Abstract
Assessing China’s carbon emission efficiency (CEE) and analyzing efficiency state transition trends are necessary to accelerate the promotion of carbon emission reduction and achieve low carbon goals. This study evaluates China’s economic and social environments by using the entropy weight method. The CEE of 30 Chinese provinces from 2006 to 2020 is measured using the three-stage slack-based model with an undesirable output. Then, this study introduces a Markov chain to explore the state transition trend of China’s CEE. The research conclusions are as follows. First, compared with the social environment, the economic environment has a more significant impact on CEE. Second, the CEE of the eastern region is the highest, followed by that of the central region and the western region, which has the worst CEE. Third, the inefficiency of the central and western regions pulls down the overall CEE of China. Fourth, the state of China’s CEE is gradually shifting to a high level; however, achieving a leapfrog shift is difficult.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data used in this research are available by the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Al-Mulali U, Fereidouni HG, Lee JY, Sab CNBC (2013) Exploring the relationship between urbanization, energy consumption, and CO2 emission in MENA countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 23:107–112
Cai S, Gu C, Zhang Z (2022) Research on the coordinated of population-resources-environment-economy in western China from the perspective of space-time evolution. Ecol Econ 38(2):168–175
Chen PY, Chen ST, Hsu CS, Chen CC (2016) Modeling the global relationships among economic growth, energy consumption and CO2 emissions. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 65:420–431
Chen W, Lv W, Li S, Dai J, Deng X (2021) Estimation and comparison of two Markov chain state transition probability matrices. J Chongqing Univ Technol ( Natural Science) 35(8):217–223
Chen W, Zhang L, Ma T, Liu Q (2014) Research on three-stage DEA model. Syst Eng 32(9):144–149
Cheng A, Zhao F (2018) Quantitative measure on inter-regional industry transfer and pollution transfer based on the idea of shift share analysis. China Popul Resour Environ 28(5):49–57
Choi Y, Zhang N, Zhou P (2012) Efficiency and abatement costs of energy-related CO2 emissions in China: a slacks-based efficiency measure. Appl Energy 98:198–208
Dong F, Hu M, Gao Y, Liu Y, Zhu J, Pan Y (2022a) How does digital economy affect carbon emissions? Evidence from global 60 countries. Sci Total Environ 852:158401
Dong F, Li Y, Gao Y, Zhu J, Qin C, Zhang X (2022b) Energy transition and carbon neutrality: exploring the non-linear impact of renewable energy development on carbon emission efficiency in developed countries. Resour Conserv Recycl 177:106002
Dong F, Zhu J, Li Y, Chen Y, Gao Y, Hu M, ..., Sun J (2022c) How green technology innovation affects carbon emission efficiency: evidence from developed countries proposing carbon neutrality targets. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(24):35780–35799
Dong X, Chi R (2020) Characteristics of the temporal and spatial pattern of the economic disparity and convergence between different regions in China. Econ Geogr 40(10):11–21
Du K, Lu H, Yu K (2014) Sources of the potential CO2 emission reduction in China: a nonparametric metafrontier approach. Appl Energy 115:491–501
Du Q, Deng Y, Zhou J, Wu J, Pang Q (2022) Spatial spillover effect of carbon emission efficiency in the construction industry of China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(2):2466–2479
Du Q, Wu M, Xu Y, Lu X, Bai L, Yu M (2018) Club convergence and spatial distribution dynamics of carbon intensity in China’s construction industry. Nat Hazards 94(2):519–536
Fang D, Zhang X, Yu Q, Jin TC, Tian L (2018) A novel method for carbon dioxide emission forecasting based on improved Gaussian processes regression. J Clean Prod 173:143–150
Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK, Pasurka C (1989) Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: a nonparametric approach. Rev Econ Stat 71:90–98
Feng C, Zhang H, Huang JB (2017) The approach to realizing the potential of emissions reduction in China: an implication from data envelopment analysis. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 71:859–872
Feng D, Li J (2017) Research of the carbon dioxide emission efficiency and reduction potential of cities in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region. Resources Science 39(5):978–986
Gao M, Yang H, Xiao Q, Goh M (2021a) A novel fractional grey Riccati model for carbon emission prediction. J Clean Prod 282:124471
