Abstract
Increased globalization in urban areas raise energy consumption that leads to high carbon dioxide discharge and degrade environmental quality. Other economic activities also produce emission; however, a well-established institutional framework can overcome the issues of environmental degradation and minimize the effect of harmful factors on the environment. In this regard, this study investigates the effect of urbanization, energy consumption, and industrialization on carbon dioxide emission by taking into consideration the role of institutional quality in the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) countries for the period of 2002 to 2019. Employing dynamic panel techniques, the results are in line with theories which show that increased urbanization, energy consumption, industrialization, and economic growth raise carbon dioxide emission and lead to environmental degradation. The study also found that international trade and political stability reduce emission; however, institutional quality as a whole positively affects carbon dioxide emission. The study also found a U-shape relationship between urbanization and carbon dioxide emission. The interaction term between institutional quality and urbanization significantly mitigates carbon dioxide emission and raise environmental sustainability. The findings of this study have considerable policy suggestions for the sample countries.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data used in the analysis is available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.
References
Abid M (2016) Impact of economic, financial, and institutional factors on CO2 emissions: evidence from sub-Saharan Africa economies. Util Policy 41:85–94
Adebayo TS, Adedoyin FF, Kirikkaleli D (2021) Toward a sustainable environment: nexus between consumption-based carbon emissions, economic growth, renewable energy and technological innovation in Brazil. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(37):52272–52282
Alajlan N, Alreshaidi A (2022) The nexus of carbon dioxide emissions, economic growth, and urbanization in Saudi Arabia. Environ Res Commun 4(12):125009
Al-Mulali U, Ozturk I (2016) The investigation of environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in the advanced economies: the role of energy prices. Renew Sust Energ Rev 54:1622–1631
Al-Mulali U, Ozturk I, Solarin SA (2016) Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in seven regions: The role of renewable energy. Ecol Indic 67:267–282
Amin A, Ameer W, Yousaf H, Akbar M (2022) Financial development, institutional quality, and the influence of various environmental factors on carbon dioxide emissions: exploring the nexus in China. Front Environ Sci 9:755
Apergis N, Li J (2016) Population and lifestyle trend changes in China: implications for environmental quality. Appl Econ 48(54):5246–5256
Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58(2):277–297
Aritenang AF (2021) The importance of agglomeration economies and technological level on local economic growth: the case of Indonesia. J Knowl Econ 12(2):544–563
Bai C et al (2020) Will income inequality influence the abatement effect of renewable energy technological innovation on carbon dioxide emissions? J Environ Manage 264:110482
Bao B, Lin B (2021) Research on the impact of economic growth and technological innovation on carbon emissions from the perspective of space. In: E3S Web of Conferences, vol 275. EDP Sciences, p 02014
Bletsas K et al (2022) Carbon dioxide and greenhouse gas emissions: the role of monetary policy, fiscal policy, and institutional quality. Energies 15(13):4733
Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J Econom 87(1):115–143
Bouchoucha N (2021) The effect of environmental degradation on health status: do institutions matter? J Knowl Econ 12(4):1618–1634
Canh NP (2019) Global emissions: a new contribution from the shadow economy.:670216917
Chien F, Ajaz T, Andlib Z, Chau KY, Ahmad P, Sharif A (2021) The role of technology innovation, renewable energy and globalization in reducing environmental degradation in Pakistan: a step towards sustainable environment. Renew Energ 177:308–317
Danish M, Ahmad T, Nadhari WNAW, Ahmad M, Khanday WA, Ziyang L, Pin Z (2018) Optimization of banana trunk-activated carbon production for methylene blue-contaminated water treatment. Appl Water Sci 8:1–11
de Leon P, Barido D, Marshall JD (2014) Relationship between urbanization and CO2 emissions depends on income level and policy. Environ Sci Technol 48(7):3632–3639
Gani A (2012) The Relationship between Good Governance and Carbon Dioxide Emissions: Evidence from Developing Economies. J Econ Dev 37(1):77–93. https://doi.org/10.35866/caujed.2012.37.1.004
Ghisellini P, Ulgiati S (2020) Circular economy transition in Italy. Achievements, perspectives and constraints. J Clean Prod 243:118360
