Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The dynamic change trends and internal driving factors of green development efficiency: robust evidence from resource-based Yellow River Basin cities

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Promoting the green development of resource-based cities is an essential way to achieve sustainable regional economic development. Based on 2009–2019 panel data of the Yellow River Basin cities, this study adopts the super-directional distance function model to measure the green development efficiency of these selected cities. Furthermore, based on the Malmquist-Luenberger index, this paper focuses on the dynamic change trend of green development efficiency and internal driving factors. Furthermore, the Tobit model is used to specifically explore the influencing factors affecting the green development of cities. The findings suggested that the green development efficiency of selected cities falls in the middle to high range and that the efficiency varies among all cities in the Yellow River Basin. Likewise, technical efficiency improvements and technological progress drive development efficiency, and the former contributes more to green development. However, financial development, energy structure adjustments, and environmental regulation can strongly contribute to the green development of cities, and each influencing factor has obvious temporal and regional differences. This paper proposes appropriate policy suggestions to promote the coordinated development of the economic development and environmental protection of the Yellow River Basin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Ahmad F, Draz MA, Chandio AA, Su L, Ahmad M, Irfan M (2021) Investigating the myth of smokeless industry: environmental sustainability in the ASEAN countries and the role of service sector and renewable energy. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(39):55344–55361

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson SE, Cornwell C (1994) Parametric estimation of technical and allocative inefficiencies with panel data. Int Econ Rev 35(1):231–243

  • Barrell R, Pain N (1999) Domestic institutions, agglomerations and foreign direct investment in Europe. Eur Econ Rev 43(4–6):925–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd GA, Pang JX (2000) Estimating the linkage between energy efficiency and productivity. Energy Policy 28(5):289–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brand U (2012) Green economy - the next oxymoron? No lessons learned from failures of implementing sustainable development. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 21(21):28–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Su XY, Zhou Q (2022) Spatial differentiation and influencing factors of the green development of cities along the Yellow River Basin. Discrete Dyn Nat Soc 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9185108

  • Choi Y (2015) Intermediary propositions for green growth with sustainable governance. Sustainability 7(11):14785–14801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung YH, Fare R, Grosskopf S (1997) Productivity and undesirable outputs: a directional distance function approach. J Environ Manage 51(3):229–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui HR, Lui ZL (2021) Spatial-temporal pattern and influencing factors of the urban green development efficiency in Jing-Jin-Ji region of China. Pol J Environ Stud 30(2):1079–1093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng C, Wang M, Liu GC, Huang JB (2017) Green development performance and its influencing factors: a global perspective. J Clean Prod 144:323–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng M, Yan YF, Li XH (2019) Measuring the efficiency of industrial green transformation in China. J Sci Ind Res 78(8):495–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu J, Xiao G, Wu C (2020) Urban green transformation in Northeast China: A comparative study with Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Guangdong provinces. J Clean Prod 273(3):122551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122551

  • Fu JY, Geng YY (2019) Public participation, regulatory compliance and green development in China based on provincial panel data. J Clean Prod 230:1344–1353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo F, Gao S, Tong L, Ren J (2022a) Spatio-temporal evolution track and influencing factors of green development efficiency in Yellow River Basin. Geogr Res 41(01):167–180 (In Chinese)

  • Guo LJ, Tan WY, Xu Y (2022b) Impact of green credit on green economy efficiency in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(23):35124–35137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo LL, Qu Y, Wu CY, Wang XL (2018) Identifying a pathway towards green growth of Chinese industrial regions based on a system dynamics approach. Resour Conserv Recycl 128:143–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo XM, Huang S, Wang Y (2020a) Influence of agricultural mechanization development on agricultural green transformation in Western China, based on the ML index and spatial panel model. Math Probl Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6351802

  • Guo YH, Tong LJ, Mei L (2020b) The effect of industrial agglomeration on green development efficiency in Northeast China since the revitalization. J Clean Prod 258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120584

  • Hallegatte S, Heal G, Fay M, Tréguer D (2012) From growth to green growth -- a framework. The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5872

  • He G, Bao KY, Wang WW, Zhu YN, Li SZ, Jin L (2021) Assessment of ecological vulnerability of resource-based cities based on entropy-set pair analysis. Environ Technol 42(12):1874–1884

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Honma S, Hu JL (2014) A panel data parametric frontier technique for measuring total-factor energy efficiency: an application to Japanese regions. Energy 78:732–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Japan Ministry of Economy Trade and Industry (2021) Green growth strategy through achieving carbon neutrality in 2050, Japan Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. https://www.meti.go.jp/english/policy/energy_environment/global_warming/ggs2050/pdf/ggs_full_en1013.pdf

  • Jing ZR, Wang JM (2020) Sustainable development evaluation of the society-economy-environment in a resource-based city of China: a complex network approach. J Clean Prod 263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121510

  • Li L, Lei YL, Pan DY, Si CY (2016) Research on sustainable development of resource-based cities based on the DEA approach: a case study of Jiaozuo, China. Math Probl Eng 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5024837

