fresh evidence from the United States of America. Sci Total Environ 754:142222

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khan SAR, Yu Z, Sharif A (2021b) No silver bullet for de-carbonization: preparing for tomorrow, today. Resour Pol 71:101942

    Google Scholar 

  • Langnel Z, Amegavi GB (2020) Globalization, electricity consumption and ecological footprint: an autoregressive distributive lag (ARDL) approach. Sustain Cities Soc 63:102482

    Google Scholar 

  • Madni GR, Anwar A (2020) Meditation for level of institutional quality to combat income inequality through financial development. Int J Fin Econ. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.1932

  • Mensah CN, Long X, Boamah KB, Bediako IA, Dauda L, Salman M (2018) The effect of innovation on CO2 emissions of OCED countries from 1990 to 2014. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:29678–29698

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miao C, Fang D, Sun L, Luo Q (2017) Natural resources utilization efficiency under the influence of green technological innovation. Resour Conserv Recycl 126:153–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathaniel S, Khan SAR (2020) The nexus between urbanization, renewable energy, trade, and ecological footprint in ASEAN countries. J Clean Prod 272:122709

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang Q, Wang TT, Deng Y, Li ZP, Atif J (2022) The impact of environmental regulations on export trade at provincial level in China: evidence from panel quantile regression. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:24098–24111

    Google Scholar 

  • Pata UK (2021) Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, economic complexity, CO2 emissions, and ecological footprint in the USA: testing the EKC hypothesis with a structural break. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:846–861

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pata UK, Caglar AE (2021) Investigating the EKC hypothesis with renewable energy consumption, human capital, globalization and trade openness for China: evidence from augmented ARDL approach with a structural break. Energy 216:119220

    Google Scholar 

  • Pata UK, Yilanci V (2020) Financial development, globalization and ecological footprint in G7: further evidence from threshold cointegration and fractional frequency causality tests. Environ. Ecol Stat 27:803–825

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Econ 22:265–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH (2021) General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels. Empir Econ 60:13–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian C, Madni GR (2022) Encirclement of natural resources, green investment, and economic complexity for mitigation of ecological footprints in BRI countries. Sustainability 14:15269

    Google Scholar 

  • Qureshi S, Najjar L (2017) Information and communications technology use an income growth: evidence of the multiplier effect in very small island states. Inf Technol Dev 23(2):212–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashed AH, Shah A (2021) The role of private sector in the implementation of sustainable development goals. Environ Dev Sustain 23(3):2931–2948

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos G (2017) Road transport and CO2 emissions: what are the challenges? Transp Policy 59:71–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Saud S, Chen S, Haseeb A, Sumayya (2020) The role of financial development and globalization in the environment: accounting ecological footprint indicators for selected one-belt-one-road initiative countries. J Clean Prod 250:119518

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Sinha A, Raghutla C, Vo XV (2022) Decomposing scale and technique effects of financial development and foreign direct investment on renewable energy consumption. Energy 238:121758

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahzad U, Ferraz D, Doğan B, do NRD A (2020) Export product diversification and CO2 emissions: contextual evidences from developing and developed economies. J Clean Prod 276:124146

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha A, Shahbaz M (2018) Estimation of environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emission: role of renewable energy generation in India. Renew Energy 119:703–711

    Google Scholar 

  • Syed QR, Bhowmik R, Adedoyin F et al (2022) Do economic policy uncertainty and geopolitical risk surge CO2 emissions? New insights from panel quantile regression approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:27845–27861

    Google Scholar 

  • Talukdar D, Meisner CM (2001) Does the private sector help or hurt the environment? Evidence from carbon dioxide pollution in developing countries. World Dev 29(5):827–840

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulucak R, Lin D (2017) Persistence of policy shocks to ecological footprint of the USA. Ecol Indicat 80:337–343

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (2006) The least developed countries report 2006: developing productive capacities. United Nations, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (2021) UNCTAD productive capacities index: methodological approach and results. United Nations, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Rodrigues VS, Evans L (2015) The use of ICT in road freight transport for CO2 reduction–an exploratory study of UK’s grocery retail industry. The International Journal of Logistics Management 26(1):2–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Vo XV, Shahbaz M, Ak A (2020) Globalization and carbon emissions: is there any role of agriculture value-added, financial development, and natural resource rent in the aftermath of COP21? J Environ Manag 268:110712

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Westerlund J, Edgerton DL (2007) A panel bootstrap cointegration test. Econ Lett 97:185–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Yilanci V, Pata UK (2020) Investigating the EKC hypothesis for China: the role of economic complexity on ecological footprint. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:32683–32694

    Google Scholar 

  • You W, Lv Z (2018) Spillover effects of economic globalization on CO2 emissions: a spatial panel approach. Energy Econ 73:248–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan C, Liu S, Fang Z, Wu J (2009) Research on the energy-saving effect of energy policies in China: 1982–2006. Energy Policy 37(7):2475–2480

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao J, Madni GR, Anwar MA, Zahra SM (2021) Institutional reforms and their impact on economic growth and investment in developing countries. Sustainability 13:4941

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

There is one single author of this paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ghulam Rasool Madni.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Arshian Sharif

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Madni, G.R. Meditation for role of productive capacities and green investment on ecological footprint in BRI countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 72308–72318 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27478-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27478-0

Keywords

Navigation