Abstract
The establishment of pilot free trade zones (FTZs) is a key strategic measure taken by China to promote high-quality economic development, but there are still gaps in the research on how the establishment of FTZs affects the environmental performance of enterprises from a micro perspective. Using data from China’s Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share resource-based listed enterprises from 2010 to 2020, this paper uses the difference-in-difference model to examine the impact of the establishment of FTZs on the environmental performance of enterprises. The study finds that after the city that the enterprise located is set up as a free trade zone (FTZ), enterprises’ environmental performance has been significantly improved, and this effect has a continuous positive impact. As far as the influence mechanism is concerned, the main driving forces for the establishment of FTZs are technology effect, competition effect, and resource allocation effect, which are embodied in the significant improvement of enterprises’ green technology innovation, total factor productivity, and environmental protection investment. The environmental performance of non-state-owned and large-scale resource-based enterprises is more prominently affected by the establishment of FTZs. In capital-intensive industries and the eastern region, the environmental performance improvement effect of the establishment of FTZs is more obvious. This study provides targeted suggestions for resource-based enterprises to effectively implement the environmental green development strategy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data supporting the research results were obtained from the Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China and the China Stock Market and Accounting Research Database (CSMAR).
Notes
The reason why we use 2015 as the representative period is that the number of listed enterprises in the cities approved to establish FTZ in 2015 is the largest, so that more matching samples and more robust regression results can be obtained. In fact, we also tried to use 2017 as a representative period, and the results of the regression still support the conclusions of this paper.
References
Abadie A, Gardeazabal J (2003) The economic costs of conflict: a case study of the Basque country. Am Econ Rev 93(1):112–132. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803321455188
Akbari M, Azbari ME, Chaijani MH (2019) Performance of the firms in a free-trade zone: the role of institutional factors and resources. Eur Manag Rev 16(2):363–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12163
Aloise PG, Macke J (2017) Eco-innovations in developing countries: the case of manaus free trade zone (Brazil). J Clean Prod 168:30–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.212
Bambang H (2012) The small medium-sized enterprise’s characteristic in batam free trade zone that able to acquire debt. Proc Econ Financ 4:76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(12)00323-1
Beladi H, Oladi R (2011) Does trade liberalization increase global pollution? Resour Energy Econ 33(1):172–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2010.04.009
Bloom N, Draca M, Reenen JV (2016) Trade induced technical change? The impact of Chinese imports on innovation. IT and Productivity Rev Econ Stud 83(1):87–117. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdv039
Bloom N, Genakos R, Martin R, Author RS (2010) Modern management: Good for the environment or just hot air. Econ J 120(544):551–572. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2010.02351.x
Buonocore E, Hayha T, Paletto A (2014) Assessing environmental costs and impacts of forestry activities: a multi-method approach to environmental accounting. Ecol Model 71(1):10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.02.008
Cao SP, Nie L, Sun HF, Taghizadeh-Hesary F (2021) Digital finance, green technological innovation and energy-environmental performance: evidence from China’s regional economies. J Clean Prod 327:129458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129458
Chen H, Yuan B, Cui Q (2020) Does the pilot free trade zone policy attract the entering of foreign-invested enterprises? The evidence from China. Appl Econ Lett 28(14):1162–1168. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2020.1803482
Chen SS, Zhang HY, Wang SH (2022) Trade openness, economic growth, and energy intensity in China. Technol Forecast Soc 179:121608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121608
Chetty R, Looney A, Kroft K (2009) Salience and taxation: theory and evidence. Am Econ Rev 99(4):1145–1177. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.4.1145
Cole M (2004) Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets curve: examining the linkages. Ecol Econ 48(1):71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.09.007
Cui XH, Lin MY (2019) How does foreign direct investment affect the green total factor productivity of enterprises? Empirical analysis based on Malmquist-luenberger index and PSM-DID model. Bus Manag J 41(3):38–55. https://doi.org/10.19616/j.cnki.bmj.2019.03.003
Daly H, Goodland R (1994) An ecological assessment of deregulation of international commerce under GATT. Ecol Econ 9:73–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02211720
Feng C, Ye YW, Tao YQ (2022) Tax authority enforcement and corporate social security contributions: evidence from China. Financ Res Lett 49:103094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103094
Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ 110(2):353–377. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118443