Gao P, Yue S, Chen H (2021b) Carbon emission efficiency of China’s industry sectors: from the perspective of embodied carbon emissions. J Clean Prod 283:124655
Hao J, Gao F, Fang X, Nong X, Zhang Y, Hong F (2022) Multi-factor decomposition and multi-scenario prediction decoupling analysis of China’s carbon emission under dual carbon goal. Sci Total Environ 841:156788
Li J, Huang X, Kwan MP, Yang H, Chuai X (2018) The effect of urbanization on carbon dioxide emissions efficiency in the Yangtze River Delta, China. J Clean Prod 188:38–48
Li J, Ma J, Wei W (2020) Study on regional differences of energy carbon emission efficiency in eight economic areas of China. Quant Tech Econ 37(6):109–129
Luo D (2012) A note on estimating managerial inefficiency of three-stage DEA model. Stat Res 29(4):104–107
Miao Z, Geng Y, Sheng J (2016) Efficient allocation of CO2 emissions in China: a zero sum gains data envelopment model. J Clean Prod 112:4144–4150
Niu F, Yang X, Sun D (2020) Water and soil carrying capacity and adjustment of industrial structure in Hainan province. Tropical Geography 40(6):1109–1116
Pan Y, Dong F (2022) Design of energy use rights trading policy from the perspective of energy vulnerability. Energy Policy 160:112668
Qin B, Ge L (2018) Relative environmental regulations, pollution-intensive industry transfer and pollution agglomeration in China. China Popul Resour Environ 28(12):52–62
Ren F, Gu L (2016) Study on transition of primary energy structure and carbon emission reduction targets in China based on Markov chain model and GM (1, 1). Math Problems Eng 2016:4912935
Su B, Ang BW, Li Y (2017) Input-output and structural decomposition analysis of Singapore’s carbon emissions. Energy Policy 105:484–492
Sun LX, Xia YS, Feng C (2021a) Income gap and global carbon productivity inequality: a meta-frontier data envelopment analysis. Sustain Prod Consump 26:548–557
Sun W, Huang C (2020) How does urbanization affect carbon emission efficiency? Evidence from China. J Clean Prod 272:122828
Sun Y, Liang Y, Qi Y, Cui Y (2021b) Temporal evolution and spatial distribution characteristics of ecological efficiency in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration. Ecol Econ 37(12):74–82
Tang J, Li S, Liu Y, Liu J, Ma M (2022) Spatial pattern evolution of tourism industry’s efficiency and its club convergence in Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomerations. Areal Res Dev 41(01):79–84+97
Tone K (2001) A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 130(3):498–509
Wang K, Wu M, Sun Y, Shi X, Sun A, Zhang P (2019a) Resource abundance, industrial structure, and regional carbon emissions efficiency in China. Resour Policy 60:203–214
Wang M, Feng C (2019) Decoupling economic growth from carbon dioxide emissions in China’s metal industrial sectors: a technological and efficiency perspective. Sci Total Environ 691:1173–1181
Wang M, Feng C (2021) Revealing the pattern and evolution of global green development between different income groups: a global meta-frontier by-production technology approach. Environ Impact Assess Rev 89:106600
Wang M, Feng C (2022) Tracking the inequalities of global per capita carbon emissions from perspectives of technological and economic gaps. J Environ Manage 315:115144
Wang Q, Zhao C (2021) Regional difference and driving factors of industrial carbon emissions performance in China. Alex Eng J 60(1):301–309
Wang SH, Song ML, Yu T (2019b) Hidden carbon emissions, industrial clusters, and structure optimization in China. Comput Econ 54(4):1319–1342
Wang S, Ma Y (2018) Influencing factors and regional discrepancies of the efficiency of carbon dioxide emissions in Jiangsu, China. Ecol Ind 90:460–468
Wang S, Sun X (2020) The global system-ranking efficiency model and calculating examples with consideration of the nonhomogeneity of decision-making units. Expert Syst 37(4):e12272
Wang S, Wang H (2022) Factor market distortion, technological innovation, and environmental pollution. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(58):87692–87705
Wang S, Gao S, Huang Y, Shi C (2020) Spatio-temporal evolution and trend prediction of urban carbon emission performance in China based on super-efficiency SBM model. Acta Geogr Sin 75(6):1316–1330
Wang S, Huang Y, Zhou Y (2019c) Spatial spillover effect and driving forces of carbon emission intensity at the city level in China. J Geog Sci 29(2):231–252
Wang S, Wang X, Lu B (2022a) Is resource abundance a curse for green economic growth? Evid Dev Countries Resour Policy 75:102533
