Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Will the public pay for green products? Based on analysis of the influencing factors for Chinese’s public willingness to pay a price premium for green products

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The promotion and use of green products is an important way to improve the living environment and reduce resource consumption and waste. Green products often have higher prices than general products due to its green attributes. According to the signal theory, purchasing green products can effectively convey the pro-social signals of the consumers. Therefore, based on the price premium characteristics of green products, this study constructed a theoretical and quantitative research model of the public’s WTP (willingness to pay) a price premium for green products and conducted an in-depth study on the consumers’ acceptability of premium for green products. A total of 991 valid questionnaires were analyzed, and the following results were obtained: (1) The public’s WTP a price premium for green products was generally low, with only 30.1% of respondents. (2) The influencing factors of the WTP a price premium for green products were conditional value>green value>functional value>value expression form>price importance. Economic factors were still the main reason that hinders the public’s WTP a price premium for green products. When the premium conveys public’s pro-social and pro-environmental signal characteristics, it could effectively improve the public’s acceptability of premium for green products. (3) The public’s WTP a price premium for green products varied with marital status, education level, working years, monthly income, and occupation characteristics. The public who were married, had a master’s degree or above, and had worked for 1 year or less and whose disposable monthly income was more than 50,000 yuan and whose occupation was engineers and technicians had the highest WTP a price premium for green products. (4) Policy guidance and media publicity had a positive moderating effect on the path of influencing factors on the WTP for green products. On this basis, this study proposes to deepen the exemplary leading role of the government and attach importance to the education and publicity function of green consumption consciousness. Enterprises should give full play to the influence of reference groups, highlight the value of green products, and popularize green products through appropriate price discount activities, so as to promote the public to participate more actively in the purchase of green products. At the same time, it can also provide reference and enlightenment for the formulation of relevant policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdullahv AM, Mohd RM, Mohd RB et al (2018) Intention and behavior towards green consumption among low-income households. J Environ Manag 227(1):73–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali T, Onur BH (2020) The green consumption effect: how using green products improves consumption experience. J Consum Res 47(1):25–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson L, Rosenthal S (2014) Signaling the green sell: the influence of eco-label source, argument specificity, and product involvement on consumer trust. J Advert 43(1):33–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audia PG, Rousseau H E , Brion S (2020) CEO power and nonconforming reference group selection. Organ Sci, in press.

  • Babutsidze Z, Chai A (2018) Look at me saving the planet! The imitation of visible green behavior and its impact on the climate value-action gap. Ecol Econ 146:290–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basuroy S, Desai KK, Talukdar D (2006) An empirical investigation of signaling in the motion picture industry. J Mark Res 43(2):287–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bearden WO, Netemeyer RG, Tell JE (1989) Measurement of consumer susceptibility to interpersonal influence. J Consum Res 15:473–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bei LT, Simpson EM (1995) The determinants of consumers' purchase decisions for recycled products: an application of acquisition-transaction utility theory. Adv Consum Res 22(1):257–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger J (2017) Are luxury brand labels and "green" labels costly signals of social status? an extended replication. PLoS One 12(2):e0170216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergh DD, Ketchen DJ, Orlandi JI et al (2018) Information asymmetry in management research: past accomplishments and future opportunities. J Manag 45(1):122–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas A, Roy M (2015) Leveraging factors for sustained green consumption behavior based on consumption value perceptions: testing the structural model. J Clean Prod 95:332–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang TW, Chen YS, Yeh Y et al (2020) Sustainable consumption models for customers: investigating the significant antecedents of green purchase behavior from the perspective of information asymmetry. J Environ Plann Man 2:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Chekima B, Wafa S, Igau OA et al (2016) Examining green consumerism motivational drivers: does premium price and demographics matter to green purchasing?.J Clean. Prod 112:3436–3450