  • Li H, He F, Deng GJ (2020a) How does environmental regulation promote technological innovation and green development? New evidence from China. Pol J Environ Stud 29(1):689–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li LS, Li W, Iop (2020b) Review on the connotation, evaluation and path of industrial high quality development in the yellow river basin. In: 5th International Conference on Renewable Energy and Environmental Protection (ICREEP). Electric Network. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/621/1/012135

  • Li J, Tang DC, Tenkorang AP, Shi ZR (2021) Research on environmental regulation and green total factor productivity in Yangtze River Delta: from the perspective of financial development. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(23):12453. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182312453

  • Li JM, Dong XC, Dong KY (2022) Is China’s green growth possible? The roles of green trade and green energy. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 35:(1)7084–7108. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2058978

  • Liu Y, Yang YL, Li HH, Zhong KY (2022) Digital economy development, industrial structure upgrading and green total factor productivity: empirical evidence from China’s cities. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042414

  • Long RY, Li HF, Wu MF, Li WB (2021) Dynamic evaluation of the green development level of China’s coal-resource based cities using the TOPSIS method. Resour Policy 74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102415

  • Lu WM, Iop (2020) Research on the efficiency of green innovation in cities in the Yellow River Basin. In: 6th International Conference on Advances in Energy Resources and Environment Engineering (ICAESEE), Chongqing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/647/1/012145

  • Ma C, Stern DI (2008) China’s changing energy intensity trend: a decomposition analysis. Energy Econ 30(3):1037–1053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin J, Henrichs T, Francis C, Hoogeveen Y, Kazmierczyk P (2012) Environmental indicator report 2012 : Ecosystem resilience and resource efficiency in a green economy in Europe. http://englishbulletin.adapt.it/docs/eea _05_2012.pdf

  • Paroussos L, Fragkiadakis K, Fragkos P (2020) Macro-economic analysis of green growth policies: the role of finance and technical progress in Italian green growth. Clim Chang 160:591–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02543-1

  • Porter ME, Linde CVD (1999) Green and competitive: ending the stalemate. Harv Bus Rev 28(6):128-129(122)

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiu SL, Wang ZL, Liu S (2021) The policy outcomes of low-carbon city construction on urban green development: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment conducted in China. Sustain Cities Soc 66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102699

  • Rashidi K, Saen RF (2015) Measuring eco-efficiency based on green indicators and potentials in energy saving and undesirable output abatement. Energy Econ 50:18–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rassier DG, Earnhart D (2010) The effect of clean water regulation on profitability: testing the Porter hypothesis. Land Econ 86(2):329–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray SC (2008) The directional distance function and measurement of super-efficiency: an application to airlines data. J Oper Res Soc 59(6):788–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren B (2022) From the miracle of China. China Review of Political Economy 13(06):3–34. (In Chinese)

  • Ren Guangla YZ (2020) Can urban innovation disperse haze? –a test based on spatial spillover perspective. China Popul Resour Environ 30(02):10 (In Chinese)

  • Saqib N (2022a) Asymmetric linkages between renewable energy, technological innovation, and carbon-dioxide emission in developed economies: non-linear ARDL analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(40):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saqib (2022b) Green energy, non-renewable energy, financial development and economic growth with carbon footprint: heterogeneous panel evidence from cross-country. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja:1–20

  • Saqib N, Duran IA, Sharif I (2022a) Influence of energy structure, environmental regulations and human capital on ecological sustainability in EKC framework; evidence from MINT countries. Front Environ Sci 10:968405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saqib N, Usman M, Radulescu M, Sinisi CI, Secara CG, Tolea C (2022b) Revisiting EKC hypothesis in context of renewable energy, human development and moderating role of technological innovations in E-7 countries? Front Environ Sci 10(2509):10–3389

    Google Scholar 

  • Santarius T, Soland M (2018) How technological efficiency improvements change consumer preferences: towards a psychological theory of rebound effects. Ecol Econ 146:414–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao SA, Luan RR, Yang ZB, Li CY (2016) Does directed technological change get greener: empirical evidence from Shanghai’s industrial green development transformation. Ecol Ind 69:758–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharif A, Saqib N, Dong K, Khan SAR (2022) Nexus between green technology innovation, green financing, and CO2 emissions in the G7 countries: The moderating role of social globalisation. Sustain Dev:1–13

  • Song YQ, Sun X, Xia PF, Cui ZK, Zhao X (2022) Research on the spatiotemporal evolution and influencing factors of green economic efficiency in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:68257–68268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20542-1

  • Sun MM, Yang XL, Iop (2019) Evaluation on green transformation competitiveness of oil-gas resource-based cities in China, 5th International Conference on Green Materials and Environmental Engineering (GMEE). Guangzhou, PEOPLES R CHINA

  • Sun JH, Tang DC, Kong HJ, Boamah V (2022a) Impact of industrial structure upgrading on green total factor productivity in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(6)

  • Sun XM, Zhang HT, Ahmad M, Xue CK (2022b) Analysis of influencing factors of carbon emissions in resource-based cities in the Yellow River basin under carbon neutrality target. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(16):23847–23860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venter ZS, Shackleton CM, Van Staden F, Selomane O, Masterson VA (2020) Green Apartheid: Urban green infrastructure remains unequally distributed across income and race geographies in South Africa. Landsc Urban Plan 203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103889

