Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Drivers of green supply chain management: a close-up study

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Green supply chain management (GSCM) is an important part of most production organisations in developed countries. Meanwhile, developing countries are yet to fully embrace the concept. This study, therefore, investigated the drivers of GSCM using a close-up approach in a leading manufacturing organisation in Nigeria with sustainability initiatives. One hundred and fifty-four questionnaires retrieved from the supply chain management team of the organisation were subjected to descriptive and inferential statistics such as mean score, standard deviation, and factor analysis. Based on the results of the analyses, the drivers of GSCM in the organisation could be grouped as government-related, organisational-related, and societal-related drivers. The study concluded that synergy of the government, organisations, non-government organisations, and individual is important for achieving green supply chain practices in developing countries. It was recommended that training at all levels is essential to improve the awareness and importance of sustainable production to the environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The dataset used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Adeniyi O, Ojo LD, Idowu OA, Kolawole SB (2020) Compliance with the stipulated procurement process in local governments: a case from a developing nation. Int J Procure Manag 13(5):678–700

    Google Scholar 

  • Adewale IA (2009) Project management with reference to local government in Nigeria’, Paper presented at 3-Day Seminar, Ekiti State Local Government Service Commission, Nigeria

  • Africanews (2019) Corporate social responsibility: Dangote gets to 5 recognition in most responsible business in Africa’ category. Available at https://www.africanews.com/2018/12/07/corporate-social-responsibility-dangote-gets-top-5-recognition-in-most-responsible-business-in-africa-category//#:~:text=Dangote's%20seven%20pillars%20of%20sustainability,are%20designed%20to%20ensure%20sustainability (Accessed 20 April 2021).

  • Akhtar P (2019) Drivers of green supply chain initiatives and their impact on economic performance of firms: evidence from Pakistan’s manufacturing sector. J Compet 11(2):5–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Akinyoade A, Uche C (2016) Dangote cement: an African success story? ASC Working Pap 131/2016:1–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Dmour R, Yassine O, Masa’deh R (2018) A review of literature on the association among employee empowerment, work engagement and employee performance. Mod Appl Sci 12(11):313–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Maáitah N (2018) Green supply chain management (GSCM) practices and their impact on performance: an insight from the Jordanian construction sector. Int J Constr Supply Chain Manag 8(2):87–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson M (2003) Methodology for close up studies–struggling with closeness and closure. High Educ 46(2):167–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Amade B, Adeyomo AA, Ogbonna AC, Okore OL, Okwara ID (2020) Barriers to green supply chain management (GSCM) adoption on construction projects. Eur Project Manag J 10(2):41–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Amakom U (2012) Manufactured exports in sub-Saharan African economies: econometric tests for the learning by exporting hypothesis. Am Int J Contemp Res 2(4):195–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Amemba CS, Nyaboke PG, Osoro A, Mburu N (2013) Elements of green supply chain management. Eur J Bus Manag 5(12):51–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Anbumozhi V, Kanda Y (2005) Greening the production and supply chains in Asia: is there a role for voluntary initiatives. IGES Kansai Res Centre KRC 6E:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Aneesa M, Gupta AK, Desai D (2015) Supply chain management: effective tool in construction industry. Int J Novel Res Eng Sci 2(1):35–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Antweiler W, Copeland BR, Taylor MS (2001) Is free trade good for the environment? Am Econ Rev 91(4):877–908

    Google Scholar 

  • Asif MS, Lau H, Nakandala D, Fan Y, Hurriyet H (2020) Adoption of green supply chain management practices through collaboration approach in developing countries–From literature review to conceptual framework. Journal of Cleaner Production 276:124191

  • Babatunde SO, Awodele OA, Adeniyi O (2018) Opportunities and challenges of foreign direct investment utilisation and its impact on the construction sector in developing countries. J Financ Manag Prop Constr 23(2):239–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Baek J (2016) A new look at the FDI–income–energy–environment nexus: dynamic panel data analysis of ASEAN. Energy Policy 91:22–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamisaye OS, Adeitan AD (2018) A review of green supply chain management on waste disposal: a study of Nigerian garment industry. Adv Res 17(3):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannick T, Coghlan D (2007) In defense of being “native”: the case for insider academic research. Organ Res Methods 10(1):59–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Brik AB, Mellahi K, Rettab B (2013) Drivers of green supply chain in emerging economies. Thunderbird Int Bus Rev 55(2):123–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockhaus S, Fawcett S, Kersten W, Knemeyer M (2016) A framework for benchmarking product sustainability efforts. Benchmarking: An International Journal 23(1):127–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks AL, Wang S, Jambeck JR (2018) The Chinese import ban and its impact on global plastic waste trade. Sci Adv 4(6):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan HK, He H, Wang WY (2012) Green marketing and its impact on supply chain management in industrial markets. Ind Mark Manag 41(4):557–562

