Abstract
The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is a development strategy with a focus on enhancing connectivity, promoting economic growth, and improving people’s livelihoods. However, it has also raised concerns about its effect on the environment. This study explores the impact of productive capacities and green investment in mitigating the ecological footprint of BRI countries. The role of productive capacities on ecological footprint is very little discussed in earlier studies. This study investigates the effect of productive capacities index and green investment on ecological footprint for 42 BRI participating countries covering the time span of 2000-2018. Different methods are applied to tackle the problem of dependence of cross sections; then Lagrange multiplier bootstrap method is applied to find co-integration. The long run relationship is uncovered by “augmented mean group” (AMG) and “common correlated effects mean group” (CCEMG). The findings of the study show that both productive capacities and green investment have a significant negative impact on ecological footprint, depicting that promoting sustainable development and environmental protection is feasible through increasing productive capacities and investing in green technologies. The findings of this study have important implications for policymakers, who should focus on promoting sustainable environment by prioritizing productive capacities and green technologies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
All data is freely available.
References
Abid M (2016) Impact of economic, financial, and institutional factors on CO2 emissions: evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa economies. Util Policy 41:85–94
Adekoya O, Oliyide J, Noman A (2021) The volatility connectedness of the EU carbon market with commodity and financial markets in time-and frequency-domain: the role of the US economic policy uncertainty. Resour Pol 74:102252
Ahmad T, Zhang D (2020) A critical review of comparative global historical energy consumption and future demand: the story told so far. Energy Rep 6:1973–1991
Ahmad M, Jiang P, Majeed A, Raza M (2020) Does financial development and foreign direct investment improve environmental quality? Evidence from belt and road countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:23586–23601
Ahmad U, Usman M, Hussain S, Jahanger A, Abrar M (2022) Determinants of renewable energy sources in Pakistan: an overview. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:29183–29201
Ahmed Z, Asghar M, Malik M, Nawaz K (2020) Moving towards a sustainable environment: the dynamic linkage between natural resources, human capital, urbanization, economic growth, and ecological footprint in China. Resour Policy 67:101677
Akadiri S, Saint Alkawfi M, Uğural S, Akadiri A (2019) Towards achieving environmental sustainability target in Italy. The role of energy, real income and globalization. Sci Total Environ 671:1293–1301
Alotaibi S, Quddus M, Morton C, Imprialou M (2021) Transport investment, railway accessibility and their dynamic impacts on regional economic growth. Research in Transportation Business & Management. 43:100702
Alvarado R, Ortiz C, Jimenez N, Ochoa-Jimenez D, Tillaguango B (2021) Ecological footprint, air quality and research and development: the role of agriculture and international trade. J Clean Prod 288:125589
Anser MK, Apergis N, Syed QR et al (2021) Exploring a new perspective of sustainable development drive through environmental Phillips curve in the case of the BRICST countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:48112–48122
Apergis N, Can M, Gozgor G, Lau C (2018) Effects of export concentration on CO 2 emissions in developed countries: an empirical analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(14):14106–14116
Baloch M, Zhang J, Iqbal K, Iqbal Z (2019) The effect of financial development on ecological footprint in BRI countries: evidence from panel data estimation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:6199–6208
Baltagi B, Feng Q, Kao C (2012) A Lagrange multiplier test for cross-sectional dependence in a fixed effects panel. J Econ 170:164–177
Bashir M, Sheng B, Doğan B, Sarwar S, Shahzad U (2020) Export product diversification and energy efficiency: empirical evidence from OECD countries. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 55:232–243
Bhattacharya M, Awaworyi CS, Paramati SR (2017) The dynamic impact of renewable energy and institutions on economic output and CO2 emissions across regions. Renew Energy 111:157–167
Brandt N, Schreyer P, Zipperer V (2017) Productivity measurement with natural capital. Rev Income Wealth 63:S7–S21
Breusch TS, Pagan AR (1980) The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Rev Econ Stud 47:239
Caglar AE (2022) Can nuclear energy technology budgets pave the way for a transition toward low-carbon economy: insights from the United Kingdom. Sustain Dev 31(1):198–210
Caglar AE, Mert M (2022) Carbon hysteresis hypothesis as a new approach to emission behavior: a case of top five emitters. Gondwana Res 109:171–182