He L, Zhang XL, Yan YX (2021) Heterogeneity of the environmental kuznets curve across Chinese cities: how to dance with ‘shackles’ ? Ecol Indic 130:108128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108128
Hu P, Zhou Y, Zhou JH, Wang GX, Zhu GW (2022) Uncovering the willingness to pay for ecological red lines protection: evidence from China. Ecol Indic 134:108458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108458
Hu ZB, Lan F, Xu H (2021) Green TFP heterogeneity in the ports of China’s pilot free trade zone under environmental constraints. Int J Env Res Pub He 18(24):12910. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182412910
Huang J, Shen J, Miao L, Zhang W (2021) The effects of emission trading scheme on industrial output and air pollution emissions under city heterogeneity in China. J Clean Prod 315:128260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128260
Isabel D, Marta F (2015) Knowledge spillovers in science and technology parks: how can firms benefit most? J Technol Transfer 40(1):70–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-013-9329-4
Jiang YF, Wang HY, Liu ZK (2021) The impact of the free trade zone on green total factor productivity—evidence from the shanghai pilot free trade zone. Energ Policy 148:112000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112000
Li MY, Gao X (2022) Implementation of enterprises’ green technology innovation under market-based environmental regulation: an evolutionary game approach. J Environ Manage 308:114570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114570
Li SJ, Liu JG, Kong YD (2021) Pilot free trade zones and Chinese port-listed companies performance: an empirical research based on quasi-natural experiment. Transp Policy 111(9):125–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.07.022
Li Z, Wu BJ, Wang DY, Tang MG (2022) Government mandatory energy-biased technological progress and enterprises’ environmental performance: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment of cleaner production standards in China. Energ Policy 162:112779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112779
Liu JY, Wang ZW, Zhu WX (2020) Does privatization reform alleviate ownership discrimination? Evidence from the Split-share structure reform in China. J Corp Financ 66:101848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101848
Liu M, Zhang B, Liao X (2022) Can trade liberalization promote green production? Evidence from China’s manufacturing enterprises. J Asian Econ 79:101369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2021.101369
Liu ZK, Cao FF, Dennis B (2019) Does the China-korea free trade area promote the green total factor productivity of China’s manufacturing industry?. J Korea Trade 23(5):27–44. https://doi.org/10.35611/jkt.2019.23.5.27
Ma Q, Zhang Y, Yang K, He K (2021) Have China’s pilot free trade zones improved green total factor productivity? Int J Env Res Pub He 18(21):11681. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111681
Madsen PM (2009) Does corporate investment drive a “race to the bottom” in environmental protection? A reexamination of the effect of environmental regulation on investment. Acad Manage J 52(6):1297–1318. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.47085173
Melitz MJ (2003) The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71(6):1695–1725. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00467
Obringer R, Rachunok B, Maia-Silva D, Arbabzadeh M, Nateghi R, Madani K (2021) The overlooked environmental footprint of increasing Internet use. Resour Conserv Recy 167:105389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105389
Olley G, Pakes A (1996) The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica 64(6):1263–1297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2171831
Pak A, Majd F (2011) Integrated coastal management plan in free trade zones, a case study. Ocean Coast Manage 54(2):129–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2010.10.033
Pan XF, Uddin MK, Han CC, Pan XY (2019) Dynamics of financial development, trade openness, technological innovation and energy intensity: evidence from Bangladesh. Energy 171:456–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.200
Peng DL, Fei XY (2017) China’s free trade zones: regulatory innovation, legal assessment and economic implication. Chin Econ 50(4):238–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/10971475.2017.1321886
Prescott EC (1998) Needed: a theory of total factor productivity. Int Econ Rev 39(3):525–551. https://doi.org/10.2307/2527389
Qin M, Sun MX, Li J (2021) Impact of environmental regulation policy on ecological efficiency in four major urban agglomerations in eastern China. Ecol Indic 130:108002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108002
Ramzan M, Sheng B, Shahbaz M, Song J, Jiao Z (2019) Impact of trade openness on GDP growth: does TFP matter? J Int Trade Econ Dev 28(8):960–995. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2019.1616805
Ren S, Hu Y, Zheng J, Wang Y (2020) Emissions trading and firm innovation: evidence from a natural experiment in China. Technol Forecast Soc 155:119989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119989
Shapiro JS, Walker R (2018) Why is pollution from US manufacturing declining?The roles of environmental regulation, productivity, and trade. Am Econ Rev 108(12):3814–3854. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20151272
Sleiti AK, Kapat SJ, Vesely L (2022) Digital twin in energy industry: proposed robust digital twin for power plant and other complex capital-intensive large engineering systems. Energy Rep 8:3704–3726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.02.305