    Google Scholar 

  • Coghlan D (2019) Doing action research in your own organization. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland BR, Taylor MS (2004) Trade, growth, and the environment. J Econ Lit 42(1):7–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Dadhich P, Genovese A, Kumar N, Acquaye A (2015) Developing sustainable supply chains in the UK construction industry: a case study. Int J Prod Econ 164:271–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Daliu P, Santini A, Novellino E (2019) From pharmaceuticals to nutraceuticals: bridging disease prevention and management. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 12(1):1–7

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins E, André K, Axelsson K, Benoist L, Swartling ÅG, Persson Å (2019) Advancing sustainable consumption at the local government level: a literature review. J Clean Prod 231:1450–1462

    Google Scholar 

  • Diabat A, Govindan K (2011) An analysis of the drivers affecting the implementation of green supply chain management. Resour Conserv Recycl 55(6):659–667

    Google Scholar 

  • Eltayeb TK, Zailani S, Ramayah T (2011) Green supply chain initiatives among certified companies in Malaysia and environmental sustainability: investigating the outcomes. Resour Conserv Recycl 55(5):495–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Emuze F, Smallwood J (2013) How can supply chain management proliferate in South Africa construction? Proceedings of 29th Annual Association of Researchers in Construction Management Conference, Edinburgh, Scotland, 513–522

  • Environmental Performance Index (EPI) (2020) 2020 EPI results. Available at Environmental Performance Index | Environmental Performance Index (yale.edu). Retrieved on 30 August 2021. Accessed on 30 August 2021

  • Etikan I, Musa SA, Alkassim RS (2016) Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. Am J Theor Appl Stat 5(1):1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahimnia B, Sarkis J, Davarzani H (2015) Green supply chain management: a review and bibliometric analysis. Int J Prod Econ 162:101–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Falck O, Heblich S (2007) Corporate social responsibility: doing well by doing good. Bus Horizons 50(3):247–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Field A (2005) Discovering statistics using SPSS. Sage Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorini PDC, Jabbour CJC, de Sousa Jabbour ABL, Stefanelli NO, Fernando Y (2019) Interplay between information systems and environmental management in ISO 14001-certified companies. Manag Decis 57(8):1883–1901

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi S, Mangla SK, Kumar P, Kumar D (2015) Evaluating factors in implementation of successful green supply chain management using DEMATEL: a case study. Int Strateg Manag Rev 3(1-2):96–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardas B, Raut R, Jagtap AH, Narkhede B (2019) Exploring the key performance indicators of green supply chain management in agro-industry. J Model Manag 14(1):260–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Geng R, Mansouri SA, Aktas E (2017) The relationship between green supply chain management and performance: a meta-analysis of empirical evidences in Asian emerging economies. Int J Prod Econ 183:245–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser M (2006) The social dimension in ecosystem management: strengths and weaknesses of human-nature mind maps. Hum Ecol Rev 13(2):122–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant DB, Wong CY, Trautrims A (2017) Sustainable logistics and supply chain management: principles and practices for sustainable operations and management. Kogan Page Publishers, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunasekara C (2007) Pivoting the centre: reflections on undertaking qualitative interviewing in academia. Qual Res 7(4):461–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta S, Palsule-Desai OD (2011) Sustainable supply chain management: review and research opportunities. IIMB Manag Rev 23(4):234–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2014) Multivariate data analysis, 7th edn. Pearson Education Limited, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  • Haiyun C, Zhixiong H, Yüksel S, Dinçer H (2021) Analysis of the innovation strategies for green supply chain management in the energy industry using the QFD-based hybrid interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy decision approach. Renew Sust Energ Rev 143:110844

    Google Scholar 

  • Harada T, Abe T, Kato F, Matsumoto R, Fujita H, Murai S, Miyajima N, Tsuchiya K, Maruyama S, Kudo K, Shinohara N (2015)Five-point Likert scaling on MRI predicts clinically significant prostate carcinoma. BMC Urol 15(1):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Head BW (2014) Evidence, uncertainty, and wicked problems in climate change decision making in Australia. Environ Plan C: Government and Policy 32(4):663–679

    Google Scholar 

  • Henson RK, Roberts JK (2006) Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educ Psychol Meas 66(3):393–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Hessels J, Stel AV (2009) Entrepreneurship, export orientation, and economic growth. Small Bus Econ 37(2):255–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Holley C (2017) Environmental regulation and governance. In: Drahos P (ed) Regulatory Theory: Foundations and applications, vol 10. ANU Press, Canberra, pp 18–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilyas S, Hu Z, Wiwattanakornwong K (2020) Unleashing the role of top management and government support in green supply chain management and sustainable development goals. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(8):8210–8223

    Google Scholar 

  • Insch A (2011) Conceptualization and anatomy of green destination brands. Int J Cult Tour Hosp Res 5(3):282–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Jermsittiparsert K, Sutduean J, Sutduean C (2019) The mediating role of innovation performance between the relationship of green supply chain management skills and environmental performance. Int J Supply Chain Manag 8(3):107–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Jo H, Kim H, Park K (2015) Corporate environmental responsibility and firm performance in the financial services sector. J Bus Ethics 131(2):257–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaur J, Sidhu R, Awasthi A, Chauhan S, Goyal S (2018) A DEMATEL based approach for investigating barriers in green supply chain management in Canadian manufacturing firms. Int J Prod Res 56(1-2):312–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan SAR, Yu Z (2021) Assessing the eco-environmental performance: an PLS-SEM approach with practice-based view. Int J Logist Res Appl 24(3):303–321

  • Khan SAR, Qianli D, SongBo W, Zaman K, Zhang Y (2017) Environmental logistics performance indicators affecting per capita income and sectoral growth: evidence from a panel of selected global ranked logistics countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(2):1518–1531

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khan SAR, Zhang Y, Anees M, Golpîra H, Lahmar A, Qianli D (2018) Green supply chain management, economic growth and environment: a GMM based evidence. J Clean Prod 185:588–599

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan SAR, Zhang Y, Kumar A, Zavadskas E, Streimikiene D (2019a) Measuring the impact of renewable energy, public health expenditure, logistics, and environmental performance on sustainable economic growth. Sustain Dev 28(4):833–843

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan SAR, Sharif A, Golpîra H, Kumar A (2019b) A green ideology in Asian emerging economies: from environmental policy and sustainable development. Sustain Dev 27(6):1063–1075

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan SAR, Yu Z, Sharif A, Golpîra H (2020) Determinants of economic growth and environmental sustainability in South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation: evidence from panel ARDL. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(36):45675–45687

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan SAR, Razzaq A, Yu Z, Miller S (2021a) Industry 4.0 and circular economy practices: a new era business strategies for environmental sustainability. Bus Strateg Environ. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2853

  • Khan SAR, Yu Z, Sharif A (2021b) No silver bullet for de-carbonization: preparing for tomorrow, today. Res Policy 71:101942

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan SAR, Zkik K, Belhadi A, Kamble SS (2021c) EEvaluating barriers and solutions for social sustainability adoption in multi-tier supply chains. Int J Prod Res 59(11):3378–3397

  • Khan SAR, Yu Z, Sarwat S, Godil DI, Amin S, Shujaat S (2021d) The role of block chain technology in circular economy practices to improve organisational performance. Int J Logist Res Appl 1–18

  • Koski C (2007) Regulatory choices: analyzing state policy design. Law & Policy 29(4):407–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Kothari CR (2004) Research methodology: methods and techniques, 2nd revised edn. New Age International Publisher, New Delhi

  • Kothari CR (2017) Research methodology methods and techniques, 2nd edn. New Age International, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar RG, Murali R, Anand S (2019) Effect of internal supply chain drivers on green supply chain management attributes. Int J Bus Perform Supply Chain Model 10(4):323–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Large RO, Thomsen CG (2011) Drivers of green supply management performance: evidence from Germany. J Purch Supply Manag 17(3):176–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin H, Zeng S, Ma H, Chen H (2015) Does commitment to environmental self-regulation matter? An empirical examination from China. Manag Decis 53(5):932–956

