Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How does artificial intelligence development affect green technology innovation in China? Evidence from dynamic panel data analysis

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As the global climate problem becomes increasingly serious, the green technology innovation to achieve “carbon peak and carbon neutral” has gradually become the global consensus of major countries, and how the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) technology affects green technology innovation (GTI) has received a great deal of attention in the field of economics. Therefore, based on China’s inter-provincial panel data from 2006 to 2019, the system GMM, dynamic panel threshold model, and quantile regression model were constructed to examine various influences of AI development on GTI under different environmental regulation intensity, research and development (R&D) investment, and institutional environmental threshold conditions. The findings presented that AI development significantly contributes to GTI and GTFP, with an impact coefficient of 0.0122 and 0.0084, and this influence is mainly reflected in the western region of China and is more obvious in the 2006–2012 period. AI development mainly enhances green technological efficiency, and it has dampening effects on green technological progress during the period 2013–2019. Additionally, there are non-linear threshold effects in the relationship between the level of AI development and GTI when environmental regulatory intensity, R&D investment, and institutional environment are in different level intervals. AI development will boost GTI only when the intensity of environmental regulation and institutional environment is above a certain threshold value. However, the AI development represented by industrial robot applications still has no obvious effect on GTI even when the R&D investment exceeds a certain threshold. Furthermore, the growth effect of AI development on GTI indicates a decreasing nonlinear pattern as the GTI’s quantile rises under the condition that R&D investment and institutional environment intensity cross the threshold, while this growth effect increases gradually with the rise of GTI’s quantile when the environmental regulation is above the threshold.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Notes

  1. Reference the World Bank Research Report: http://www.worldbank.org/research/2007/02/7503894/cost-pollution-china-economic-estimates-physical-damages

  2. Ministry of Environmental Protection: “Ministry of Environmental Protection reports air quality in some cities”, January 29, 2013.

  3. Reference the "Trusted Artificial Intelligence White Paper" issued by the China Academy of Information and Communications: http://www.caict.ac.cn/kxyj/qwfb/bps/202107/P020210709319866413974.pdf

  4. Economic information daily: http://www.xinhuanet.com/2017-10/19/c_1121823302.htm

  5. Reference to the website: “http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj./ndsj”, “https://data.cnki.net/Trade/yearbook/single/N2022020102?zcode=Z001” and “https://data.cnki.net/Trade/yearbook/single/N2021050066?zcode=Z023”, respectively.

  6. Reference to the website: “https://www.cnrds.com/Home/Index#/” and “https://ifr.org/#”, respectively.

References

  • Acemoglu D, Restrepo P (2018) The race between man and machine: implications of technology for growth, factor shares, and employment. Am Econ Rev 108:1488–1542

    Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu D, Restrepo P (2020) Robots and jobs: evidence from US labor markets. J Polit Econ 128(6):2188–2244

    Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu DM, Restrepo PM (2018a) Artificial intelligence, automation and work. NBER Working Papers. SSRN Journal 68:99-120

  • Agrawal A, Gans JS, Goldfarb A (2019) Economic policy for artificial intelligence. Innov Policy Econ 19:139–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Aitken BJ, Harrison AE (1999) Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela. Am Econ Rev 89(3):605–618

    Google Scholar 

  • Arayama Y, Miyoshi K (2004) Regional diversity and sources of economic growth in China. China World Econ 27:1583–1607

    Google Scholar 

  • Benzidia S, Makaoui N, Bentahar O (2021) The impact of big data analytics and artificial intelligence on green supply chain process integration and hospital environmental performance. Technol Forecast Soc Change 165:120557

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertani F, Raberto M, Teglio A (2020) The productivity and unemployment effects of the digital transformation: an empirical and modelling assessment. Rev Evol Political Econ 1(3):329–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessen J (2019) Automation and jobs: When technology boosts employment. Econ Policy 34:589–626

    Google Scholar 

  • Bi KX, Yang CJ, Huang P (2011) Research on the impact of FDI on the green process innovation of Chinese manufacturing industries: an empirical analysis based on the panel data. China Soft Sci 20(9):172–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Borland J, Coelli M (2017) Are robots taking our jobs? Aust Econ Rev 50:377–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson E, Rock D, Syverson C (2017) Artificial intelligence and the modern productivity paradox: a clash of expectations and statistics. Rev Econ Stat 4:44–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai YZ, Chen N (2019) Artificial intelligence and high-quality growth & employment in the era of new technological revolution. J Quant Tech Econ 36:3–22 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Caner M, Hansen BE (2004) Instrumental variable estimation of a threshold model. Economet Theor 20(5):813–843