  • Wang M, Feng C (2021) Revealing the pattern and evolution of global green development between different income groups: a global meta-frontier by-production technology approach. Environ Impact Assess Rev 89(1):106600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu HT, Li YW, Hao Y, Ren SY, Zhang PF (2020) Environmental decentralization, local government competition, and regional green development: evidence from China. Sci Total Environ 708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135085

  • Xie WC, Yan TH, Xia SM, Chen FZ (2020) Innovation or introduction? the impact of technological progress sources on industrial green transformation of resource-based cities in China. Front Energy Res 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2020.598141

  • Xin BG, Qu YM (2019) Effects of smart city policies on green total factor productivity: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16132396

  • Xu G, Chang H, Yang H, Schwarz P (2022) The influence of finance on China's green development: an empirical study based on quantile regression with province-level panel data. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 29:71033–71046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20856-0

  • Yang L, Ni M (2022) Is financial development beneficial to improve the efficiency of green development? Evidence from the “Belt and Road” countries. Energy Econ 105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105734

  • Yang Q, Wan XZ, Ma HM (2015) Assessing green development efficiency of municipalities and provinces in China integrating models of super-efficiency DEA and Malmquist index. Sustainability 7(4):4492–4510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang YY, Guo HX, Chen LF, Liu X, Gu MY, Ke XL (2019) Regional analysis of the green development level differences in Chinese mineral resource-based cities. Resour Policy 61:261–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Q, Huo J, Saqib N, Mahmood H (2022) Modelling the effect of renewable energy and public-private partnership in testing EKC hypothesis: Evidence from methods moment of quantile regression. Renew Energy 192:485–494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ye TF, Zheng H, Ge XY, Yang KL (2021) Pathway of green development of Yangtze river economics belt from the perspective of green technological innovation and environmental regulation. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910471

  • Yellow River Cultural encyclopedia Compilation Committee (2000) Yellow River culture encyclopedia. Sichuan Dictionary Press, Sichuan

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin Q, Wang YD, Wan KD, Wang DL (2020) Evaluation of green transformation efficiency in Chinese mineral resource-based cities based on a three-stage DEA method. Sustainability 12(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229455

  • Yin Q, Wang YD, Xu ZH, Wan KD, Wang DL (2022) Factors influencing green transformation efficiency in China’s mineral resource-based cities: Method analysis based on IPAT-E and PLS-SEM. J Clean Prod 330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129783

  • Zeng G, Geng CX, Guo HX (2020) Spatial spillover effect of strategic emerging industry agglomeration and green economic efficiency in China. Pol J Environ Stud 29(5):3901–3914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhan Y, Li X (2021) Slope rainfall environment characteristics based on target tracking algorithm and economic efficiency of green city. Arab J Geosci 14(18). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-08094-z

  • Zhang Q, Yan FH, Li K, Ai HS (2019) Impact of market misallocations on green TFP: evidence from countries along the Belt and Road. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(34):35034–35048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao K, Zhang R, Liu H, Wang GY, Sun XL (2021) Resource endowment, industrial structure, and green development of the Yellow River Basin. Sustainability 13(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084530

  • Zhou L, Che L, Zhou C (2019) Spatio-temporal evolution and influencing factors of urban green development efficiency in China. Acta Geogr Sin 74(10):2044 (In Chinese)

  • Zhou SY, Chang J, Hu TH, Luo PJ, Zhou HX (2020a) Spatiotemporal variations of land use and landscape ecological risk in a resource-based city, from rapid development to recession. Pol J Environ Stud 29(1):475–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou XL, Sun XX, Yang YP, Chen YH (2020b) FDI Inflows, market fragmentation and their impact on industrial environmental efficiency: an empirical study in China. Pol J Environ Stud 29(4):2969–2980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou YJ, Li D, Li WF, Mei D, Zhong JY (2022) Drag effect of economic growth and its spatial differences under the constraints of resources and environment: empirical findings from China's Yellow River Basin. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19053027

Download references

Funding

This research was funded by the National Social Science Foundation of China Grant No. 21BJY163 and the National Natural Science Foundation (41971127).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Data curation: Li Yue and Huizhen Yan; formal analysis: Li Yue, Fayyaz Ahmad, Abbas Ali Chandio, and Huizhen Yan; investigation: Muhammad Munir Ahmad and Najia Saqib; methodology: Li Yue and Huizhen Yan; project administration: Fayyaz Ahmad; writing original draft: Li Yue, Huizhen Yan, and Fayyaz Ahmad; writing, review, and editing: Najia Saqib, Muhammad Munir Ahmad, and Abbas Ali Chandio. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fayyaz Ahmad.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yue, L., Yan, H., Ahmad, F. et al. The dynamic change trends and internal driving factors of green development efficiency: robust evidence from resource-based Yellow River Basin cities. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 48571–48586 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25684-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25684-4

Keywords

Navigation