Caglar AE, Ulug M (2022) The role of government spending on energy efficiency R&D budgets in the green transformation process: insight from the top-five countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:76472–76484
Caglar AE, Guloglu B, Gedikli A (2022) Moving towards sustainable environmental development for BRICS: investigating the asymmetric effect of natural resources on CO2. Sustain Dev. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2318
Can M, Gozgor G (2017) The impact of economic complexity on carbon emissions: evidence from France. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(19):16364–16370
Can M, Ahmad M, Khan Z (2021) The impact of export composition on environment and energy demand: evidence from newly industrialized countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:33599–33612
Casson MC, Della GM, Kambhampati US (2010) Formal and informal institutions and development. World Dev 38(2):137–141
Charfeddine L (2017) The impact of energy consumption and economic development on ecological footprint and CO2 emissions: evidence from a Markov switching equilibrium correction model. Energy Econ 65:355–374
Chatti W (2021) Moving towards environmental sustainability: information and communication technology (ICT), freight transport, and CO2 emissions. Heliyon 7(10):e08190
Dagar V, Khan MK, Alvarado R, Usman M, Zakari A, Rehman A, Murshed M, Tillaguango B (2021) Variations in technical efficiency of farmers with distinct land size across agro-climatic zones: evidence from India. J Clean Prod 315:128109
Dietz T, Rosa EA (1994) Rethinking the environmental impacts of population, affluence and technology. Human Ecol Rev 1(2):277–300
Doğan B, Saboori B, Can M (2019) Does economic complexity matter for environmental degradation? An empirical analysis for different stages of development. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(31):31900–31912
Fafchamps M, Quisumbing AR (1999) Human capital, productivity, and labor allocation in rural Pakistan. J Hum Resour 34(2):369–406
Frees EW (1995) Assessing cross-sectional correlation in panel data. J Econ 69:393–414
Friedman M (1937) The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance. J Am Stat Assoc 32:675–701
Gurgul H, Lach Ł (2014) Globalization and economic growth: evidence from two decades of transition in CEE. Econ Model 36:99–107
Hancock C, Kingo L, Raynaud O (2011) The private sector, international development and NCDs. Glob Health 7:23
Husnain MIU, Syed QR, Bashir A. 2022. et al. Do geopolitical risk and energy consumption contribute to environmental degradation? Evidence from E7 countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:41640–41652.
Jahanger A (2021) Impact of globalization on CO2 emissions based on EKC hypothesis in developing world: the moderating role of human capital. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:20731–20751
Kamal M, Usman M, Jahanger A, Balsalobre-Lorente D (2021) Revisiting the role of fiscal policy, financial development, and foreign direct investment in reducing environmental pollution during globalization mode: evidence from linear and nonlinear panel data approaches. Energies 14:6968
Kang YQ, Zhao T, Yang YY (2016) Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions in China: a spatial panel data approach. Ecol Indic 63:231–239
Khan M (2020) CO2 emissions and sustainable economic development: new evidence on the role of human capital. Sustain Dev 28(5):1279–1288
Khan A, Hussain J, Bano S, Yang C (2020a) The repercussions of foreign direct investment, renewable energy and health expenditure on environmental decay? An econometric analysis of B&RI countries. J Environ Plan Manag 63:1965–1986
Khan Z, Hussain M, Shahbaz M, Yang S, Jiao Z (2020b) Natural resource abundance, technological innovation, and human capital nexus with financial development: a case study of China. Resour Policy 65:101585
Khan I, Hou F, Le HP (2021a) The impact of natural resources, energy consumption, and population growth on environmental quality: fresh evidence from the United States of America. Sci Total Environ 754:142222
Khan SAR, Yu Z, Sharif A (2021b) No silver bullet for de-carbonization: preparing for tomorrow, today. Resour Pol 71:101942
Langnel Z, Amegavi GB (2020) Globalization, electricity consumption and ecological footprint: an autoregressive distributive lag (ARDL) approach. Sustain Cities Soc 63:102482
Madni GR, Anwar A (2020) Meditation for level of institutional quality to combat income inequality through financial development. Int J Fin Econ. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.1932
Mensah CN, Long X, Boamah KB, Bediako IA, Dauda L, Salman M (2018) The effect of innovation on CO2 emissions of OCED countries from 1990 to 2014. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:29678–29698
Miao C, Fang D, Sun L, Luo Q (2017) Natural resources utilization efficiency under the influence of green technological innovation. Resour Conserv Recycl 126:153–161