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen K, Peng Q (2014) Analysis on the influence of reference group on green consumption attitudinal-behavioral gap. China Popula Res Environ 24(S2):458–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung M, To WM (2019) An extended model of value-attitude-behavior to explain Chinese consumers' green purchase behavior. J Retail Consum Serv 50:145–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childers TL, Rao AR (1992) The influence of familial and peer-based reference groups on consumer decisions. J Consum Res 19(2):198–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cicia G, Del Giudice T, Scarpa R (2002) Consumers’ perception of quality in organic food. Br Food J 104:200–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darby S (2006) Social learning and public policy: lessons from an energy-conscious village. Energy Policy 34(17):2929–2940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado MS, Harriger JL, Khanna N (2015) The value of environmental status signaling. Ecol Econ 111:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drozdenko R, Jensen M, Coelho D (2011) Pricing of green products: premiums paid, consumer characteristics and incentives. Int J Bus Mar Deci Sci 4(1):106–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang J, Wen ZL, Liang DM, Li NN (2015) Analysis of regulatory effects based on multiple regression. Psychol Sci 8(03):715–720

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadenne D, Sharma B, Kerr D, Smith T (2011) The influence of consumers' environmental beliefs and attitudes on energy saving behaviors. Energy Policy 39(12):7684–7694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge WD, Sheng GH, Gong SY (2020) Formation mechanism of consumers' willingness to co-create green value -- from the perspective of attribution theory and reciprocity theory. Soft Sci 01: 13 to 18.

  • Ghosh PK, Manna AK, Dey JK, Kar S (2021) Supply chain coordination model for green product with different payment strategies: a game theoretic approach. J Clean Prod 290(2):125734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goncalves HM, Lourenco TF, Silva GM (2016) Green buying behavior and the theory of consumption values: a fuzzy-set approach. J Bus Res 69(4):1484–1491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griskevicius V, Tybur JM, Den Bergh BV (2010) Going green to be seen: status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. J Pers Soc Psychol 98(3):392–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo YL, Zhang P, Liao J, Wu F et al (2020) S Social exclusion and green consumption: a costly signaling approach. Front Psychol 11:535489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta AK (2021) Innovation dimensions and firm performance synergy in the emerging market: a perspective from dynamic capability theory & signaling theory. Technol Soc 64:101512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta S, Ogden DT (2009) To buy or not to buy? A social dilemma perspective on green buying. J Consum Mark 26(6):376–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahnel U, Oliver A, Michael W et al (2015) The power of putting a label on it: green labels weigh heavier than contradicting product information for consumers' purchase decisions and post-purchase behavior. Front Psychol 6:1392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia H, Wang YG, Liu JY et al (2008) A review of research on the influence of reference groups on consumption decision-making. Fore Eco Manag 30(6):51–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Jie F, Sheng GH, Gong SY (2019) Study on the influence of reference groups on green consumption behavior of Chinese residents under the background of civil environmental co-governance. China Pop Resour Environ 29(8):66–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi Y, Rahman Z (2015) Factors affecting green purchase behavior and future research directions. Int Strateg Manag Rev 3(1–2):128–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan SN, Mohsin M (2017) The power of emotional value: exploring the effects of values on green product consumer choice behavior. J Clean Prod 150:65–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilbourne W, Pickett G (2008) How materialism affects environmental beliefs, concern, and environmentally responsible behavior. J Bus Res 61(9):885–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollmuss A, Agyeman J (2002) Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environ Educ Res 8:239–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laroche M, Bergeron J, Barbaroforleo G (2013) Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products. J Consum Mark 18(6):503–520(18)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Q, Long R, Chen H (2017) Empirical study of the willingness of consumers to purchase low-carbon products by considering carbon labels: a case study. J Clean Prod 161:1237–1250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein DR, Ridgway NM, Netemeyer RG (1993) Price perceptions and consumer shopping behavior: a field study. J Mark Res 30(2):234–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin PC, Huang YH (2012) The influence factors on choice behavior regarding green products based on the theory of consumption values. J Clean Prod 22(1):11–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin ST, Niu HJ (2018) Green consumption: environmental knowledge, environmental consciousness, social norms, and purchasing behaviour. Bus Strateg Environ:1–10

