Abstract
Sustainable management of natural resources and green urbanization is crucial because it assists the use of resources wisely without unnecessary use and without affecting future generations’ needs. This research aims to examine the impact of the abundance of natural resources on China’s CO2 emissions while moderating the roles of manufacturing value-added, urbanization, and permanent cropland from 1970 to 2016. This study developed a comprehensive empirical analysis, applied advanced econometric methodologies, and used the generalized linear model (GLM) and robust generalized estimating equation (GEE). Overall, the results conclude that natural resource abundance and permanent cropland are negatively associated with China’s CO2 emissions. However, urbanization and manufacturing value-added are negatively related to those CO2 emissions. Moreover, natural resource abundance and permanent cropland improve environmental sustainability while urbanization and manufacturing value-added deteriorate that environmental sustainability. It is suggested that policymakers should promote sustainable management of natural resources and encourage economic usage of natural resources to boost resilient ecosystems; shape sustainable places, lifestyles, and communities; and consume natural resources less. Additionally, policymakers should consider collaborating with landscape architects, urban planners, engineers, transport planners, ecologists, sociologists, physiologists, economists, physicists, and other specialists to develop green urban communities. The limitations of the study and directions for future research are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Not applicable.
References
Ahmad M (2018) Does financial development asymmetrically affect CO 2 emissions in China ? An application of the nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag ( NARDL ). model. 9(6):1–6
Ahmad M, Khattak SI (2020) Is Aggregate Domestic Consumption Spending (ADCS) Per Capita Determining CO2 Emissions in South Africa? A New Perspective. Environ Resour Econ 75(3):529–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-019-00398-9
Ahmad M, Wu Y (2022) Combined role of green productivity growth, economic globalization, and eco-innovation in achieving ecological sustainability for OECD economies. J Environ Manag 302:113980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113980
Ahmad M, Zhao ZY (2018) Causal linkages between energy investment and economic growth: a panel data modelling analysis of China. Energy Sources, Part B: Econ Plann Policy 13(8):363–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2018.1495278
Ahmad M, Zheng J (2021) Do innovation in environmental-related technologies cyclically and asymmetrically affect environmental sustainability in BRICS nations? Technol Soc 67:9–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101746
Ahmad M, Khan Z, Rahman ZU, Khattak SI, Khan ZU (2019a) Can innovation shocks determine CO2 emissions (CO2e) in the OECD economies? A new perspective. Econ Innov New Technol, 0(0), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2019.1684643
Ahmad M, Ul Haq Z, Khan Z, Khattak SI, Ur Rahman Z, Khan S (2019b) Does the inflow of remittances cause environmental degradation? Empirical evidence from China. Econ Res-Ekonomska Istrazivanja 32(1):2099–2121. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1642783
Ahmad M, Zhao ZY, Rehman A, Shahzad M, Li H (2019c) Revealing long- and short-run empirical interactions among foreign direct investment, renewable power generation, and CO2 emissions in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(22):22220–22245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05543-x
Ahmad M, Muslija A, Satrovic E (2021) Does economic prosperity lead to environmental sustainability in developing economies? Environmental Kuznets curve theory. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(18):22588–22601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12276-9
Ahmed Z, Asghar MM, Malik MN, Nawaz K (2020a) Moving towards a sustainable environment: The dynamic linkage between natural resources, human capital, urbanization, economic growth, and ecological footprint in China. Res Policy 67(November 2019):101677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101677
Ahmed Z, Zafar MW, Ali S, Danish (2020b) Linking urbanization, human capital, and the ecological footprint in G7 countries: An empirical analysis. Sustain Cities Soc 55(November 2019):102064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102064
Ali HS, Nathaniel SP, Uzuner G, Bekun FV, Sarkodie SA (2020) Trivariate modelling of the nexus between electricity consumption, urbanization and economic growth in Nigeria: fresh insights from Maki Cointegration and causality tests. Heliyon 6(2):e03400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03400