    Google Scholar 

  • Longoni A, Luzzini D, Guerci M (2018) Deploying environmental management across functions: the relationship between green human resource management and green supply chain management. J Bus Ethics 151(4):1081–1095

    Google Scholar 

  • Malviya RK, Kant R (2015) Green supply chain management (GSCM): a structured literature review and research implications. Benchmarking: An International Journal 22(7):1360–1394

    Google Scholar 

  • Manchanda S, Kaleem H, Schlorke S (2020) Artificial intelligence investments allow emerging markets to develop and expand sophisticated manufacturing capabilities. International Finance Corporation, World Bank, pp 1–8

  • Manderson L, Bennett E, Andajani-Sutjahjo S (2006) The social dynamics of the interview: age, class, and gender. Qual Health Res 16(10):1317–1334

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermid F, Peters K, Jackson D, Daly J (2014) Conducting qualitative research in the context of pre-existing peer and collegial relationships. Nurs Res 21(5):28–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittal R, Gupta S, Pareek S (2013) Pressures, practices and performance of green supply chain (A study in Indian perspective). Interdiscip J Contemp Res Bus 5(3):472–487

    Google Scholar 

  • Mufidah I, Jiang BC, Lin SC, Chin J, Rachmaniati YP, Persada SF (2018) Understanding the consumers’ behavior intention in using green ecolabel product through pro-environmental planned behavior model in developing and developed regions: lessons learned from Taiwan and Indonesia. Sustainability 10(1425):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhammad S, Fathelrahman E, Ullah RUT (2015) Factors affecting consumers' willingness to pay for certified organic food products in United Arab Emirates. J Food Distrib Res 46(1):37–45

  • Niemann W, Kotze T, Adamo F (2016) Drivers and barriers of green supply chain management implementation in the Mozambican manufacturing industry. J Contemp Manag 13(1):977–1013

    Google Scholar 

  • Ninlawan C, Seksan P, Tossapol K, Pilada W (2010) The implementation of green supply chain management practices in electronics industry. Proc World Congress Eng 2182:1563–1568

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogunlela G (2018) Green supply chain management as a competitive tool in the fast-moving consumer goods manufacturing industry. J Bus Retail Manag Res 12(4):167–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Ojo LD, Ogunsemi DR (2019) Critical Drivers (CDs) of value management adoption in the Nigerian construction industry: a Delphi study. J Eng Des Technol 17(1):250–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Ojo E, Mbohwa C, Akinlabi E (2014) Green supply chain management in constriction industries in South Africa and Nigeria. Int J Chem Environ Biol Sci 2(2):146–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Ojo LD, Oladinrin TO, Obi L (2021) Critical barriers to environmental management system implementation in the Nigerian construction industry. Environ Manag 68(2):147–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01473-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oke AE, Aighimien DO (2018) Drivers of value management in the Nigerian construction industry. J Eng Des Technol 16(2):270–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Oladinrin OT, Ojo LD (2021) Characterisation of the drivers of environmental management system implementation. Eng Constr Archit Manag. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-04-2021-0356

  • Olamuyi E (2012) Preparing Nigerian market for green products. National Mirrow, 29/3.2013 (Accessed September 19, 2020)

  • Olaniyan A, Bosede A, Olusola O (2015) Supply chain management practices in construction procurement: perceptions of professional quantity surveyors in Ondo State, Nigeria. PM World J 4(4):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson EG (2008) Creating an enterprise-level “green” strategy. J Bus Strateg 29(2):22–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2010) Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. Am Econ Rev 100(3):641–672

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottman J (2011) The new rules of green marketing: Strategies, tools, and inspiration for sustainable branding. Berrett-Koehler Publishers

  • Owolana VO, Booth CA (2016) Stakeholder perceptions of the benefits and barriers of implementing environmental management systems in the Nigerian construction industry. J Environ Eng Landsc Manag 24(2):79–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallant J (2011) SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS, 4th edn. Everbest Printing Company, Kwun Tong

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallant J (2020) SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS, 7th edn. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pär H, Nan LN (2004) Exports as an indicator on or promoter of successful Swedish manufacturing firms in the 1990s. Rev World Econ 140(3):415–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne DG (1996) Voices in the wilderness: American nature writing and environmental politics. University Press of New England, Hanover