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty P, Chatterjee C (2017) Does environmental regulation indirectly induce upstream innovation? New evidence from India. Res Policy 46(5):939–955

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen F, Liu ST (2022) Can artificial intelligence technology become a new engine of urban green development. J Nanjing Univ Financ Econ 03:78–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng H, Jia R, Li D, Li H (2019) The rise of robots in China. J Econ Perspect 33:71–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn IM, Henderson R, Stern S (2018) The impact of artificial intelligence on innovation: An exploratory analysis. The economics of artificial intelligence: An agenda. University of Chicago Press 2018:115–146. https://doi.org/10.3386/W24449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David H (2018) Is automation labor- displacing? Productivity growth, employment, and the labor share. BPEA Conference Drafts 03:8–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Dey K, Saha S (2018) Influence of procurement decisions in two-period green supply chain. J Cleaner Prod 190:388–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Du C (2021) A new generation of artificial intelligence helps to improve factor productivity. China Social Sciences Daily 2021:003 (in Chinese)

  • Du K, Cheng Y, Yao X (2021) Environmental regulation, green technology innovation, and industrial structure upgrading: the road to the green transformation of Chinese cities. Energy Econ 98:105247

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Kassar AN, Singh SK (2019) Green innovation and organizational performance: the influence of big data and the moderating role of management commitment and HR practices. Technol Forecast Soc Change 144:483–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S (2000) Theory and application of directional distance functions. J Prod Anal 13:93–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S, Pasurkajr CA Jr (2007) Environmental production functions and environmental directional distance functions. Energy 32:1055–1066

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama H, Weber WL (2009) A directional slacks-based measure of technical inefficiency. Socio Econ Plann Sci 43:274–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith RW (1951) A perpetual inventory of national wealth. NBER Stud Income Wealth 14:5–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Graetz Georg and Guy Michaels (2015) Robots at work: the impact on productivity and jobs. CentrePiece-The Magazine for Economic Performance 2015:447. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2589780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenstone M, Hornbeck R, Moretti E (2010) Identifying agglomeration spillovers: evidence from winners and losers of large plant openings. J Polit Econ 118(3):536–598

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches Z, Mairesse J (1991) R&D and productivity growth: comparing Japanese and US manufacturing firms. Productivity growth in Japan and the United States. University of Chicago Press 1991:317–348

  • Grossman GM, Helpman E (1990) Trade, innovation, and growth. Am Econ Rev 80(2):86–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Hao Y, Guo Y, Wu H (2022a) The role of information and communication technology on green total factor energy efficiency: does environmental regulation work? Bus Strategy Environ 31(1):403–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Hao Y, Li Y, Guo Y, Chai J, Yang C, Wu H (2022b) Digitalization and electricity consumption: Does internet development contribute to the reduction in electricity intensity in China? Energy Policy 164:112912

    Google Scholar 

  • Halkos GE, Tzeremes NG (2011) Growth and environmental pollution: empirical evidence from China. J Chin Econ Foreign Trade Stud 4:144–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Han J, Yan XF, Wei NN (2018) Study on regional differences of the impact of artificial intelligence on China's employment skill structure. Northwest Population Journal (03):45–57

  • Hansen BE (1992) The likelihood ratio test under nonstandard conditions: testing the Markov switching model of GNP. J Appl Econom 7(S1):S61–S82

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen BE (1999) Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: estimation, testing, and inference. J Econ 93:345–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskel JE, Pereira SC, Slaughter MJ (2007) Does inward foreign direct investment boost the productivity of domestic firms? Rev Econ Stat 89(3):482–496

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell ST (2017) Financing innovation: Evidence from R&D grants. Am Econ Rev 107(4):1136–1164

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussinger K (2008) R&D and subsidies at the firm level: an application of parametric and semiparametric two-step selection models. J Appl Econom 23(6):729–747

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishak I, Jamaludin R, Abu NH (2017) Green technology concept and implementation: a brief review of current development. Adv Sci Lett 23:8558–8561

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin T, Zong JF (2005) Discussion on the mode of extensive economic growth in China’s transition period. Reform 8:18–22 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jing WM, Zhang L (2014) Environmental regulation, opening to the outside world and green technological progress in China’s I industry. Econ Res J 49(09):34–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone N, Managi S, Rodríguez MC, Haščič I, Fujii H, Souchier M (2017) Environmental policy design, innovation and efficiency gains in electricity generation. Energy Econ 63:106–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan MA, Ali ST, Yang Z, Ali F, Sarwar Z (2020) Outward foreign direct investment and corporate green innovation: an institutional pressure perspective. S Afr J Bus Manag 51(1):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleer R (2010) Government R&D subsidies as a signal for private investors. Res Pol 39(10):1361–1374

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenker R, Bassett G (1978) Regression quantiles. Econometrica 46:33–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Kong X, Hao FY (2021) R&D inputs, innovation strategy and company performance of artificial intelligence industry: evidence from 112 China’s A- -shares companies. Sci Technol Manag Res 41(08):101–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Korinek A, Stiglitz JE (2017) Artificial intelligence, worker-replacing technological progress and income distribution. NBER working paper 2017:24174

  • Kremer S, Bick A, Nautz D (2013) Inflation and growth: new evidence from a dynamic panel threshold analysis. Empirical Econ 44(2):861–878

    Google Scholar 

  • Kromann L, Skaksen JR, Sørensen A (2011) Automation, labor productivity and employment–a cross country comparison. Centre for Economic and Business Research. Copenhagen Business School, Fredriksberg 2011:226–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P (1994) The myth of Asia’s miracle. Foreign Aff 73:62–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee CC, Qin S, Li Y (2022) Does industrial robot application promote green technology innovation in the manufacturing industry? Technol Forecast Soc Change 183:121893

    Google Scholar 

  • Lei H (2006) The effect of investment on economic growth and investment efficiency since the reform in China. Ph.D. Thesis. Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan. https://doi.org/10.7666/d.d048372

  • Li JH (2022) Green manufacturing and intelligent manufacturing in china: development realities and future path. Res Econ Manag 43(06):3–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Li GL, Jiang X (2020) Green development, talent concentration and improvement of urban innovation-a study of the Yangtze River Delta City Group. Journal of Anhui University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) 44(03):122–130. https://doi.org/10.13796/j.cnki.1001-5019.2020.03.014

  • Li JL, Chen LT, Liu M (2021) Influence of Internet development on the efficiency of China’s regional green economy. China Popul Resour Environ 31(10):149–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Li WH, Bi KX, Sun B (2013) Research on the effect of environmental regulation intensity on green technological innovation of pollution intensive industries—Empirical test based on panel data of 2003–2010. R&D Manag 25(6):72–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Zhang Y, Pan A, Han M, Veglianti E (2022) Carbon emission reduction effects of industrial robot applications: heterogeneity characteristics and influencing mechanisms. Technol Soc 70:102034

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu BL, Zhang Y, Li XS (2022a) Influence mechanism of Internet development on urban green innovation: an analysis from the perspective of patents. China Popul Resour Environ 32(06):104–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu L, Hu GL (2020) Artificial intelligence and total factor productivity: Chinese Proof of “Productivity Dilemma” Falsification. Jianghai Acad J 3:118–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Li ZH, Wei FX (2022b) The impact of digitalization and R&D investment on green technology innovation. West Forum Econ Manag 33(05):37–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu L, Li LY, Liu J et al (2020) Intelligent and economic development mode transformation: theoretical mechanism and empirical evidence. Econ Rev 2:3–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu TT, Zhu ZY (2021) Will AI reduce labor income share––a test based on fixed effect model and panel quantile model. J Shanxi Univ Financ Econ 11:29–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Makridakis S (2017) The forthcoming Artificial Intelligence (AI) revolution: Its impact on society and firms. Futures 90:46–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Marku E, Castriotta M, Di Guardo MC, Loi M (2021) Mapping innovation in the digital transformation era: The role of technology convergence. In: Research Anthology on Digital Transformation, Organizational Change, and the Impact of Remote Work. IGI Global, pp 761–779. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-7297-9.ch038