Annuar AS, Rahman RA, Munir A, Murad A, El-enshasy HA, Illias R (2021) Jo ur l P re. Carbohydr Polym 2021:118159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105884
Anser MK, Alharthi M, Aziz B, Wasim S (2020) Impact of urbanization, economic growth, and population size on residential carbon emissions in the SAARC countries. Clean Techn Environ Policy 22(4):923–936. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-020-01833-y
Arslan HM, Khan I, Latif MI, Komal B, Chen S (2022) Understanding the dynamics of natural resources rents , environmental sustainability , and sustainable economic growth : new insights from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19952-y
Bekhet HA, Othman NS (2017) Impact of urbanization growth on Malaysia CO2 emissions: Evidence from the dynamic relationship. J Clean Prod 154:374–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.174
Bilal, Khan I, Tan D, Azam W, Tauseef Hassan S (2022) Alternate energy sources and environmental quality: The impact of inflation dynamics. Gondwana Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2021.12.011
Breusch TS (1978) Testing for Autocorrelation in Dynamic Linear Models*. Aust Econ Pap 17(31):334–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8454.1978.tb00635.x
C2ES (20200) Center for climate and energy solution, a climate of change: Manufacturing Must Rise to the Risks and Opportunities of Climate Change. https://www.c2es.org/document/a-climate-of-change-manufacturing-must-rise-to-the-risks-and-opportunities-of-climate-chan [WWW Document]. US Ind. Today
Chen S, Jin H, Lu Y (2018) Impact of urbanization on CO2 emissions and energy consumption structure: a panel data analysis for Chinese prefecture-level cities. Struct Chang Econ Dyn. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2018.08.009
Cui L, Weng S, Kirikkaleli D, Bashir MA, Rjoub H, Zhou Y (2021) Exploring the role of natural resources, natural gas and oil production for economic growth of China. Res Policy 74:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102429
Danish, Ulucak R, Khan SUD (2020) Determinants of the ecological footprint: Role of renewable energy, natural resources, and urbanization. Sustain Cities Soc 54:101996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101996
Dicky-Fuller. (1997) Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. J Am Stat Assoc 74(366a):427–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1979.10482531
Ding Q, Iqbal S, Ahmad M (2021) Towards sustainable production and consumption : Assessing the impact of energy productivity and eco-innovation on consumption-based carbon dioxide emissions ( CCO 2 ) in G-7 nations. Sustain Prod Consum 27:254–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.11.004
EPA (2014) Global greenhouse gas emissions data, United States Environmental Protection Agency. United States Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/global-greenhouse-gas-emissions-data
EPA (2020) Sustainability, Sustainable Manufacturing, United States Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/sustainability/sustainable-manufacturing#:~:text=Sustainable%20manufacturing%20is%20the%20creation,conserving%20energy%20and%20natural%20resource [WWW Document]. United States Environ Prot Agency
Gao J, Tian M (2016) Analysis of over-consumption of natural resources and the ecological trade deficit in China based on ecological footprints. Ecol Indic 61:899–904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.044
González-Val R, Pueyo F (2019) Natural resources, economic growth and geography. Econ Model 83(February):150–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2019.02.007
Gutti B, Aji MM, Magaji G (2012) Environmental Impact of Natural Resources Exploitation in Nigeria and the Way Forward. J Appl Technol Environ Sanit 2(2):95–102
Hassan ST, Batool B, Zhu B, Khan I (2022) Environmental complexity of globalization, education, and income inequalities: New insights of energy poverty. J Clean Prod 340(August 2021):130735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130735
Hubacek K, Guan D, Barrett J, Wiedmann T (2009) Environmental implications of urbanization and lifestyle change in China: Ecological and Water Footprints. J Clean Prod 17(14):1241–1248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.03.011
Hubbard, A. E., Ahern, J., Fleischer, N. L., Laan, M. Van der Laan M, Satariano SA, .…, Satariano, W. A. (2010). To GEE or not to GEE: Comparing population average and mixed models for estimating the associations between neighborhood risk factors and health. Epidemiology, 21(4), 467–474. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181caeb90
IEA (2020) Renewables, https://www.iea.org/fuels-and-technologies/renewables
Ibrahim MJ (2017) Introductory Chapter: Economics, Natural Resources and Sustainable Development, in: Emerging Issues in Economics and Development. pp. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.70399