    Google Scholar 

  • Reio TG Jr, Shuck B (2015) Exploratory factor analysis: implications for theory, research, and practice. Adv Dev Hum Resour 17(1):12–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizwan M, Ahmad SU, Mehboob N (2013) Enhancing the green purchase intention based on green marketing: an empirical study from Pakistan. Asian J Empir Research 3(2):208–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Sajjad A, Eweje G, Tappin D (2015) Sustainable supply chain management: motivators and barriers. Bus Strateg Environ 24(7):643–655

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkis J, Zhu Q, Lai KH (2011) An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature. Int J Prod Econ 130(1):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Sezen B, Çankaya SY (2018) Green supply chain management theory and practices. Operations and Service Management: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, Turkey, pp 118–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahriarpour M, Tabriz AA (2017) The importance of green supply chain management and its role in marketing management. Int J Econ Financ Issues 7(3):265–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma G (2017) Pros and cons of different sampling techniques. Int J Appl Res 3(7):749–752

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen Q, Liu G (2003) Critical success factor for value management studies in construction. J Constr Eng Manag 129(5):485–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheu JB, Chou YH, Hu CC (2005) An integrated logistics operational model for green-supply chain management. Transp Res Part E: Logist Transp Rev 41(4):287–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh A, Trivedi A (2016) Sustainable green supply chain management: trends and current practices. Compet Rev 26(3):265–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Singhal P (2013) Green supply chain and eco-design in electronic industry. Delhi Bus Rev 14(1):57–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Somjai S, Jermsittiparsert K (2019) Role of pressures and green supply chain management practices in enhancing the operational efficiency of firms: evidence from Thailand. Int J Supply Chain Manag 8(4):437–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava SK (2008) Network design for reverse logistics. Omega 36(4):535–548

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens C (2010) Linking sustainable consumption and production: the government role. Nat Res Forum 34(1):16–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Sustainable Report (2018) Championing impact and sustainability: building prosperity and self-sufficiency across Africa. Dangote Cement Sustainable Report, Africa

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamazian A, Chousa JP, Vadlamannati KC (2009) Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation: evidence from BRIC countries. Energy Policy 37(1):246–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan C, Yoo S, Low C (2018) Green Supply chain management practices and organizational performance: an empirical study in Malaysian manufacturing firms. J Pengurusan 52:19–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner C, Wölfing KS (2003) Promoting sustainable consumption: determinants of green purchases by Swiss consumers. Psychol Mark 20(10):883–902

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor J (2011) The intimate insider: negotiating the ethics of friendship when doing insider research. Qual Res 11(1):3–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Teshome HM, Thakur A (2017) Construction material waste minimization and management: review. Int Res J Eng Technol 4(12):41–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas K, Littlewood S (2010) From green belts to green infrastructure? The evolution of a new concept in the emerging soft governance of spatial strategies. Plan Pract Res 25(2):203–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian X, Sarkis J (2020) Expanding green supply chain performance measurement through emergy accounting and analysis. Int J Prod Econ 225:107576

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseng ML, Islam MS, Karia N, Fauzi FA, Afrin S (2019) A literature review on green supply chain management: trends and future challenges. Resour Conserv Recycl 141:145–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Tumpa TJ, Ali SM, Rahman MH, Paul SK, Chowdhury P, Khan SAR (2019) Barriers to green supply chain management: an emerging economy context. J Clean Prod 236:117617

    Google Scholar 

  • Turker D, Altuntas C (2014) Sustainable supply chain management in the fast fashion industry: an analysis of corporate reports. Eur Manag J 32(5):837–849

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang YF, Chen SP, Lee YC, Tsai CTS (2013) Developing green management standards for restaurants: an application of green supply chain management. Int J Hosp Manag 34:263–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Mathiyazhagan K, Xu L, Diabat A (2016) A decision making trial and evaluation laboratory approach to analyze the barriers to Green Supply Chain Management adoption in a food packaging company. Journal of Cleaner Production 117:19–28

  • Wang Z, Wang Q, Zhang S, Zhao X (2018) Effects of customer and cost drivers on green supply chain management practices and environmental performance. J Clean Prod 189:673–682

