Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Investigating the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis amidst geopolitical risk: Global evidence using bootstrap ARDL approach

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Environmental concerns have become one of the top inevitable issues the world has been facing nowadays. Human-induced carbon emissions are the main reasons behind these environmental issues and to reduce them and mitigate their consequences, policymakers globally explore their drivers and determinants continuously. Although several socio-economic factors have been explored that affect the level of emissions, relatively less attention has been paid to geopolitical risk (GPR). Over the past few decades, the world has witnessed a significant rise in GPR with economic and environmental impacts. However, the existing body of literature on the GPR-environment nexus documents the contrasting conclusion, which might cause inconvenience while proposing environmental protection policies. Therefore, the present study reinvestigates the impact of GPR on carbon emissions at the global level. The findings document that, in the short run, a 1% rise in GPR impedes emissions by 3.50% globally. On the contrary, a 13.24% rise in emissions is fostered by a 1% increase in GPR in the long run. Also as was expected, we report that energy consumption leads to higher global emissions in both the short and long run. Next, this study also validates the existence of the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis at the global level. Based on these aforementioned outcomes, we propose several policy recommendations to curb global carbon emissions via GPR accomplish, thus, a few sustainable development goals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Source: authors’ calculation

Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Available upon request.

Notes

  1. We use geopolitical risk historical index (GPRH) as proxy for global geopolitical risk Fig. 2.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the participatory contribution of all respondents to this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors strongly believe that they have made an equal and substantial contribution to preparing this manuscript. S.M.H. performed: project administration, visualization, roles/writing—original draft, writing—review & editing. R.B. performed: conceptualization, data curation, investigation, resources, visualization, roles/writing—original draft, writing—review & editing. R.I.L. performed: investigation, methodology, supervision, writing—review & editing. Q.R.S. performed: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, methodology, project administration, software, visualization, roles/writing—original draft, writing—review & editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roni Bhowmik.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hashmi, S.M., Bhowmik, R., Inglesi-Lotz, R. et al. Investigating the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis amidst geopolitical risk: Global evidence using bootstrap ARDL approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 24049–24062 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17488-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17488-1

Keywords

Navigation