Johansen (1995) A Statistical Analysis of Cointegration for I (2) Variables, 11(1) edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 25–59 Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3532929
Johansen (1991) Estimation and Hypothesis Testing of Cointegration Vectors in Gaussian Vector Autoregressive Models. JEconometrica 59(6):1551–1580. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Khan I, Hou F, Le HP (2021a) The impact of natural resources, energy consumption, and population growth on environmental quality: Fresh evidence from the United States of America. Sci Total Environ 754:142222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142222
Khan I, Hou F, Phong H, Ahtsham S (2021b) Do natural resources , urbanization , and value-adding manufacturing affect environmental quality ? Evidence from the top ten manufacturing countries. Res Policy 72(November 2020):102109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102109
Khan I, Hou F, Zakari A, Irfan M, Ahmad M (2021c) Links among energy intensity, non-linear financial development, and environmental sustainability: New evidence from Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation countries. J Clean Prod 330:129747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129747
Khan I, Hou F, Zakari A, Tawiah V (2021d) Energy use and urbanization as determinants of China’s environmental quality : prospects of the Paris Climate Agreement. J Environ Plan Manag, 0(0), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2021.1972797
Khan I, Zakari A, Zhang J, Dagar V, Singh S (2022) A study of trilemma energy balance, clean energy transitions, and economic expansion in the midst of environmental sustainability: New insights from three trilemma leadership. Energy 248:123619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123619
Kossoy A, Guigon P (2009) State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2012, 6th edn. World Bank, Washington, pp 24–25 © World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/13335 License: CC BY 3.0 IGO. Euroheat and Power (English Edition). http://hdl.handle.net/10986/13336
Li S, Yuan W, Shi TM, Zhou L (2011) Dynamic analysis of ecological footprints of Nanchong City in the process of urbanization. Proc Eng 15:5415–5419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.08.1004
Li J, Lei J, Li S, Yang Z, Tong Y, Zhang S, Duan Z (2022) Spatiotemporal analysis of the relationship between urbanization and the eco-environment in the Kashgar metropolitan area, China. Ecol Indic 135(February):1–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108524
Liang W, Yang M (2019) Urbanization, economic growth and environmental pollution: Evidence from China. Sustain Comp: Inform Syst 21:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suscom.2018.11.007
Liu C, Yang M (2020) An empirical analysis of dynamic changes in ecological sustainability and its relationship with urbanization in a coastal city: The case of Xiamen in China. J Clean Prod 256:120482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120482
Liu B, Su X, Shi J, Hou R (2020) Does urbanization drive economic growth decoupled from energy consumption in China’s logistics? J Clean Prod 257:120468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120468
Lyu L, Khan I, Zakari A, Bilal. (2021) A study of energy investment and environmental sustainability nexus in China : a bootstrap replications analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16254-7
Muhammad S, Long X, Salman M, Dauda L (2020) Effect of urbanization and international trade on CO2 emissions across 65 Belt and Road Initiative Countries. Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117102
Nathaniel SP (2020) Ecological footprint , energy use , trade , and urbanization linkage in Indonesia. GeoJournal 7:2057–2070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10175-7
Nathaniel S, Khan, S. A. R. (2020a) The Nexus between Urbanization, Renewable Energy, Trade, and Ecological Footprint in ASEAN Countries. J Clean Prod 272:122709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122709
Nathaniel S, Abdul SKR (2020b) The nexus between urbanization, renewable energy, trade, and ecological footprint in ASEAN countries. J Clean Prod 272:2–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122709
Rahim S, Murshed M, Umarbeyli S, Kirikkaleli D, Ahmad M, Tufail M, Wahab S (2021) Do natural resources abundance and human capital development promote economic growth? A study on the resource curse hypothesis in Next Eleven countries. Resources, Environ Sustain 4:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resenv.2021.100018
Rashid A, Irum A, Malik IA, Ashraf A, Rongqiong L, Liu G et al (2018) Ecological footprint of Rawalpindi; Pakistan’s first footprint analysis from urbanization perspective. J Clean Prod 170:362–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.186
Taghizadeh-Hesary F, Zakari A, Yoshino N, Khan I (2022) Leavering on Energy Security to Alleviate Poverty in Asian Economics. The Singapore Economic Review, Singapore, pp 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217590822440015