Song M, Wang J, Wang S, Zhao D (2019) Knowledge accumulation, development potential and efficiency evaluation: an example using the Hainan free trade zone. J Knowl Manag 23(9):1673–1690. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-06-2018-0368
Tang C, Xu YY, Hao Y, Wu HT, Xue Y (2021) What is the role of telecommunications infrastructure construction in green technology innovation? A firm-level analysis for China. Energ Econ 103:105576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105576
Wan Z, Zhang Y, Wang X, Chen J (2014) Policy and politics behind Shanghai’s free trade zone program. J Transp Geogr 34:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.10.015
Wang AP, Hu Y, Li YY, Rao SQ, Lin WF (2022a) Do pilot free trade zones improve the green total factor productivity? Evidence from a quasi‑natural experiment in China. Environ Sci Pollut R. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21003-5
Wang HY, Zhang YH, Liu ZK, Liu RK, Li KY (2022b) The impact and mechanisms of the Shanghai pilot free-trade zone on the green total factor productivity of the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration. Environ Sci Pollut R 29:40997–41011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17758-y
Wang J (2016) Cross-Border investment and financing reforms in shanghai pilot free trade zone. J Financ Risk Manage 5:94–100. https://doi.org/10.4236/jfrm.2016.52010
Wang LH, Wang Z, Ma YT (2021) Environmental effects of trade liberalization—evidence from China’s pilot free trade zone. J Int Commer Econ Po 12(3):2150013. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793993321500137
Waugh ME, Ravikumar B (2016) Measuring openness to trade. J Econ Dyn Control 72:29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2016.03.009
Wei W, Li J, Chen B, Wang M, Zhang P, Guan D, Meng J, Qian H, Cheng YH, Kang C, Feng K, Yang Q, Zhang N, Liang X, Xue J (2021) Embodied greenhouse gas emissions from building China’s large-scale power transmission infrastructure. Nat Sustain 4:739–747. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00704-8
Wu C, Su N, Guo W, Wei W (2022) Import competition and the improvement in pollutant discharge from heterogeneous enterprises: evidence from China. J Environ Manage 310:114809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114809
Wurlod JD, Noailly J (2018) The impact of green innovation on energy intensity: an empirical analysis for 14 industrial sectors in OECD countries. Energ Econ 71:47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.12.012
Yan JN, Su B (2020) What drive the changes in China’s energy consumption and intensity during 12th Five-Year Plan period? Energ Policy 140:111383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111383
Yang W (2017) Environmental protection review in the free trade zone. Chin Econ 50(4):291–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/10971475.2017.1321896
Yao DQ, Whalley J (2016) The China (shanghai) pilot free trade zone: background, developments and preliminary assessment of initial impacts. World Econ 39(1):2–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12364
Zhang K, Li YC, Qi Y, Shao S (2021) Can green credit policy improve environmental quality? Evidence from China J Environ Manage 298:113445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113445
Zhang XM, Lu FF, Xue D (2022) Does China’s carbon emission trading policy improve regional energy efciency?—an analysis based on quasi-experimental and policy spillover efects. Environ Sci Pollut R 29:21166–21183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17021-4
Zhou GL, Zhang ZN, Fei YL (2022) How to evaluate the green and high-quality development path? An FsQCA approach on the China pilot free trade zone. Int J Env Res Pub He 19(1):547. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010547
Zhu SJ, Tang YD, Qiao XZ, Peng C, Li D (2020) The spillover effects of China’s regional environmental markets to local listed firms: a risk Granger causality approach. Environ Sci Pollut R 27:44123–44136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10320-2
Zhuo C, Deng F (2020) How does China’s Western development strategy affect regional green economic efficiency? Sci Total Environ 707:135939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135939
Zhuo CF, Mao YH, Rong JX (2021) Policy dividend or “policy trap”? Environmental welfare of establishing free trade zone in China. Sci Total Environ 756:143856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143856
Acknowledgements
The authors are very grateful to the editors and anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments that helped us sufficiently improve the quality of this paper.
Funding
The authors received financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.72072048).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Xin Li, Qiong Xu, and Hecheng Wang. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Xin Li, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
All the co-authors agreed to participate in the research.
Consent for publication
All the co-authors agreed to publish the manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Ilhan Ozturk
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, X., Xu, Q. & Wang, H. Environmental effects of the establishment of pilot free trade zones: evidence from Chinese resource-based enterprises. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 21384–21403 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23722-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23722-1