Gholipour HF, Farzanegan MR (2018) Institutions and the effectiveness of expenditures on environmental protection: evidence from Middle Eastern countries. Const Polit Econ 29(1):20–39
Gierałtowska U et al (2022) Renewable Energy, Urbanization, and CO2 Emissions: A Global Test. Energies 15(9):3390
Gnangoin TY et al (2022). Renewable energy, non-renewable energy, economic growth and CO2 emissions in the newly emerging market economies: the moderating role of human capital. Front Environ Sci1657
Godil DI et al (2020) The dynamic nonlinear influence of ICT, financial development, and institutional quality on CO2 emission in Pakistan: new insights from QARDL approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:24190–24200
Hamdaoui M et al (2021) Capital account liberalization, political stability, and economic growth. Knowl Econ:1–50
Ikumapayi J (2020). Impact of urbanization on environmental health quality
Jan MS et al (2019) Impact of governance on foreign direct investment in context of Pakistan. Int J Finance Econ 19(1)
Jiang Y, Khan H (2022) The relationship between renewable energy consumption, technological innovations, and carbon dioxide emission: evidence from two-step system GMM. Environ Sci Pollut:1–16
Jorgenson AK et al (2014) The (de-) carbonization of urbanization, 1960–2010. Clim Change 127(3):561–575
Kahouli B et al (2022) Do energy consumption, urbanization, and industrialization play a role in environmental degradation in the case of Saudi Arabia? Energ Strat Rev 40:100814
Khan H et al (2019) Does good governance matter FDI inflow? Evidence from India. Mod Econ 10(6):1526–1538
Khan H et al (2021a) Environmental innovation, trade openness and quality institutions: an integrated investigation about environmental sustainability. Environ Dev Sustain:1–31
Khan I et al (2021b) Analyzing renewable and nonrenewable energy sources for environmental quality: dynamic investigation in developing countries. Math Probl Eng 2021
Khan H et al (2022a) The role of financial development and institutional quality in environmental sustainability: panel data evidence from the BRI countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(55):83624–83635
Khan H, Weili L, Khan I (2022b) Examining the effect of information and communication technology, innovations, and renewable energy consumption on CO2 emission: evidence from BRICS countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(31):47696–47712
Khoshnevis Yazdi S, Golestani Dariani A (2019) CO 2 emissions, urbanisation and economic growth: evidence from Asian countries. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 32(1):510–530
Khoshnevis Yazdi S, Shakouri B (2017) Renewable energy, nonrenewable energy consumption, and economic growth. Energy Sources Part B 12(12):1038–1045
Kinyondo A, Pelizzo R, Byaro M (2021) “DELIVER AFRICA FROM DEBTS”: Good gGovernance alone is not enough to save the continent from debt onslaught. World Affairs 184(3):318–338
Kong D et al (2021) Clusters of 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) cases in Chinese tour groups. Transbound Emerg Dis 68(2):684–691
Krueger AB and G Grossman (1995). Economic growth and the environment
Li T, Wang Y, Zhao D (2016) Environmental Kuznets curve in China: new evidence from dynamic panel analysis. Energy Policy 91:138–147
Li K et al (2019) How population and energy price affect China’s environmental pollution? Energy Policy 129:386–396
Li A et al (2022) The impact of urbanization on carbon emissions and spatial–temporal differentiation based on meta-analysis in China. Sustainability 14(22):14840
Luqman M, Rayner PJ, Gurney KR (2023) On the impact of urbanisation on CO2 emissions. NPJ Urban Sustain 3(1):6
Mader S (2018) The nexus between social inequality and CO2 emissions revisited: challenging its empirical validity. Environ Sci Policy 89:322–329
Martínez-Zarzoso I, Maruotti A (2011) The impact of urbanization on CO2 emissions: evidence from developing countries. Ecol Econ 70(7):1344–1353
Muhammad S et al (2020) Effect of urbanization and international trade on CO2 emissions across 65 belt and road initiative countries. Energy 196:117102
Nguyen CP et al (2018) The ambivalent role of institutions in the CO2 emissions: the case of emerging countries. Int J Energy Econ Policy 8(5):7
Niu H, Lekse W (2017) Carbon emission effect of urbanization at regional level: empirical evidence from China. Economics Discussion Papers, No 2017–62. Kiel Institute for the World Economy, 2017–62
Ozcan B, Apergis N (2018) The impact of internet use on air pollution: evidence from emerging countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(5):4174–4189
Pala A (2019) Innovation and economic growth in developing countries: Empirical implication of swamy's random coefficient model (RCM). Procedia Comput Sci 158:1122–1130
Pece AM et al (2015) Innovation and economic growth: an empirical analysis for CEE countries. Procedia Econ Financ 26:461–467
Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Economet 22(2):265–312
Poumanyvong P, Kaneko S (2010) Does urbanization lead to less energy use and lower CO2 emissions? A cross-country analysis. Ecol Econ 70(2):434–444
Raheem ID, Tiwari AK, Balsalobre-Lorente D (2020) The role of ICT and financial development in CO2 emissions and economic growth. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(2):1912–1922
Raihan A (2023) An econometric evaluation of the effects of economic growth, energy use, and agricultural value added on carbon dioxide emissions in Vietnam. Asia-Pacific. J Reg Sci:1–32
Sadik-Zada ER, Gatto A (2021) Energy security pathways in South East Europe: diversification of the natural gas supplies, energy transition, and energy futures, From economic to energy transition. Springer, pp 491–514
Shao S, Chen Y, Li K, Yang L (2019) Market segmentation and urban CO2 emissions in China: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta region. J Environ Manage 248:109324
Solarin SA, Lean HH (2016) Natural gas consumption, income, urbanization, and CO 2 emissions in China and India. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(18):18753–18765
Stern D (2004) Therise and fallofthe environmental Kuznets curve. World Dev 32:1419–1439
Suki NM et al (2022) The role of technology innovation and renewable energy in reducing environmental degradation in Malaysia: a step towards sustainable environment. Renew Energ 182:245–253
Usman O, Alola AA, Sarkodie SA (2020) Assessment of the role of renewable energy consumption and trade policy on environmental degradation using innovation accounting: Evidence from the US. Renewable Energy 150:266–277
Usman M, Jahanger A, Makhdum MSA, Balsalobre-Lorente D, Bashir A (2022) How do financial development, energy consumption, natural resources, and globalization affect Arctic countries’ economic growth and environmental quality? An advanced panel data simulation. Energy 241
Wawrzyniak D, Doryń W (2020) Does the quality of institutions modify the economic growth-carbon dioxide emissions nexus? Evidence from a group of emerging and developing countries. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 33(1):124–144
Wen Y, Song P, Yang D, Gao C (2022) Does governance impact on the financial development-carbon dioxide emissions nexus in G20 countries. PLOS One 17(8):e0273546
Wu Q, Madni GR (2021) Environmental protection in selected one belt one road economies through institutional quality: prospering transportation and industrialization. PLoS One 16(1):e0240851
Xaisongkham S, Liu X (2022) Institutional quality, employment, FDI and environmental degradation in developing countries: evidence from the balanced panel GMM estimator. Int J Emerg Mark (ahead-of-print)
Yan J, Dong Q, Wu Y, Yang H, Liu X (2023) The Impact of Urbanization on Carbon Emissions from Perspective of Residential Consumption. Pol J Environ Stud. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/160193
Yang L et al (2023) The relationship between spatial characteristics of urban-rural settlements and carbon emissions in Guangdong Province. Int J Environ Res Public Health 20(3):2659
Yao F, Zhu H, Wang M (2021) The impact of multiple dimensions of urbanization on CO2 emissions: A spatial and threshold analysis of panel data on China’s prefecture-level cities. Sustain Cities Soc 73
Zhang Y, Chen X (2022) Spatial and nonlinear effects of new-type urbanization and technological innovation on industrial carbon dioxide emission in the Yangtze River Delta. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–15
Zhang T, Song Y, Yang J (2021) Relationships between urbanization and CO2 emissions in China: An empirical analysis of population migration. PloS One 16(8):e0256335
Zhou C, Wang S, Wang J (2019) Examining the influences of urbanization on carbon dioxide emissions in the Yangtze River Delta, China: Kuznets curve relationship. Sci Total Environ 675:472–482
Zoundi Z (2017) CO2 emissions, renewable energy and the Environmental Kuznets Curve, a panel cointegration approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 72:1067–1075
Funding
This paper is supported by Youth Project of National Social Science Foundation of China (20CSH061) and Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province” (2018B715X14).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Formal analysis and conceptualization were done by Hu Ziyu; proofreading and formal writing of the study were done by Hayat Khan.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Roula Inglesi-Lotz
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Hu, Z., Khan, H. The effect of institutions and urbanization on environmental quality: evidence from the Belt and Road Initiative countries using dynamic panel models. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 65746–65761 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27031-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27031-z