  • Miguel C, Pazó C (2017) Environmental protection, innovation and price-setting behavior in Spanish manufacturing firms. Energy Econ 68:116–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Mubarak MF, Tiwari S, Petraite M, Mubarik M, Rasi RZRM (2021) How Industry 4.0 technologies and open innovation can improve green innovation performance? Manag Environ Qual: An Int J 32(5):1007–1022

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen I, Majumder S, Szwarc E, Saha S (2020) Impact of strategic cooperation under competition on green product manufacturing. Sustainability 12:10248

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen IE, Majumder S, Saha S (2019) Exploring the intervention of intermediary in a green supply chain. J Cleaner Prod 233:1525–1544

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus WD (2015) Are we approaching an economic singularity? information technology and the future of economic growth. National Bureau of Economic Research 2015: w21547

  • Oh DH (2010) A global Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index. J Prod Anal 34:183–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin J, Chang HQ (2021) Digital technology, marketization level and development of new energy industry: an empirical analysis based on threshold effect model. Modern Manag Sci 08:26–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiu B, Yang S, Xin PJ (2008) Research on FDI technology spillover channel and productivity growth of Chinese manufacturing industry: an analysis based on Panel data. J World Econ 08:20–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng H, Liu Y (2018) How government subsidies promote the growth of entrepreneurial companies in clean energy industry: an empirical study in China. J Clean Prod 188:508–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Ren S, Hao Y, Wu H (2021) Government corruption, market segmentation and renewable energy technology innovation: evidence from China. J Environ Manage 300:113686

  • Ritika ND (2013) FDI in Indian retail sector: opportunities and challenges. Innovative Journal of Business and Management 2013:2(05)

  • Romer PM (1990) Endogenous technological change. J Polit Econ 98(5, Part 2):S71–S102

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun HP (2016) Institutional environment, factors distortion and innovation technical progress. Sci Technol Manag Res 21:251–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun X, Zhou X (2018) A study on influence of service openness on climbing efficiency of manufacturing value chain –an analysis based on threshold regression. J Int Trade 8:94–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang C, Xu Y, Hao Y, Wu H, Xue Y (2021) What is the role of telecommunications infrastructure construction in green technology innovation? A firm-level analysis for China. Energy Econ 103:105576

    Google Scholar 

  • Tone K (2001) A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 130:498–509

    Google Scholar 

  • Tone K (2004) Dealing with undesirable outputs in DEA: a Slacks-Based Measure (SBM) Approach. Presentation At NAPW III, Toronto, pp 44–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang B, Zhao C (2019) China’s green technological innovation—patent statistics and influencing factors. J Ind Technol Econ 38:53–66

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang F (2021a) Analysis of new demands promoting the convergence and innovation of data industry in the digital economy. E3S Web Conf 236:04056

  • Wang H, Liu H (2019) Foreign direct investment, environmental regulation, and environmental pollution: an empirical study based on threshold effects for different Chinese regions. Environ Sci and Pollut R 26(6):5394–5409

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang SH, Chen M, Song ML (2018a) Energy constraints, green technological progress, and business profit ratios: Evidence from big data of Chinese enterprises. Int J Prod Res 56(8):2963–2974

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang SH, He YQ, Song ML (2020a) Global value chains, technological progress, and environmental pollution: Inequality towards developing countries. J Environ Manage 277:110999

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang SH, Sun XL, Song ML (2021) Environmental regulation, resource misallocation, and ecological efficiency. Emerg Mark Finance Trade 57:611–630

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang SH, Tang Y, Song ML (2020b) Export trade, embodied carbon emissions, and environmental pollution: an empirical analysis of China’s high and new tech industries. J Environ Manage 276:110371

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Chu X, Wang F (2018b) Green technology innovation and enterprises’ optimal dynamic configuration of financing contracts: an empirical study based on panel data of the listed high-tech manufacturing companies. R & D Manag 30:12–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Fan G, Hu L (2019) Marketization Index of China’s Provinces: NERI Report 2018. Social Sciences Academic Press, Beijing, pp 739–746