Tawiah VK, Zakari A, Khan I (2021) The environmental footprint of China-Africa engagement : An analysis of the effect of China – Africa partnership on carbon emissions. Sci Total Environ 756:143603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143603
UnitedNations. (2018). Department of Economic and Social Affairs. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/population/2018-revision-of-world-urbanization-prospects.html [WWW Document]
United Nations (2018) Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A New Era Glob Heal 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1891/9780826190123.ap02
Vachon S, Klassen RD (2008) Environmental management and manufacturing performance: The role of collaboration in the supply chain. Int J Prod Econ 111(2):299–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.11.030
World Atlas (2018) Countries With the Most Natural Resources. https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/countries-withthe-most-natural-resources.html [WWW Document]
Wu D, Yang Y, Shi Y, Xu M, Zou W (2022) Renewable energy resources , natural resources volatility and economic performance : Evidence from BRICS. Res Policy 76(June):1–22
Yang X, Khan I (2021) Dynamics among economic growth , urbanization , and environmental sustainability in IEA countries : the role of industry value-added. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16000-z
Yasin I, Ahmad N, Chaudhary MA (2020) Catechizing the Environmental-Impression of Urbanization, Financial Development, and Political Institutions: A Circumstance of Ecological Footprints in 110 Developed and Less-Developed Countries. Soc Indic Res 147(2):621–649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-019-02163-3
Yasmeen H, Tan Q, Zameer H, Tan J, Nawaz K (2020) Manuscript title: Exploring the impact of technological innovation, environmental regulations and urbanization on ecological efficiency of China in the context of COP21. J Environ Manag 274(August):111210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111210
Zahoor Z, Khan I, Hou F (2021) Clean energy investment and financial development as determinants of environment and sustainable economic growth : evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res, (0123456789). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16832-9
Zakari A, Khan I (2021) Boosting economic growth through energy in Africa : the role of Chinese investment and institutional quality. J Chin Econ Bus Stud, 00(00), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14765284.2021.1968709
Zakari A, Khan I (2022) The Introduction of Green Finance : A Curse or a Benefit to Environmental Sustainability ? Energy Res Lett 3(2021):1–5
Zakari A, Khan I, Tawiah V, Alvarado R (2022a) Reviewing the ecological footprints of Africa top carbon consumer : a quantile on quantile analysis. Int J Environ Sci Technol, (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03904-z
Zakari A, Khan I, Tawiah V, Alvarado R, Li G (2022b) The production and consumption of oil in Africa : The environmental implications. Res Policy 78(May):102795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102795
Zakari A, Li G, Khan I, Jindal A, Tawiah V (2022c) Are abundant energy resources and Chinese business a solution to environmental prosperity in Africa ? Energy Policy 163(February):112829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112829
Zallé O (2019) Natural resources and economic growth in Africa: The role of institutional quality and human capital. Res Policy 62(October):616–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.11.009
Zhang YJ, Yi WC, Li BW (2015) The Impact of Urbanization on Carbon Emission: Empirical Evidence in Beijing. Energy Procedia 75:2963–2968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.601
Zhang C, Khan I, Dagar V, Saeed A, Zafar MW (2022) Technological Forecasting & Social Change Environmental impact of information and communication technology : Unveiling the role of education in developing countries. Technol Forecast Soc Change 178(February):121570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121570
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Zahid Zahoor: original draft preparation, conceptualization, methodology. Muhammad Irfan Latif: theoretical framework. Irfan Khan: modeling, software. Fujun Hou: supervision, reviewing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Arshian Sharif
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zahoor, Z., Latif, M.I., Khan, I. et al. Abundance of natural resources and environmental sustainability: the roles of manufacturing value-added, urbanization, and permanent cropland. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 82365–82378 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21545-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21545-8