  • Moloney S, Strengers Y (2014) 'Going green'?: the limitations of behaviour change programmes as a policy response to escalating resource consumption. Environ Policy Gov 24(2):94–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemeyer S (2010) Consumer voices: adoption of residential energy-efficient practices. Int J Consum Stud 34(2):140–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogiemwonyi O, Harun AB, Alam MN et al (2020) Do we care about going green? Measuring the effect of green environmental awareness, green product value and environmental attitude on green culture. An insight from Nigeria. Environ Cli Tec 24(1):254–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohtomo S, Hirose Y (2007) The dual-process of reactive and intentional decision making involved in eco-friendly behavior. J Environ Psychol 27(2):117e125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park CW, Lessig VP (1977) Students and housewives: differences in susceptibility to reference group influence. J Consum Res 4(2):102–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peattie K (2010) Green consumption: behavior and norms. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. Annual Rev 35:195–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Priest SH (2009) Risk communication for nanobiotechnology: to whom, about what, and why? J Law Med Ethics 37(4):759–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao AR, Monroe KB (1988) The moderating effect of prior knowledge on cue utilization in product evaluations. J Consum Res 15(2):253–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren Y, Luo S, Fan B et al (2020) The role of green consumption in promoting high-quality development. China Environ Manag 12(01):24–30

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau S, Vranken L (2013) Green market expansion by reducing information asymmetries: evidence for labeled organic food products. Food Policy 40:31–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruey-Jer BJ, Daekwan K, Kevin ZZ, et al (2021) E-platform use and exporting in the context of Alibaba: a signaling theory perspective. J Int Bus Stud, in press.

  • Sana SS (2020) Price competition between green and non-green products under corporate social responsible firm. J Retail Consum Serv 55:102118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheel C, Eduardo A, Bello B (2020) Decoupling economic development from the consumption of finite resources using circular economy. A model for developing countries. Sustainability 12(4):1291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuitema G, Groot J (2015) Green consumerism: the influence of product attributes and values on purchasing intentions. J Consum Behav 14(1):57–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheng GH, Yue BB, Xie F (2019) Research on the driving mechanism of Chinese residents' green consumption behavior from the perspective of environmental co-governance. Sta. Infor. Forum 34(01):109–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheth JN, Newman BI, Gross BL (1991) Why we buy what we buy: a theory of consumption values. J Bus Res 22(2):159–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha I, Batra R (1999) The effect of consumer price consciousness on private label purchase. Int J Re Mark 16(3):237–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks P, Shepherd R (1992) Self-identity and the theory of planned behavior - assessing the role of identification with green consumerism. Soc Psychol Q 55(4):388–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence M (1978) Job market signaling. Q J Econ 87(6):335–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence M (2002) Signaling in retrospect and the informational structure of markets. Ameri Eco Rev 92(3):434–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suki NM (2016) Consumer environmental concern and green product purchase in Malaysia: structural effects of consumption values. J Clean Prod 132:204–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Wang S, Gao L, Li J (2018) Unearthing the effects of personality traits on consumer’s attitude and intention to buy green products. Nat Hazards 93(1):299–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler RH, Sunstein CR (2009) Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Penguin, Yale University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang P, Liu Q, Qi Y (2014) Factors influencing sustainable consumption behaviors: a survey of the rural residents in China. J Clean Prod 63:152–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang DH, Yao T, Yao F (2015) To buy or not to buy——a study on the purchase intention of ecological products from the perspective of contradictory attitudes. Nankai Manag Rev 18(2)

