Skip to main content
Log in

What can the Allium cepa test say about pesticide safety? A review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article has been updated

Abstract

The increasing use of pesticides has caused global concerns about the toxic effects and adverse consequences of pesticides on humans and the environment. Among the ways to understand the impact of pesticides, the Allium cepa bioassay stands out. This test is suitable to evaluate different toxic, cytotoxic, genotoxic, and mutagenic outcomes. In this context, the present review aimed to summarize the history of using the A. cepa bioassay to investigate pesticide damages. Data on the experimental conditions were also discussed. The reviewed studies showed the toxicity profile of 113 active ingredients primarily tested in the laboratory, using water for exposure. The most used biomarkers were the mitotic index, chromosomal aberrations, and nuclear abnormalities. All active ingredients caused some toxicity levels in A. cepa, showing the efficiency and sensibility of this bioindicator and the adverse effect of pesticides on humans and the environment. Furthermore, it was evident that pesticides have great potential to damage the mitotic spindle and DNA because almost all active ingredients tested induced chromosomal aberrations and nuclear abnormalities. The current review showed that the A. cepa bioassay is an effective and appropriate model to evaluate pesticide toxicity, and it might indicate research gaps and recommendations for further studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this review are included in this published article.

Change history

  • 27 May 2022

    Given and Family name tagging correction for the correct citation of the article.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Brazilian funding agencies Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Goiás (FAPEG). CFCC was supported by CAPES student fellowship (88887.483362/2020-00). LMA thanks Universidade Estadual Goás (UEG) from financial support (grants PrP 04/2021 and PrP 05/2021).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All the authors declare to have made substantial contributions to the article conception. The idea for the article was from CFCC. CFCC: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, visualization, writing—original draft and writing—review and editing. LMA: conceptualization, project administration, supervision, methodology, writing—original draft and writing—review and editing. EFLCB: conceptualization, methodology and writing—review and editing. LSO: writing—review and editing. FMC: writing—review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos Filipe Camilo-Cotrim.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All the authors have approved the manuscript and agreed with the submission.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Ludek Blaha

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 512 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Camilo-Cotrim, C.F., Bailão, E.F.L.C., Ondei, L.S. et al. What can the Allium cepa test say about pesticide safety? A review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 48088–48104 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20695-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20695-z

Keywords

Navigation