Wang S, Wang X, Chen S (2022b) Global value chains and carbon emission reduction in developing countries: does industrial upgrading matter? Environ Impact Assess Rev 97:106895
Wang S, Zeng J, Huang Y, Shi C, Zhan P (2018) The effects of urbanization on CO2 emissions in the Pearl River Delta: a comprehensive assessment and panel data analysis. Appl Energy 228:1693–1706
Wang Y, Chen L, Kubota J (2016) The relationship between urbanization, energy use and carbon emissions: evidence from a panel of Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries. J Clean Prod 112:1368–1374
Wu J, Sun J, Liang L, Zha Y (2011) Determination of weights for ultimate cross efficiency using Shannon entropy. Expert Syst Appl 38(5):5162–5165
Xie Z, Wu R, Wang S (2021) How technological progress affects the carbon emission efficiency? Evidence from national panel quantile regression. J Clean Prod 307:127133
Xu G, Luan H (2018) Spatial difference and influencing factors of carbon dioxide emission Efficiency in Jiangsu: analysis based on improved three stage SBM-DEA model. Ecol Econ 34(7):33–38
Xu SC, He ZX, Long RY (2014) Factors that influence carbon emissions due to energy consumption in China: Decomposition analysis using LMDI. Appl Energy 127:182–193
Xu X, Zhang W (2021) Economic growth differentiation, competitive advantage and development pathway of the 14th Five-Year Plan in four regions of China. Econ Geogr 41(7):1–9
Yan D, Lei Y, Li L, Song W (2017) Carbon emission efficiency and spatial clustering analyses in China’s thermal power industry: Evidence from the provincial level. J Clean Prod 156:518–527
Yang Y, Tang D, Zhang P (2019) Effects of fiscal decentralization on carbon emissions in China. Int J Energy Sect Manage 14(1):213–228
Yao X, Zhou H, Zhang A, Li A (2015) Regional energy efficiency, carbon emission performance and technology gaps in China: a meta-frontier non-radial directional distance function analysis. Energy Policy 84:142–154
Yu X, Wu Z, Zheng H, Li M, Tan T (2020) How urban agglomeration improve the emission efficiency? A spatial econometric analysis of the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration in China. J Environ Manage 260:110061
Zha Y, Zhao L, Bian Y (2016) Measuring regional efficiency of energy and carbon dioxide emissions in China: a chance constrained DEA approach. Comput Oper Res 66:351–361
Zhang C, Chen P (2022) Applying the three-stage SBM-DEA model to evaluate energy efficiency and impact factors in RCEP countries. Energy 241:122917
Zhang YJ, Hao JF, Song J (2016) The CO2 emission efficiency, reduction potential and spatial clustering in China’s industry: evidence from the regional level. Appl Energy 174:213–223
Zhao H, Guo S, Zhao H (2019) Provincial energy efficiency of China quantified by three-stage data envelopment analysis. Energy 166:96–107
Zhou X, Zhang J, Li J (2013) Industrial structural transformation and carbon dioxide emissions in China. Energy Policy 57:43–51
Zhou Y, Kong Y, Zhang T (2020) The spatial and temporal evolution of provincial eco-efficiency in China based on SBM modified three-stage data envelopment analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(8):8557–8569
Zhu R, Zhao R, Sun J, Xiao L, Jiao S, Chuai X, ..., Yang Q (2021) Temporospatial pattern of carbon emission efficiency of China’s energy-intensive industries and its policy implications. J Clean Prod 286:125507
Zhu W (2016) Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei regional informatization coordination development law model based on entropy weights and its applications. J Modern Inf 36(11):146–153
Funding
The work is financially supported by National Natural Science Funds of China (Nos. 72174053, 71871153, 71921001, 71971203), the Four Batch Talent Programs of China, the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (WK2040000027), Anhui Philosophy and Social Science Foundation (AHSKY2021D147) and the sponsorship of the Tang Scholar of Soochow University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Jie Wu: conceptualization, formal analysis, investigation, and writing—original draft. Ruizeng Zhao: methodology, formal analysis, and writing—original draft. Jiasen Sun: funding acquisition, investigation, and supervision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Ilhan Ozturk
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, J., Zhao, R. & Sun, J. State transition of carbon emission efficiency in China: empirical analysis based on three-stage SBM and Markov chain models. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 117050–117060 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24885-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24885-7