  • Wang DH, Duan S, Zhang C et al (2018) Research on repeated purchase intention of green products——based on the moderating effect of the public notification method. Soft Sci 032(002):134–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsch H, Kühling J (2009) Determinants of pro-environmental consumption: the role of reference groups and routine behavior. Ecol Econ 69(1):166–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead M (2000) Willingness to pay. The Lancet 356(9227):437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu B (2014) A review of research on green consumption. For Ecol Manag 36(11):178–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav R, Pathak GS (2017) Determinants of consumers' green purchase behavior in a developing nation: applying and extending the theory of planned behavior. Ecol Econ 134:114–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young W, Hwang K, Mc Donald S et al (2010) Sustainable consumption: green consumer behavior when purchasing products. Sustain Dev 18(1):20–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu S, Lee J (2019) The effects of consumers' perceived values on an intention to purchase upcycled products. Sustainability 11(4):1034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu CL, Zhu XD, Wang X et al (2019) Face consciousness and purchase intention of green products -- moderating effect of use situation and relative price level. Manag Rev 31(11):139–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Yun W, Hanson N (2020) Weathering consumer pricing sensitivity: the importance of customer contact and personalized services in the financial services industry. J Retail Consum Serv 55:102085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L (2018) Research on the impact of green product logos and packaging environmental protection attributes on consumers' willingness to purchase green products. Doctoral

  • Zhang JY, Du QL (2009) Reference groups, cognitive styles and consumers' purchase decisions—a review from the perspective of behavioral economics. Econ Perspect 11:83–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Li D, Cao C, Huang S (2018) The influence of greenwashing perception on green purchasing intentions: the mediating role of green word-of-mouth and moderating role of green concern. J Clean Prod 187:740–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Xiao C, Zhou G (2019) Willingness to pay a price premium for energy-saving appliances: role of perceived value and energy efficiency labeling. J Clean Prod 242:118555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zong JC, Lv Y, Tang FF (2014) Environmental attitudes, willingness to pay and product environmental premium-evidence from laboratory research. Nanki Manag Rev 17(2):153–160

  • Amna Kirmani, (1997) Advertising Repetition as a Signal of Quality: If It's Advertised So Much, Something Must Be Wrong. Journal of Advertising 26 (3):77-86

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by: the Major Project of the National Social Science Funding of China (19ZDA107); the Key Project of the National Social Science Funding of China (18AZD014); the Major Project of the Social Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (2018SJZDA008); the Think Tank of Green Safety Management and Policy Science (2018 “Double First-Class” Initiative Project for Cultural Evolution and Creation of CUMT 2018WHCC03); the Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (KYCX20_2028); and the Future Scientists Program of China University of Mining and Technology (2020WLKXJ034).

Availability of data and materials

Data can be available upon reasonable request from the corresponding authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Economics and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Nanhu Campus, 221116, Xuzhou, Jiangsu Province, China

    Menghua Yang, Yujie Wang, Congmei Hou & Bei Liu

  2. School of Business, Jiangnan University, 1800 Lihu Avenue, 214122, Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, China

    Hong Chen & Ruyin Long

  3. Institute for National Security and Green Development, Jiangnan University, 1800 Lihu Avenue, 214122, Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, China

    Hong Chen

  4. The Institute for Jiangnan Culture, Jiangnan University, 1800 Lihu Avenue, 214122, Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, China

    Ruyin Long

Authors
  1. Menghua Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hong Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ruyin Long
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yujie Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Congmei Hou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Bei Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Menghua Yang: Methodology; software; formal analysis; writing—original draft; writing—review and editing. Hong Chen: Conceptualization; visualization; supervision; funding acquisition. Ruyin Long: Conceptualization; writing—review and editing; visualization; funding acquisition. Yujie Wang: Software; writing—review and editing. Congmei Hou: Software; writing—review and editing. Bei Liu: Writing—review and editing; visualization.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hong Chen or Ruyin Long.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable

Consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Baojing Gu

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, M., Chen, H., Long, R. et al. Will the public pay for green products? Based on analysis of the influencing factors for Chinese’s public willingness to pay a price premium for green products. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 61408–61422 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14885-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14885-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation