Abstract
Sustainable urban development has been a popular subject in urban studies and related disciplines. Owing to the challenges faced by cities worldwide to accommodate the growing urban populations, it is becoming ever more important for innovative research on sustainable urban development to be performed to help cities achieve sustainability. This study develops and tests an integrated approach to sustainable city assessment, which is a combination of importance-performance analysis (IPA) and modified analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Questionnaires designed following the IPA concept were distributed to residents of three cities. The importance scores from the collected data were factorized and the factors’ relative scores were then calculated using a formula developed in this study to represent pairwise comparisons. The derived criteria weights were applied to the performance scores to evaluate the cities’ relative overall sustainability performance. This approach replaces the AHP’s 1–9 scale with the IPA’s importance rating scale, which is a Likert scale, in the questionnaire. Based on the findings, implications and future research suggestions were provided.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Not applicable
References
Afacan Y (2015) Resident satisfaction for sustainable urban regeneration. Munic Eng 168:220–234. https://doi.org/10.1680/muen.14.00046
Akbar M, Jinca M, Rahim J (2018) Combination of the IPA-SWOT-AHP models for the formulation of the road network of development policy (A case study in Merauke Regency, Papua Indonesia). Int J Eng Technol 18:28–34
Alonso J, Lamata M (2006) Consistency in the analytic hierarchy process: a new approach. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl Based Syst 14:445–459. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218488506004114
Al-Thani H, Koç M, Isaifan R (2018) A review on the direct effect of particulate atmospheric pollutionon materials and its mitigation for sustainable cities and societies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:27839–27857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2952-8
Andereck K, Nyaupane G (2011) Exploring the nature of tourism and quality of life perceptions among residents. J Travel Res 50:248–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287510362918
Arshad Z, Robaina M, Shahbaz M, Veloso A (2017) The effects of deforestation and urbanization on sustainable growthin Asian countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:10065–10086. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07507-7
Asadabadi M, Chang E, Saberi M (2019) Are MCDM methods useful? A critical review of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and analytic network process (ANP). Cogent Eng 6. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2019.1623153
Bafahm A, Sun M (2018) Some conflicting results in the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 18:465–486. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622018500517
Bunruamkaew K, Murayam Y (2011) Site suitability evaluation for ecotourism using GIS & AHP: a case study of Surat Thani Province, Thailand. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 21:269–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.07.024
Chan P (2020) Assessing sustainability of the capital and emerging secondary cities of Cambodia based on the 2018 commune database. Data 5:79. https://doi.org/10.3390/data5030079
Chan P, Lee M-H (2019a) Developing sustainable city indicators for Cambodia through delphi processes of panel surveys. Sustainability 11:3166. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113166
Chan P, Lee M-H (2019b) Prioritizing sustainable city indicators for Cambodia. Urban Sci 3:104. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci3040104
Chang K-H, Chang Y-C, Chung H-Y (2015) A novel AHP-based benefit evaluation model of military simulation training systems. Math Probl Eng 2015:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/956757
Choong J (2020) Minister: Residents of KL, Labuan, Putrajaya may hawk anything and anywhere until April. Malay Mail Malaysia. https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2020/11/10/minister-residents-of-kl-labuan-putrajaya-may-hawk-anything-and-anywhere-un/1921355. Accessed 5 Jan 2021
Danjaji A, Ariffin M (2017) Green infrastructure policy for sustainable urban development. Int J Environ Sustain Dev 16:112. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijesd.2017.083293
Department of Statistics Malaysia (2011) Population distribution and basic demographic characteristic report 2010 (Updated: 05/08/2011). Department of Statistics Malaysia Official Portal. https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/index.php?r=column/cthemeByCat&cat=117&bul_id=MDMxdHZjWTk1SjFzTzNkRXYzcVZjdz09&menu_id=L0pheU43NWJwRWVSZklWdzQ4TlhUUT09. Accessed 10 Nov 2020
Department of Statistics Malaysia (2020) Current population estimates, Malaysia, 2020. https://newss.statistics.gov.my
Emrouznejad A, Marra M (2017) The state of the art development of AHP (1979–2017): a literature review with a social network analysis. Int J Prod Res 55:6653–6675. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1334976
European Commission (2016) Quality of life in European cities 2015: Flash Eurobarometer 419. European Union, Brussels
Federal Department of Town and Country Planning (2016) Malaysia national report for the 3rd United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development (Habitat III). Habitat III National Reports. https://uploads.habitat3.org/hb3/Malaysia-National-Report-28092016.pdf
Gołaś J, Zarębska K, Nosek K, Szramowiat-Sala K, Marczak M (2019) Energy and environment as the foundations for sustainable development. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:8359–8361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04299-8
Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2014) Multivariate data analysis, 7th edn. Pearson Education Limited, Harlow
Hoang G, Fujiwara T, Phu T, Nguyen L (2019) Sustainable solid waste management system using multi-objective decision-making model: a method for maximizing social acceptance in Hoi An city, Vietnam. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:34137–34147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3498-5
Howley P, Scott M, Redmond D (2009) Sustainability versus liveability: an investigation of neighbourhood satisfaction. J Environ Plan Manag 52:847–864. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560903083798
Hsu W-K, Yu H-F, Huang S-H (2015) Evaluating the service requirements of dedicated container terminals: a revised IPA model with fuzzy AHP. Marit Policy Manag 42:789–805. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2015.1043750
Kakar A, Khan A (2020) The impacts of economic and environmental factors on sustainable mega project development: role of community satisfaction and social media. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:2753–2764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10661-y
Koch F, Ahmad S (2018) How to measure progress towards an inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable city? Reflections on applying the indicators of Sustainable Development Goal 11 in Germany and India. In: Kabisch S, Koch F, Gawel E, Haase A, Knapp S, Krellenberg K (eds) Urban Transformations. Springer, Cham, pp 77–90
Lee SW, Xue K (2020) A model of destination loyalty: integrating destination image and sustainable tourism. Asia Pac J Tour Res 25:393–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2020.1713185
Lee SW, Seow CW, Xue K (2021) Residents’ sustainable city evaluation, satisfaction and loyalty: Integrating importance-performance analysis and structural equation modelling. Sustainability 13:6766. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126766
Lirn T-C, Wu Y-CJ, Chen YJ (2012) Green performance criteria for sustainable ports in Asia. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 43:427–451. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-04-2012-0134
López C, Ruíz-Benítez R, Vargas-Machuca C (2019) On the environmental and social sustainability of technological innovations in urban bus transport: The EU case. Sustainability 11:1413. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051413
Ma C, Li Y, Li X, Gao L (2020) Evaluation of groundwater sustainable development consideringseawater intrusion in Beihai City, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:4927–4943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07311-3
Maleki H, Zahir S (2012) A comprehensive literature review of the rank reversal phenomenon in the analytic hierarchy process. J Multicrit Decis Anal 20:141–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.1479
Mardani A, Jusoh A, Nor K, Khalifah Z, Zakwan N, Valipour A (2015) Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications – a review of the literature from 2000 to 2014. Econ Res 28:516–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2015.1075139
Martilla J, James J (1977) Importance-performance analysis. J Mark 41:77–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224297704100112
Maryanti M, Khadijah H, Muhammad Uzair A, Megat Mohd Ghazali M (2017) The urban green space provision using the standards approach: issues and challenges of its implementation in Malaysia. WIT Trans Ecol Enviro 210:369–379. https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP160311
Melillo P, Pecchia L (2016) What is the appropriate sample size to run analytic hierarchy process in a survey-based research? Int Symp Anal Hierarchy Process. https://doi.org/10.13033/isahp.y2016.130
Mouratidis K (2017) Is compact city livable? The impact of compact versus sprawled neighbourhoods on neighbourhood satisfaction. Urban Stud 55:2408–2430. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017729109
Musa H, Yacob M, Abdullah A, Ishak M (2017) Sustainable city: assessing the community happiness of residents in Putrajaya municipality Malaysia. Rev Eur Stud 9:31. https://doi.org/10.5539/res.v9n1p31
Nefeslioglu H, Sezer E, Gokceoglu C, Ayas Z (2013) A modified analytical hierarchy process (M-AHP) approach for decision support systems in natural hazard assessments. Comput Geosci 59:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2013.05.010
Ouria M (2019) Sustainable urban features and their relation with environmental satisfaction in commercial public space: an example of the Great Bazaar of Tabriz, Iran. Int J Urban Sustain Dev 11:100–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2019.1579726
Pak R (2013) Combining importance-performance analysis with analytic hierarchy process for enhancing satisfaction. J Adv Manag Sci:368–371. https://doi.org/10.12720/joams.1.4.368-371
Peng T, Deng H (2021) Evaluating urban resource and environment carrying capacity by using an innovative indicator system based on eco-civilization—a case study of Guiyang. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:6941–6955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11020-7
Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill International Book Company, New York
Samat N, Ghazali S, Hasni R, Elhadary Y (2014) Urban expansion and its impact on local communities: a case study of Seberang Perai, Penang, Malaysia. Pertanika J Soc Sci Humanit 22:349–367
Senlier N, Yildiz R, Aktaş E (2009) A perception survey for the evaluation of urban quality of life in Kocaeli and a comparison of the life satisfaction with the European cities. Soc Indic Res 94:213–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9361-1
Shao J, Hu Z, Li B, Luo J, Xi J (2019) A sustainable urban design framework for the suburbanisation of coastal southeaster Australia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:13931–13947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04879-8
Surendran S (2019) Why cost of living remains high. The Edge MarketsEdge Weekly. https://www.theedgemarkets.com/article/why-cost-living-remains-high. Accessed 7 Jan 2021
Teo C, Mohd Khan N, Hj Abd Rahim F (2014) Understanding cultural heritage visitor behavior: the case of Melaka as World Heritage City. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 130:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.001
UN-Habitat (2017) Cities 2030, cities for all: implementing the new urban agenda. http://wuf9.org/wp-content/uploads/WUF9-concept-paper.pdf
United Nations (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, New York
United Nations (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development, A/RES/70/1. United Nations, New York
United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 23 December 2016: New Urban Agenda, A/RES/71/256. United Nations, New York
United Nations (2018a) 2018 revision of world urbanization prospects. https://www.un.org/development/desa/publications/2018-revision-of-world-urbanization-prospects.html
United Nations (2018b) The Sustainable Development Goals report 2018. United Nations, New York
Varian HR (2014) Intermediate microeconomics with calculus: A modern approach, 1st edn. W. W. Norton & Company Inc., New York
Viechtbauer W, Smits L, Kotz D, Budé L, Spigt M, Serroyen J, Crutzen R (2015) A simple formula for the calculation of sample size in pilot studies. J Clin Epidemiol 68:1375–1379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.04.014
Wang X, Li X, Zhen F, Zhang J (2016) How smart is your tourist attraction?: Measuring tourist preferences of smart tourism attractions via a FCEM-AHP and IPA approach. Tour Manag 54:309–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.12.003
Wang M-H, Ho Y-S, Fu H-Z (2019) Global performance and development on sustainable city based on natural science and social science research: A bibliometric analysis. Sci Total Environ 666:1245–1254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.139
Yilmaz S, Mutlu B, Aksu A, Mutlu E, Qaid A (2020) Street design scenarios using vegetation for sustainable thermal comfort in Erzurum. Turkey Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:3672–3693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10555-z
Zegras P, Poduje I, Foutz W, Ben-Joseph E, Figueroa O (2004) Indicators for sustainable urban development. In: Keiner M, Zegras C, Schmid W, Salmerón D (eds) From Understanding to Action. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 157–189
Zenker S, Petersen S, Aholt A (2013) The Citizen Satisfaction Index (CSI): evidence for a four basic factor model in a German sample. Cities. 31:156–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.02.006
Zhang Y, Sun Y, Qin J (2012) Sustainable development of coal cities in Heilongjiang province based on AHP method. Int J Min Sci Technol 22:133–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2012.02.002
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study. Conceptualization, material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Say Wah Lee and supervised by Ke Xue. The draft of the manuscript was written by Say Wah Lee and Ke Xue commented on it. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable
Consent to participate
Not applicable
Consent for publication
Not applicable
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, S.W., Xue, K. An integrated importance-performance analysis and modified analytic hierarchy process approach to sustainable city assessment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 63346–63358 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15235-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15235-0