Nathaniel S, Khan SAR (2020) The nexus between urbanization, renewable energy, trade, and ecological footprint in ASEAN countries. J Clean Prod 272:122709
Ouyang Q, Wang TT, Deng Y, Li ZP, Atif J (2022) The impact of environmental regulations on export trade at provincial level in China: evidence from panel quantile regression. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:24098–24111
Pata UK (2021) Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, economic complexity, CO2 emissions, and ecological footprint in the USA: testing the EKC hypothesis with a structural break. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:846–861
Pata UK, Caglar AE (2021) Investigating the EKC hypothesis with renewable energy consumption, human capital, globalization and trade openness for China: evidence from augmented ARDL approach with a structural break. Energy 216:119220
Pata UK, Yilanci V (2020) Financial development, globalization and ecological footprint in G7: further evidence from threshold cointegration and fractional frequency causality tests. Environ. Ecol Stat 27:803–825
Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Econ 22:265–312
Pesaran MH (2021) General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels. Empir Econ 60:13–50
Qian C, Madni GR (2022) Encirclement of natural resources, green investment, and economic complexity for mitigation of ecological footprints in BRI countries. Sustainability 14:15269
Qureshi S, Najjar L (2017) Information and communications technology use an income growth: evidence of the multiplier effect in very small island states. Inf Technol Dev 23(2):212–234
Rashed AH, Shah A (2021) The role of private sector in the implementation of sustainable development goals. Environ Dev Sustain 23(3):2931–2948
Santos G (2017) Road transport and CO2 emissions: what are the challenges? Transp Policy 59:71–74
Saud S, Chen S, Haseeb A, Sumayya (2020) The role of financial development and globalization in the environment: accounting ecological footprint indicators for selected one-belt-one-road initiative countries. J Clean Prod 250:119518
Shahbaz M, Sinha A, Raghutla C, Vo XV (2022) Decomposing scale and technique effects of financial development and foreign direct investment on renewable energy consumption. Energy 238:121758
Shahzad U, Ferraz D, Doğan B, do NRD A (2020) Export product diversification and CO2 emissions: contextual evidences from developing and developed economies. J Clean Prod 276:124146
Sinha A, Shahbaz M (2018) Estimation of environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emission: role of renewable energy generation in India. Renew Energy 119:703–711
Syed QR, Bhowmik R, Adedoyin F et al (2022) Do economic policy uncertainty and geopolitical risk surge CO2 emissions? New insights from panel quantile regression approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:27845–27861
Talukdar D, Meisner CM (2001) Does the private sector help or hurt the environment? Evidence from carbon dioxide pollution in developing countries. World Dev 29(5):827–840
Ulucak R, Lin D (2017) Persistence of policy shocks to ecological footprint of the USA. Ecol Indicat 80:337–343
UNCTAD (2006) The least developed countries report 2006: developing productive capacities. United Nations, Geneva
UNCTAD (2021) UNCTAD productive capacities index: methodological approach and results. United Nations, Geneva
Wang Y, Rodrigues VS, Evans L (2015) The use of ICT in road freight transport for CO2 reduction–an exploratory study of UK’s grocery retail industry. The International Journal of Logistics Management 26(1):2–29
Wang L, Vo XV, Shahbaz M, Ak A (2020) Globalization and carbon emissions: is there any role of agriculture value-added, financial development, and natural resource rent in the aftermath of COP21? J Environ Manag 268:110712
Westerlund J, Edgerton DL (2007) A panel bootstrap cointegration test. Econ Lett 97:185–190
Yilanci V, Pata UK (2020) Investigating the EKC hypothesis for China: the role of economic complexity on ecological footprint. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:32683–32694
You W, Lv Z (2018) Spillover effects of economic globalization on CO2 emissions: a spatial panel approach. Energy Econ 73:248–257
Yuan C, Liu S, Fang Z, Wu J (2009) Research on the energy-saving effect of energy policies in China: 1982–2006. Energy Policy 37(7):2475–2480
Zhao J, Madni GR, Anwar MA, Zahra SM (2021) Institutional reforms and their impact on economic growth and investment in developing countries. Sustainability 13:4941
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
There is one single author of this paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Arshian Sharif
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Madni, G.R. Meditation for role of productive capacities and green investment on ecological footprint in BRI countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 72308–72318 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27478-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27478-0