  • Wang XX (2021b) Venture Capital R&D Investment and Green Technology Innovation in China. J Ind Technol Econ 40(07):23–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen HD, Liu YL, Wen HY (2008) An empirical study on FDI, foreign trade and environment pollution in China. Mod Econ Sci 2:88–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu H, Ba N, Ren S, Xu L, Chai J, Irfan M, Hao Y et al (2022) The impact of internet development on the health of Chinese residents: Transmission mechanisms and empirical tests. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 81:101178

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu H, Xue Y, Hao Y, Ren S (2021) How does internet development affect energy-saving and emission reduction? Evid China Energy Econ 103:105577

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu H, Zhao JW (2020) The green technology advancement effect of R&D investment: based on the perspective of technological progress at the city level. China Popul Resour Environ 30(02):121–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu XC, Ren X, Chang ZH (2019) Big data and Green Development. Rev Econ Res 10:97–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z, He Y, Wang H (2012) A Study of Factors that Affect Governments’ R&D Supports and Enterprises’ R&D Investment-Based on Research of System Dynamics. Manage Rev 24(4):67–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Xue F, Liu J Q, Fu YM (2022) The influence of artificial intelligence technology on carbon emission. Science & Technology Progress and Policy 2022:1–9

  • Yan XL, Zhu BK, Ma C (2020) Employment under Robot Impact: Evidence from China Manufacturing. Statist Res 01:74–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang B, Zhao J (2016) Construction of technological innovation system for production mode going green. Forum Sci Technol China 10:5–10 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang W, Qiu Z, Wu Q (2018) A literature review on the impact of artificial intelligence on employment. Chinese Journal of Population Science 5:109–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang CJ, Wang DH, Bi KX (2021) Research on the spatial effect of institutional environment on industrial green innovation. Sci Res Manag 42(12):108–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang RF, Zheng YY (2020) Environmental Regulation, Technological Innovation and High-quality Development of Manufacturing Industry. J Statist Inf 35(08):73–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang W, Yuan X (2008) The effect of foreign trade and FDI on environmental pollution: An analysis based on the impulse response function of time series in china: 1982–2006. World Econ Study 12(62–68):86

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan YJ, Xie RH (2015) FDI, environmental regulation and green total factor productivity growth of China’s industry: An empirical study based on Luenberger index. J Int Trade 8:84–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaenhal D, Sun H (2022) Analysis of Spatial spillover and threshold effect of Green Technology Innovation on Urban Ecological efficiency. Statistics Decision 38(14):169–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Li Z (2020) Does OFDI promote green TFP growth in China—an empirical study based on dynamic system GMM estimation and threshold model. J Int Trade 7:159–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Wu G, Zhang J (2004) The estimation of China’s provincial capital stock: 1952–2000. Econ Res J 10:35–44 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Ran GH, Chen Q (2014) Regional Financial strength, FDI spillover and Real Economic growth – A study based on Panel Threshold Model. Econ Sci 6:76–89 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang N, Liu Z, Zheng X, Xue J (2017) Carbon footprint of China’s belt and road. Science 357:1107–1107

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang WB, Zhang LP, Zhang KY (2010) Inter-provincial competition pattern of environmental regulation intensity and its evolution in China: an analysis based on a two-zone spatial Durbin fixed effects model. J Manag World 12:34–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y (2008) The Local Difference of FDI Technology Spillovers and the Threshold Characters of Absorbing Capacity. J Quant Tech Econ 25(1):28–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao P, Gao Y, Sun X (2022) How does artificial intelligence affect green economic growth?—Evidence from China. Sci Total Environ 834:155306

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Sun B (2016) The influence of Chinese environmental regulation on corporation innovation and competitiveness. J Clean Prod 112:1528–1536

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Social Science Found Major Projects of China (grant no. 14ZDB151).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, C.H. and K.Y.; formal analysis, calculating and writing—original draft preparation, C.F; methodology and data curation C.F and C.H.; writing—review and editing, K.Y and C.H.; supervision, C.H. Both authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chong Huang.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was obtained from the National Social Science Foundation of China.

Consent to participate

All authors of the article consent to participate.

Consent for publication

All authors of the article consent to publish.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Ilhan Ozturk

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yin, K., Cai, F. & Huang, C. How does artificial intelligence development affect green technology innovation in China? Evidence from dynamic panel data analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 28066–28090 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24088-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24088-0

Keywords

Navigation