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Dong C, Liu Y (2019) Beijing direct investment to its neighbors: a pollution haven or pollution halo effect? J Clean Prod 239:118062

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss EB, Jacobson HK (2000) Engaging countries: strengthening compliance with international environmental accords. MIT press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wibowo MA, Handayani NU, Mustikasari A (2018) Factors for implementing green supply chain management in the construction industry. J Ind Eng Manag 11(4):651–679

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieland A (2021) Dancing the supply chain: toward transformative supply chain management. J Supply Chain Manag 57(1):58–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood A, Logar CM, Riley WB Jr (2015) Initiating exporting: the role of managerial motivation in small to medium enterprises. J Bus Res 68(11):2358–2365

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu KJ, Tseng ML, Vy T (2011) Evaluation the drivers of green supply chain management practices in uncertainty. Proc Soc Behav Sci 25:384–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Yenipazarli A (2017) To collaborate or not to collaborate: prompting upstream eco-efficient innovation in a supply chain. Eur J Oper Res 260(2):571–587

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu Z, Khan SAR (2021a) Green supply chain network optimization under random and fuzzy environment. Int J Fuzzy Syst 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-020-00979-7

  • Yu Z, Khan SAR (2021b) Evolutionary game analysis of green agricultural product supply chain financing system: COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Logist Res Appl 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2021.1879752

  • Yu W, Chavez R, Feng M, Wiengarten F (2014) Integrated green supply chain management and operational performance. Supply Chain Manag: An International Journal 19(5/6):683–696

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng SX, Meng XH, Zeng RC, Tam CM, Tam VW, Jin T (2011) How environmental management driving forces affect the environmental and economic performance of SMEs: a study in the Northern China district. J Clean Prod 19(13):1426–1437

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Q, Sarkis J, Lai KH (2012) Examining the effects of green supply chain management practices and their mediations on performance improvements. Int J Prod Res 50(5):1377–1394

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Q, Sarkis J, Lai KH (2013)Institutional-based antecedents and performance outcomes of internal and external green supply chain management practices. J Purch Supply Manag 19(2):106–117

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

OO administered the questionnaire, retrieved it, and participated in the writing of research methodology section; LD analysed the data, interpreted it, participated in writing the research methodology, and wrote the discussion of findings as well; OE wrote the literature review section, while AE contributed to the implication of the study and proofread the entire manuscripts.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olajide Emmanuel Ogundimu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This research involved human participants to fill a structured questionnaire. The questionnaire of the study does not contain any implicating item to the image of the institution where the research was conducted; therefore, ethics approval of the organisation was waived. The submitted work is original and have not been published elsewhere in any form neither is it under consideration for publication elsewhere.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Part A. Background Information

  1. 1.

    Gender:□ Male□ Female

  2. 2.

    Age:□ < 20□ 20-29 □ 30-39□ 40-49□ 50-59□ >59

  3. 3.

    Marital status:□ Single□ Married□ Widowed□ Divorced

  4. 4.

    Highest education level: □ Senior school certificate□ Diploma□ Bachelor□ Master□ Doctoral

5. Working experience: □ < 1 yr□ 1-5 yrs□ 6-10 yrs□ 11-15 yrs□ 16-20 yrs□ >20 yrs

6. Level in organisation: □ Junior staff□ Senior staff □ Manager□ Director

7. Business unit: □ Cement production□ Sugar refinery□ Salt refinery □ Flour mill□ Steel mills□ Food and beverages□ Transport & logistics □ Oil refinery□ Others (indicate) __________

PART B. Drivers of Green Supply Chain Management

8. Kindly rate your level of agreement with the following drivers of green supply chain management practices in Dangote group of companies using the following rating scale; 1= strongly disagree, 2= disagree, 3= neither agree or disagree, 4= agree, 5= strongly agree.

Drivers

1

2

3

4

5

Federal government environmental regulations

State government support for enforcement

Company’s green initiatives

Establishing a company’s green image

Industrial professional group activities

Desire to engage in the exportation of products

Consumers’ environmental awareness

Competitors’ green strategies

Supplier’s advances in developing environmentally friendly goods

Green movement activism by non-government organisations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ososanmi, A.O., Ojo, L.D., Ogundimu, O.E. et al. Drivers of green supply chain management: a close-up study. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 14705–14718 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16638-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16638-9

Keywords

Navigation